
Just LOOK at it!
And lets not forget my own personal favorite.. the SUPER Yamato ;3

Moderator: Edi





I'll second that.weemadando wrote:Pegasus class hydrofoil missile boat, sure it was canned, but it just had a nice look.







Oh yeah... The old Cold War era Albanys —three converted Cleveland-class ships. Those beauties were in one of the very first Navy books I ever checked out of the library. Always like those ships.
The U.S. Navy did have line-battleships. The first one, the America, was actually constructed during the Revolutionary War but was not completed before Cornwallis' surrender at Yorktown. She was given to France. There were also the post-1812 Independence-class vessels, 74s, and the larger USS Pennsylvania which carried around 120 guns in array but proved a very unwieldy beast to manage. Also very profligate in crew requirements. Line-battleships did not last long in U.S. Navy service and spent most of their lifetimes laid up in ordinary. One which was never completed was the USS New Orleans, which was actually being built to control the Great Lakes during Thomas MacDonough's campaign against Sir James Yeo, but she never made it off the stocks. She sort of lay forgotten for about fifty years before eventually being broken up.Vehrec wrote:Because the US was unable to build Ships of the Line, they built frigates. But they were the best damn frigates in the world, thick hulled live oak construction and pushing 56 guns.





I second ‘VLS is boring’, and I just love the internal magazine arrangements on those early Mk 10/12 Terrier/Talos launchers. You’ve got anywhere from two to four huge rotary drums of twenty missiles each for storage, then an elevator that lifts the missile vertically through auto opening blast doors into a handling space while mounted on a rail. Then men ram on fins by hand, the missile rail angled upward, and then the missile is rammed through the ramp and onto the rail on the actual launcher. You even had a guy in a little armored cupola on the deck to report if a missile fired or needed to be jettisoned.Tsyroc wrote: The USS Bainbridge CGN-25 a modified nuclear version of the
Leahy class cruiser. Like I said, I like missile rails and I really like the
little "ramp" this class has that the missiles come out of when they get
autoloaded onto the rails.
Wow! That's really....Frank Hipper wrote:Yes, that red x is really something else, Crossroads!
Anyway:
Charles Martel, the ultimate in sex appeal.






Nelson and Rodney are a result of certain design compromises on an existing plan to fit within the 3500 ton limit inflicted by the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922, which resulted in two warships that were slow, ungainly with difficult arcs for a third of the main armament and ruined a reputation in RN ships for good looks.Isolder74 wrote:snip Rodney
I wonder who thought up that one....


Damn. You beat me to it.Simplicius wrote:I don't care to pick favorites. But two I like that I don't expect to see here are the Clemson flush-deck destroyers:

I concur, and curse you for getting to that image first.Isolder74 wrote:For my pick of best looking Warship I have to say....
THE IOWA CLASS

Let me know her name and dates of service and I'll see what I can do.Aquatain wrote:My old ship, but sadly it's impossible to find any good pictures of the old girl.[/img]

Still doesn't explain why the third turret isn't located on the back of the ship where it might actually be useful. The impression I get from the design of the Rodney was to have a ship that "crossing the T' would be mainly academic. Sadly the design is such that Rodney can't fire its third turret forward other then at high angles.Stuart Mackey wrote:Nelson and Rodney are a result of certain design compromises on an existing plan to fit within the 3500 ton limit inflicted by the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922, which resulted in two warships that were slow, ungainly with difficult arcs for a third of the main armament and ruined a reputation in RN ships for good looks.Isolder74 wrote:snip Rodney
I wonder who thought up that one....

