Probably as you look over at my name, you see "newbie" there. I am still trying to get the tone of this board. Being new, I emulated the behavior of people who post.
The example you set is one of sophomopric name-calling.
Welcome to SD.net, idiot. If you don't like it, leave.
You demand the posting of URLs for any statement you disagree with, yet I have yet to see you post one on any of your Anti-American claptrap...
Oooh, I'm 'anti-American' now.
You know the stuff, "Bush is a moron" "Americans have no culture" "Saddam knew nothing" and the like.
Hey, look, a bunch of moron strawmen! Surely you can do better
Now I havn't called you on any of this because in the course of my reading, I have probably read the piece you are slavishly repeating. I have (no doubt mistakenly) tentatively accepted your word as to what you claim as fact, depending on your intellectual integrity to help along a minor conversational thread.
The very fact that you think the undisputed fact of not finding any WMD in Iraq despite Bush's public proclamations of thousands of litres of the stuff and an 'active nuclear weapons program' needs 'calling on' speaks volumes of your pitiful knowledge base.
While you claim my style to be that of a "Moron" you don't understand that you have indicted your own style. Let me narrow this down for you. You are a closed-minded little pseudo-sophist who wants to hide behind proceedural rules rather than cut to the issues like an adult.
Funny, I'm not the one making unsupported bullshit claims without backing them up, and hiding behind pathetic style-over-substance fallacies to cover up the fact that I don't have an argument. Unlike you.
You are a loudmouthed little shikepoke whose main debating tools are the argumentum ad hominem
Look, the pretentious tit is using latin! Learn the rules of logic, you ignorant hatfucker- if the insult is the *whole* of the argument, then it's an adhominem. If I argue with you and call you an asslicking spastic on top of that, it's not an ad hominem. Dumbass.
the appeal to (supposed) authority
Funny, please point out where I appealed to any authority, you intellectual pygmy.
and the fallacy of repetition.
You are a frightened little fool.
Funny, I'm not the one making unsupported claims and refusing to back them up.
You don't want to understand the other side of the argument, you just want to shout the other fellow into submission.
Shouting? I'm shouting now?
You have the morals of a spoiled nine year old, and the maturity to match.
Hello style over substance fallacy.
Just so you are sure to know you've been insulted, put an appropriate remark about your Mother right here.
Eat me, moron.
Politics *does* get heated sometimes. It doesn't *have* to because people of good conscience disagree. The hashing out of political matters is for *grownups*, and if you can't do any better than you have been doing, I suggest you have Mum change your nappies and put you to bed until your attitude improves. Five years ought to do it.
Yes yes that's all very well and good. Luckily, your pathetic non-debate on this thread is open for all to see.
1: You have failed to present any evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11, as you pathetically attempted to insinuate.
3: You didn't back up your assertion that American involvement in Bosnia was France's doing
4: You seem to be living in some sort of fantasy land that WMD have actually been found in Iraq.
Do fuck off now, and if we're lucky, you won't come back.