

Moderator: Moderators
because the whole point of the scenario is to have the TF force made up entirely of B1 battledroids with their standard blaster rifles. At least so i've been told.harbringer wrote:but why have them and not use them
Because thin packing crates consistantly provide excellent cover in firefights and phaser misses don't even scortch starship walls.The Silence and I wrote:Why are phasers thought ineffective against metals?
Before the androids were formatted, they appeared as a humanoid shaped blob. WHY should we assume thats metal?TOS:
What Are Little Girls Made Of?: Bulky androids are readily phasorized, presumably metal is used extensively in their construction, no?
All I remember is a ceramic pot and a no-name ensign.The Omega Glory: Tracy phasorized many things in this episode seen and unseen, but most relevant is the large metal object next to Spock.
It took Scotty several minutes toThe Naked Time: It may or may not have been this episode but a stray phaser blasts a smoking hole into a thick support member around engineering somewhere.
Looked more like plastic to me.TNG:
Heart Of Glory: A close range phaser blast can pierce the material used in the matter/antimatter reactor. Presumably the metallic main reactor housing isn't made of the cheapest low grade thin materials they could find?
Worf always has been full of himself and his weapons.The Neutral Zone: Not shown but Worf indicates blasting open a large metal door on the cryo ship would be easy. Data then notices the manual handle.
If it was something like lead, melting it isn't that great an accomplishment.The Enemy: Geordi's phaser on a low setting is quite capable of melting a silvery unrefined metal.
Correction: made disappear into thin air. Cooking pots aren't usually made out of dense metals. Usually they're aluminum or other light weight material of similar density to the above items.Movies:
The Undiscovered Country: A cooking pot is phasorized
The door was shattered, not vaporized/disappearing act and VERY thin. It behaved like opaque glass would.Nemesis: Picard's phaser rifle blasts a very large hole in the metal door to the Scimitar's bridge--he steps through afterwards, that large.
Depends on the metal, its density. An who ever said "totally ineffective"? The argument is far LESS effective than against low density materials.Can we at least all accept hand phasers can damage metals?
You think it ridiculous to cut corners on one part but not do it on another?I am amused by attempts to inflate the quality of B1 droids, neutronium spiked armor indeed![]()
Those pieces of crap were made with the cheapest servos, computers and materials the builders could find, but it has been claimed they were covered in uber dense materials and only blasters can pierce it
Any armor is better than the armor in Trek which is non-existant.Whatever armor (if any) they have is hardly worth having...
The Jedi damaged the internal circuitry directly with the force.D) After finding the droids are not heavy what then should we think when a Jedi round house kick merely knocks a droid to the floor and leaves it there? You'd think that if immense force was needed to damage them any effective kick would fling them some distance... (not exactly phaser related, but this was brought up).
Thus phasorization. As opposed to vaporisation.Darth Servo wrote:Correction: made disappear into thin air.The Silence and I wrote: Movies:
The Undiscovered Country: A cooking pot is phasorized
Thankyou Batman.Batman wrote:Thus phasorization. As opposed to vaporisation.Darth Servo wrote:Correction: made disappear into thin air.The Silence and I wrote: Movies:
The Undiscovered Country: A cooking pot is phasorized
The packing crates are a silly brainbug much akin to storm troopers successfully shielding themselves behind logs in ROTJ (yes, the all mighty blaster, set high enough to kill stormtroopers behind their armor, was repeatedly stopped by a log several stormtroopers were hiding behind). For all we know packing crates must be repeatedly subjected to extreme conditions and are built like tanks, using the best materials available, which happen to be highly resistent to phasers on standard parameters. For all we know blasters are also a chain reaction weapon and are useless against marble, wood and for the hell of it, cheese. Trek's worst is dug up and displayed frequently, want to know what I can find in Wars?Darth Servo wrote:Because thin packing crates consistantly provide excellent cover in firefights and phaser misses don't even scortch starship walls.
That is just a peculiarity of its construction. Finished androids have an internal metalic structure, the first android Kirk phasorizes leaves a small pile of rubbery skin, unknown stuff and shiny metallic bits and pieces. Roger Korby tore his hand near the end and we see a shiny metallic understructure. No, the androids were composed partly of metal. What do you expect they were? Clay?Before the androids were formatted, they appeared as a humanoid shaped blob. WHY should we assume thats metal?
I do not remember a ceramic pot, but there I was refering to thisAll I remember is a ceramic pot and a no-name ensign.
Was that hole blasted out? Was it smoking? Was it from a stray phaser shot? NO! Of course that isn't the one I was talking about!!! I refer to a shot taken at Kirk which missed and hit a metal beam near the floor, blasting (as in flash and smoke) a hole most of a foot across. The torn edges appeared to be around an inch thick. Not the bloody hole Scotty was meticulously cutting in his attempt to open the door to engineering.It took Scotty several minutes to
Somehow I doubt it would be made of anything so easily melted as plastic... especially given their known ability to make at least one metal transparent...Looked more like plastic to me.
So? He is an expert and knows what a phaser can and cannot do. His suggestions are always correct, 'a phaser set to level __ should do it' is always right on. His speciality is weaponry after all--his aim has nothing to do with his knowledge so don't bring it up.Worf always has been full of himself and his weapons.
I did type the very next sentance in the hope no one would actually feel the need to point that out again...If it was something like lead, melting it isn't that great an accomplishment.
It had varying thicknesses but was around an inch and solid. It does appear to have shattered, but metals don't do that (it looked like metal and every other door and bulkhead on the entire ship is metal) typically. There has been speculation that phaser chain reaction effects can follow micro fault lines if you will, explaining why rocks shatter and explode into nothingness instead of simply vanishing like humans do. A similar thing could easily explain the door.The door was shattered, not vaporized/disappearing act and VERY thin. It behaved like opaque glass would.
There does seem to be a correlation to density, but B1 droids are not dense so it isn't really an issue. Low density and normal density metals can be phasorized, without evidence to the contrary we assume B1 low density armor is not going to stop the phaser reaction due to other exotic properties we can't even guess at. If it ain't very dense we can't assume it will simply wont work.Depends on the metal, its density. An who ever said "totally ineffective"? The argument is far LESS effective than against low density materials.
Read what I go to some effort to type. I have to explain and re-explain almost every other point I try to make with you--and only you. I rarely have to reword some part of every post unless it is you responding. It is getting tiresome.You think it ridiculous to cut corners on one part but not do it on another?
A pointless statement, everyone who has ever stepped mouse into this forum knows this.Any armor is better than the armor in Trek which is non-existant.
A good and workable explanation when the droids are force pushed. I am not talking about that, and I expected you to at least notice.The Jedi damaged the internal circuitry directly with the force.
Have you performed calculations to show that it is trivially easy to blow through a thick tree? Especially with primarily thermal weapons as opposed to something like an armour-piercing bullet? There is certainly much more mass in a thick log than there is in an empty packing crate.The Silence and I wrote:The packing crates are a silly brainbug much akin to storm troopers successfully shielding themselves behind logs in ROTJ (yes, the all mighty blaster, set high enough to kill stormtroopers behind their armor, was repeatedly stopped by a log several stormtroopers were hiding behind).
Impossible since we know they're quite light and can be knocked over easily.For all we know packing crates must be repeatedly subjected to extreme conditions and are built like tanks, using the best materials available, which happen to be highly resistent to phasers on standard parameters.
Find examples of SW weapons initating an obvious slow-propagating chain-reaction such as we have seen for phasers on numerous occasions.For all we know blasters are also a chain reaction weapon and are useless against marble, wood and for the hell of it, cheese.
I hope you can do better than the bullshit you've tried so far.Trek's worst is dug up and displayed frequently, want to know what I can find in Wars?
Nice exaggeration. Since when is an ordinary piece of iron (the most likely type of material being used for a cheap battledroid since it's the most common metal in existence) a "sheath of high quality expensive armor material?" What is your theory for the many cases in which phasers were basically useless against things like packing crates and doors? Just chalk it up to "brainbug?" This brainbug happens to be canon.Given the above evidence why might you think the Trade Federation might have gone to the expense to outfit each of these craptastic shitty uberly cheap and worthless excuses for target practice with a sheath of high quality expensive armor material ...
Say what? You do realize that for the most part in the films they're fighting *Jedi*, right, and if the Jedi didn't swing their lightsabres- they'd be dead. When fighting Naboo security forces they do inflict casualties (and fight them to a standstill, forcing them to take another route)- and against Clonetroopers they simply get blown to dust by gunship attack.A) B1 Droids have craptastic servos and computers (watch them repeatedly miss targets by decimeters* at spit ball range)
C) The Trade Federation was clearly unwilling to invest in enough intelligence or hardware performance to actually hit the broad side of a barn with a glowing neon bull'seye.
Its blasters only, otherwise there probably wouldn't be any dissent regarding which army would come out on top.[/quote]BringerOfLight wrote:And back to the original post, I ask again, are these B-1 droids armed only with blasters? Or are there the various configurations as seen in games such as Galactic Battlegrounds and Battlefront?
Well there was that little incident where a battledroid missed Amidala, who was standing open from only a few meters away.. Padme of course then immediately blew it away.Vympel wrote: Say what? You do realize that for the most part in the films they're fighting *Jedi*, right, and if the Jedi didn't swing their lightsabres- they'd be dead. When fighting Naboo security forces they do inflict casualties (and fight them to a standstill, forcing them to take another route)- and against Clonetroopers they simply get blown to dust by gunship attack.
There's more too.SylasGaunt wrote:Well there was that little incident where a battledroid missed Amidala, who was standing open from only a few meters away.. Padme of course then immediately blew it away.Vympel wrote: Say what? You do realize that for the most part in the films they're fighting *Jedi*, right, and if the Jedi didn't swing their lightsabres- they'd be dead. When fighting Naboo security forces they do inflict casualties (and fight them to a standstill, forcing them to take another route)- and against Clonetroopers they simply get blown to dust by gunship attack.
Which scene?The Silence and I wrote: Well there was that little incident where a battledroid missed Amidala, who was standing open from only a few meters away.. Padme of course then immediately blew it away.
There was kind of other stuff going on at that point. Like shooting at people with actual guns.There's more too.
In the hanger scene the pilots, who are totally exposed and weaponless, manage to not get hit for the most part.
Tell me how many missed.From a few paces the droids miss by a significant amount with frequency. Even the supposedly superior superbattle droids manage to miss (as one example) Mace Windu before he retreats and jumps--I don't mean they shoot Mace blocks, I mean they shoot, Mace blocks a few shots and the rest fly off half a meter to the left or right of his head. They missed. From spit ball range.
The Droids don't fire at full auto in both movies, the Super Battle Droids do in one. Also, your claim that the Super Battle Droids fire much more frequently than the Jedi block is BS- for the most part, they don't show us a Jedi blocking an SBD's fire- only the SBD firing. Given the dead Jedi and their ability to block shots fired at a slower rate, the solution is quite obvious.Count the frequency of fire and then count the frequency of blocked shots throughout both movies; you will find the droids fire much more frequently than the Jedi block. There is reason for this...
You mean the one when the Viceroy was confused about which chick was the real queen? And need we remind you, the Trade Fed wanted Amidala alive to sign the treaty legitimizing their occupation of Naboo?SylasGaunt wrote:Immediately after Amidala pulls the guns from the throne.Vympel wrote: Which scene?
That there is more mass in a log than an empty crate is hardly in dispute. My beef with the scene is not so much that the shots didn't penetrate the entire log, blowing it to splinters in the process (although from what I've heard I must wonder why they didn't do that--surely they could have without using up all their juice?) it is more that shots hitting very near the top edge of the log resulted in nothing more than a flash and some smoke. Maybe you are more forgiving but I expected weaponry capable of penetrating the oh so vaunted stormtrooper armor to at least blast a small chunk of something from a dead log when it hits... If you really want calculations I can try something but I really didn't think I'd meet resistence on this.Darth Wong wrote:Have you performed calculations to show that it is trivially easy to blow through a thick tree? Especially with primarily thermal weapons as opposed to something like an armour-piercing bullet? There is certainly much more mass in a thick log than there is in an empty packing crate.The Silence and I wrote:The packing crates are a silly brainbug much akin to storm troopers successfully shielding themselves behind logs in ROTJ (yes, the all mighty blaster, set high enough to kill stormtroopers behind their armor, was repeatedly stopped by a log several stormtroopers were hiding behind).
You assume they must be dense to achieve this hardiness, which is going to hard to support. More importantly, we know phasers are highly mutable. TOS type II phasers demonstrated the ability to cause heavy damage to thick metal, as well as complete phasorization of metals. Clearly the Federation has the technology to give a type II phaser the ability to readily deal destruction to metals, so the remaining question is why TNG type II phasers do not do the same, even when clearly on a high setting.Impossible since we know they're quite light and can be knocked over easily.For all we know packing crates must be repeatedly subjected to extreme conditions and are built like tanks, using the best materials available, which happen to be highly resistent to phasers on standard parameters.
There are none I am aware of, but you do realize the sarcasm? In other words I was not being entirely serious, due to my frustration with Darth Servo.Find examples of SW weapons initating an obvious slow-propagating chain-reaction such as we have seen for phasers on numerous occasions.For all we know blasters are also a chain reaction weapon and are useless against marble, wood and for the hell of it, cheese.
I'll make this quick.Nice exaggeration. Since when is an ordinary piece of iron (the most likely type of material being used for a cheap battledroid since it's the most common metal in existence) a "sheath of high quality expensive armor material?" What is your theory for the many cases in which phasers were basically useless against things like packing crates and doors? Just chalk it up to "brainbug?" This brainbug happens to be canon.Given the above evidence why might you think the Trade Federation might have gone to the expense to outfit each of these craptastic shitty uberly cheap and worthless excuses for target practice with a sheath of high quality expensive armor material ...
Except it's not the confused viceroy doing the fighting, and this is after he's sent most of his droids off chasing what he THINKS is the real queen. Remember, he'd already told the droids that Padme was just a decoy so they had no reason NOT to blow her head off.Darth Servo wrote:You mean the one when the Viceroy was confused about which chick was the real queen? And need we remind you, the Trade Fed wanted Amidala alive to sign the treaty legitimizing their occupation of Naboo?
He IS the one calling the shots though.SylasGaunt wrote:Except it's not the confused viceroy doing the fighting,
They had no reason TO blow her head off either. They didn't want a lot of blood on their hands. They wanted a clean capture operation. A lot of dead Naboo wouldn't look too good for them with teh senate.and this is after he's sent most of his droids off chasing what he THINKS is the real queen. Remember, he'd already told the droids that Padme was just a decoy so they had no reason NOT to blow her head off.
Yet they've been firing with deadly force on the guard intrusion for the last few minutes. Furthermore they'd already dispatched a number of their group to catch the real queen. What you're suggesting is that the droid DELIBERATELY missed to avoid bloodshet instead of blowing away the now armed assailant in the same room as the viceroy.... riiiiiiight.They had no reason TO blow her head off either. They didn't want a lot of blood on their hands. They wanted a clean capture operation. A lot of dead Naboo wouldn't look too good for them with teh senate.
False dilema fallacy. There is middle ground between shooting to kill and delibrately missing.SylasGaunt wrote:What you're suggesting is that the droid DELIBERATELY missed to avoid bloodshet instead of blowing away the now armed assailant in the same room as the viceroy.... riiiiiiight.
The only "evidence" of deadly force used against the people of Naboo was a forged holonet transmission allegedly from Sio Bibble. You think that was reliable evidence?SylasGaunt wrote:There is absolutely no reason for them not to use deadly force as they have been throughout the entire damn movie.
Easy to pass off as an accident, like a plumbing rupture.Remember these are the same people who tried to gas and kill two ambassadors, why would they use kid-gloves on armed rebels?