Size of the new Enterprise

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Bounty »

Stark wrote:How is that even REMOTELY relevant to my question? I'm asking Bounty if the ship is particularly outsize or large IN UNIVERSE (ie a one-off megaship to kill Unicron or whatever) or if larger-than-TOS ships are the norm (since the only two ships I've seen appear to be much larger).
Spoiler
She's the Federation flagship-to-be, so she's on the upper end of the size scale in-universe, but the few other ships we see are pretty close volume-wise. Big ships is the trend in this version of Trek, not the exception.
That said... the movie is really clever about the parallel universe idea:
Spoiler
The characters explicitly say that Nero caused the new universe to exist and that the point of divergence is the Kelvin. But it also doesn't explicitly say where Spock Prime originally came from - whether he's from TOS-verse or a movie-verse TOS where the Kelvin incident never happened. So as far as the movie is concerned, it's up in the air and you can believe what you want to believe, either that up to the Kelvin JJverse is TOS and the Kelvin was a peculiar design, or that it's all JJverse.
I am pretty excited by some of the spoiler comments in this thread and look forward to some awesome spaceship pron.
You will so not be disappointed :mrgreen:
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Bounty »

Furthermore about the size:
Spoiler
It's not just the outside that's huge. The guts of the ship are shown in a few scenes, never long enough to get a good overview, but there's one shot of Kirk on the so-called "Engineering Decks" (it's all very TOS in nomenclature) where the camera pans out to show a cavernous hall spanning half a dozen decks and going several hundred feet into the distance filled with assorted machinery. Everything belowdecks looks like the boiler room on a Victorian steamer built for giants.

It's in the detailing, too. I don't think a Federation ship has been seen to be so busy and crawling with assorted technicians and crewman since TMP. It doesn't just look huge, it feels huge, but in an awe-inspiring way, not a wankish one.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Stofsk »

Goddamnit, Saturday can't come quickly enough. :)
Image
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by tim31 »

Tell me about it.

This one's probably already been done, but the size of the Monsterprise should have been apparent back in January of last year; in this screencap from the first teaser, you can see workmen on the leading edge of the saucer surrounded by mounted floodlights. Look further up the saucer above the 'T' in ENTERPRISE and you can see the dude who was welding in the opening shots of the teaser; or at least, see the welding arc. Compare this to a similar shot of people standing on the primary hull in TMP.
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16481
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Missing Alfred

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Batman »

Forbidden/404 on the second link I'm afraid.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by tim31 »

Ah, christ. Rehosted.
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
Worlds Spanner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 542
Joined: 2003-04-30 03:51pm

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Worlds Spanner »

OK, that makes it look a lot bigger, like five times.
If you don't ask, how will you know?
User avatar
SylasGaunt
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5267
Joined: 2002-09-04 09:39pm
Location: GGG

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by SylasGaunt »

After seeing it on Thursday it seems the Enterprise is big but not the biggest ship there is.
Spoiler
There's a truly stupedously huge saucer section floating around in the debris field left from Nero's battle with starfleet. Unless it's from one of those ships that's almost all saucer section, that would be a big mother of a ship.
User avatar
Anguirus
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3702
Joined: 2005-09-11 02:36pm
Contact:

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Anguirus »

^ I did catch that, it definitely looked like a primary hull that was severed from an even larger ship. It had a diameter comparable to the Enterprise's length.
"I spit on metaphysics, sir."

"I pity the woman you marry." -Liberty

This is the guy they want to use to win over "young people?" Are they completely daft? I'd rather vote for a pile of shit than a Jesus freak social regressive.
Here's hoping that his political career goes down in flames and, hopefully, a hilarious gay sex scandal.
-Tanasinn
You can't expect sodomy to ruin every conservative politician in this country. -Battlehymn Republic
My blog, please check out and comment! http://decepticylon.blogspot.com
Worlds Spanner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 542
Joined: 2003-04-30 03:51pm

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Worlds Spanner »

Memory Alpha has the following in their still brief article on the new ship:
Spoiler
The following specifications are given on the Enterprise Tour website:
Class: Constitution class ship. Type: Heavy Cruiser. Registry: NCC-1701. Designer: W. Matt Jeffries [sic]. Construction Site: Starfleet Division, San Francisco Fleet Yards. Overall Mass: 495,000 metric tonnes. Length: 2500 feet. Saucer Diameter: 1100 feet. Ship Height: 625 feet

The overall length is close to the 3000 feet stated in the Post Magazine article 'Star Trek' Returns. We also learn during the tour that the bridge is located on A Deck, while the sickbay is located on G Deck, and that there are 1100 crewmembers aboard.
If you don't ask, how will you know?
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Bounty »

I'd take that info with a grain of salt. In the movie proper the decks are numbered, not assigned a letter, and Sickbay was on six.
Worlds Spanner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 542
Joined: 2003-04-30 03:51pm

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Worlds Spanner »

Good point.
If you don't ask, how will you know?
User avatar
andrewgpaul
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2270
Joined: 2002-12-30 08:04pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by andrewgpaul »

Overall Mass: 495,000 metric tonnes. Length: 2500 feet. Saucer Diameter: 1100 feet. Ship Height: 625 feet
Oh, for fuck's sake; just pick one and be consistent, please?
"So you want to live on a planet?"
"No. I think I'd find it a bit small and wierd."
"Aren't they dangerous? Don't they get hit by stuff?"
User avatar
TithonusSyndrome
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2569
Joined: 2006-10-10 08:15pm
Location: The Money Store

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by TithonusSyndrome »

SylasGaunt wrote:After seeing it on Thursday it seems the Enterprise is big but not the biggest ship there is.
Spoiler
There's a truly stupedously huge saucer section floating around in the debris field left from Nero's battle with starfleet. Unless it's from one of those ships that's almost all saucer section, that would be a big mother of a ship.
Spoiler
Maybe it wasn't a ship. Maybe it was the remains of an orbital defense station. Why should a founding member of the Federation not have at least one such defensive station in orbit over their homeworld?
Image
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by tim31 »

I'm on board with that. Hell, it could even be part of a full spacedock facility, even though transit time from Earth to Vulcan at warp was Not Very Long. The Vulcan science academy surely maintained its own vessels seperate from Starfleet?
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Havok »

Worlds Spanner wrote:Memory Alpha has the following in their still brief article on the new ship:
Spoiler
The following specifications are given on the Enterprise Tour website:
Class: Constitution class ship. Type: Heavy Cruiser. Registry: NCC-1701. Designer: W. Matt Jeffries [sic]. Construction Site: Starfleet Division, San Francisco Fleet Yards. Overall Mass: 495,000 metric tonnes. Length: 2500 feet. Saucer Diameter: 1100 feet. Ship Height: 625 feet

The overall length is close to the 3000 feet stated in the Post Magazine article 'Star Trek' Returns. We also learn during the tour that the bridge is located on A Deck, while the sickbay is located on G Deck, and that there are 1100 crewmembers aboard.
Wow. That is completely fucking stupid. The ship was built in Iowa. It was sorta, y'know, in the movie.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Stofsk »

Hang on, I thought the ship that was under construction was just a Connie, and Kirk and everybody got aboard a shuttle and went up to the enterprise which was in orbit (and obviously already built) didn't they?

You know what this means? I need to watch the film again. :D
Image
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Havok »

Stofsk wrote:Hang on, I thought the ship that was under construction was just a Connie, and Kirk and everybody got aboard a shuttle and went up to the enterprise which was in orbit (and obviously already built) didn't they?
Nope. They just flew of to Starfleet SF.
You know what this means? I need to watch the film again. :D
Sounds like it. :P
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by tim31 »

Havok wrote: Nope. They just flew of to Starfleet SF.
What's bizarre about this is that McCoy seemed to think this would mean a suborbital trajectory. Or was he just freaking out about being in a spacecraft full stop?
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Bounty »

tim31 wrote:
Havok wrote: Nope. They just flew of to Starfleet SF.
What's bizarre about this is that McCoy seemed to think this would mean a suborbital trajectory. Or was he just freaking out about being in a spacecraft full stop?
Considering that he was also being pissy about getting shingles, I'd say that was just a drama queen moment.
Hang on, I thought the ship that was under construction was just a Connie, and Kirk and everybody got aboard a shuttle and went up to the enterprise which was in orbit (and obviously already built) didn't they?
Word Of God is that the ship in the field was the Enterprise. Later Kirk takes the shuttle to San Francisco, we get the "three years later" card, and the Enterprise is in orbit awaiting her maiden voyage.
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Knife »

I didn't think the 'giant saucer' was that much larger than the one on the Enterprise. Rather a matter of perspective seeing it full on with a cross section of the Ent saucer section. Anyways, the caterman-like ship looked a lot bigger than the Enterprise and with two engineering sections probably more volume too.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
Worlds Spanner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 542
Joined: 2003-04-30 03:51pm

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Worlds Spanner »

Hang on, I thought the ship that was under construction was just a Connie, and Kirk and everybody got aboard a shuttle and went up to the enterprise which was in orbit (and obviously already built) didn't they?
Word Of God is that the ship in the field was the Enterprise. Later Kirk takes the shuttle to San Francisco, we get the "three years later" card, and the Enterprise is in orbit awaiting her maiden voyage.
As the camera pans out to watched the shuttle depart you can clearly see '1701' on the ship.
If you don't ask, how will you know?
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Darth Wong »

Question: will the new continuity reverse the bizarre trend established in earlier Star Treks where freighters are always tiny vessels compared to warships? Real freighters can be huge, particularly oil tankers.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Worlds Spanner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 542
Joined: 2003-04-30 03:51pm

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Worlds Spanner »

Havok wrote: Wow. That is completely fucking stupid. The ship was built in Iowa. It was sorta, y'know, in the movie.
Perhaps "San Fransisco Fleet Yards" is the designation for all Earthbound construction facilities in North America. It's not like they have room for a shipyard in SanFran itself. Maybe the idea is to spread ships out in case of attack (although it seems really inefficient, even on top of building them surface-side in the first place).

More likely, that information was written before they decided that the image of the ship under construction was so cool that they wanted to keep it in. "SanFran Fleet Yards" was probably a facility in orbit above SanFran.
If you don't ask, how will you know?
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: Size of the new Enterprise

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Darth Wong wrote:Question: will the new continuity reverse the bizarre trend established in earlier Star Treks where freighters are always tiny vessels compared to warships? Real freighters can be huge, particularly oil tankers.
Maybe there just wasn't all that much interstellar frieght to be had, so they haven't built larger ships for that purpose because there's no need?

Just a guess.
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
Post Reply