Trekkie Wall o' Text

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Oskuro
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2698
Joined: 2005-05-25 06:10am
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Oskuro »

The Romulan Republic wrote:So I'm not sure its really fair to just blame such a brain bug on TV Trek (maybe TV sci-fi as a whole).
I was referring to TV Sci-fi as a whole, of course.
unsigned
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10235
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Solauren »

Assuming that a Trek ship with Red Matter could get to Coruscant, there is one way that a Red matter attack could work.

This assumes

#1 - That the black holes created by Red Matter are 'long term'. Meaning they last a few days or more.
#2 - The Empire isn't aware of Red Matter (maybe it's hypermatter, who knows), hasn't seen the 'Black hole' before, and doesn't know how to deal with it.

The only way to get around Coruscant's defenses is to avoid them entirely. So, figure out Coruscant's orbital data, and activate the Red Matter ahead of Coruscant. Effectively, Coruscant will orbit into the black hole.

Sure, they'll be lots of time for an evacuation of the planet (depending on how far out the Red Matter is activated), but it's got a higher change of working then 'pissy little Trek ship attempts to destroy one of the most heavily defended planets in the Star Wars galaxy'

Of course, using the Red Matter to neutralize Coruscant's sun is also an option, but it leaves Coruscant intact.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
Jarek Densaku
Redshirt
Posts: 6
Joined: 2009-08-19 12:07pm
Location: Québec, (Still in) Canada

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Jarek Densaku »

OK. I'll be brief......I'ld like to point this part.......
Star Trek is based off of true science. Star Wars is based off of fantasy/never-going-to-happen movie science. Fight your losing battle. You have been owned.
Ah? Since when god-like entities (Q, The Prophets, etc....), time travels et giant space montsters are true science? And i don't even mention all these fantasy anomalies (Omega molecule anyone?)

Besides. The Abrams movie is fucking far away from true science.
"In 1966 Star Trek anticipated the cellphone.
In 2009 it's making placements for Nokia.
Seems like future generations of scientists will look somewhere else for inspiration."
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by PeZook »

To people wondering if a Trek ship could get into Coruscant by posing as a merchant freighter, consider this:

They need to figure out the procedures and regulations for this traffic. They need to do that well enough not to draw any attention to themselves. They'd need navigational charts, computers that could interface with traffic control computers, be able to understand slang, know the local frequencies etc.

How are they going to get this intel? Where will they acquire the books detailing stuff about the environment around Coruscant? If they go right in and just try to blaze through it, they will attract attention, and this means they're dead. Or they'll collide with a 10 gigaton superfreighter carrying fried chicken to Corcuscant, because they didn't know the spacelane they were using was reserved for heavy traffic.
Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.
bz249
Padawan Learner
Posts: 356
Joined: 2007-04-18 05:56am

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by bz249 »

Jarek Densaku wrote:OK. I'll be brief......I'ld like to point this part.......
Star Trek is based off of true science. Star Wars is based off of fantasy/never-going-to-happen movie science. Fight your losing battle. You have been owned.
Ah? Since when god-like entities (Q, The Prophets, etc....), time travels et giant space montsters are true science? And i don't even mention all these fantasy anomalies (Omega molecule anyone?)

Besides. The Abrams movie is fucking far away from true science.
Godlike beings are the least problem with ST, while they are not scientific they are neither unscientific. Current day science has nothing to say about very advanced things or even "supernatural" stuff (until it happens a statistically large occasions, because from that point they are a natural phenomena which deserves scientific explanation). The bad thing they care jack shit about classical, relativistic and quantum mechanics which should work if one has the correct conditions.
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Serafina »

bz249 wrote: Godlike beings are the least problem with ST, while they are not scientific they are neither unscientific. Current day science has nothing to say about very advanced things or even "supernatural" stuff (until it happens a statistically large occasions, because from that point they are a natural phenomena which deserves scientific explanation). The bad thing they care jack shit about classical, relativistic and quantum mechanics which should work if one has the correct conditions.
The main problem with Trek-science it is that it dresses as science, but is not scientific at all.

Oh, and science can, per definition, make no comment on the supernatural. Of course, this gets scetchy if you can actually observe it - if it is part of the natural(=observable) universe, it is not supernatural anymore, is it?
How often these things occur does not really matter.


Oh, and the Defiant (or any other Trekship) being taken out by colliding with a superfreighter is kinda funny, don't you think?
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Akkleptos
Jedi Knight
Posts: 643
Joined: 2008-12-17 02:14am
Location: Between grenades and H1N1.
Contact:

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Akkleptos »

Serafina wrote: Oh, and the Defiant (or any other Trekship) being taken out by colliding with a superfreighter is kinda funny, don't you think?
Considering the readings and estimates on firepower (and therefore, shield-power, given the fact that pirate-attacks exist in the SW Galaxy, and no ship carrying cargo from places such as the Outer Rim is excempt from the possibility of such an attack) one can easily find on the main Stardestroyer.net site, it would be more than likely that a superfreighter in orbit into Coruscant would run into Nero's mining ship (with ST-type shields) and, after feeling an eerie tremor in the superstructure, it would go something like "What was that? Did we just hit something?" right after mass-driving Nero's ship to oblivion.
Life in Commodore 64:
10 OPEN "EYES",1,1
20 GET UP$:IF UP$="" THEN 20
30 GOTO BATHROOM
...
GENERATION 29
Don't like what I'm saying?
Take it up with my representative:
bz249
Padawan Learner
Posts: 356
Joined: 2007-04-18 05:56am

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by bz249 »

Serafina wrote:

Oh, and science can, per definition, make no comment on the supernatural. Of course, this gets scetchy if you can actually observe it - if it is part of the natural(=observable) universe, it is not supernatural anymore, is it?
How often these things occur does not really matter.
Of course it matters, most scientific laws from late XIXth century are statistical in their nature. Lots of weird thing can happen with infinitesimal probability, like the violation of the second law of thermodynamics. If it happened once you don't need any explanation, this is how the dice rolled, if it happens regularly then something is wrong with the current laws, so some adjustment is required.
User avatar
Formless
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4141
Joined: 2008-11-10 08:59pm
Location: the beginning and end of the Present

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Formless »

^ But even if it happens once thanks to infinitesimally low probability (disregarding for a second how stupid Trek is about this kind of thing) that still doesn't make it SUPERNATURAL, just IMPROBABLE by definition. Hence science still can't comment on the "supernatural."
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Samuel »

Of course science can. If it exists in the real world it isn't supernatural anymore- just showing that are knowledge of how the universe works is very, very wrong.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16351
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Batman »

Samuel wrote:Of course science can. If it exists in the real world it isn't supernatural anymore- just showing that are knowledge of how the universe works is very, very wrong.
Which means there IS no such thing as the supernatural (just phenomena we don't fully understand yet), which in turn means science CAN'T comment on the supernatural, due to no such thing existing :P
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Darth Wong »

bz249 wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:Actually, I can't think of many examples of a Trek faction pulling off or even attempting a decapitating strike on the national level against another power. About the only incidences of such tactics that jump readily to mind are a few attempts to do so against the Founders in DS9 (all obviously failed, except for the Founders-killing bioweapon), and against the Borg in the Voyager series finale.

So I'm not sure its really fair to just blame such a brain bug on TV Trek (maybe TV sci-fi as a whole).
Shinzon? Technically what he has done was a coup, yet it was carried out in a single action by killing the Senate and after that point he was the big bad guy.
Yeah, but that was just shitty storytelling. All he did was kill one room full of people. There is no reason why any fantastic superweapon technology was required, when his ship in orbit could have obliterated the entire building with a single shot. It was done just to show off the Medusa weapon, ie- the whole scene was nothing more than a dramatic "reveal" scene which made no sense in context. If you had a new weapon technology like that, you wouldn't reveal it for such paltry gain.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Patrick Degan »

Star Trek is based off of true science. Star Wars is based off of fantasy/never-going-to-happen movie science. Fight your losing battle. You have been owned.
Hmm...

BWAHAHAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

I think that about sums it up.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12219
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Lord Revan »

It would a nice experiment to give these "trek is based on real science!!" trekkies a single trek episode or film, tell them to spot and report all science errors and inaccurities in said episode or film (and preferbly give them a one with loads of said errors and/or inaccurities) and see if they can actually admit that trek is just as realistic as any other Scifi francise there is.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Patrick Degan »

Lord Revan wrote:It would a nice experiment to give these "trek is based on real science!!" trekkies a single trek episode or film, tell them to spot and report all science errors and inaccurities in said episode or film (and preferbly give them a one with loads of said errors and/or inaccurities) and see if they can actually admit that trek is just as realistic as any other Scifi francise there is.
FTL. They have no argument.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Peptuck
Is Not A Moderator
Posts: 1487
Joined: 2007-07-09 12:22am

Re: Trekkie Wall o' Text

Post by Peptuck »

Darth Wong wrote:
bz249 wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:Actually, I can't think of many examples of a Trek faction pulling off or even attempting a decapitating strike on the national level against another power. About the only incidences of such tactics that jump readily to mind are a few attempts to do so against the Founders in DS9 (all obviously failed, except for the Founders-killing bioweapon), and against the Borg in the Voyager series finale.

So I'm not sure its really fair to just blame such a brain bug on TV Trek (maybe TV sci-fi as a whole).
Shinzon? Technically what he has done was a coup, yet it was carried out in a single action by killing the Senate and after that point he was the big bad guy.
Yeah, but that was just shitty storytelling. All he did was kill one room full of people. There is no reason why any fantastic superweapon technology was required, when his ship in orbit could have obliterated the entire building with a single shot. It was done just to show off the Medusa weapon, ie- the whole scene was nothing more than a dramatic "reveal" scene which made no sense in context. If you had a new weapon technology like that, you wouldn't reveal it for such paltry gain.
Not to mention the Romulans don't appear to have any concept of continuity of government. Not like there'd be someone somewhere who could take over the Romulan government after Shinzon axes the higher-ranking members and then direct the Romulan military after him.

But hey, we need a movie, so let's make the dangerous, savvy and masterful experts of backstabbing and deception complete retards!
X-COM: Defending Earth by blasting the shit out of it.

Writers are people, and people are stupid. So, a large chunk of them have the IQ of beach pebbles. ~fgalkin

You're complaining that the story isn't the kind you like. That's like me bitching about the lack of ninjas in Robin Hood. ~CaptainChewbacca
Post Reply