[Beer]Biofuels drive price up in Germany

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Lonestar
Keeper of the Schwartz
Posts: 13321
Joined: 2003-02-13 03:21pm
Location: The Bay Area

[Beer]Biofuels drive price up in Germany

Post by Lonestar »

USAtoday
Biofuel boom raises beer prices in Germany

AYING, Germany (AP) — Like most Germans, brewer Helmut Erdmann is all for the fight against global warming. Unless, that is, it drives up the price of his beer.
And that is exactly what is happening to Erdmann and other German brewers as farmers abandon barley — the raw material for the national beverage — to plant other, subsidized crops for sale as environmentally-friendly biofuels.

"Beer prices are a very emotional issue in Germany — people expect it to be as inexpensive as other basic staples like eggs, bread and milk," said Erdmann, director of the family-owned Ayinger brewery in Aying, an idyllic village nestled between Bavaria's rolling hills and dark forests with the towering Alps on the far horizon.

"With the current spike in barley prices, we won't be able to avoid a price increase of our beer any longer," Erdmann said, stopping to sample his freshly brewed, golden product right from the steel fermentation kettle.

In the last two years, the price of barley has doubled to 200 euros ($271) from 102 euros per ton as farmers plant more crops such as rapeseed and corn that can be turned into ethanol or bio-diesel, a fuel made from vegetable oil.

FIND MORE STORIES IN: Germany | German Chancellor | Germans | Bavaria
As a result, the price for the key ingredient in beer — barley malt, or barley that has been allowed to germinate — has soared by more than 40%, to around 385 euros ($522) per ton from around 270 euros a ton two years ago, according to the Bavarian Brewers' Association.

For Germany's beer drinkers that is scary news: their beloved beverage — often dubbed 'liquid bread' because it is a basic ingredient of many Germans' daily diet — is getting more expensive. While some breweries have already raised prices, many others will follow later this year, brewers say.

Talk about higher beer prices has not gone unnoticed by consumers. Sitting at a long wooden table under leafy chestnut trees at the Prater, one of Berlin's biggest beer gardens, Volker Glutsch, 37, complained bitterly.

"It's absolutely outrageous that beer is getting even more expensive," Glutsch said, gulping down the last swig of his half-liter dark beer at lunch. "But there's nothing we can do about it — except drinking less and that's not going to happen."

A meager barley harvest last year in Germany and barley-exporting countries such as France, Australia and Canada has compounded the problem. The price rise is squeezing breweries — many of them smaller, family-owned enterprises that can ill afford it.

The Ayinger Brewery, which has 65 employees and has been family owned since its founding in 1878, produces 1.98 million gallons of beer each year and purchases most of the ingredients from farmers nearby.

Eventually, Erdmann and other brewers say, it is drinkers who will bear the brunt of the higher costs for raw materials.

Already, at the annual brewery festival in Aying this week, prices for Erdmann's Ayinger beer were up at 6.40 euros ($8.60) from last year's 6.10 euros for a one-liter (34 fluid ounce) mug. That's no small matter for Bavarians, who are among the world's heaviest beer drinkers. They put away about 42 gallons of beer a year — well above the already high German average of 30.38 gallons per person.

And organizers of the world-famous Oktoberfest in Munich have announced a 5.5% price increase: A one-liter mug will cost up to 7.90 euros ($10.70) at this year's autumn beer festival — the highest price ever.

Brewers predict that higher barley prices will add about 1 euro ($1.35) to each 10-liter case of beer, but the German Farmers Association disputes that, saying the figure is about 33 euro cents ($0.45). Other factors like higher salaries and energy prices are also jacking up prices.

"The financial pressure on Germany's small and medium-sized breweries is immense," brewers association head Walter Koenig said. "The increasing costs of raw materials may become a serious threat for many breweries."

"Beer drinkers across the country will get upset when beer prices will rise even further in the fall," said Koenig. "We are therefore demanding that government stop its subsidies for biofuels immediately."

However, in its first major report on bioenergy, the United Nations tried to temper enthusiasm over biofuels last week, warning that the diversion of land to grow crops for fuel will increase prices for basic food commodities.

That is what happened in Mexico, when increased demand for corn to make ethanol in the United States pushed up the price of tortillas.

The German government subsidizes biofuel crops at the rate of euro45 per hectare (US$24.60 per acre), according to the Agency for Renewable Energies, part of the Agriculture Ministry.

Barley production in Germany went down by 5.5% — from 542,000 hectares in 2006 to 514,000 hectares in 2007, according to the Bavarian Farmers Association. On the other hand, the production of corn for biofuel more than doubled last year and the production of rapeseed for biofuel grew by 3.4%.

Biofuels, which reduce the emission of greenhouse gases believed to cause global warming, have been seen by many as a cleaner and cheaper way to meet the world's soaring energy needs than with greenhouse-gas emitting fossil fuels. European leaders have decided that at least 10% of fuels will come from biofuels by 2020.

Germany leads in the consumption of bioenergy in Europe with an annual usage of 4.3% of overall fuel consumption, according to figures by the Agency of Renewable Energies. Germany also is among the leaders in producing wind energy and recycling garbage.

Beer prices are serious business in Bavaria, which has some 615 breweries and gave Germany its famed beer purity law, which dates back to 1516 and in its current form permits only four ingredients: malted grain, hops, yeast and water.

Farmers say the brewers share some of the blame.

"For years there was an oversupply and we couldn't make any profits with barley and that's why we switched to biofuel crops," said Anton Stuerzer, 43, who grows barley and rapeseed at his farm in the neighboring village of Hoehenkirchen.

"It serves the brewers right that they have to pay those high prices now -they should have paid us fair prices even when there was too much barley available."

Damn Eco-nuts screwing with the price of beer! *shakes fist*


Well, I found it interesting. :P
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
User avatar
Colonel Olrik
The Spaminator
Posts: 6121
Joined: 2002-08-26 06:54pm
Location: Munich, Germany

Post by Colonel Olrik »

You find it funny now, wait until an army in Dirndl and Lederhosen begins another World conquering spree, driven by the antagonistic goals of having enough beer to make them happy as well as enough gas to keep the BMW and Audis going at 220 Km/h. Americans will stage a counterattack only to be cowed back by countless boob-showing blonds.

This sucks. I want my mass for the old 5 eur, damnit.
Thunderfire
Jedi Master
Posts: 1063
Joined: 2002-08-13 04:52am

Post by Thunderfire »

Colonel Olrik wrote: This sucks. I want my mass for the old 5 eur, damnit.
Hmm I am able to get a mass for less than 4 EUR in rual franconia(northern bavaria).
User avatar
Colonel Olrik
The Spaminator
Posts: 6121
Joined: 2002-08-26 06:54pm
Location: Munich, Germany

Post by Colonel Olrik »

Thunderfire wrote:
Colonel Olrik wrote: This sucks. I want my mass for the old 5 eur, damnit.
Hmm I am able to get a mass for less than 4 EUR in rual franconia(northern bavaria).
Leider, München is expensive as shit. A normal Biergarten mass costs 6.5 EUR nowadays around here. 5 EUR a mass is a really good price (worth going to the place on purpose if we know of such an offer).
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Well I prefer a dark porter to the lighter german beers anyway :)
User avatar
Turin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1066
Joined: 2005-07-22 01:02pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post by Turin »

I saw a similar article on the television about grocery prices here in the US recently. I have to say I'm a little curious whether this phenomena is being reported accurately. Shouldn't rising petroleum prices be having a similar effect on goods in industrialized agriculture?

I'm not sure how it is everywhere else, but here in the US we pay farmers not to grow crops so as to keep prices high enough for them to be worth the farmer's time to grow in the first place (by creating artificial reduction of supply). If there's increased demand, why wouldn't we simply be increasing the supply to go with it rather than allowing prices of every day commodities to go up?
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

Here's what really sucks-- supposedly, corn-based ethanol is the least efficient form of ethanol and it takes about as much power to produce at it provieds-- so in other words, no real savings. Meanwhile, because corn is use din cattle & chicken feed, ands corn syrup (an evil brew) is used to sweeten so many foods, the price of basic foods is also going up in the US.

Now, cattle really should be fed grass not corn, and corn (especially corn syrup) is not the most nutritious food, but by damn they're going to push the corn based food & fuels through, probably until we hit soil depletion.

Now what I'm wondering is, instead of ethanol, would biodiesel be better, since it doesn't interfere with the food production, and can be grown from non-soil-depleting plants (ie, hemp)?
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Coyote wrote:Here's what really sucks-- supposedly, corn-based ethanol is the least efficient form of ethanol and it takes about as much power to produce at it provieds-- so in other words, no real savings. Meanwhile, because corn is use din cattle & chicken feed, ands corn syrup (an evil brew) is used to sweeten so many foods, the price of basic foods is also going up in the US.

Now, cattle really should be fed grass not corn, and corn (especially corn syrup) is not the most nutritious food, but by damn they're going to push the corn based food & fuels through, probably until we hit soil depletion.

Now what I'm wondering is, instead of ethanol, would biodiesel be better, since it doesn't interfere with the food production, and can be grown from non-soil-depleting plants (ie, hemp)?
Soybean and rape are better for yields, though they tend to require better climates than corn and the likes of palm oils are for far more tropical areas, but they produce far more energy at the end of it. Ethanol is really a boondoggle because it has half the energy of standard 85 octane gasoline and so you need more of it in the system. Bio-diesel isn't much better and suffers from never being really shown to be successful at large scales (then there's the little issue of hardly anyone owning a diesel in the US).

Despite all this, Bush is quite happy, along with other presidential candidates, to push the agenda which means more farmers find it more profitable to use their land to grow ethanol fuel crops than food ones. That hits the life stock feed industry which in turn hurts just about all grocery prices in the end, despite the endless claims that the US is swimming in food and has no problems at all in meeting demand. No one ever seems to notice the economics of the problem. Ireland was swimming in food and even exporting it during the potato famine, yet thousands died from mal-nourishment. It's no good saying you have billions of tonnes of produce when no one can afford it, and that is how people starve, not from a lack of food which has never happened in the industrialised world we live in today.

Many proponents also fail to point out that these companies wouldn't make a profit if not for subsidies. You can subsidise anything to the point that it looks good economically, just look at oil shale (and before anyone brings up Estonia, theirs is the richest in oil, the largest deposit per capita on the planet and also something they're moving away from anyway). You'd literally need most all of the arable land in Africa to fuel all the cars in the US today using corn or rapeseed. I'm doubting the US is going to attain energy security and independence this route.
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Post by Glocksman »

What's driving the corn biofuels bullshit in the US is the farming/agribusiness lobby, plain and simple.
Hell, I live in a state known for its corn production and the biofuels propaganda is pretty heavy around here.
But as Coyote noted, the proponents don't mention the net zero gain or (or even loss, as some studies indicate) of energy from corn based biofuel.
The also don't mention that ethanol is highly corrosive and that massive adoption of 'E85' would cost billions in both distribution network improvments and retrofitting of existing vehicles to use it without the fuel system rusting to pieces.

What's ironic is that the hardships in some sectors of agribusiness caused by higher corn prices is fracturing the once monolithic lobby.
For example, beef producers are very unhappy, Hormel has issued warnings to investors about the high feed prices materially affecting their profits and IIRC, Tyson's done the same thing.

Hormel and Tyson probably aren't very happy about subsidizing ADM's profits.
Maybe we'll get lucky and they'll fight so much we can start repealing the worst of the ag subsidies.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Quite. To get petrol stations to transport and store this stuff, they'd need totally new pipelines and tanks thanks to the corrosive nature of the chemical, and since it has far less energy content, you'd need the system to store more than the 187 Mbbl. of gasoline lower limit in the system today.

I also read comments from farmers about homesteads being bought out by large farming conglomerates that raze the land of anything from alfalfa to rotational crops to produce these huge, monoculture fields of corn or rape or soy that are cultivated purely for the fuel industry.

Robert Rapier, a petroleum analyst, got this e-mail the other day:
I am a farmer in Nebraska, where I farm 160 acres of corn (a "small" farmer by any standard). I have lived on my farm for 50 years. I wish people could see up close the devastation to the local countryside that this ethanol frenzy has brought---and is going on as we speak. Landowners are ripping-out beautiful windbreaks and tree stands of cottonwoods and elms, these were windbreaks that were planted by the CCC back in the New Deal days, and getting the land ready to grow corn. This past winter, a factory hog farm came in and purchased a neighbor's farm. This farm was a beautiful piece of property with a grand 100 year old home and excellent buildings. They outbid all of the local farmers who wanted to buy it. Within 2 months they had completely stripped everything away--it's all gone. It just broke my 88 year-old dad's heart to see it. Other farmers around me are busy plowing-up grass pastures for corn production, land so hilly and highly erodable I never would have thought it could be used for growing row crops.

This corn-for-fuel thing has everyone in my area plowing-up their alfalfa fields. Alfalfa is an excellent low-input crop. Once it is established it pretty much takes care of itself, doesn't need any fertilizer or herbicides. It produces alot of protein and naturally enriches the soil. It takes a good two years after planting to get a crop from alfalfa, so with the dissappearance of these fields I don't care to think about the long term effect it is going to have on dairy farmers in my area, who need lots of locally grown hay.

I'm just a farmer and not good at writing, but I hope I have given Alternet's readers some idea about what is happening "out here". I wish I could post some pictures I have taken of the devastation.

New-built and proposed ethanol plants are going-up in the cities around me. No matter that they require enormous amounts of water in an area that is experiencing growing water shortages. The Platte River, which is about 10 miles from where I live, is a major gathering place for birds migrating to Canada. It has completely dried up in the summer months the past several years.

Our senators Nelson (D) and Hagel (R) beat the drum for ethanol production with every speech they make. But that is probably because Monsanto and ADM were big contributors to their campaigns.
By the way, in the last 7 years, ethanol production has gone up 3 billion gallons, while gasoline has gone up 14 billion gallons. The ethanol pushers can't do basic maths. And that's with exponential growth in ethanol refineries and farm sites which is now cooling off after the initial buzz.
Post Reply