Darth Raptor wrote:You've yet to present the former and your own personal vernacular is entirely irrelevant.
No, fuck you, you holier-than-thou sack of shit. It's not his own personal vernacular, it's the American English vernacular, in which "deviant" is a loaded term that heavily signifies disapproval. People don't call A+ student's "deviants" because they recieved marks that deviated significantly from a statistical norm, now do they? There's a reason that psychologists use the word "paraphilia" rather than "deviant sexuality" when they talking about BDSM and such.
Sometimes a person's choice of loaded terminology is unintentional but reveals a lot about what he really means.
"It" in this context is Pablo's "ethnic minorities are disabled" strawman. Which I did not, in fact, ever say. Jesus, I can't be bothered to argue with fucking fifth graders.
Strawman? Fuck yourself, it's what you said. People on this forum apparently like to throw around the names of logical fallacies as if it makes them smart, but something can't be a "strawman" if you actually fucking said it.
This Dumbshit wrote:In the case of the handicapped, that's access ramps and parking spaces. In the case of ethnic minorities, that's Affirmative Action.
There you go. Now explain to me how is this supposed to be read? It looks to me you're arguing that access ramps are equivalent to Affirmative Action, meaning that you think ethnic minorities are handicapped by their race. I'm not going to play any "I didn't use those exact words" semantics games. Either you typed the above so as to indicate that you think ethnic minorities are effectively handicapped, or you can admit that you expressed yourself poorly.
]
