Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid people
* FAQ    * Search   * Register   * Login 
Want to support this site? Click

Quote of the Week: "A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within." - Will Durant, American historian (1885-1981)


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-08-11 04:39pm
Offline
Padawan Learner

Joined: 2010-08-10 07:55pm
Posts: 322
I've been in many debates where the other side would quote my post and, unable to respond to it, say "oh that isn't worth responding to" or "I already disproved that" or simply "haha you lost".

What do you guys do when (or if) somebody does this? One way would be to simply ignore the guy, but on a public forum you may want to make it clear that the guy has no argument.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-08-11 05:08pm
Offline
Padawan Learner
User avatar

Joined: 2010-07-11 12:00am
Posts: 302
Location: 2nd door on the left, next to the sputnik replica
Whenever possible, try to introduce new ideas that haven't been hashed out over and over.
But sometime's this happens.
Even though the idea is new (or you just think it's new) sometimes someone else thinks it's the same thing.
When this happens....You move on.
Sometimes the only way to win, is not to play the game.

Many of the people here who talk like that have been here so long they are mods or have at least some mod powers.
Chances are, they lock the thread right after.
Don't PM them on it, or they'll threaten you.
If you read the hall of shame posts, you know they use the hammer.
BIG FISH, small pond.
The argument is over. Find something more important to do than being right.

If you are daring, call them on it. Politely ask for links to old arguments. You might learn something new. The worst thing that can happen, is you'll be wrong on a minor point of fanboy trivia about the magical laser on the "Deathstar". I know I can live with that.

To recap.
Move on. Write some original fiction. Toss out another new idea on another part of the forum instead. Comment on the news. Realize you aren't getting paid to debate. Live Happy. :D



This is my signature. Soon a fan-boy will use it for an ad hominem.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-08-11 05:15pm
Offline
Jedi Knight
User avatar

Joined: 2004-02-07 12:55am
Posts: 901
Location: Kansas City, MO
I'm going to say the other thing. Call them on it. Drag their dirty little secrets of "debate" and air the fact that they are simply not responding to you in public. Make it damned obvious that they haven't answered your question.

Then again, as Uncluttered says, if they're stonewalling with ignorance or just blatantly refusing to listen or debate fairly, sometimes you will just have to walk away from the argument.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-08-11 09:34pm
Offline
Padawan Learner
User avatar

Joined: 2010-07-11 12:00am
Posts: 302
Location: 2nd door on the left, next to the sputnik replica
Dave wrote:
I'm going to say the other thing. Call them on it. Drag their dirty little secrets of "debate" and air the fact that they are simply not responding to you in public. Make it damned obvious that they haven't answered your question.

Then again, as Uncluttered says, if they're stonewalling with ignorance or just blatantly refusing to listen or debate fairly, sometimes you will just have to walk away from the argument.


That sounds like a nice balance. 8)

I only enter into debates/discussions here that have some bearing on my present and future projects. (Otherwise I feel like I'm just fanboy trawling for trivia)
When someone stonewalls, I often say. "Your comment is useless to me without elaboration."
Sometimes it works. :) Most of the time the thread just dies. :(



This is my signature. Soon a fan-boy will use it for an ad hominem.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-08-12 03:54pm
Offline
Sith Devotee
User avatar

Joined: 2008-11-10 09:59pm
Posts: 3268
Location: the beginning and end of the Present
Star Wars 888 wrote:
I've been in many debates where the other side would quote my post and, unable to respond to it, say "oh that isn't worth responding to" or "I already disproved that" or simply "haha you lost".

The first one should be called out, and you can call them a coward to boot if you're in a nasty mood. A good way to call it out is to ask them why they think the point isn't worth responding to, or if you're feeling polite to ask them to humor you. The ball is in their court, make them play or make them pay.

The second is a bald faced lie, and should be called a lie if that is possible (some forums are so chickenshit that you will get auto-banned for calling someone a liar, even if you can show it to be true). You could also ask them where and when they dealt with it. Again, you dictate the terms; play or pay.

The third is simple posturing. Mockery is your best bet, and you can even appeal to the audience in most cases because even many Miss Manners forums consider that a form of self-pwnage. You could also demonstrate how by that "logic" you can assert anything you like. Example: "Cheese is made of plutonium." "Why?" "Because I say it is. That's why." Put as simply as that, its obviously absurd.

Its often better to appeal to the audience or readers than the person themselves. If they are this dishonest, its unlikely you will get through to them.



Image
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"

The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-08-26 12:38am
Offline
Youngling
User avatar

Joined: 2009-10-29 06:30am
Posts: 83
This is somewhat related but how would someone respond to a person who's only "proof" is conspiracy theory? My first thought is to just ignore it out of hand.



"You have to believe in God before you can say there are things that man was not meant to know.
I don't think there's anything man wasn't meant to know. There are just some stupid things that people shouldn't do." - David Cronenberg


"Doesn't Rush Limbaugh remind you of one of those gay guys that like to lie in a tub while other guys pee on him?" - Bill Hicks

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-08-26 02:25pm
Offline
Overfiend of the Superego
Overfiend of the Superego
User avatar

Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Posts: 12882
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?
Uncluttered wrote:
Whenever possible, try to introduce new ideas that haven't been hashed out over and over.
But sometime's this happens.
Even though the idea is new (or you just think it's new) sometimes someone else thinks it's the same thing.
When this happens....You move on.
Sometimes the only way to win, is not to play the game.

Many of the people here who talk like that have been here so long they are mods or have at least some mod powers.
Chances are, they lock the thread right after.
Don't PM them on it, or they'll threaten you.
If you read the hall of shame posts, you know they use the hammer.
BIG FISH, small pond.
The argument is over. Find something more important to do than being right.
If you're under the impression that allowing arguments that have been settled for nearly a decade to continue for no other purpose than to allow people with no experience in arguing the pertinent points to give it a try is a worthwhile use of bandwidth, time, and effort, then you're mistaken.

Use the search function. It's there for a reason, and so very many arguments have been boiled down to extraordinary minutiae that allowing them to begin anew is pointless; the information for drawing informed conclusions exists already.

As to PMs to mods who lock threads; we have rules in place in case you feel you've been treated unfairly by moderator action, and they're right there in the announcements forum for everyone to benefit from.
Aquaint yourself with them, please.


Quote:
If you are daring, call them on it. Politely ask for links to old arguments.
Or, you could use the search function. Why should an erstwhile opponent do your research for you?



Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-08-26 02:46pm
Offline
Sith Devotee
User avatar

Joined: 2007-12-22 12:11pm
Posts: 2659
Location: United States
I think it depends on what your goals are in a debate.

If you are defending a position, you would definitely call them out if they are making an unsubstantiated argument.

If you are arguing to persuade or gain agreement, you could point out the lack of acknowledgment as an oversight and request the argument be addressed. or you could overlook the omission entirely in favor of a more important point.

If you are attacking a position and want to discredit it entirely, by all means rip them a new one for daring to ignore a facet of your argument. Insult their lineage, possibly include some topical humor or deposit that humiliating metaphor on their face.




"Since when is "the west" a nation?"-Styphon
"ACORN= Cobra obviously." AMT
This topic is... oh Village Idiot. Carry on then.--Havok

Top
 Profile  
 Post subject: Re: If the other side pretty much ignores your argument PostPosted: 2010-09-10 08:58pm
Offline
Padawan Learner

Joined: 2010-08-10 07:55pm
Posts: 322
Thanks, I guess.

Some debaters can be so annoying. This one guy (who argued that Edward could solo the Jedi Order) actually asked me to prove HIS claim; not as a rhetoric, but actually as his argument, and then refusing to prove it himself.

Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group