Now, I have produced the numbers you demanded. They may be technologically infeasible, but they are

*not*scientifically impossible.

**YOU HAVE CLAIMED THAT YOUR ALTERNATE THEORY IS FEASIBLE. THIS MEANS YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO PRODUCE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THIS TO BE THE CASE, OTHERWISE YOU HAVE BEEN LYING THE WHOLE TIME AND YOU ACTUALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHETHER IT IS FEASIBLE OR EVEN SCIENTIFICALLY POSSIBLE**.

So,

**YOU HAVE 24 HOURS TO PRODUCE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT YOUR ALTERNATE MECHANISM IS SCIENTIFICALLY POSSIBLE AND WOULD REQUIRE LESS ACTIVATION ENERGY THAN THE CONVENTIONAL ONE.**

We're all tired of your bullshit, Stewart. You claim to be a nuclear weapons expert, and tout this totally unverified and heretofore completely unsubstantiated "expertise" at every opportunity. You now have 24 hours to prove it. Let's see those calculations, shithead.