

Fine, only not with Saddam!What do you all have against atomic canal blasting
Well most of it was done by Osama, not meStas Bush wrote:Brilliant. Khomenei wouldn't have told it better.
Which moon doesn't orbit over Saddamistan?Zor wrote:I think we should begin to set our sights on the moons.
Zor
You should have used the pic on the previous page of this thread of the guy giving the finger. It would have made much more of an impact that way.Grand Moff Yenchin wrote:Well most of it was done by Osama, not meStas Bush wrote:Brilliant. Khomenei wouldn't have told it better.
PleaseWhich moon doesn't orbit over Saddamistan?
I'm more worried that he might perceive any object on that moon to be a violation of his territory and embark on some Special Ops strike.Stas Bush wrote:PleaseWhich moon doesn't orbit over Saddamistan?Saddam can't have ASAT missiles reaching the moon. That's stupid.
how about we set up a massive tessla deathray on one of the moons and point it at saddamistan?Stas Bush wrote:PleaseWhich moon doesn't orbit over Saddamistan?Saddam can't have ASAT missiles reaching the moon. That's stupid.
I think we're concerned that Shep is going to start doing all his engineering with nukes, merrily blowing fallout into the airStas Bush wrote: EDIT: okay, you all decided to condemn EPAs?But it was tried in reality and not like it gathered much outrage.
Well, obviously.Stas Bush wrote:I mean, we were more concerned with nukes falling into Saddam's hands, than the canal digging.![]()
![]()
This is acceptable ; Just give me a couple of days.Shroom Man 777 wrote:Okay, PeZookia will plan for the economic intervention and the rest of the FUN (Shroomania included) will back you up?
Well, there's always some new crises that might even spark some gunboat diplomacy. Nothing is smooth sailing after all.Shroom Man 777 wrote:I prefer we end up screwing shit up and perpetuating the situation. No puppies and kittens. Or rainbows.
Most likely outcome is they recover slightly and then go for each other's throats, but I suppose it's somewhat better than the "Choose one and bomb the other two to ash" variantShroom Man 777 wrote:I prefer we end up screwing shit up and perpetuating the situation. No puppies and kittens. Or rainbows.
Well, sure. But we could have screwed it up anywaysStas Bush wrote:Syndromia had a population of what, 7,5 million people and military contingents on par with todays' US Iraq occupation.
Of course it turned out better
Uh...how, exactly, did the history of our world show that? So far we've managed to resolve our conflicts peacefully, and they were some serious ones.DarthShady wrote: History of our world has shown that war is a very likely possibility and i only want a way to protect my people.Opinions?