The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Post Reply
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by FaxModem1 »

NPR
The middle class through the Hollywood lens
House Beautiful

The kitchen portrayed in "It's Complicated" was featured in House Beautiful magazine.

Subscribe to podcast
Download audio
Embed player
Audio player assistance
Pop-Up

by Krissy Clark
Marketplace for Friday, June 28, 2013

Story

Consumer spending drives most of the growth in the American economy. And that spending depends on having enough people with enough disposable income that they're willing and able to spend. It's a group of people we like to call the Middle Class. Chances are you consider yourself one of them. But how do we decide who qualifies as middle class, and how much stuff it takes to be part of it?

Those questions have no straight answers. But a good place to find a sort of collective image of what the middle class looks like and how that image has changed over the years is Hollywood.

Once upon a time, in the 1950s, when America was still working out just what the middle class was, you could see the question getting hashed out on screen. Up until then, we talked more about two different ends of what we now call the middle class: wage earners on the one hand and salary men on the other. Each group was portrayed in Hollywood.

When Ernest Borgnine won his Oscar for "Marty," he was playing a classic wage-earner -- a butcher.


On the salary man side, Gregory Peck embodied the archetype when he played Tom Rath in "The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit."


By the end of the '50s, it was clear that the optimism Betsy Rath expressed in that clip was well-founded. The economy was booming. Upward mobility seemed really possible. So much so that the worlds of salary man and wage earner began to merge.

In July of 1959, there was a sort of official declaration of this fact by the United States government, when the Department of Labor released a report titled “How American Buying Habits Change.”

“Today the wage earner's way of life is well nigh indistinguishable from that of his salaried co-citizens,” the report announced. “Their homes, their cars, their baby sitters, the style of the clothes their wives and children wear, the food they eat, the bank or lending institution where they establish credit, their days off, the education of their children, their church -- all of these are alike and are becoming more nearly identical.”

Or, as Kathleen Newman, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University who studies mass media and society, paraphrases: “Guess what, we did it, everyone's middle class. We can relax now.”

And Hollywood began to reflect that storyline back to us. We stopped seeing many Marty the Butchers. We got lots of men in suits, from Ward Cleaver in "Leave it to Beaver" all the way through Dr. Huxtable in "The Cosby Show" (who may have been famous for his colorful sweaters, but whose job as a doctor and well-appointed home put him squarely in the white-collar middle class.)

For a while at least, Hollywood's airbrushed version of the middle class made some sense. Wages for average workers were rising. A blue collar job could afford you a lot of the stuff a white collar family had. But by the late 1970s that trend was in reverse. Since then, the gap between the two ends of the middle class has only continued to widen. And Hollywood has been less quick to chart that new direction.

This disconnect was made painfully clear to a set decorator named Rosemary Brandenburg several years ago, when she was working on the set for "Castaway." Before Tom Hanks gets in that plane crash and has to survive on a desert island, there's a scene at his girlfriend's parents house, eating Christmas dinner.

“We were asked to make a ‘typical middle class’ dining room/ living room,” Brandenburg remembers. “And I was too shy to go to our director and ask him which middle class he really wanted.”

That’s when Brandenburg made her mistake.

“I made middle class in my life, which was old fashioned granny lamp shade, print couches and a La-Z-Boy chair, printed wall paper.” In short, a working class version of a "typical middle class home” -- well loved, a little bit shabby.

When Rosemary had the set ready, the director came to see. “He walked in and just hated it. Said ‘What have you done here? I mean this looks like grandma's house!’ He had in mind someone with much more upscale tastes, and up-to-date furnishings.

Brandenburg complied with the director’s version of the middle class. She redid the set, lampshade to wallpaper. Here’s a clip -- it’s a little dark, but if you look closely you’ll notice the fancier props.


After the "Castaway" experience, Brandenburg says she never worked for that director again. But she says she also learned an important lesson. “One can't assume that middle class is middle class,” she says. Especially in Hollywood.

Hollywood's inflated version of the middle class is still alive and well. Think about the TV show "New Girl," where a bunch of 20-somethings on teacher, bartender, research assistant and “junior lead marketing associate” salaries, live in a gorgeous loft in L.A.

Then there’s that movie from a couple years ago, "It's Complicated," where Meryl Streep plays a baker who somehow lives in a House Beautiful-worthy home -- literally, it was featured in the magazine -- in Santa Barbara, where the kitchen alone looks like it cost a fortune. Oh yeah, and the plot of the movie centers around a remodel of said kitchen, so Streep’s character can finally get a “real” one.


Of course there’s nothing wrong with dreaming. And Hollywood never pretended to be anything but pretend. But consider this observation, from Damon Silvers, a labor lawyer for the AFL-CIO. When he watches this stuff, he thinks about how it shapes the collective image we have of ourselves.

“There is a tendency to imagine that we live in a country where the typical family makes $150,000 a year. But half of all American households have incomes less than $55,000 a year,” he says. “So there's a kind of a cognitive problem here. We don't live in the country we think we live in. The world that is projected as middle class in the media is a world that no more than something like 15 percent of America can afford.”

And yet, a lot of us try to afford it. Often by getting in lots of debt.http://www.marketplace.org/topics/wealt ... ywood-lens
Personally, I think this shows a rather alarming disconnect with what people think the country is, and what the country should be, and that Hollywood is continuing it.

Though, this could be due to the fact that most of them make rather large salaries themselves, and so they haven't seen the other half in so long that they are genuinely ignorant of it.
Image
User avatar
Meest
Jedi Master
Posts: 1429
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:04am
Location: Toronto

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Meest »

Would be interesting to see if directors or producers who grew up middle class or lower care about those details. Would say majority of the people that do make it in Hollywood had a decent upbringing with the odd breakthrough person who had it hard, just check the bios on current movie makers, generalizing they mostly had well to do parents or family in the business.

Hard to judge at least from my perspective because the homes I grew up in and knew in Canada didn't have a great room, that big open living space like say in Married with Children, where kitchen and family room is exposed with no walls, so everything looks too big. In movies especially down and out comedy movies, where the guy is supposed to be down on his luck yet lives in at least a 3000 sq ft home or crazy downtown apartment that should be beyond the rent they could afford seems to be the norm. Then they go too far with the shit holes so it seems to be an either or situation, complete ghetto shit hole or upper middle class mini mansion.
"Somehow I feel, that in the long run, Thanos of Titan came out ahead in this particular deal."
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by fgalkin »

So, do we call this brave new style of filmmaking Capitalist Realism? :lol:

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by FaxModem1 »

I always thought a good example was Roseanne, it seemed like a house for those who lived in the lower class, and having to make do with two blue collar parents. The house felt lived in, and a bit cramped with all the members of the family they had.
Image
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Metahive »

That actually goes back even further. Look at Donald Duck for example, someone's who's supposed to be always down on his luck, broke and without a steady job, yet except for Duck Tales, where's he a Navy sailor, he's always portrayed as living in a neat, nicely groomed and spacious suburbian home.
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Questor
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1601
Joined: 2002-07-17 06:27pm
Location: Landover

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Questor »

Metahive, is that coming from the comics/cartoons from the US, or the exclusive german ones? I never associated Donald with "Down on your luck", but then I've never really taken the time to look deeply at the character.

The point about hollywood is well taken, although I wonder how much of it is socio-economic and how much is practical. If you listen to the creators commentary on several Friends episodes (and many other movies/sitcoms set in large urban areas) there is a repeated theme of "We know that this is completely unrealistic, but we just CAN'T shoot our show in a realistic 5-600 square ft apartment that two people might share in (X)." When I think of movies or shows that show actual sized living spaces for their characters, none of them are actually set in those spaces.

Do other production locations do a better job? I'm trying to think of homes that I've seen on BBC's fiction lineup, and I"m not thinking of any that I'd consider "realistically sized" for a middle-income earner. Rose's mother's apartments are bigger than mine, and I remember there being some kind of excuse for Sherlock. Luthor's in a job that would be at the upper-range of middle-income in the US.

It may be that accurately portraying a true middle-class home is impractical in the visual medium. The obvious counter-argument is Apollo 13, but then, that's an exceptional movie.

EDIT: Here's an interesting thought, Fraiser (Fraiser) and Charlie Harper (Two and a Half Men)'s homes are not actually that much bigger than the unrealistic homes we're discussing. Most of the other "Could afford a bigger than average home" characters homes seem to focus on roughly the same size.

EDIT: I'd love to hear Kanastrous's thoughts on this one.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28773
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Broomstick »

In the US, the space available to a family of a given socio-economic level can vary enormously. In New York City even the rich live in comparatively small spaces due to population density and the value of real estate. In rural America even the very poor may, in fact, have a rambling home (perhaps repeatedly added on to for a couple generations) on a large spread of land. Most live somewhere in between those two extremes. I have 1,100 square feet of living space, room to park two vehicles, and a decent back yard despite living at or below the poverty line, whereas someone living in New York City would need to have a MUCH higher income, by a couple orders of magnitude, in order to have the same amount of space in, say, Manhattan. A poor farm family in a rambling, sprawling house isn't too far from reality. 20-somethings just starting their careers having lavish apartments in a big city is whack.

The difficulty of filming in a small space is not trivial, although smaller and more portable cameras make this less of a problem these days.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7455
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Zaune »

Questor wrote:Do other production locations do a better job? I'm trying to think of homes that I've seen on BBC's fiction lineup, and I"m not thinking of any that I'd consider "realistically sized" for a middle-income earner. Rose's mother's apartments are bigger than mine, and I remember there being some kind of excuse for Sherlock. Luthor's in a job that would be at the upper-range of middle-income in the US.
Rose Tyler's mother lives in what looks like public housing; either she's renting from the local council, who generally charge quite a bit less than the private sector, or she took advantage of the right-to-buy legislation in the 80s before the housing market in this country went cuckoo for Coco Pops. And Sherlock is getting a very generous deal because Mrs Hudson owes him a large favour; the details are somewhat vague but apparently he's partly responsible for putting her husband behind bars.

And we are definitely not the first people to notice this one. See you in four hours.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
User avatar
Ubiquitous
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2821
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:07pm

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Ubiquitous »

Thanks for sharing this article. This is something [as a foreigner] that has always puzzled me about US entertainment: the houses all appear to be so vast and wonderful. I'm interested to learn that it is mainly an illusion decorated by out-of-touch Hollywood types.
"I'm personally against seeing my pictures and statues in the streets - but it's what the people want." - Saparmurat Niyazov
"I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent." - Q
HAB Military Intelligence: Providing sexed-up dodgy dossiers for illegal invasions since 2003.
User avatar
Spekio
Jedi Knight
Posts: 762
Joined: 2009-09-15 12:34pm
Location: Brazil

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Spekio »

Ubiquitous wrote:Thanks for sharing this article. This is something [as a foreigner] that has always puzzled me about US entertainment: the houses all appear to be so vast and wonderful. I'm interested to learn that it is mainly an illusion decorated by out-of-touch Hollywood types.
Same here.

In that vein: Is Walter White´s House on Breaking Bad really low middle class?
User avatar
starslayer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 731
Joined: 2008-04-04 08:40pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by starslayer »

There's a couple things in Walt's case that make his house plausible. One, he's in New Mexico, an area with fairly cheap real estate (the median home value in Albuquerque is only ~$175k). Two, he lost his job as a research or industrial chemist before the show. That job probably paid him well north of $100k/yr, given where he seemed to be in his career before the show. Is it a lower middle class house, especially given the quality of the furnishings and stuff? No. But it is an upper middle class house that might reasonably be maintained for a while on a lower middle class budget.
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Metahive »

Questor wrote:Metahive, is that coming from the comics/cartoons from the US, or the exclusive german ones? I never associated Donald with "Down on your luck", but then I've never really taken the time to look deeply at the character.
In the comics Donald's frequently shown unable to hold down a steady job and his bad luck is often contrasted with the perpetually lucky Gladstone Gander. He's also constantly in debt with Scrooge and gets many times blackmailed into providing work for his cheapskate uncle for free because of it.
Yet despite all this he lives, as mentioned, in a spacious, neat suburban home.
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
FTeik
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2035
Joined: 2002-07-16 04:12pm

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by FTeik »

Metahive wrote:
Questor wrote:Metahive, is that coming from the comics/cartoons from the US, or the exclusive german ones? I never associated Donald with "Down on your luck", but then I've never really taken the time to look deeply at the character.
In the comics Donald's frequently shown unable to hold down a steady job and his bad luck is often contrasted with the perpetually lucky Gladstone Gander. He's also constantly in debt with Scrooge and gets many times blackmailed into providing work for his cheapskate uncle for free because of it.
Yet despite all this he lives, as mentioned, in a spacious, neat suburban home.
At least in the german comics - IIRC - the home of Donald is owned by his uncle Scrooge.
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.

"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10314
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

Speaking from Israel, tv shows here do tend to portray living standards of families relatively well - i.e rather small crappy block apartment for most families living in cities, including middle upper class ones...
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Metahive »

FTeik wrote:At least in the german comics - IIRC - the home of Donald is owned by his uncle Scrooge.
Not always, there's a (very old) Lustiges Taschenbuch (I think the one with the stories from 1001 Arabian Nights), where the linking story is Donald's feud with the guy who sold him the home and who tries to collect the money for it. It ends with Scrooge paying off the debt for some favor.
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Silver Jedi
Padawan Learner
Posts: 299
Joined: 2002-07-24 12:15am
Location: The D of C
Contact:

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Silver Jedi »

Broomstick wrote:20-somethings just starting their careers having lavish apartments in a big city is whack.
Friends was especially bad about this. At the beginning of the series, the only real "salary man" in the group was Chandler. Joey was perpetually out of work until he landed the spot on Days of Our Lives, Rachel worked at the coffee shop, Monica was a chief, and Phoebe was a Masseuse. Yet somehow they were able to afford these huge apartments in uptown Manhattan. I always assumed Chandler was paying the majority of the rent in the guys' place, and I suppose Monica could have been doing the same across the hall (she did seem to be a really good chef at an upscale restaurant). Ross, meanwhile, must have been the best paid professor at NYU to afford Ugly Naked Guy's old place.

Interestingly, Seinfield, another NBC 90's sitcom set in New York is much better about this. Jerry and Kramer have large apartments, but Jerry has a very successful career as a comedian, while Kramer... well, we don't really know where his money came from, but he is implied to have plenty of it. Elaine lives in the same neighborhood, but again she is a professional with successful career. George, on the other hand, whose professional life is much less stable, has to live with his parents in another borough.
starslayer wrote:There's a couple things in Walt's case that make his house plausible. One, he's in New Mexico, an area with fairly cheap real estate (the median home value in Albuquerque is only ~$175k). Two, he lost his job as a research or industrial chemist before the show. That job probably paid him well north of $100k/yr, given where he seemed to be in his career before the show. Is it a lower middle class house, especially given the quality of the furnishings and stuff? No. But it is an upper middle class house that might reasonably be maintained for a while on a lower middle class budget.
IIRC, Skyler specifiably worries that the place is too big and expensive for them, but Walt convinces her that they can afford it because of his job. they very well may have had the place completely paid off before Walt lost his good job, which makes maintaining it on a teacher's salary a lot more realistic.
Not a n00b, just a lurker

108th post on Wed Jun 28, 2006 A Whoop!

200th post on Fri Feb 3, 2012 Six months shy of a decade!
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by tim31 »

For those who refused to click the link Zaune provided, here's a quote that bears on the topic:

"Without a doubt, the combined forces of Carrie, Samantha, Charlotte, and Miranda have been more devastating to life in New York than anything dreamed up by Roland Emmerich or Michael Bay. As a cable series, Sex turned New York's way of life upside down — convincing millions of Midwest dreamers that they could afford a one-bedroom Manhattan apartment by writing a single newspaper column every four months, that they could subsist entirely on Cosmos and pastries, and that they would magically have enough free time and disposable income to lunch with the girls in between Manolo Blahnik shopping sprees. Utterly devastating."
— Premiere.com, "20 Movies That Destroy New York"
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16300
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by Gandalf »

Silver Jedi wrote:Friends was especially bad about this. At the beginning of the series, the only real "salary man" in the group was Chandler. Joey was perpetually out of work until he landed the spot on Days of Our Lives, Rachel worked at the coffee shop, Monica was a chief, and Phoebe was a Masseuse. Yet somehow they were able to afford these huge apartments in uptown Manhattan. I always assumed Chandler was paying the majority of the rent in the guys' place, and I suppose Monica could have been doing the same across the hall (she did seem to be a really good chef at an upscale restaurant). Ross, meanwhile, must have been the best paid professor at NYU to afford Ugly Naked Guy's old place.
Monica illegally sublet the apartment from her grandmother. That might explain some of the costs, especially if the place is rent controlled or some such.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12738
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Questor wrote:Metahive, is that coming from the comics/cartoons from the US, or the exclusive german ones? I never associated Donald with "Down on your luck", but then I've never really taken the time to look deeply at the character.
Here in Finland/Sweden Donald Duck is really bloody popular (mickey mouse is a scrub) and I read thousands upon thousands of DD magazines as a kid, including old ones from the 1960s and eariler and DD being down on his luck, being poor etc was always a constant theme. Yet he always had a house and he always had time & money to lie in his hammock and drink soda.

This was something I wondered about as a kid numerous times and hey other people noticed it too I see.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10314
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

His Divine Shadow wrote: Here in Finland/Sweden Donald Duck is really bloody popular (mickey mouse is a scrub) and I read thousands upon thousands of DD magazines as a kid, including old ones from the 1960s and eariler and DD being down on his luck, being poor etc was always a constant theme. Yet he always had a house and he always had time & money to lie in his hammock and drink soda.

This was something I wondered about as a kid numerous times and hey other people noticed it too I see.
... Isn't that the average living level in Finland/Sweden? :P
(Well, Finland 50 years ago less so, but still - Scandinavian welfare states and all ;))
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12738
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Depends on what kinda poor you where, a poor farmer in a rural area could have a house and some facilities for animals and barely make do selling milk and meat.

You never had the time to lie about like that though, always in the woods picking berries during summers when you had time off from harvesting hay and other crops, and when you didn't have to do any of that and the animals didn't need taking care off then you chopped wood for the fire (including cutting down trees and dragging them home and drying them). Don't forget to plant the potatoes for personal consumption though, and keep that vegetable garden going if you want to eat vegetables, the "grocery bus" only comes two times a week.

That there was my grandfather and grandmothers life, as well as my dads childhood pretty much. I had it a bit easier myself, the "grocery bus" BTW stayed in business until the late 90s and it was always fun on wednesdays and saturdays if you had a few markkas to spend on candy as a kid in the late 80s.

If you where poor in an urban area I guess you lived in some small shitty apartment in a crappy neighborhood, counting the days until deaths release.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23194
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: The Middle Class through the Hollywood lens

Post by LadyTevar »

Also in rural areas, housing can be quite relative. My mother lives in my grandmother's out. One of my cousins moved into my paternal grandmother's house for a time. Another has taken over her great-grandmother's house. In rural towns, if a house is still standing in good shape, there's usually some cousin or family member who could use it. Thus, you get a newly-wed couple in a 4bedroom house, cause Uncle had to go in the Nursing Home.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
Post Reply