Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid people
* FAQ    * Search   * Register   * Login 
Want to support this site? Click

Thank you, Electron Boy!

Note: network performance may be spotty for the next week, as our Internet connection was severed and the server has been moved to a temporary location. Please bear with us during this time.

Quote of the Week: "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick, American author (1928-1982)


It is currently 2010-07-30 06:30am


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 185 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: OMFG, TrekBBS + RSA = Comedy Gold PostPosted: 2005-12-16 02:51pm
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Posts: 68896
Location: Toronto, Canada
This is fucking hilarious. This is an E-mail I got recently:
Quote:
Mr. Wong--
 
I know your site is devoted to Star Wars, but  your readers may get a kick
out of this thread. (I sent you the url in the first  letter.)
 
_The  Trek BBS: For Paula Block_
( http://www.trekbbs.com/threads/showflat ... =7&fpart=1 )
 
Having learned earlier that Paula Block is the  final authority on all things
canon in Trek publications -- after denying Trek  writers and editors had the
authority to make pronouncements on the topic -- he  started out with what
looked like a reasonable question about how canon in Trek  worked. By the end he
was accusing a Pentecostal minister of trying to learn his  identity for the
purpose of conveying death threats.
 
Along the way he told several Trek  novelists, including Keith DeCandido,
Christopher Bennett, and Dayton Ward;  former DS9 scriptwriter David Mack; Pocket
Books Executive Editor, Star Trek  Division, Marco Palmieri; and Paula Block,
head honcho over protecting the Star  Trek license at VIACOM that they not
only did not understand their own jobs but  were incapable of constructing a
reasonable response to his posts.
 
Enjoy!

--Kevin

It's all true. I looked through the thread and it's pretty long, but it's fucking hilarious the way RSA tries to start out by seeming quite reasonable but swiftly degenerates into his true self, because, well, he just can't help it.

One of the writers actually said this to him:
KevinK, Writer wrote:
Your "rigorous analysis" is demonstrably predicated on the assumption that the statements of fact provided to you by the people in a position to know are false, either through their ignorance or deliberate misdirection. Your prejudice against facts with which you do not agree reduces your logic (reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity) to sophistry (deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning). It's my belief your persistence in this practice indicates deliberate behavior. That is not an accusation, that is an assessment based on your public actions.

And Paula Block said this:
pmblock wrote:
Gene R. himself had a habit of decanonizing things. He didn't like the way the animated series turned out, so he proclaimed that it was NOT CANON. He also didn't like a lot of the movies. So he didn't much consider them canon either. And--okay, I'm really going to scare you with this one--after he got TNG going, he...well...he sort of decided that some of the Original Series wasn't canon either. I had a discussion with him once, where I cited a couple things that were very clearly canon in the Original Series, and he told me he didn't think that way anymore, and that he now thought of TNG as canon wherever there was conflict between the two. He admitted it was revisionist thinking, but so be it.

And finally, all of the writers made a point of schooling RSA in the fact that they consider "continuity" and "canon" to be two different things. Canon is simply the films and TV shows, but the accepted Trek continuity is a different thing entirely, and may exclude parts of the canon, which is how they deal with contradictions in canon.

So, not only has he tried to argue with Lucasfilm employees about Lucasfilm policy, but he has basically tried the same thing with Paramount and Trek writers! Yessiree, boys and girls, RSA has gone into complete meltdown :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:02pm
The Arbiter
User avatar

Joined: 2005-04-30 12:03am
Posts: 5938
Location: Beyond the Outer Rim
:wtf:

Holy Crap. What's next? RSA getting into a fist fight with Lucas over the canonocity of the special editions?

He really strikes me as the sort of person who will eventually snap completely and go try to kill some of these people



The Rift
Stanislav Petrov- The man who saved the world
Hugh Thompson Jr.- A True American Hero
"In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." - President Barack Obama
"May fortune favor you, for your goals are the goals of the world." - Ancient Chall valediction

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:19pm
Mammy Two-Shoes
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Posts: 30777
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
DarkStar wrote:
LightningStorm wrote:
Continuity and Canon are NOT the same thing.

A great many people use the terms either interchangeably or in their own predetermined set way that overlaps with other people's use of other terms for the same meaning.

I love it when people say shit like this in an attempt to dodge around the fact that they're a fucking idiot, or at the least, fucked something up and refuse to admit it.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:34pm
Darkest Knight
Darkest Knight
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Posts: 17823
Location: California
KevinK, Writer wrote:
Your "rigorous analysis" is demonstrably predicated on the assumption that the statements of fact provided to you by the people in a position to know are false, either through their ignorance or deliberate misdirection. Your prejudice against facts with which you do not agree reduces your logic (reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity) to sophistry (deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning). It's my belief your persistence in this practice indicates deliberate behavior. That is not an accusation, that is an assessment based on your public actions.


Dude, he just got OWNED. This is hilarious, Mike. I'd like to see how his cronies react to things like this.

BTW, is the "Kevin" person who sent this e-mail someone we should know, already, or is he simply an anonymous hero of the hour?



"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:39pm
Sith Marauder
User avatar

Joined: 2004-03-26 02:31pm
Posts: 3699
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA
KevinK also told him in another thread that:

KevinK wrote:
As a service to those who visit your site, you should either post the truth or clearly state that the site reflects only your opinion and is a work of fiction.

Source: +http://www.trekbbs.com/threads/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=3612780&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=7&fpart=2&vc=1



(I)t all has to show impeccable logic and unflawed realism, even if it deals with a different galaxy and an era 3,000 years in the past or the future.- George Lucas about Star Wars


Last edited by Mange on 2005-12-16 03:41pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:40pm
Mammy Two-Shoes
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Posts: 30777
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
Jesus, I'm not even halfway through the second page, and DarkStar is already getting called and starting to unravel...

This stuff with him is starting to develop into some surreal level of sick humour...

Mange: OUCH, that's gotta sting... :!:

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:41pm
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Posts: 68896
Location: Toronto, Canada
Master of Ossus wrote:
KevinK, Writer wrote:
Your "rigorous analysis" is demonstrably predicated on the assumption that the statements of fact provided to you by the people in a position to know are false, either through their ignorance or deliberate misdirection. Your prejudice against facts with which you do not agree reduces your logic (reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity) to sophistry (deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning). It's my belief your persistence in this practice indicates deliberate behavior. That is not an accusation, that is an assessment based on your public actions.


Dude, he just got OWNED. This is hilarious, Mike. I'd like to see how his cronies react to things like this.

BTW, is the "Kevin" person who sent this e-mail someone we should know, already, or is he simply an anonymous hero of the hour?

I can't be 100% sure, but I think it's Kevin K himself. And yes, he is the hero of the hour :)



Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:45pm
Mammy Two-Shoes
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Posts: 30777
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
DarkStar wrote:
The consistent claim that PDE is a licensee is, at best, a case of "terminological inexactitude".

What the fuck is that even supposed to mean? :?

Is he trying to sound smart? That's not smart, that's not knowing how to use a God damned thesaurus properly.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:49pm
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Posts: 24229
Location: Robot Hell
Quote:
Another thing that makes canon a little confusing. Gene R. himself had a habit of decanonizing things. He didn't like the way the animated series turned out, so he proclaimed that it was NOT CANON. He also didn't like a lot of the movies. So he didn't much consider them canon either. And--okay, I'm really going to scare you with this one--after he got TNG going, he...well...he sort of decided that some of the Original Series wasn't canon either. I had a discussion with him once, where I cited a couple things that were very clearly canon in the Original Series, and he told me he didn't think that way anymore, and that he now thought of TNG as canon wherever there was conflict between the two. He admitted it was revisionist thinking, but so be it.


Damnit. I always thought he was just being revisionist. But now, this is far worse. Urgh. My respect for the man is once again lowered by his treatment of the earlier series.



Superior Moderator - BotM - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:51pm
Mammy Two-Shoes
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Posts: 30777
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
My respect for Roddenberry completely evaporated once I found out how much of a complete and total sadistic asshole the man was.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:53pm
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Posts: 68896
Location: Toronto, Canada
It's not news; Roddenberry thumped TOS' importance in the continuity way back in the preface to the TMP novelization, as Lord Poe is fond of pointing out.



Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:53pm
Sith Devotee
User avatar

Joined: 2002-12-09 01:15pm
Posts: 2913
Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination
Oh man, Kevin Killiany asked who DSG2k is and someone named zhu provided a link to stardestroyer.net (see below). Can you imagine how that made RSA feel? :mrgreen:

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Hat ... neral.html



Image

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 03:57pm
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Posts: 24229
Location: Robot Hell
Darth Wong wrote:
It's not news; Roddenberry thumped TOS' importance in the continuity way back in the preface to the TMP novelization, as Lord Poe is fond of pointing out.


Quite. There's a certainly level of it that I can manage (disowning, say, the episode with the hippies in space, I can sympathise with. Same with disowning the cardboard sets) as with Lucas. At least the TMP novel, which I rather like, preface preserves the idea that these things happened, in general terms. But just riding roughshod over the old series with the pseudo-communistic bullshit and ineptitude sqared he seemed to preffer. Urgh.



Superior Moderator - BotM - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 04:00pm
Black Mage
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Posts: 27475
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere
Noble Ire wrote:
:wtf:

Holy Crap. What's next? RSA getting into a fist fight with Lucas over the canonocity of the special editions?

He really strikes me as the sort of person who will eventually snap completely and go try to kill some of these people


Not quite, but... He does go to yell at Lucasfilm employees telling them they don't know what's going on.



Legal immigration: No, you're not allowed!
Remember: If you're here on a work visa, pointing out you do not get minimum wage can get you deported!

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 04:06pm
Lord of the FUQ
Lord of the FUQ
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Posts: 18013
Location: New York
Happy Holidays, everyone! *raises a cup of eggnog*



Image
Rob "Uncle Roby" Dalton | ASVS Vets '99 | SG-14: Gotta Blow Something Up | Knight of the Order of the SDN Galactic Empire

"Ahh, coffee, thou canst take the latest of nights and make it as the earliest of mornings. Whence the potency of thy bitter brew?" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 04:08pm
Emperor's Hand
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Posts: 14113
Location: Orleanian in exile
So far as Roddenberry's attitude goes, I'm at the point now where if it's not TOS, it's not real Star Trek, and so I suspect are many of the fans. But of course that is personal preference.

As for RSA, I think the only thing we're waiting for now is final news that he's been certified and dragged off for a nice long rest by members of the Jackson, MS police anti-lunatic squad.



What a vivid imagination my brother has. At age five, he was able to deduce, through careful observation of the neighbours, that babies were brought not by the stork but rather by the midwife. In her satchel.
—Mycroft Holmes The Private Life Of Sherlock Holmes (1970)

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 04:26pm
Darkest Knight
Darkest Knight
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Posts: 17823
Location: California
Dalton wrote:
Happy Holidays, everyone! *raises a cup of eggnog*


*Raises toast with Dalton*

And what a stocking stuffer this makes!



"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 04:35pm
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Posts: 24229
Location: Robot Hell
Master of Ossus wrote:
*Raises toast with Dalton* And what a stocking stuffer this makes!


"Q bless us, everyone!"



Superior Moderator - BotM - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 04:53pm
Tipsy Space Birdie
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
Posts: 12547
Holy Mother of Beavis and Butthead, that is hilarity? How is it that DarkStar is fucking arguing with people who actually freaking work for the franchise as professional writers, some of which who have actually written for the show, and the woman who actually reads all Trek literature as quality control?

Actually, my bigger question is why he warranted those people's time and effort to brutally cockslap him in a hilarious way not often seen outside of Tekken? He should be on his belly like a fucking worm in gratitude that they people with actual jobs in the industry are good enough to give him their time and he insults them and says he knows better.

I want to yell "Oh SNAP!" like Ling Ling confronted with soiled panties at the beating he received, but I also want to kick his ass in a dark alley for the shame of knowing who he is.



"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet

"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert

"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 05:08pm
Sith Marauder
User avatar

Joined: 2004-03-26 02:31pm
Posts: 3699
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA
Of course, how could the ST authors and Paula Block, Senior Director of Licensed Publishing at Viacom Consumer Products, be correct on the Star Trek canon when Leland Chee (as well as LFL) is wrong on the Star Wars canon and only Darkstar himself knows the true canon of the two franchises?

+http://forums.starwars.com/thread.jspa?threadID=408&start=1950

Oh, and it seems as if KevinK has joined the boards...
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=82036



(I)t all has to show impeccable logic and unflawed realism, even if it deals with a different galaxy and an era 3,000 years in the past or the future.- George Lucas about Star Wars

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 05:15pm
Sith Devotee
User avatar

Joined: 2003-02-07 01:49pm
Posts: 2627
Location: Surrounded by fundies who mock other fundies
I actually stood up and applauded to RSA after reading this.

By schooling the LFL officials he showed how dishonest he could be.

By this fiasco he showed us how shameless he could be.

The next 2 steps in the RSA Agenda: Lucas, and an Ouija Board for Roddenberry.



Image
1st Plt. Comm. of the Warwolves
Member of Justice League
"People can't see Buddha so they say he doesn't have a body, since his body is formed of atoms, of course you can't see it. Saying he doesn't have a body is correct"- Li HongZhi

Take the Udumbara Challenge!

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 05:36pm
Youngling
User avatar

Joined: 2005-04-21 01:38am
Posts: 60
Location: A blasted nuclear wasteland - Slough
Forgive me, but might I ask what Darkstar hopes to achieve by debating the canonicity of "Mosaic" and "Pathways"? I mean is there really anything in those two novels (or any other Star Trek novel for that matter) that would allow the Federation to defeat the Galactic Empire? I sincerely doubt it.

It's also interesting to note that the two novels mentioned above were only considered "quasi-canon" in the first place, and had no further bearing on Voyager as soon as the author left the Voyager production team, effectively rendering them non-canon. Does this mean that they might be removed from SD.net's canon database in the future?

But aside from my observations, my main question is "why?"



Raver|Metalhead|Stoner|Atheist|Anarchist|Transhumanist|Technocrat

ImageImage
PRFYNAFBTFC - Commander MFS Cockslapping Cannon Fodder

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 05:42pm
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
User avatar

Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Posts: 68896
Location: Toronto, Canada
NoXion wrote:
Forgive me, but might I ask what Darkstar hopes to achieve by debating the canonicity of "Mosaic" and "Pathways"? I mean is there really anything in those two novels (or any other Star Trek novel for that matter) that would allow the Federation to defeat the Galactic Empire? I sincerely doubt it.

It's also interesting to note that the two novels mentioned above were only considered "quasi-canon" in the first place, and had no further bearing on Voyager as soon as the author left the Voyager production team, effectively rendering them non-canon. Does this mean that they might be removed from SD.net's canon database in the future?

But aside from my observations, my main question is "why?"

Perhaps he found something in those novels which he really wants to include as evidence. It's interesting how the debate over what is canon has become such a wild-eyed obsession with him. My own site lists numerous different approaches, stipulates that it's a matter of personal choice, and only demands that you be consistent in your approach. He, on the other hand, rants and raves endlessly about the "correct" canon policy (oops, I forgot: he always capitalizes Canon Policy).



Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 05:46pm
Jedi Knight
User avatar

Joined: 2002-12-06 01:24pm
Posts: 934
Location: The Pillar of Autumn
I thought Kevin's post was brilliant, and spot on as far as RSA is concerned. And Paula brought up some interesting info, I didn't know Gene felt the way he did in regards to Trek canon and such.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:  PostPosted: 2005-12-16 05:48pm
Youngling
User avatar

Joined: 2005-04-21 01:38am
Posts: 60
Location: A blasted nuclear wasteland - Slough
Darth Wong wrote:
Perhaps he found something in those novels which he really wants to include as evidence. It's interesting how the debate over what is canon has become such a wild-eyed obsession with him. My own site lists numerous different approaches, stipulates that it's a matter of personal choice, and only demands that you be consistent in your approach. He, on the other hand, rants and raves endlessly about the "correct" canon policy (oops, I forgot: he always capitalizes Canon Policy).


About the canon thing; I would take it as a sign of true desperation when one takes a debate (In this case, could the Empire kick the Fed's arse) from focusing on analysing on-screen evidence, which is fair enough, to the most obscure depths of the canon policies of LFL and Paramount respectively.

This is probably an extraneous observation, but I cannot imagine a single day in which Darkstar does not think of his endless Jihad against Star Wars.



Raver|Metalhead|Stoner|Atheist|Anarchist|Transhumanist|Technocrat

ImageImage
PRFYNAFBTFC - Commander MFS Cockslapping Cannon Fodder

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 185 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

It is currently 2010-07-30 06:30am


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group