Imperial Wiki!

Ted C · Post by **Ted C** » 2008-01-03 11:19pm

Darth Ruinus wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:SW Roleplaying Game, First Edition.
Is it canon though?

I think it's in the "innocent until proven guilty" official category.

Illuminatus Primus · Post by **Illuminatus Primus** » 2008-01-04 05:12am

Darth Ruinus wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:SW Roleplaying Game, First Edition.
Is it canon though?

Of course. I should add that 51 million inhabited "worlds" (whether this includes only terrestrial planets or all inhabited planets or artificial habitats is unknown) is the extreme lower limit. It is really saying there are 1 million political entities with formal full-political franchise in the Empire, and 50 million lesser political entities (colonies, protectorates, governorates, etc.). Those 51 million political entities total number of inhabited communities or inhabited systems could be significantly higher. To say nothing of property, where the Mining Guild controls billions of high-metallicity worlds in a spiral arm.

Ted C · Post by **Ted C** » 2008-01-09 01:28pm

New expansions to the articles on phasers and GStone.

Ted C · Post by **Ted C** » 2008-01-10 10:47am

New page up for Luke Skywalker, if anyone's interested.

Coiler · Post by **Coiler** » 2008-01-24 11:37am

Added articles on cherrypicking and the appearance over performance fallacy.

Anyone is welcome to add notable examples of cherrypicking in the vs. debate, as I'm not as well versed in it as you are.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-24 08:55pm

Minor additions to the article on JMSpock.

New article on clones both in real life and their abuse in sci-fi.

Planets. Not really satisfied with this one. Feel free to add and/or correct.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-24 09:43pm

Entry for Mike DiCenso now has actual content rather than an empty page. Feel free to add to his 'greatest hits'

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-24 10:12pm

Article for Mr. Oragahn added as well as entries for "superluminal boost" and "unquantifiable mechanism" added to the dictionary.

Post by **Vympel** » 2008-01-25 02:08am

I think that entry re: Mr Oragahn is too harsh. He's not a trekkie, he's just IMO generally contrarian about everything. He likes to use (some) Darkstar arguments, though I've never seen him espouse the worst of the worst (eg. days to get to Endor).

Kane Starkiller · Post by **Kane Starkiller** » 2008-01-25 09:46am

Vympel wrote:I think that entry re: Mr Oragahn is too harsh. He's not a trekkie, he's just IMO generally contrarian about everything.

No he is not. He is a Stargate fanwhore. Check his wanking here.
So because the ship can withstand a certain power intensity for 10 hours that means it's shields capacity is that time multiplied with power? If I go sunbathing and lie on the beach for ten hours my skin will absorb 50MJ of energy. I guess that must mean my skin's "energy capacity" is 50MJ. And he calls his numbers conservative.

Here he is whining about Necronlord's calculated ZPM upper limit.
And last but not least check out this thread featuring STvsSG scenario and the debate between DiCenso/AFT/sonofccn and Mr.Oraghan/l33telboi. Naturally they can't agree over anything and you'll notice how Oragahn and DiCenso get progressively less polite and in the last page start accusing each other of...*gasp*.. dishonesty, desperation, wall of ignorance!

P.S. Isn't it amusing how these clowns constantly refer to "Wong's calculators" for nuclear effects and asteroid destruction?

Ritterin Sophia · Post by **Ritterin Sophia** » 2008-01-25 01:07pm

I'll never understand SFJ or SB's net nannies. Everytime I converse with one I feel like I'm being lied to. Frankly, I find being called an asshat or a fucktard more honest than the little game they play.

Ted C · Post by **Ted C** » 2008-01-25 01:24pm

Darth Servo wrote:Article for Mr. Oragahn added as well as entries for "superluminal boost" and "unquantifiable mechanism" added to the dictionary.

I find it ironic that you describe Oragahn as "unremarkable", yet you felt he rated an article in the Wiki.

I think we may be giving the SFJ trekkies and whatnot entirely too much attention.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2008-01-25 01:49pm

Ted C wrote:I think we may be giving the SFJ trekkies and whatnot entirely too much attention.

That's a good point; if anything, they should be treated as a single conglomerated entry rather than each one being given his own "star page". They're all kind of the same anyway.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-26 12:53am

Darth Wong wrote:
Ted C wrote:I think we may be giving the SFJ trekkies and whatnot entirely too much attention.
That's a good point; if anything, they should be treated as a single conglomerated entry rather than each one being given his own "star page". They're all kind of the same anyway.

I see what you mean. Good idea. I nominated the pages for Mr Oragahn and Mike DiCenso for deletion and moved their text to the starfleetjedi entry. I left tjhairball alone since his "greatest hits" are from his few posts here. JMSpock still has his own page as well. The starfleetjedi page is categorized under both "famous trolls" and the troll subcategory "Mindless Scooter Cockgoblins"

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-26 01:08am

Should GStone's information be moved there as well? Its rather large.

white_rabbit · Post by **white_rabbit** » 2008-01-26 10:05am

Why even mention them specifically, remove all individual pages referring to them.

I mean, I know the byword is "mockery of stupid people", but these types, especially the SFG nutters, feed off it, it just gives them more opportunity to whine.

Eliminate their pages, amalagamate them into some pages referring to I dunno, something like " Classic Trekkie idiocy" or whatever, give the examples of said stupidity, i.e. Gstones Jemhadar body armour plot, or Spocky's " Star Destroyer Fuel is PEO....DIESEL" lunacy, then simply credit the individual crazies as the authors.

Much as I find it funny reading about Gstones career as an International man of mystery, that sort of thing might be best in a section of SFJ, perhaps as part of a series of quote from various members there, seperate from their Versus arguments that show case the character of the board.

meh

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-26 11:48pm

white_rabbit wrote:Why even mention them specifically, remove all individual pages referring to them.

Most already were. See my last two posts in this thread. Here is the combined page for StarfleetJedi forums.

Lord Poe · Post by **Lord Poe** » 2008-01-27 11:04am

Anyone thinking of wiki pages refuting other wiki pages, found on Wookiepdia?

Ted C · Post by **Ted C** » 2008-01-28 03:56pm

For anyone wondering what to contribute, I give you the most wanted pages of the Wiki.

These are topics that are linked from multiple pages in the wiki but don't have pages of their own. Please feel free to improve the wiki by adding content.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-28 05:02pm

STFC page up.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-28 05:32pm

An initial page for Jean-Luc Picard is up.

Ted C · Post by **Ted C** » 2008-01-31 03:26pm

In attempting to describe the phase cloak, I found that I also had to try to define technobabble.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2008-01-31 05:25pm

Ted C wrote:For anyone wondering what to contribute, I give you the most wanted pages of the Wiki.

Trying to fill these seems to lead to creating even more "dead links". Obi-Wan Kenobi page is up.

Darth Ruinus · Post by **Darth Ruinus** » 2008-01-31 11:31pm

Do we really need a Weapons page?

I mean.. come on, its kinda stupid to make that into a page.

Darth Ruinus · Post by **Darth Ruinus** » 2008-01-31 11:32pm

Darth Ruinus wrote:Do we really need a Weapons page?

I mean.. come on, its kinda stupid to make that into a page.

Crap forgot to add this part.

I could make a weapons page though, if it is needed.