The thing is that in other countries this process is generally not a public circus. There's just a direct national vote of party members (registered ones, not just anyone who shows up registered for the day) between the candidates and maybe a runoff vote if it's not decided.Rogue 9 wrote: Who the fuck is the political party if not the people comprising it?
[Official Thread] OBAMA WINS RE-ELECTION
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
The primaries themselves are exactly that, really- the details may vary, but it's always a process in which party members gather and vote.
The US system is different because the parties are set up to give substantial local autonomy to the states- the nomination is decided province by province instead of by national vote. That's a big advantage for states like Iowa, which have a long tradition of holding their primaries early, which means that they get extra influence over a candidate's prospects by controlling whether they get to build momentum in the opening weeks.
It didn't used to be such a circus, but various states started scheduling their primaries earlier and earlier to get more leverage at the expense of other states, until next thing you know, there are primaries being held three to six months before the nomination is officially made, and almost a year before the general election. It also doesn't help that the political media deems events in those few states (like Iowa) to be of huge interest, so they send mobs of reporters to cover the early rounds of primaries for the 'race horse' aspect.
The US system is different because the parties are set up to give substantial local autonomy to the states- the nomination is decided province by province instead of by national vote. That's a big advantage for states like Iowa, which have a long tradition of holding their primaries early, which means that they get extra influence over a candidate's prospects by controlling whether they get to build momentum in the opening weeks.
It didn't used to be such a circus, but various states started scheduling their primaries earlier and earlier to get more leverage at the expense of other states, until next thing you know, there are primaries being held three to six months before the nomination is officially made, and almost a year before the general election. It also doesn't help that the political media deems events in those few states (like Iowa) to be of huge interest, so they send mobs of reporters to cover the early rounds of primaries for the 'race horse' aspect.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
- White Haven
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 6360
- Joined: 2004-05-17 03:14pm
- Location: The North Remembers, When It Can Be Bothered
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
Given that one state constitution is written to mandate being the first primary, I've got this utter urge to troll the entire system by getting such an amendment written into another state constitution. At which point you can just sit there and watch as both states are legally mandated to one-up each other, racing back along the calendar until they actually enter the previous election cycle.
Chronological Incontinence: Time warps around the poster. The thread topic winks out of existence and reappears in 1d10 posts.
Out of Context Theatre, this week starring Darth Nostril.
-'If you really want to fuck with these idiots tell them that there is a vaccine for chemtrails.'
Fiction!: The Final War (Bolo/Lovecraft) (Ch 7 9/15/11), Living (D&D, Complete)
Out of Context Theatre, this week starring Darth Nostril.
-'If you really want to fuck with these idiots tell them that there is a vaccine for chemtrails.'
Fiction!: The Final War (Bolo/Lovecraft) (Ch 7 9/15/11), Living (D&D, Complete)
- Metatwaddle
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: 2003-07-07 07:29am
- Location: Up the Amazon on a Rubber Duck
- Contact:
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
The constant one-upmanship has been tried. In 2008, Michigan and... Florida, I think it was, tried scheduling their primaries before they were "allowed" to, maybe before the Iowa caucus. The parties just refused to accept their delegates at the convention.
Public funding for elections and candidates would be wonderful and I'm all in favor of it, but it would almost certainly require a (US) constitutional amendment. I'm sure we can all see how unlikely it is that a bunch of politicians who won elections by outspending their opponents would ever vote for such a thing.
Public funding for elections and candidates would be wonderful and I'm all in favor of it, but it would almost certainly require a (US) constitutional amendment. I'm sure we can all see how unlikely it is that a bunch of politicians who won elections by outspending their opponents would ever vote for such a thing.
Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things... their number is negligible and they are stupid. --Dwight D. Eisenhower
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
But will they win by outspending their opponent this year?
The big difference is that american politics are focused WAY more on single persons. And there is much more "bombard-them-with-ads" hard-sell in american media. To european sensibilities the whole primary process comes off as patently ridiculous. I am not judging, it's just a cultural difference.
That's nothing special. But e.g. here in Germany we simply decide in local meetings whom we send to the federal convention.Simon_Jester wrote:The primaries themselves are exactly that, really- the details may vary, but it's always a process in which party members gather and vote.
The US system is different because the parties are set up to give substantial local autonomy to the states- the nomination is decided province by province instead of by national vote.
The big difference is that american politics are focused WAY more on single persons. And there is much more "bombard-them-with-ads" hard-sell in american media. To european sensibilities the whole primary process comes off as patently ridiculous. I am not judging, it's just a cultural difference.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/test
Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.74
This is pre-WWII. You can sort of tell from the sketch style, from thee way it refers to Japan (Japan in the 1950s was still rebuilding from WWII), the spelling of Tokyo, lots of details. Nothing obvious... except that the upper right hand corner of the page reads "November 1931." --- Simon_Jester
Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.74
This is pre-WWII. You can sort of tell from the sketch style, from thee way it refers to Japan (Japan in the 1950s was still rebuilding from WWII), the spelling of Tokyo, lots of details. Nothing obvious... except that the upper right hand corner of the page reads "November 1931." --- Simon_Jester
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
Well, it's not completely impossible. The Senate passed the 17th Amendment, after all. But it would take a massive grassroots campaign and probably the threat of the states calling a constitutional convention. So you'd also have to get the state legislatures on board (again, not impossible--it was the threat of a convention that got Congress to pass the 17th), but it would be a big, hard, long-term project.Metatwaddle wrote:The constant one-upmanship has been tried. In 2008, Michigan and... Florida, I think it was, tried scheduling their primaries before they were "allowed" to, maybe before the Iowa caucus. The parties just refused to accept their delegates at the convention.
Public funding for elections and candidates would be wonderful and I'm all in favor of it, but it would almost certainly require a (US) constitutional amendment. I'm sure we can all see how unlikely it is that a bunch of politicians who won elections by outspending their opponents would ever vote for such a thing.
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
Wasn't the 17th Amendment passed something like 90 years ago? It's not impossible; but following the same model is well into the "highly improbable" category given the changes since 1913.
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
Changes such as what? What specific changes make a successful grassroots push for political change less likely today?Zinegata wrote:Wasn't the 17th Amendment passed something like 90 years ago? It's not impossible; but following the same model is well into the "highly improbable" category given the changes since 1913.
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
Citizens United enabling Super-pacs to flood local markets with political messages against your message. The general apathy of the America voter, the morphing of the media from a reporting industry to entertainment with news actors reading the copy of the AP and adding analysis that was 100% political talking points and 0% actual analysis.RedImperator wrote:Changes such as what? What specific changes make a successful grassroots push for political change less likely today?Zinegata wrote:Wasn't the 17th Amendment passed something like 90 years ago? It's not impossible; but following the same model is well into the "highly improbable" category given the changes since 1913.
Also the fact that since the 80's the Constitution has been turned from our founding document into our Holy Scripture so the idea of calling a Constitutional convention is greeted much the same by the average America as if you had asked to convene the Council of Cardinals to add the Book of Adam and Steve to the Bible.
"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
The real question is how much foam and fluff and talking heads and bribed obscurantism in politics the American masses are willing to stand. It's gotten vastly worse in the past ten years, but that doesn't mean it can keep getting worse indefinitely. We're already seeing ripples of discontent from the ends of the political spectrum, people no longer willing to work within the system the way they did in 2008.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the American people collectively balk at their treatment within the next ten to twenty years, to the point where a constitutional convention becomes a credible (if difficult) possibility.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the American people collectively balk at their treatment within the next ten to twenty years, to the point where a constitutional convention becomes a credible (if difficult) possibility.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
- bobalot
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 2008-05-21 06:42am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
Following calculations are when the results were at 31133 votes (91% reporting).Mr Bean wrote:Okay some numbers time now we are at 75% reporting in Nevada
Total votes in Nevada are roughly 25k atm.
Mormons were roughly 25% and 88% of them voted for Romney, so that's more like 22%.Mr Bean wrote:Of that vote total 27% were Mormon votes of which were Romney votes.
Now it's 31133 x 25% x 88% = 6850 (rounded up).Mr Bean wrote:25k x 27% = 6750 votes x .92% = 6210 Mormon votes for Romney
Now it's 15429. Arbitrarily taking away the Mormon vote of 6850, leaves 8579 non-Mormon voters for Romney.Mr Bean wrote:As Romney's vote total is currently 11822 minus that 6210 we get a vote total of 5612
Mr Bean wrote:Which means if the Mormons had not been in Neveda period New Gingrich would have won Nevada.
His current total non-Mormon vote is actually higher than any other candidate. Gingrich is on 6621, Ron Paul is on 5,901 and Santorum is on 3,182 (at 91% counted).
In summation, even without his Mormon voters, Romney would have shit all over the other candidates.
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi
"Problem is, while the Germans have had many mea culpas and quite painfully dealt with their history, the South is still hellbent on painting themselves as the real victims. It gives them a special place in the history of assholes" - Covenant
"Over three million died fighting for the emperor, but when the war was over he pretended it was not his responsibility. What kind of man does that?'' - Saburo Sakai
Join SDN on Discord
"Problem is, while the Germans have had many mea culpas and quite painfully dealt with their history, the South is still hellbent on painting themselves as the real victims. It gives them a special place in the history of assholes" - Covenant
"Over three million died fighting for the emperor, but when the war was over he pretended it was not his responsibility. What kind of man does that?'' - Saburo Sakai
Join SDN on Discord
Re: Mitt Romney wins Nevada.
Yes the final vote total looks like even without Mormon votes he would have cleaned up, interesting Romney also won Catholics. It looks like my numbers were premature since Clark county which was the only major county outstanding yesterday went Romney by nearly 60% adding massively to Romney's vote total. That county alone added nine thousand votes to Romney's total.
"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
Currently ongoing, there's also a Missouri contest going on that awards nothing so is being ignored except as TV filler.
If exit polling is to be believed Rick Sanatorium is going to win the beauty contest and both Colorado and Minnesota and net himself between 29 to 48 delegates depending on the size of his win.
If exit polling is to be believed Rick Sanatorium is going to win the beauty contest and both Colorado and Minnesota and net himself between 29 to 48 delegates depending on the size of his win.
"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
- Dalton
- For Those About to Rock We Salute You
- Posts: 22637
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
- Location: New York, the Fuck You State
- Contact:
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
As of this hour, Missouri was called for Rick Santorum.
To Absent Friends
"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster
May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
- Dalton
- For Those About to Rock We Salute You
- Posts: 22637
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
- Location: New York, the Fuck You State
- Contact:
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
Santorum wins Minnesota
To Absent Friends
"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster
May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
Huzzah for Media to go insane tomorrow as we are back to a three man race, or two man race if they want to ignore Gingrich.Dalton wrote:Santorum wins Minnesota
*Edit has Colorado been called as well? It looks like it should be considering the exit polls were reporting 50% Santorum support.
"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
- Dalton
- For Those About to Rock We Salute You
- Posts: 22637
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
- Location: New York, the Fuck You State
- Contact:
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
No, only 1% in. Colorado is nowhere near ready to call.
To Absent Friends
"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster
May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
-
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3539
- Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
- Location: Around and about the Beltway
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
With 30% reporting in, Santorum has a vote share of 42% compared to Mitten's 30%.
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/state/co
So other than some of the larger/more Mormon counties not reporting in yet, how is that possible?
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/state/co
So other than some of the larger/more Mormon counties not reporting in yet, how is that possible?
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
The Focus on the Family milquetoast in Colorado made the result fairly predictable in a restricted voting primary, and Minnesota's conservatives are a lot like Iowa's, the only reason the state has a liberal reputation is that unlike Iowa it has a big city that drags it left. Despite these wins I'm not sure Santorum has any traction.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
-
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3539
- Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
- Location: Around and about the Beltway
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
Mittens now leads by 37% to Santorum's 35%, with 51% of the votes in (thanks to Denver and Boulder).
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/state/co
Will see how long that lasts.
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/state/co
Will see how long that lasts.
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
-
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3539
- Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
- Location: Around and about the Beltway
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
Now Mittens is leading Santorum by 133 votes, so both are at 37% with 70% of the votes in. I won't bother to link to the CNN website again (same URL).
This feels a lot like Iowa again.
This feels a lot like Iowa again.
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
-
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3539
- Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
- Location: Around and about the Beltway
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
82% reporting in, Santorum now has 38% to Mitten's 37%. CNN is calling it for the chocolate froth.
How incompetent is Mitten's organization?! He won Colorado in 2008 with 60%!
How incompetent is Mitten's organization?! He won Colorado in 2008 with 60%!
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
- The Duchess of Zeon
- Gözde
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
- Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
Pelranius wrote:82% reporting in, Santorum now has 38% to Mitten's 37%. CNN is calling it for the chocolate froth.
How incompetent is Mitten's organization?! He won Colorado in 2008 with 60%!
It doesn't matter. All three contests are actually nonbinding.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
- Gandalf
- SD.net White Wizard
- Posts: 16351
- Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
- Location: A video store in Australia
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
The GOP chairman just called Colorado for Santorum.
Call me an uneducated foreigner who couldn't get this info on Wikipedia, but what does the vote affect?The Duchess of Zeon wrote:It doesn't matter. All three contests are actually nonbinding.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"
- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist
"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"
- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist
"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
-
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3539
- Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
- Location: Around and about the Beltway
Re: Colorado & Minnesota Caucus
Yes, but doesn't the outcomes of these contests have some sort of effect on how the delegates will get divvied up later at the state conventions (I don't think the party bosses would be venal/tone deaf enough to tilt things too much)?The Duchess of Zeon wrote:Pelranius wrote:82% reporting in, Santorum now has 38% to Mitten's 37%. CNN is calling it for the chocolate froth.
How incompetent is Mitten's organization?! He won Colorado in 2008 with 60%!
It doesn't matter. All three contests are actually nonbinding.
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.