impatrick4life wrote:Arachnidus wrote:Erra wrote:You know, I think there should be a new name for angel-daemons. And it would apply to both of them, since daemons are more of a sub-species of angel. It would be especially helpful once (if what Stuart is hinting at comes to fruitiion in LoW) other species of outworlders start showing up and stirring up shit, you know, instead of angels, big angels, and really big angels, etc. Humans in story are probably pretty sick of the whole angel daemon names anyway, considering the history. If we're forcing science on the pricks, we should start naming things scientifically, or at least differentially from the historical names.
But IANAS so I leave that to you sciency folks.
Species wise, considering Humans, Angels and Daemons all come from a root ancestor, the names would be
Homo Angelus and
Homo Everto. At least, that's how I'd see it.
Yeah, actually, you're right. I forgot the common ancestry bit. So slap Homo in front of what I said >_>
Ok, so angels, demons and humans all descend from the same ancestor. what happen then to the long line of alleged human ancestors? the other Homo before the sapiens?
if the ancestor where before those, and the hominids known now are just the line of humanity, then ok, I suppose those are good names for them.
If the ancestor is more modern, and the other hominids are just failed experiments (which, given the similarities between homo sapiens and the UBers ,it's more likely than the other option) then the name should include sapiens somewhere around, to emphasize the sentient nature of all the subspecies.
So humans are homo sapiens sapiens, and angels are homo sapiens X, and demons are a branch of angels, so homo sapiens X Y.
Btw, the evolution of angels is a shaky argument. Angels shouldnt be able to get to their physiques by the process of evolution as we know it. That would require A LOT of generations (which is OK in the baldrick speciation case, since it is said that baldricks have a noticeably higher rate of birth and death than angels ) but Uriel, for one, sports the same physique than younger, more evolved ones. So, if evolution took place before Uriel`s birth, then angels evolved before human race existed, and as such they aren`t in the same evolutionary path. Or the common ancestor is Older Than Dirt, and the conceptualization of evolution as we know it was just a lucky shot with false evidence to a phenomena we can`t actually prove on our own species (well, on our own phylum, now), because all the missing links are, well, missing.
That, or the stargate, star trek theory of a super race seeding humanoids in the Multiverse for some reason eons ago.
take your pick...
About yahwe`s parents.... yeah, until told otherwise, I`m going to add parricide to the long list of crimes of our charming little boy there. Perhaps that`s the secret that bound Uriel to Yahwe in the first place...