Italian CIA trial put on hold

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10732
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Italian CIA trial put on hold

Post by Elfdart »

Link
Associated Press wrote: Published on Monday, June 18, 2007 by Associated Press
Italian Judge Suspends CIA Trial
by Colleen Barry

MILAN, Italy (AP) — An Italian judge on Monday suspended the first trial involving the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program until the country’s highest court can rule on the case.

The Italian government has asked the Constitutional Court to throw out the indictments against the 26 American defendants, all but one identified by prosecutors as CIA agents. They are accused of kidnapping an Egyptian terror suspect from a Milan street on Feb. 17, 2003.

In an argument that would effectively scuttle the case, state lawyers have said that the judge who issued the indictments unlawfully relied on state secrets to justify the charges. The high court is to also hear another similar challenge from the defense saying prosecutors had gone too far by wiretapping phone conversations of Italian secret service agents.
:lol:
The 26 Americans have left Italy, and a senior U.S. official has said they would not be turned over for prosecution even if Rome requests it. The government has not yet responded to prosecutors’ requests to seek their extradition, and the justice minister has indicated the Constitutional Court’s ruling would be a key factor.

On Monday, Judge Oscar Magi suspended the trial until Oct. 24, agreeing to a request by the defense to put the trial on hold until the Constitutional Court’s ruling, which is expected on Oct. 19.

The ruling will indicate whether the trial will have the power to publicly air details of the U.S. renditions - moving terrorism suspects from country to country without public legal proceedings.

The judge also stopped the clock on the statute of limitations until the trial reconvenes. The statute of limitations on the charge of abduction with aggravating circumstances is 12 1/2 years from the date of the crime; four years and four months have elapsed.

“It’s a very clean decision,” said Alessia Sorgato, a lawyer for several American defendants. “It’s like sealing the case in Tupperware and putting it in the freezer.”

Italian prosecutors say Osama Moustafa Hassan Nasr, also known as Abu Omar, was abducted in an operation coordinated by the CIA and Italian intelligence, then transferred to U.S. bases in Italy and Germany before being moved to Egypt, where he was imprisoned for four years. Nasr, who was released Feb. 11, said he was tortured.

Prosecutor Armando Spataro argued vigorously that the court must continue its deliberations despite the pending case in the highest court, denying that any state secrets were involved in the preparation of the case and expressing confidence that the Constitutional Court’s decision would back him up.

Prosecutors said the decision effectively gives the government inordinate powers to interfere with the justice system. “Is it possible to have a system in which a trial can be suspended anytime any government decides to launch a conflict?” co-prosecutor Ferdinando Pomarici said.

Besides the Americans, seven Italians also were indicted in the case, including Nicolo Pollari, the former chief of military intelligence. Pollari has denied any involvement by Italian intelligence in the abduction.

© 2007 The Associated Press.
Maybe an "extraordinary rendition" could be used to bring these cowards to stand trial. What is it with these candyassed war whores and torture enthusiasts? First Scooter Libby cries like a bitch because he might do jail time, now these sniveling twerps. Take it like a man, you pussies!
weemadando
SMAKIBBFB
Posts: 19195
Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
Contact:

Post by weemadando »

I'd like to see every single extraordinary rendition brought to trial and investigated to determine if the standard of evidence for a regular extradition could have been met, or if the US agents and agencies involved and any complicit domestic parties should face kidnapping charges.
User avatar
White Haven
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6360
Joined: 2004-05-17 03:14pm
Location: The North Remembers, When It Can Be Bothered

Post by White Haven »

What's more terrifying, the thought that someone you don't know personally, but who hates what you represent may try to blow you into tiny pieces, or the idea that a formerly-trusted government could turn on you and 'disappear' you without warning? Fuck kidnapping charges, that's state-sponsored terrorism, especially by the broad application of the term that's been common recently.
Image
Image
Chronological Incontinence: Time warps around the poster. The thread topic winks out of existence and reappears in 1d10 posts.

Out of Context Theatre, this week starring Darth Nostril.
-'If you really want to fuck with these idiots tell them that there is a vaccine for chemtrails.'

Fiction!: The Final War (Bolo/Lovecraft) (Ch 7 9/15/11), Living (D&D, Complete)Image
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

It does make me nervous.

The Geneva Convention's exception clause for illegal combatants was meant primarily to allow you to get medieval on their asses in the field of the battle itself, to execute them as an example to the locals of what would happen if they started shooting occupying officers in the back while dressed as women, and so on. It was intended to make combat more humane, not less, by providing for the execution of any captive who wasn't following the rules which makes combat humane. A far cry from this..
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
Post Reply