CEO of Canadian Museum for Human Rights resigns over censorship of LGBT content, racism, sexual harassment.

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

CEO of Canadian Museum for Human Rights resigns over censorship of LGBT content, racism, sexual harassment.

Post by The Romulan Republic »

https://cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/cmh ... -1.5629662
The CEO of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights is gone after three weeks of controversy surrounding the national institution, but former employees say more action needs to be taken to effect real change.

And a national LGBT advocacy group says so much harm has been done, it now wants the museum to remove its stories on display.

"Quite frankly, I don't think that they have earned the right to showcase our stories, and I don't think that they have the credibility or the authenticity to showcase our stories," Helen Kennedy, executive director of Egale Canada, said in an interview with CBC News from Toronto on Friday.

Kennedy said she wants the Winnipeg museum to replace a same-sex marriage display with an explanation of how it sometimes forced staff not to show LGBT content — and in some cases deliberately hid it.

"We believed in them. This is the highest institution for human rights in this country and they betrayed us, they betrayed our stories," she said.

Helen Kennedy, executive director of national LGBT advocacy group Egale Canada, says the damage the museum has done is significant. "I don't think that they have earned the right to showcase our stories." (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
"People gave their personal stories and their personal information on the understanding that it would be available for public view. It wasn't. It was hidden. We were shamed and that cannot be allowed to continue."

The museum's president and CEO, John Young, stepped down Thursday night following allegations that staff were forced to censor LGBT content for at least two years, as well as claims from current and former staff of racism and sexual harassment at the institution.

His departure came after five women told CBC that the museum's human resources department dismissed their complaints of sexual harassment by a male colleague and two weeks after former employees started sharing stories of alleged racism inside the CMHR.

"These allegations were not properly escalated to the board of trustees. We should have been made aware of these incidents, and it is unfortunate that we were not," board chair Pauline Rafferty wrote in an internal email to all staff on Thursday.

In February, Young said in an interview that he wanted to continue his role as CEO, but after allegations from staff began to emerge, he said last week that he would leave at the end of his term in August.

But in a statement announcing his departure, Rafferty said both Young and the board "agreed that it is in the best interest of the museum that he step down, effective immediately."

Former program assistant Liam Green said that should only be the first step. He said systemic discrimination against people of colour inside the museum needs to be addressed.

Green, who is gay, said he struggled to speak up when he knew his colleagues were being forced to censor content.

"I was also in situations where I felt that my voice as an employee and as a queer person were not being taken seriously."

Former employee Thiané Diop started the #cmhrstoplying hashtag three weeks ago and has been watching developments around the museum carefully.

"Part of me feels finally validated in a way that I didn't for years," she said Friday, in reaction to the CEO's departure.

"I'm watching and waiting. I'm not jumping up and down or excited quite yet, but I'm interested to see how this continues to develop."

Buck doesn't stop with CEO: union
The union representing about 160 employees at the national museum is calling for accountability beyond Young, and it wants an onsite counsellor hired whom staff can turn to.

"We know that there are managers and executives still within the museum that were responsible to make decisions to not address some of the harassment complaints," said Marianne Hladun, the Public Service Alliance of Canada's Prairie Region executive vice-president.

The museum's board of trustees says it's created a new diversity and inclusion committee. It has also promised to launch an institution-wide review of the museum and its policies once a Winnipeg lawyer finishes her investigation into discrimination allegations.

The board issued an apology to staff, donors, volunteers and members of the community in its statement Thursday.

Rafferty has taken over Young's role until a new CEO can be found. The CEO of the Crown corporation is appointed by the federal government.
"I know its easy to be defeatist here because nothing has seemingly reigned Trump in so far. But I will say this: every asshole succeeds until finally, they don't. Again, 18 months before he resigned, Nixon had a sky-high approval rating of 67%. Harvey Weinstein was winning Oscars until one day, he definitely wasn't."-John Oliver

"The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan."-General Von Clauswitz, describing my opinion of Bernie or Busters and third partiers in a nutshell.

I SUPPORT A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE TO REMOVE TRUMP FROM OFFICE.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10233
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: CEO of Canadian Museum for Human Rights resigns over censorship of LGBT content, racism, sexual harassment.

Post by Solauren »

A clusterfuck all around.

How much did the government known?
Probably not much, truth be told. Crown Corporation or not, it's not like an audio would cover more then the books. You'd need an expert on how a place like this should be run to go in, and do a top to bottom review of everything, including archives.
And until something like this is exposed, you find little political will for that sort of thing.

How much did the employees bring this up to the union?
How much did the Union bring this up?

I'd like to know this, because if the Union was bringing this up, I'd like to know why they didn't bring it to the publics attention.
If the Union did know, and did nothing, they're as responsible as management was.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
Post Reply