Obama speaking on debt crisis.

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Well, its on CNN right now, and Obama claims an agreement has been achieved.

Basically:

-Big cuts (1 trillion over ten years, I think he said).
-No tax hikes mentioned.
-A committee to investigate other approaches, and it sounds like Obama will still be pushing for tax hikes.
-Debt ceiling raised. Thank the Lord.

I may post more details later.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Basically it looks like the Republican ‘deal’ will be the deal; but minus the balanced budget amendment and the 18% of GDP spending cap that the Senate would never pass. Great, we get to do this all over again next summer!
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Narkis
Padawan Learner
Posts: 391
Joined: 2009-01-02 11:05pm
Location: Greece

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Narkis »

So, Obama just bended over. Again. Can't say I'm surprised, but why? Why can he never find his balls?
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Its a sorry world we live in where this is considered a compromise, but compared to what the Tea Party wanted, I guess it actually is.

One thing that makes it slightly easier to swallow is that apparently a lot of the cuts will be to defence (though medicare may take a hit too :( ).
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Simon_Jester »

For the sake of people who would suffer by getting caught in the middle, I have to say that I am just as glad that this time he chose not to take a hardline position at the last minute.

He might have been able to avoid such a disaster by showing more courage at other stages in the game, but this was not the time for posturing.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Narkis wrote:So, Obama just bended over. Again. Can't say I'm surprised, but why? Why can he never find his balls?
Predictable, but probably unjustified. What would you have had him do? Let the US default, with the suffering that would befall millions of people as a result? I realize bashing Obama for not snapping his fingers like Q and making your dreams come true is trendy here, but give it a rest.

Obama has to work within the system. That system is currently largely controlled by the GOP. Sucks, but its the truth.
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22456
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Mr Bean »

Again RR he has the 14th Amendment option, he also had the option of not waiting until now when this became a massive pressing issue to get a deal made. He's let the Congress lead to his great sorrow on every issue.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
Narkis
Padawan Learner
Posts: 391
Joined: 2009-01-02 11:05pm
Location: Greece

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Narkis »

I don't know. It's possible this was the only option left to him. I've heard he could invoke the 14th amendment, but I'm not knowledgeable enough about the US legal code to say how good an option that'd be. He could definitely try doing something more decisive before it became a last minute issue. But it really sucks when the goddamn President of the United States caves in to any demand made by these lunatics. And what the heck is he gonna do next year when this thing repeats itself? The Tea Partiers aren't gonna back down for sure.
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Mr Bean wrote:Again RR he has the 14th Amendment option, he also had the option of not waiting until now when this became a massive pressing issue to get a deal made. He's let the Congress lead to his great sorrow on every issue.
I remember reading (in one of the other threads here I think) that the 14th. Amendment solution was Constitutionally dubious, and that if he tried it and it was ruled Unconstitutional, it could actually make things worse.

As for acting sooner, maybe he had other issues to worry about a year, or six months ago. Or maybe he didn't expect the right to be this stupid and callous (which would be naive, but perhaps understandable). And honestly, I doubt it would have made much different. Its last minute pressure that's forcing consensus. If he'd acted earlier, I think it might still have turned out this way.

But I don't expect that to stop your reflexive Obama bashing.
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22456
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Mr Bean »

Narkis wrote:I don't know. It's possible this was the only option left to him. I've heard he could invoke the 14th amendment, but I'm not knowledgeable enough about the US legal code to say how good an option that'd be. He could definitely try doing something more decisive before it became a last minute issue. But it really sucks when the goddamn President of the United States caves in to any demand made by these lunatics. And what the heck is he gonna do next year when this thing repeats itself? The Tea Partiers aren't gonna back down for sure.
Why would they back down? When you give in to hostage takers...they take more hostages and make more demands. And those demands will be met because Obama wants to give in because he wants the Republicans to like him. Or he thinks the Republicans are right... or... he's just that weak.
The Romulan Republic wrote:
I remember reading (in one of the other threads here I think) that the 14th. Amendment solution was Constitutionally dubious, and that if he tried it and it was ruled Unconstitutional, it could actually make things worse.
The 14 Amendment option is constitutionally sound, Debt limits did not exists until a few decades ago and in the opinion of legal scholars not currently employed by Fox News it is a sound argument. More importantly beyond the legality of it, it gives the President time and turns this from a ticking time bomb that's going to go off in a week to one that's going to go off next year when the case would have come before the Supreme Court which funny enough is the EXACT same time frame that this bill is going to elapse. The only difference being one option gives away a trillion dollars in cuts to government spending in a downturn economy.
The Romulan Republic wrote:But I don't expect that to stop your reflexive Obama bashing.
Or your reflexive Obama can do no wrong fanboyism? As I've mentioned before and you seem to have forgotten, I'm not some rabid Obama hater who voted for McCain who loves his guns and hates them damn illegal aliens who dun took Mah JOB! No sir, I gave time and money to the Obama campaign in 2008 and unlike you I'm willing to call a spade a spade. If the President does something good I'll say good for the President. But if he's willing for the third time to start a negotiation on Republican ground and the end position of the debate is MORE Conservative than the initial Republican position? Then I will call it as I see it.
Last edited by Mr Bean on 2011-07-31 10:00pm, edited 1 time in total.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Starglider »

The Romulan Republic wrote:Its a sorry world we live in where this is considered a compromise, but compared to what the Tea Party wanted, I guess it actually is.
Of course it is. The Tea Partiers are right now screaming and wailing about how this is a complete defeat, a fig leaf for the RINO leadership, how Obama got a blank check for only token cuts etc etc. Several of the more impractical Republican suggestions are gone, and in any case both plans used dubious baselines and backloaded cuts to the extent that there will be no actual spending decreases in the near future (i.e. before the whole can of worms is opened again).
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Mr Bean wrote: Why would they back down? When you give in to hostage takers...they take more hostages and make more demands. And those demands will be met because Obama wants to give in because he wants the Republicans to like him. Or he thinks the Republicans are right... or... he's just that weak.
So you would rather have had a default?

Obama is not going to give in to the GOP for no reason, and if he agreed with them he could have just run as a Republican. And it is not nessissarily weakness to accept a compromise, even a lop-sided one, to avoid a national disaster. This could actually have been a lot worse. Its not a good deal. Its not what I wanted. But its better than a default.
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7510
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Zaune »

Mr Bean wrote:Why would they back down? When you give in to hostage takers...they take more hostages and make more demands. And those demands will be met because Obama wants to give in because he wants the Republicans to like him. Or he thinks the Republicans are right... or... he's just that weak.
Or he doesn't feel like dealing with the fallout if the nuttier end of the right wing are actually serious about "2nd Amendment Solutions", though personally I'd just love to watch them try.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22456
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Mr Bean »

The Romulan Republic wrote:
So you would rather have had a default?

Obama is not going to give in to the GOP for no reason, and if he agreed with them he could have just run as a Republican. And it is not nessissarily weakness to accept a compromise, even a lop-sided one, to avoid a national disaster. This could actually have been a lot worse. Its not a good deal. Its not what I wanted. But its better than a default.
Again he had the 14th amendment option, he also had the line item Veto option where in the President picked and chose what would get payed and would not get payed in essence the default giving him the power to kill any program in the entire Federal government he did not like. Killing all Congressional salaries for one might have a wonderful effect on some of these freshmen Republicans.

And I'll remind you RR that we will be back here in less than a year, and what do you think the Tea Party will make Obama give away then? If he trades away Medicare or Social security for another debt ceiling increase will you throw up your hands again and say What could he do? The Republicans were just so crazy!

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
erik_t
Jedi Master
Posts: 1108
Joined: 2008-10-21 08:35pm

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by erik_t »

When the other party is fundamentally negotiating in bad faith, precisely what other outcome (besides actual factual default) is possible? I'm not pleased with this result, but I don't try to withhold various phones, keys, trinkets from muggers either.

As for invoking the 14th, that would be the surest possible way to get the House to not pass a single bill (save articles of impeachment) until 2012.
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Mr Bean wrote: Again he had the 14th amendment option, he also had the line item Veto option where in the President picked and chose what would get payed and would not get payed in essence the default giving him the power to kill any program in the entire Federal government he did not like. Killing all Congressional salaries for one might have a wonderful effect on some of these freshmen Republicans.
The 14th amendment option was of questionable legality, as I already noted and as you ignored. I don't know anything much about the line item veto option and don't recall seeing any previous mention of it in discussions on this topic, so please elaborate.
And I'll remind you RR that we will be back here in less than a year, and what do you think the Tea Party will make Obama give away then? If he trades away Medicare or Social security for another debt ceiling increase will you throw up your hands again and say What could he do? The Republicans were just so crazy!
First of all source that this is going to come up within a year, because I've heard that this increase is more long term than that.

Second of all, you have not yet answered my question: would you prefer a default?

Third of all, this situation only continues while the GOP holds the House. If Obama can stave off a default until 2012, and then the Democrats retake the House, we might actually be able to resolve the situation without global disaster.

Furthermore, this is not as one-sided as it appears. Yes, their are big cuts and no tax hikes. But a lot of those cuts are apparently going to come from a Republican favorite, defence. And the crazier Tea Party crap (like the balanced budget amendment or simply letting the country default) has been averted. Its not a perfect deal. But when do you ever get a perfect deal in politics? Again, this is like attacking Obama for not being Q.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Mr Bean wrote: Again he had the 14th amendment option, he also had the line item Veto option where in the President picked and chose what would get payed and would not get payed in essence the default giving him the power to kill any program in the entire Federal government he did not like. Killing all Congressional salaries for one might have a wonderful effect on some of these freshmen Republicans.
The line item veto was ruled unconstitutional by the supreme court many years ago and never used. Try to do that and low and behold, the Congress now has a completely valid reason to impeach Obama.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Prannon
Jedi Knight
Posts: 601
Joined: 2009-03-25 07:39am
Location: Ontario

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Prannon »

Mr Bean wrote: Again he had the 14th amendment option, he also had the line item Veto option where in the President picked and chose what would get payed and would not get payed in essence the default giving him the power to kill any program in the entire Federal government he did not like. Killing all Congressional salaries for one might have a wonderful effect on some of these freshmen Republicans.
The Line Item Veto option is something that Congress gave to President Clinton back in the 90s, which was promptly ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the US. There is no line item veto option that the president can currently exercise.
User avatar
aerius
Charismatic Cult Leader
Posts: 14795
Joined: 2002-08-18 07:27pm

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by aerius »

The Romulan Republic wrote:First of all source that this is going to come up within a year, because I've heard that this increase is more long term than that.
The increase is what $2.1 trillion? Minus the $200 billion or so they robbed from the government pension funds which they now have to put back. That gives $1.9 trillion of room left. The US is currently running a deficit of about $1.5-1.8 trillion depending on which estimates you go by, either way you're going to hit the limit again in about 12-15 months.
Second of all, you have not yet answered my question: would you prefer a default?
Question: Default now or default later when things are further down the shitter?
Third of all, this situation only continues while the GOP holds the House. If Obama can stave off a default until 2012, and then the Democrats retake the House, we might actually be able to resolve the situation without global disaster.
By then you'll have a couple trillion of extra debt to deal with, the US may lose its AAA debt rating and have to pay higher interest rates on its debt, and barring a miracle the economy's going to be even worse than it is today. The longer you let it go the harder it becomes to fix the problem, compound interest is a bitch.
Image
aerius: I'll vote for you if you sleep with me. :)
Lusankya: Deal!
Say, do you want it to be a threesome with your wife? Or a foursome with your wife and sister-in-law? I'm up for either. :P
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by The Romulan Republic »

aerius wrote:The increase is what $2.1 trillion? Minus the $200 billion or so they robbed from the government pension funds which they now have to put back. That gives $1.9 trillion of room left. The US is currently running a deficit of about $1.5-1.8 trillion depending on which estimates you go by, either way you're going to hit the limit again in about 12-15 months.
Hmm. That's concerning. But at least it buys a little time.
Question: Default now or default later when things are further down the shitter?
That assumes a default is inevitable.
By then you'll have a couple trillion of extra debt to deal with, the US may lose its AAA debt rating and have to pay higher interest rates on its debt, and barring a miracle the economy's going to be even worse than it is today. The longer you let it go the harder it becomes to fix the problem, compound interest is a bitch.
Granted, but it seems it isn't really solvable while the GOP holds the House, other than by cutting massively from various programs, which hurts a lot of people anyway.
Minischoles
Jedi Knight
Posts: 566
Joined: 2008-04-17 10:09pm
Location: England

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Minischoles »

Not surprised - Obama bent over again, and no doubt that 'special' committee will be completely pointless. I can already see Fox News spinning like crazy to prove the democrats are unwilling to compromise and all those big cuts are going to come out of Defence - to which Obama will readily bend over and take it again, and absolutely nothing will be solved except for him getting laughed out of office and the country dragging the rest of the world with it when it inevitably defaults because TAXES ARE EVIL!
“The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that the English language is as pure as a crib-house whore. It not only borrows words from other languages; it has on occasion chased other languages down dark alley-ways, clubbed them unconscious and rifled their pockets for new vocabulary. “
- James Nicoll
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Narkis wrote:So, Obama just bended over. Again. Can't say I'm surprised, but why? Why can he never find his balls?
Why is it so hard for some people to just pursue the parsimonious answer that he just doesn't give a fuck about me or you?

Of course, I am sure every well-meaning liberal will line up quietly and obediently in a year and vote for him anyway, because of the endless hysteria. I tell you what the Tea Party is best for: making sure Democrats can vote like 90's Republicans and take no responsibility for it, ever. The U.S. Constitutional system electorally seemed built from the ground up to make sure everyone is suckered into lesser-evil votes tying them to the really pretty broad policy consensus not just nation-wide, but world-wide (austerity for all, it is the social programs which are hurting profits making the economy bad for everyone).

No significant change or diversion from the major policy preferences of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the typical feelings one could casually survey on Wall Street will ever be yielded through picking Thing A or Thing B through the legal political system. We didn't leave Vietnam because people elected Nixon, either.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7510
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Zaune »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:
Narkis wrote:So, Obama just bended over. Again. Can't say I'm surprised, but why? Why can he never find his balls?
Why is it so hard for some people to just pursue the parsimonious answer that he just doesn't give a fuck about me or you?
Because it's wrong. He's a politician. Politicians require votes in order to keep being politicians. Neither is he dumb enough to think this isn't costing him votes, though I'm sure I don't know who else you're supposed to vote for if you're even slightly to the left of Glenn Beck.

But Obama can be the President who let his opponents dictate terms to the long-term detriment of the country, or the President who stood firm on a point of principle and took the country down with him. For better or worse, he chose to be the former.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
User avatar
K. A. Pital
Glamorous Commie
Posts: 20813
Joined: 2003-02-26 11:39am
Location: Elysium

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by K. A. Pital »

Zaune wrote:Because it's wrong. He's a politician. Politicians require votes in order to keep being politicians.
The electorate is dumb enough to vote again considering a very narrow amount of choices. Besides, how is he going to stop being a politician if he loses a presidential election? So far I heard, all former US presidents spent their post-presidency life as wealthy fucks with no problems in life - except the few ones who got murderized, like Kennedy and Lincoln. You have to be truly crazy to think your NYAH NYAH vote seriously makes Obama's life worse.
Lì ci sono chiese, macerie, moschee e questure, lì frontiere, prezzi inaccessibile e freddure
Lì paludi, minacce, cecchini coi fucili, documenti, file notturne e clandestini
Qui incontri, lotte, passi sincronizzati, colori, capannelli non autorizzati,
Uccelli migratori, reti, informazioni, piazze di Tutti i like pazze di passioni...

...La tranquillità è importante ma la libertà è tutto!
Assalti Frontali
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Obama speaking on debt crisis.

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Zaune wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:
Narkis wrote:So, Obama just bended over. Again. Can't say I'm surprised, but why? Why can he never find his balls?
Why is it so hard for some people to just pursue the parsimonious answer that he just doesn't give a fuck about me or you?
Because it's wrong. He's a politician. Politicians require votes in order to keep being politicians.
Wrong. Elections are primarily driven by public relations and rich donors and basically the same way you find out which toothpaste you'll buy. The atomized individualized public is not an active agent in the process.
Zaune wrote:Neither is he dumb enough to think this isn't costing him votes, though I'm sure I don't know who else you're supposed to vote for if you're even slightly to the left of Glenn Beck.
I just said that no meaningful political or social change comes from merely voting, or even voting at all.
Zaune wrote:But Obama can be the President who let his opponents dictate terms to the long-term detriment of the country, or the President who stood firm on a point of principle and took the country down with him. For better or worse, he chose to be the former.
Obama was the candidate of the financial industry, and he has continued to shill very well for corporate interests, whatever his meaningless rhetoric, since 2008. His party has almost no popular institutions represented whatsoever, since the relative social peace in the various 'identity-based' groups since the 1970s, and with organized labor being at below 10% of the entire labor force, and getting it head kicked in constantly.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Post Reply