IEA: We've Hit Peak
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
IEA: We've Hit Peak
My Internet connection has been dying slowly for the past fortnight (avoid Tiscali like the fucking plague), and I'm in the process of moving to Cambridgeshire for a new job, so my time online is limited. But I do think the most important piece of news this week, along with record all time highs for oil, is one of the energy industry's Pollyanna's admitting in a report now that we're, for all intents and purposes, slightly fucked energy-wise.
I can't get to the link I'd post from this PC for the aforementioned reasons, but the understatement of the century is the world requiring an additional 20 million barrels daily of output being found right now just to stay at current supply rates being "a little tight". Sort of like how WWII was "a little violent", but it had good investment opportunities.
Just one more thing to add, which involves rubbing the US gov't's face in shit, such a fun past time of late. The combined global output of ethanol will reach maybe 1.8 mbpd by 2012, or about 1-2% total liquid fuels capacity.
I'm watching talking heads go on about the awesome 787 (how come when Boeing uses composites no one poo-poos it?) and crying. I'm paying about $8/gallon for petrol as it is.
Hope y'all having fun now.
I can't get to the link I'd post from this PC for the aforementioned reasons, but the understatement of the century is the world requiring an additional 20 million barrels daily of output being found right now just to stay at current supply rates being "a little tight". Sort of like how WWII was "a little violent", but it had good investment opportunities.
Just one more thing to add, which involves rubbing the US gov't's face in shit, such a fun past time of late. The combined global output of ethanol will reach maybe 1.8 mbpd by 2012, or about 1-2% total liquid fuels capacity.
I'm watching talking heads go on about the awesome 787 (how come when Boeing uses composites no one poo-poos it?) and crying. I'm paying about $8/gallon for petrol as it is.
Hope y'all having fun now.
- Lord Zentei
- Space Elf Psyker
- Posts: 8742
- Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
- Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.
If this is the report I think it is, he gives it till 2015 without Iraqi oil production increasing (which it almost certainly won't) before we hit a wall, going by 1.9% increase in consumption per year till 2012.
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!
-- Asuka
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!

- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
Actually, it's major problems by 2009 with 2 mbpd lost while the outlook is 5 years, or till 2012. Iraq is on the brink of collapse, Venezuela is ruining any chances it had of expansion even if it liked us, Russia is scraping the bottom of the barrel and Nigeria is still in chaos. Ethanol is pathetic, even if it were affordable, deep-sea is going waaay off budget and oil and tar sands are expensive boondoggles.
Even the USAF, the largest single liquid fuel user, is looking to coal by 2010 and the US has only 100 years worth at present rates. This is a major reason why the bill for Iraq is now sky rocketing.
If we implement a Manhattan Project style crash programme today, we may be able to deal with 1.5 maybe up to 2% or even 2.5%, optimistically, decline rate. That includes mass transit electrification, namely railways. Anything higher is unsurvivable. And that is what the IEA report projects, they seem to be oblivious to Jeffery Brown's Export Land Model where your oil goes quicker as exporters stop exporting (the UK Parliament has this week set-up a inquiry into the North Sea and Peak Oil given the expectations of the declining output being stopped and reversed by investment and new technology has failed to appear: the North Sea is now dropping at 60% a year in some fields. Imagine if the UK was the only exporter, the world would now have only 40% of what it had a year ago).
It all rests on OPEC. And they refuse demands for more. They will likely tacitly admit, as the IEA seems to be here, the wolf is at the door. Point to the beast, don't speak its name.
Even the USAF, the largest single liquid fuel user, is looking to coal by 2010 and the US has only 100 years worth at present rates. This is a major reason why the bill for Iraq is now sky rocketing.
If we implement a Manhattan Project style crash programme today, we may be able to deal with 1.5 maybe up to 2% or even 2.5%, optimistically, decline rate. That includes mass transit electrification, namely railways. Anything higher is unsurvivable. And that is what the IEA report projects, they seem to be oblivious to Jeffery Brown's Export Land Model where your oil goes quicker as exporters stop exporting (the UK Parliament has this week set-up a inquiry into the North Sea and Peak Oil given the expectations of the declining output being stopped and reversed by investment and new technology has failed to appear: the North Sea is now dropping at 60% a year in some fields. Imagine if the UK was the only exporter, the world would now have only 40% of what it had a year ago).
It all rests on OPEC. And they refuse demands for more. They will likely tacitly admit, as the IEA seems to be here, the wolf is at the door. Point to the beast, don't speak its name.
- Lord Zentei
- Space Elf Psyker
- Posts: 8742
- Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
- Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.
Two years from now? Well, then you will probably be able to say "told ya", since this board will probably still exist at that point. I must admit to a greater optimism, though.Admiral Valdemar wrote:Actually, it's major problems by 2009 with 2 mbpd lost while the outlook is 5 years, or till 2012. Iraq is on the brink of collapse, Venezuela is ruining any chances it had of expansion even if it liked us, Russia is scraping the bottom of the barrel and Nigeria is still in chaos. Ethanol is pathetic, even if it were affordable, deep-sea is going waaay off budget and oil and tar sands are expensive boondoggles.
Even the USAF, the largest single liquid fuel user, is looking to coal by 2010 and the US has only 100 years worth at present rates. This is a major reason why the bill for Iraq is now sky rocketing.
But with 100 years at current rates, the coal is sufficient to bridge the gap to nuclear.
Yes, I figured in some thread or other that a 4-500 billion dollar or so a year coal project would be able to do that. Just over the current deficit for a decade or so. Will we feel a great pinch? Absolutely. But I'm skeptical on a Great Collapse being unavoidable.Admiral Valdemar wrote:If we implement a Manhattan Project style crash programme today, we may be able to deal with 1.5 maybe up to 2% or even 2.5%, optimistically, decline rate. That includes mass transit electrification, namely railways.
Define "unsurvivable".Admiral Valdemar wrote:Anything higher is unsurvivable.
Near as I can tell, Jeffery Brown's Export Land Model is debatable.Admiral Valdemar wrote:And that is what the IEA report projects, they seem to be oblivious to Jeffery Brown's Export Land Model where your oil goes quicker as exporters stop exporting.

CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!
-- Asuka
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!

- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
Oh, we'll survive. *chuckles drolly* We'll survive. I don't think you'll much agree with the definition, though.
And, for the record, most of the reliable experts still think it won't be until 2011 (the other reliable experts are on Valdemar's side).
If that's the case, then you'll have from between 2013 - 2019 depending on sundry factors before the world completely upfucks itself.
Who knows. A couple more desperate finds, the Iranians restarting Iraqi production for us (nobody else will be able to) and sundry equipment upgrades in other states fueled by absolutely desperate governments, and people in the suburbs may just still have food to eat by 2020.
No worries, they'll be starving a year later.
And, for the record, most of the reliable experts still think it won't be until 2011 (the other reliable experts are on Valdemar's side).
If that's the case, then you'll have from between 2013 - 2019 depending on sundry factors before the world completely upfucks itself.
Who knows. A couple more desperate finds, the Iranians restarting Iraqi production for us (nobody else will be able to) and sundry equipment upgrades in other states fueled by absolutely desperate governments, and people in the suburbs may just still have food to eat by 2020.
No worries, they'll be starving a year later.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
- Lord Zentei
- Space Elf Psyker
- Posts: 8742
- Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
- Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.
I'm farily sure I will, as I live well below my means.The Duchess of Zeon wrote:Oh, we'll survive. *chuckles drolly* We'll survive. I don't think you'll much agree with the definition, though.
That span of time is enough for coal and nukes to replace the Iraqis. Unless, of course we get George III or something equivalent in 2008.The Duchess of Zeon wrote:If that's the case, then you'll have from between 2013 - 2019 depending on sundry factors before the world completely upfucks itself.
Who knows. A couple more desperate finds, the Iranians restarting Iraqi production for us (nobody else will be able to) and sundry equipment upgrades in other states fueled by absolutely desperate governments, and people in the suburbs may just still have food to eat by 2020.
No worries, they'll be starving a year later.
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!
-- Asuka
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!

- SirNitram
- Rest in Peace, Black Mage
- Posts: 28367
- Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
- Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere
Methinks the complaints about the expense of synthetic petroleum are about to vanish in a puff of logic.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.
Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.
Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus
Debator Classification: Trollhunter
Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.
Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus
Debator Classification: Trollhunter
- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
NOT without major reductions in our standard of living. We would have had to have started mitigating in 1991 to avoid suffering any ill consequences from a 2011 peak.Lord Zentei wrote: That span of time is enough for coal and nukes to replace the Iraqis. Unless, of course we get George III or something equivalent in 2008.
Remember the UK is going to get hit harder. Valdemar is talking literally if nobody bothers to send them food once this goes down.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
And don't think Barack Obama is going to save your lives. Even the best candidate on this issue--who is actually Richardson--is just proposing an average fuel standard of 50mpg for vehicles by 2020. Nobody seems to have recognized the fact that vehicles won't be operating after 2020, assuming they are in 2020, which is a sizeable assumption.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
At "present rates". The US military starts going at it, you can kiss that goodbye right away. Oil prices have gone from $10 to near $80 in 7 years, yet demand is growing. The IEA had to revise their estimates this year from 2% to 2.2% with further up revisions possible. No one is giving a shit.Lord Zentei wrote: Two years from now? Well, then you will probably be able to say "told ya", since this board will probably still exist at that point. I must admit to a greater optimism, though.
But with 100 years at current rates, the coal is sufficient to bridge the gap to nuclear.
If it was started a decade ago, sure. And if you don't see double-digit shrinkage in oil and gas supplied over a decade as being something of a problem, I can't imagine what would scare you.Yes, I figured in some thread or other that a 4-500 billion dollar or so a year coal project would be able to do that. Just over the current deficit for a decade or so. Will we feel a great pinch? Absolutely. But I'm skeptical on a Great Collapse being unavoidable.
Current way of life going extinct, ending the trend started by the industrial revolution. End of the green revolution (already seen by high food prices) and major resource wars and instability (Zimbabwe is facing collapse within a month, Turkey is ready to go into Iraq if need be, many Third World nations are off the grid and gone dark thanks to being priced out of the energy market).
Define "unsurvivable".
It's been demonstrated in the UK, Mexico, Russia and Iran. I don't see it being academic now. For a single digit reduction in product by geology, you get a double-digit one for exports.Near as I can tell, Jeffery Brown's Export Land Model is debatable.
I'd rather not go with the "told you so" because I've finally found a promising job with a biotech company that pays well and enables me to live in a pleasant country village with cats. All that looks quite naïve now.
- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
I'm not as worried about coal as such, because I think we have sizeable additional reserves in the form of oil shale (reserves of coal-equivalent material) which can be burned in existing powerplants with little additional difficulty. Of course, strict rationing of powerplant uses of coal may be necessary while we work on mitigation.
But then, I've said that 10 - 15 years without power at home for the average American is not impossible on repeated occasions, something that Valdemar probably thinks is optimistic, and yet I've still gotten mobbed by angry people basically saying "how you dare you propose that everyone suffer so much!"
Well, believe me, if I was a goddess this wouldn't be happening, okay?
But then, I've said that 10 - 15 years without power at home for the average American is not impossible on repeated occasions, something that Valdemar probably thinks is optimistic, and yet I've still gotten mobbed by angry people basically saying "how you dare you propose that everyone suffer so much!"
Well, believe me, if I was a goddess this wouldn't be happening, okay?
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
It isn't an island so much as a "net food importer".Eulogy wrote:So the worst place to be at Peak Oil is either on an island, in a Third world country, or in the suburbs. :x
I hate to say it, but a lot of innocent people are going to get right and proper fucked.
If the USA wasn't a massive net food exporter which produces at least three times as much food as its population needs to survive and then dumps most of that into growing hideously wasteful "corn-fed" meat, we would be the most thoroughly fucked nation on the planet. As it is, we're just going to kiss our suburbs goodbye and keep tightening our belts for quite sometime. And get used to plenty of shortages.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
- NeoGoomba
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3269
- Joined: 2002-12-22 11:35am
- Location: Upstate New York
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/09/business/oil.php
PARIS: Despite four years of high prices and increasingly dire warnings about climate change, a new report Monday predicted that world oil demand would rise faster than previously expected over the next five years while production slips, threatening a supply crunch.
"Demand is growing and as people become accustomed to higher prices they are starting to return to their previous trends of high consumption," said Lawrence Eagles, the head of oil markets analysis at the Paris-based International Energy Agency. "It's important that we have more investment and a greater emphasis on energy efficiency."
The pressures on fuel supplies are growing because booming Asian economies are using more fuel to power their prospering manufacturing industries and to supply growing numbers of automobiles amid a spurt in consumerism.
Rapid growth of the petrochemicals sector and low-cost airlines are other important factors lifting demand.
Supplies are being squeezed by a scarcity of modern oil refining facilities as well as sufficient staff to operate them. Supplies also are a concern because of deteriorating production of oil from countries outside the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, the price-setting cartel operated by the world's biggest producers.
The world "needs more than three million barrels per day of new oil each year to offset the falling production in the mature fields outside of OPEC," Eagles said.
Analysts said that behind the overall numbers were signs that the energy habits of the planet were moving in two distinct directions.
In developed countries, and in particular in the European Union, obligations agreed to by governments to conserve energy and use renewable sources of energy - both to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and to maintain energy security - are expected to ease pressure on oil supplies.
But that trend is being offset by rapidly developing nations. While they still consume far less energy per capita, they also are manufacturing goods for rich countries and increasingly are adopting heavily energy-consuming lifestyles, including air conditioners, refrigerators and cars.
"My view is that energy consciousness will figure strongly in Western countries and could contribute to demand decrease, but it's not at all sure that we will see the same trends in China and India," said Colette Lewiner, global leader for energy at Capgemini in Paris.
In its report, the International Energy Agency, which advises 26 industrialized countries, said that global oil demand would rise by an average 2.2 percent a year from 2007 to 2012, up from a forecast in February 2007 of 2 percent annually from 2006 to 2011.
Developing world and emerging industrialized economies will see their share of world oil consumption rise from 42 percent of global oil demand to 46 percent by 2012, the report said.
Eagles welcomed progress in Europe and Asia, where governments are mandating more efficient cars. He said that the "United States is very clearly coming to the point where there would be a landmark change in fuel efficiency policies."
He also welcomed ramped up investment in refining capacity across the world, saying that could help exert some downward pressure on prices over the next three years. But those effects are likely to be short-lived, Eagles said.
Beyond 2010, Eagles warned, "tightness in OPEC's spare capacity will reassert itself."
And by 2012, he said, there would either have to be limits on demand or additional supplies in order to avoid price increases.
Eagles also gave a stark warning that biofuels - a renewable source of energy produced from plants - were unlikely to be a quick, silver-bullet solution.
Factories to make biofuels are becoming commonplace but agricultural products that are the basis of the fuels are - like crude oil in some parts of the world - becoming scarcer.
Prices of this feedstock including corn, sugar, soybeans, wheat and palm oil have risen sharply, making the production of biofuels increasingly expensive.
"Although we have a lot of policy statements on biofuels in many countries, the policies and mandates aren't fully in place at this point so we are not sure that this supply is going to be there," Eagles said.
By 2012 biofuels will still only account for only 2 percent of global oil supplies, the International Energy Agency said.
Yet another factor weighing on fuel supplies is periodic but severe problems in supplies of cleaner-burning natural gas, which has supplanted fuel oil in many industries over the past quarter-century.
But natural catastrophes such as Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita in 2005, which knocked out U.S. gas production, and political decisions such as when Russia turned off gas supplies to neighboring countries in 2006, have led to renewed demand for fuel oil - putting yet more pressure on oil supplies.
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know...tomorrow."
-Agent Kay
-Agent Kay
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
The world will go to hell before we even touch on the heavy oils to any real degree. You see Terrence "Zod" Stamp on Live Earth in Lahndon this weekend? People were shouting "Get on with it!" when he dared talk about climate change, proof if any was needed that people went there for music, some condescending talk on living conservatively by megastars and then going home to carry on regardless.The Duchess of Zeon wrote:I'm not as worried about coal as such, because I think we have sizeable additional reserves in the form of oil shale (reserves of coal-equivalent material) which can be burned in existing powerplants with little additional difficulty. Of course, strict rationing of powerplant uses of coal may be necessary while we work on mitigation.
But then, I've said that 10 - 15 years without power at home for the average American is not impossible on repeated occasions, something that Valdemar probably thinks is optimistic, and yet I've still gotten mobbed by angry people basically saying "how you dare you propose that everyone suffer so much!"
Well, believe me, if I was a goddess this wouldn't be happening, okay?
End of the world, end of the world, but some great prospects to expand your third quarter portfolio this year according to Bloomberg.
- SirNitram
- Rest in Peace, Black Mage
- Posts: 28367
- Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
- Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere
Power plants simply aren't the issue, at least in the US. You'll lose three percent of the grid(Oil plants) with a fifteen percent margin. Any loss of power will be from the wires being overloaded, which will get fixed in alot less than decades. Hell, currently planned natural gas additions to the grid will, per year, amount to more energy than will be lost by oil loss. So electricity is not the problem.
The problem comes from the rail system, which is insufficient and privately owned. Eminent Domain seizures and modernization into electrical lines are the most probable reactions, but I doubt it's gonna take up the 100+MWs it would take to blackout the grid, especially as nuke, hydro, and other power sources will still be being built.
There's plenty of problems, but one could at least try and crunch the numbers and focus on the ones that will exist.
The problem comes from the rail system, which is insufficient and privately owned. Eminent Domain seizures and modernization into electrical lines are the most probable reactions, but I doubt it's gonna take up the 100+MWs it would take to blackout the grid, especially as nuke, hydro, and other power sources will still be being built.
There's plenty of problems, but one could at least try and crunch the numbers and focus on the ones that will exist.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.
Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.
Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus
Debator Classification: Trollhunter
Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.
Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus
Debator Classification: Trollhunter
- Lord Zentei
- Space Elf Psyker
- Posts: 8742
- Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
- Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.
What, 100 years of supplies, gone just like that? Nonsense. Though if the millitary sees fit to go after it, that requires such a plan to be vetted by the government, yes?Admiral Valdemar wrote:At "present rates". The US military starts going at it, you can kiss that goodbye right away. Oil prices have gone from $10 to near $80 in 7 years, yet demand is growing. The IEA had to revise their estimates this year from 2% to 2.2% with further up revisions possible. No one is giving a shit.Lord Zentei wrote:Two years from now? Well, then you will probably be able to say "told ya", since this board will probably still exist at that point. I must admit to a greater optimism, though.
But with 100 years at current rates, the coal is sufficient to bridge the gap to nuclear.
That would be on account of me being skeptical of your near-term dates. Though I agree that a decade ago would have been nice.Admiral Valdemar wrote:If it was started a decade ago, sure. And if you don't see double-digit shrinkage in oil and gas supplied over a decade as being something of a problem, I can't imagine what would scare you.Yes, I figured in some thread or other that a 4-500 billion dollar or so a year coal project would be able to do that. Just over the current deficit for a decade or so. Will we feel a great pinch? Absolutely. But I'm skeptical on a Great Collapse being unavoidable.
That is no small prediction -- and something that I find incredible. Production of artificial oil, though not sufficient to cover our current consumption, allows for a lot more than pre-industrial lifestyle.Admiral Valdemar wrote:Current way of life going extinct, ending the trend started by the industrial revolution.Define "unsurvivable".
Well, that remains to be seen: as I said, the time you are citing is less than half the current lifetime of the board. Though I wonder what sort of career you were to go for if the biotech one is unrealistic.Admiral Valdemar wrote:I'd rather not go with the "told you so" because I've finally found a promising job with a biotech company that pays well and enables me to live in a pleasant country village with cats. All that looks quite naïve now.

CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!
-- Asuka
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!

- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
I'm talking about coal rationing so it lasts long enough for us to build all the alternative power sources we need when we run out of coal, too. Because that's going to happen a lot sooner than 100 years from now if demand skyrockets. Even with oil shale being burned in the furnaces as a stopgap replacement. And don't forget that building equipment for new nuclear and geothermal powerplants and wind turbines and so on requires energy which is not currently being used, energy which in this situation can only come in the form of electricity.SirNitram wrote:Power plants simply aren't the issue, at least in the US. You'll lose three percent of the grid(Oil plants) with a fifteen percent margin. Any loss of power will be from the wires being overloaded, which will get fixed in alot less than decades. Hell, currently planned natural gas additions to the grid will, per year, amount to more energy than will be lost by oil loss. So electricity is not the problem.
We can build parallel grids servicing only the railroads. The same thing for for desalination equipment, ultimately, when we start having to mitigate global warming--hook the nuclear reactors up directly to massive desalination plants.The problem comes from the rail system, which is insufficient and privately owned. Eminent Domain seizures and modernization into electrical lines are the most probable reactions, but I doubt it's gonna take up the 100+MWs it would take to blackout the grid, especially as nuke, hydro, and other power sources will still be being built.
Look, the problem is more than peak oil, and so if we want to survive this we're going to have to factor in the other problems, like our limited coal available, and the political factors which will keep us from doing anything until the Great Depression has literally already happened all over again, and global warming happening in the same timeframe but the obvious solution being to increase coal use, which will result in even more global warming.There's plenty of problems, but one could at least try and crunch the numbers and focus on the ones that will exist.
These problems do not exist in a vacuum.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
- J
- Kaye Elle Emenopey
- Posts: 5860
- Joined: 2002-12-14 02:23pm
If one believes the economists, once oil hits $80 (or was it $100?) a barrel the oil shales will become a viable and economically feasible resource, and 500 billion barrels worth of additional oil will become available from deep sea drilling and enhanced recovery methods. The Arabs will also stop hogging their oil and open up their oil fields for proper exploitation & development by the likes of BP and ExxonMobil, which will undoubtedly add a quarter trillion barrels to existing reserves. There's nothing to worry about, and there has never been anything to worry about, and this supposed oil shortage is all the fault of the Arabs and fear-mongering by peak oil loonies. Remember, we have at least 5 trillion barrels of oil and we've barely used 20% of it, we'll be fine for at least the next 50-100 years.
This post is a 100% natural organic product.
The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects
I'm not sure why people choose 'To Love is to Bury' as their wedding song...It's about a murder-suicide
- Margo Timmins
When it becomes serious, you have to lie
- Jean-Claude Juncker
The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects
I'm not sure why people choose 'To Love is to Bury' as their wedding song...It's about a murder-suicide
- Margo Timmins
When it becomes serious, you have to lie
- Jean-Claude Juncker
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
No, not just like that, but near enough. The US has long since peaked in energy content, so each extra tonne of coal has less and less energy and the rule of 72 means the more and more you ramp up the output, the less it will last. To replace oil and gas, you've got probably a decade, maybe slightly more. A lot of coal won't ever leave the ground because it's too dangerous or expensive to move, the same problem is plaguing the UK fields.Lord Zentei wrote: What, 100 years of supplies, gone just like that? Nonsense. Though if the millitary sees fit to go after it, that requires such a plan to be vetted by the government, yes?
Keep in mind, the IEA and most organisations like them (the EIA, CERA, Bloomberg, WSJ etc.) were predicting a peak maybe around 2040, or later. Think about that and then consider why I don't trust the gov't to save our skins or free market capitalism.
That would be on account of me being skeptical of your near-term dates. Though I agree that a decade ago would have been nice.
So the collapse of the economy is something incredible? Why? An economy as we have now cannot function without constant growth, something I've spoke at length on. The current massive inflation and rising prices in commodities from food to copper to land is all down to energy. And artificial oil isn't saving you. Not unless you know where you can get 86 mbpd and more onstream in, oh, about a decade.
That is no small prediction -- and something that I find incredible. Production of artificial oil, though not sufficient to cover our current consumption, allows for a lot more than pre-industrial lifestyle.
Synoil has NEVER gotten anywhere near that amount. The Nazi Germany and South Africa examples are totally meaningless and just as full of misplaced hope as oil shale which has been striving to free us from the Middle-East for cheap oil since '46.
If I had the money? I'd go off the grid and live on a remote farm. Any accumulated wealth from playing the markets now needs to be converted to real wealth such as PV cells, food stores and water. When the economy dives, your billions in greenbacks if you're someone like Bill Gates, are worth more as fuel for the bonfire.
Well, that remains to be seen: as I said, the time you are citing is less than half the current lifetime of the board. Though I wonder what sort of career you were to go for if the biotech one is unrealistic.
And anyone thinking gas will takeover, think again. Iran and Brazil along with numerous other nations already jumped on the NG powered cars and infrastructure band wagon. NG prices are rising and output will peak just after oil, Russia's Gazprom wishing to be the first company on Earth to be worth a trillion dollars notwithstanding, they have yet to show they can meet future demand. Fun thing about gas is it just abruptly stops one day. Oil gives you a warning with reduced output, gas just shuts off without any hint. Not that the US would get any anyway. You don't have Canada to rely on for much longer, which means LNG tankers and loading docks, which are in short supply and cost hundreds of billions to bring about and decades to install for what is needed. And why should Asia and Europe feed the US? What does the US offer the world but niche electronic products and services? I can't eat iPods and elite banking options, so the US is meaningless to me.
- J
- Kaye Elle Emenopey
- Posts: 5860
- Joined: 2002-12-14 02:23pm
On a related note, Brent Crude is about 60 cents a barrel below its all-time high during the Israel-Lebanon conflict last year. Depending on what the US DOE inventory reports says in about 17 hours, we could very likely see an all-time high by this time tomorrow.
This post is a 100% natural organic product.
The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects
I'm not sure why people choose 'To Love is to Bury' as their wedding song...It's about a murder-suicide
- Margo Timmins
When it becomes serious, you have to lie
- Jean-Claude Juncker
The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects
I'm not sure why people choose 'To Love is to Bury' as their wedding song...It's about a murder-suicide
- Margo Timmins
When it becomes serious, you have to lie
- Jean-Claude Juncker
- Lord Zentei
- Space Elf Psyker
- Posts: 8742
- Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
- Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.
So, 100 years = a decade? Colour me sceptical. The 100 years was a downgrade of earlier estimates of 200+ years due to the factors you are citing.Admiral Valdemar wrote:No, not just like that, but near enough. The US has long since peaked in energy content, so each extra tonne of coal has less and less energy and the rule of 72 means the more and more you ramp up the output, the less it will last. To replace oil and gas, you've got probably a decade, maybe slightly more. A lot of coal won't ever leave the ground because it's too dangerous or expensive to move, the same problem is plaguing the UK fields.
Yes: they also claimed that the oil peak would be a long series of crests and troughs, rather than a peak and then a sudden dip; something that they're still claiming.Admiral Valdemar wrote:Keep in mind, the IEA and most organisations like them (the EIA, CERA, Bloomberg, WSJ etc.) were predicting a peak maybe around 2040, or later. Think about that and then consider why I don't trust the gov't to save our skins or free market capitalism.
Prediction of collapse to pre-industrial levels is a prediction of unprescedented calamity. I should think that it is clear that such a prediction would be met with some skepticism. And bollocks to the idea that the economy cannot function without constant growth; we've already seen slowdown over the past decades.Admiral Valdemar wrote:So the collapse of the economy is something incredible? Why? An economy as we have now cannot function without constant growth, something I've spoke at length on. The current massive inflation and rising prices in commodities from food to copper to land is all down to energy. And artificial oil isn't saving you. Not unless you know where you can get 86 mbpd and more onstream in, oh, about a decade.That is no small prediction -- and something that I find incredible. Production of artificial oil, though not sufficient to cover our current consumption, allows for a lot more than pre-industrial lifestyle.
Synoil has NEVER gotten anywhere near that amount. The Nazi Germany and South Africa examples are totally meaningless and just as full of misplaced hope as oil shale which has been striving to free us from the Middle-East for cheap oil since '46.
Back to the middle ages, eh? Sorry, you lost me there. I see stagnation but this is way off the mark.Admiral Valdemar wrote:If I had the money? I'd go off the grid and live on a remote farm. Any accumulated wealth from playing the markets now needs to be converted to real wealth such as PV cells, food stores and water. When the economy dives, your billions in greenbacks if you're someone like Bill Gates, are worth more as fuel for the bonfire. <SNIP SNIP>Well, that remains to be seen: as I said, the time you are citing is less than half the current lifetime of the board. Though I wonder what sort of career you were to go for if the biotech one is unrealistic.
PS: Incidentally I'm not an American.
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!
-- Asuka
TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet
And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel!

- Mr Flibble
- Psychic Penguin
- Posts: 845
- Joined: 2002-12-11 01:49am
- Location: Wentworth, Australia
Well this is certainly believable. Both the company I work for and the one my brother works for are in the oil exploration industry and all indications are that we are getting near to the peak at the very least. We are certainly getting a lot of interest in what are regarded as 'marginal' areas.
The only good thing I can think about this situation for me is that I'm in perhaps the one industry that might benefit from this. We are certainly doing our best to find what is left, but we are pretty much scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The only good thing I can think about this situation for me is that I'm in perhaps the one industry that might benefit from this. We are certainly doing our best to find what is left, but we are pretty much scraping the bottom of the barrel.
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
It really doesn't matter all that much about reserves in the end anyway, since we still have a trillion barrels of oil in the ground. The problem is delivering the goods, and coal isn't coming out any quicker than oil or gas. The global oil industry (including national companies) are cancelling projects left, right and centre because a) the prices are going through the roof, b) there isn't the manpower.Lord Zentei wrote:
So, 100 years = a decade? Colour me sceptical. The 100 years was a downgrade of earlier estimates of 200+ years due to the factors you are citing.
All those proposing we build huge wind farms or solar farms and electric railways: where are you getting the money from? Where's the manpower coming from? Industry is stretched to breaking point today to the point that making a refinery is a decision that is seriously considered by Big Oil, one of the wealthiest, if not, the wealthiest sectors in the world. They can't find the people to build them even if they weren't going up in price every month thanks to increased prices for iron, copper, zinc and so on. It's all very well saying you'll do this and that, but in the real world, you need the moolah and expertise to make dreams reality. I'd love to have a thousand pebble-bed reactors online next year. Guess what? Ain't happening. The law of receding horizons is making what was supposed to be cheaper as oil rose, ever more costly, because oil rising in price means all things rise in price. Remember, no one ever went starving because of lack of food. Lack of money, however...
None of which even touches on the main problem: too many humans. So you delay an energy crunch by a few decades, big deal.
For the US to replace its oil input with synthetic in any meaningful timescale is wholly unrealistic. The US gov't hasn't even admitted there's an issue yet.
I think at this point I'll just reiterate that I really don't care what they say either way. That they didn't even manage to actually say "We're on the downslope now, lads. Better cash in while you can" is indicative of them beating around the bush. This peaks and troughs things has been going on since 2003-4. It's now beyond the undulating plateaux.
Yes: they also claimed that the oil peak would be a long series of crests and troughs, rather than a peak and then a sudden dip; something that they're still claiming.
Slowdown? Slowdown is less growth. Even the greatest financial clusterfuck in history, the Great Depression, was a short period of contraction, followed by very, very slow growth which would still be going now had WWII not happily placed the US as de facto superpower. To equate a recession with a shrinking energy environment is to equate a schoolyard fight with the Napoleonic Wars.Prediction of collapse to pre-industrial levels is a prediction of unprescedented calamity. I should think that it is clear that such a prediction would be met with some skepticism. And bollocks to the idea that the economy cannot function without constant growth; we've already seen slowdown over the past decades.
And what's wrong with a prediction of unprecedented calamity? You can't comprehend it, ergo, it must not be true? That's very Creationist. I can't believe it took FEMA five days to get water to the superbowl, but hey, shit happens.
Because things will go well when there is less and less energy and hyperinflation? I suggest you fly over to Zimbabwe or Senegal or Pakistan and tell them them to stop being such sissies just because their economies are imploding from lack of energy fueling them.Back to the middle ages, eh? Sorry, you lost me there. I see stagnation but this is way off the mark.
That makes baby Jesus cry.PS: Incidentally I'm not an American.
Last edited by Admiral Valdemar on 2007-07-10 05:52pm, edited 1 time in total.