
Shot of the pan, frizzen and jaws:

Pan, frizzen, jaws and touchhole:

Sabot (L) and some cheap bulk ammo for target shooting (R):

Now with flint installed:

I know the pictures suck, seem to have a problem taking decent ones.
Moderator: Beowulf
Exactly what I was thinking. Very strange dichotomy indeed with the wildly anachronistic combination of advanced sights and stock with such an ancient action. The case-hardened parts are beautiful and well-figured as well.Ilya Muromets wrote:There's something both strange yet pretty cool about an old-style muzzle-loader actually having an apparently plastic stock.
Yes, you have to load the powder and shot separately, down the muzzle of the weapon. This one isn't a traditional flintlock, as it can use "pellets" as well as traditional powder, which cuts down on the loading time and is just plain easier to use. This one was also designed to use either conical bullets (Minie ball), sabot or the traditional ball and patch, the later will be less accurate thanks to the type of rifling twist though.Venator wrote:What can you tell us about it (other than that it looks downright awesome)?
I really don't know much about firearms of that era beyond "they take a long time to reload"... do you have to load the powder separately/what kind of effective range/etc.?
I've been thinking about picking up one of their flintlock pistols (the one in your link uses a percussion cap), though I'm also tempted by their Josey Wales reproduction.Bounty wrote: I've always liked the look of flintlock, especially pistols. Not to shoot, just... the look.
It's amazing they still make these guns. Understandable, since there's bound to be a market for them, but still, amazing.
EDIT: Now this is what I'm talking about.
JointStrikeFighter wrote:Needs picatinny rails.
Not for flashlights, silly. For the 40mm under-barrel grenade launcher.Cpl Kendall wrote:JointStrikeFighter wrote:Needs picatinny rails.Yeah, I can see why I'd need a flashlight on that.
And a pouch for the matches you use to hand-light the grenade fuses.Ryan Thunder wrote:Not for flashlights, silly. For the 40mm under-barrel grenade launcher.Cpl Kendall wrote:JointStrikeFighter wrote:Needs picatinny rails.Yeah, I can see why I'd need a flashlight on that.
Would that point be at the holographic sight, or the laser?Venator wrote:Seriously, lads, as odd as it is to see a flintlock in tactical black, there is a point of transition from "tacticool" to simply "wrong".
...cannot be unseenSimplicius wrote:*snip image*
tim31 wrote:Aaron.
Get video footage or ban.
...cannot be unseenSimplicius wrote:*snip image*
Simplicius wrote:Would that point be at the holographic sight, or the laser?Venator wrote:Seriously, lads, as odd as it is to see a flintlock in tactical black, there is a point of transition from "tacticool" to simply "wrong".
![]()
*snip*
That honestly could be the coolest thing I have seen in recent memory.Simplicius wrote:Would that point be at the holographic sight, or the laser? :P
[*snip*]