Take action!(If you live in the US)

Post by **Alyrium Denryle** » 2002-09-09 09:52am

Under this amendment. No legal protection. Your friend is screwd, as she cannot get health insurance for her family.

Wicked Pilot · Post by **Wicked Pilot** » 2002-09-09 12:09pm

MKSheppard wrote:The reactions on that thread from such tolerant people as Wong were hilarious. They sounded like fundies there, man.

Like I said earlier, people can tolerate outright perversion as long as they
don't SEE it. When confronted with the evidence, they forget all their tolerance
and their eyeballs jump out of their heads.

I must disagree. I think you are confusing fundie reaction of "that guy's sinning and goint to hell, someone send the cops to arrest him" with the board members reactions of "we're not going to show you our asshole, out of common courtesy please don't show us yours."

Falkenhorst · Post by **Falkenhorst** » 2002-09-09 05:41pm

I must disagree. I think you are confusing fundie reaction of "that guy's sinning and goint to hell, someone send the cops to arrest him" with the board members reactions of "we're not going to show you our asshole, out of common courtesy please don't show us yours."

Still, you've gotta wonder what Mr. Goatse was thinking when he posed for that photo. He must have a very strange sense of humor.

Wicked Pilot · Post by **Wicked Pilot** » 2002-09-09 06:29pm

Falkenhorst wrote:Still, you've gotta wonder what Mr. Goatse was thinking when he posed for that photo. He must have a very strange sense of humor.

Who knows? It could have been for a number of reasons. There is even a somewhat possibility that he never intended the photo to go on the net. His motives here are pretty irrevelant. It's not like he did this in a public square or in the local Wal-Mart. It was in fact Shep who though it wise to show us the pic. That man may or may not have intended that to happen.

Falkenhorst · Post by **Falkenhorst** » 2002-09-10 12:36am

well, in my opinion, having someone take a picture of the inside of yer colon is just asking for trouble.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2002-09-10 12:40am

Falkenhorst wrote:well, in my opinion, having someone take a picture of the inside of yer colon is just asking for trouble.

LOL, that pic is as old as the internet. Thank my brother and Something
Awful for bringing that pic to my attention. It became a cult hit over
at SA.

Apparently, the SA people think a man's exposed colon is funnay as hell.

There's a reason they're called fudge packers, and turd burglars, ya know.

Very unsanitary to ram something up someone's exhaust pipe.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2002-09-10 09:48am

MKSheppard wrote:LOL, that pic is as old as the internet. Thank my brother and Something Awful for bringing that pic to my attention. It became a cult hit over at SA.

Apparently, the SA people think a man's exposed colon is funnay as hell.

So do you, apparently, since you wanted us all to see it.

There's a reason they're called fudge packers, and turd burglars, ya know.

Did you ever notice that 90% of hetero porn shows anal sex?

Very unsanitary to ram something up someone's exhaust pipe.

Of course it is. That's why we've invented something called "soap".

Falkenhorst · Post by **Falkenhorst** » 2002-09-10 12:33pm

[quote]Did you ever notice that 90% of hetero porn shows anal sex? /quote]

Interesting. Can you provide stats/info/urls to back up this claim? I thought the majority of straight porn was just regular sex.

Ted · Post by **Ted** » 2002-09-10 12:58pm

Colonel Olrik wrote:I don't understand sex education is school. Instead of hardening physics and mathematics, they insist on teaching things that are learnt:
1)with a good ol' dirty movie when you're 12
2)with a nice 18 year old girl when you're 16 [yeap, I did it, yes siree ]

When you became legal, eh?

Ted · Post by **Ted** » 2002-09-10 01:03pm

Falkenhorst wrote:
Did you ever notice that 90% of hetero porn shows anal sex? /quote]

Interesting. Can you provide stats/info/urls to back up this claim? I thought the majority of straight porn was just regular sex.

Although technically, I shouldn't be able to comment on this, regular sex pornos have anal in them. It's pretty much normal now in porno's.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2002-09-10 02:38pm

Falkenhorst wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Did you ever notice that 90% of hetero porn shows anal sex?
Interesting. Can you provide stats/info/urls to back up this claim? I thought the majority of straight porn was just regular sex.

I rent a lot of porno. I'm speaking from direct observation; most of it includes anal sex. In fact, an increasing percentage of porn also includes kinkier activities such as DP (double penetration, one in front door, one in back door), etc.

Obviously, you need to watch more porno. You have been negligent in your porn watching duties. I command you to go out and rent some porn!

Robert Treder · Post by **Robert Treder** » 2002-09-10 02:53pm

I can vouch for Mike's findings. On the internet, it's actually kind of hard to find "regular sex." There's softcore bullshit, then there's crazy-ass craziness.

And c'mon, Falkenhorst, all it takes is like two minutes and a search engine to figure that out for yourself.

Post by **Alyrium Denryle** » 2002-09-10 09:48pm

How did this get from gay rights to porn?

CorSec · Post by **CorSec** » 2002-09-10 09:54pm

Alyrium Denryle wrote:How did this get from gay rights to porn?

Everything can be related back to porn. Porn is a tie that binds.