lazerus wrote:
As usual, no, you aren't. Punch clock villains may still be evil, but they don't necessarily all deserve to die. Not every member of the German Army is a war criminal, not every Germany citizen who collaborated with the Nazi regime deserves to be killed. By calling the punch-clock villains I indicated that while what they did was wrong, I felt no particular hostility towards them, and so derived no pleasure from watching them die.
I got that part moron. What I was criticising is how you downplayed them, as "just trying to keep their heads down" when its clear those the Doctor killed where mercenaries, who if they somehow didn't know what they were getting into at the start, it was drilled into their heads at the very beginning when they arrived on Pandora.
lazerus wrote:
Newsflash, fucktard -- steady with more technologically advanced civilization advances your civilization.
Hey dumbshit, the Na'vi were refusing those advances anyway. In effect the Doctor changed nothing in terms of their technological development.
The RDA was, indirectly, pushing the Navi to advance, they were just committing terrible warcrimes in the process, making it a net loss. A good solution would have been for the doctor to allow the humans to mine some Unobtanium in exchange for maintaining their network of schools across Pandora, and offering the Navi technologically advanced items in trade.
Where you watching the same movie retard? The humans were already mining some of the Unobtanium. The conflict arose because they got greedy and wanted more. The humans had already tried offering the Na'vi things which they didn't want. Therefore the Doctor didn't ensure the Na'vi would remain primitive at the present, they were already making that choice themselves. Therefore your claim that it was the Doctor's fault is full of shit just like you. Now show some evidence that the Na'vi would have taken up the technology or else concede the point. But I bet you will dodge it right?
What you call "bribes" is what sane people call "an offer."
The semantic whoring. Whether is a bribe or an offer, the point is the Na'vi were shown to not want it fuckwit. Once again the Doctors actions contributed nothing to leaving them primitive, yet alone primitive FOOOOREVER.
The doctor just needs to make sure that the Navi have the power to say no, so if they don't want the shiny toy that goes bling, they don't have to take it.
Once again they already made the choice in the movie.
In other words, a reasonable solution would have been to keep the two civilizations in contact so the Navi can advance, while simultaneously protecting them from aggression or extortion.
This does not support your statement that the Doctor made the existing situation worse. You know, the one where the Na'vi will attack and take tremendous losses. You know the one when the Na'vi will win anyway and still severe contact with the humans (except a few). Geez, that sounds like the situation the Doctor left them in but with less overall casualties. Now back up your bullshit claims that a) the Doctor left them primitive forever and b) he made existing situation worse or concede the point coward.
Instead he just kills all the humans returning the Navi to their blissful, ignorant isolation.
Now I have absolute proof that you are a dishonest turd. He kills ALL the humans. Did you even fucking read the story properly? When can I get your concession? But I bet you will just shift the goalposts right? You do realise the Na'vi would be in the "blissful, ignorant isolation" without the Doctor's actions right? Therefore he could not have made the situation worse in that regard.
lazerus wrote:
News flash. Thats how he is written.
Cite it.
You have seen the show right?
1. You have read the examples I have cited where he essential casts judgment on an entire planet of Time Lords right?
2. You did read the posts previously where he does exactly the same thing to the Racnoss.
3. You have seen the Christmas Invasion where in a moment of arrogance he brings down Harriet Jone's sovereign and democratically elected government because he didn't like one decision.
4. You did see human nature / family of blood where he punishes members of the family with essentially eternal suffering for a finite crime because it personally effected him emotionally didn't you.
5. You did see how he and Donna essentially killed more Daleks than RDA mercenaries.
6. You did see him freeing a criminal go because he got on well with her in Planet of the Dead.
7. You did see him breaking the laws of time because he felt like it in Water of Mars and becoming the "Time Lord Victorious"
Now lets see what you said.
God like power, and all he uses it for is to be an arrogant, superior dick, addressing the immediate problem while making the underlying one's much worse, all with a double dose of the new-doctors holier-then-thou attitude.
Arrogance - I would say all those examples. Being a superior dick is a subjective thing, however example four fits the bill since the Family's crime was only finite but he punished them with eternal imprisonment (ie an infinite punishment).
I don't care if you dislike how the Doctor is potrayed in his own show. I do however take issue with your claim that I have someone potrayed him incorrectly. But then if you watch the show with the same level of detail your watched Avatar its obvious now how a dumbshit like you could fail to see the point.
lazerus wrote:
But I guess the lives of murdering aggressors are more important than primitives defending themselves.
No, you're just stupid and my point went over your head.
What an dishonest turd you are, with your selective quoting.
Lets summarise for you. You claimed the Doctor's actions made the situation worse. Given that the Na'vi would have taken more casualties than RDA had numbers the Doctors actions saved more lives because the Na'vi wouldn't have to fight RDA anymore. The only way the situation could be worse is if somehow a human life from RDA is worth more than several Na'vi. This point you refused point blank to address, because, maybe it would require you to concede that your original statement about making the situation worse is utter bunk.
You again refuse to defend your contention that the Doctor made things worse by changing the topic and talking about how you would write the story. Combined with a selective quoting and appealing to your own personal opinion, and we have a winner.
Now why don't you address how the Doctor made the situation worse, unless you really do think the life of a human is worth several Na'vi?
"Waah! He committed genocide! He is so evil! The skies turn dark in his presence and demons sing his name!"
OMG, you can appeal to your personal incredulity. Maybe we should concede in the presence of your awe inspiring stupidity.
Wait, no.
He killed one adult of the species, and one ship full of youngsters. Call it, maybe, a few thousand counts of murder, if we're *really* generous about the contents of that ship.
Actually he killed the youngsters. The queen was killed by the orders of Harold Saxon.

Your stupidity knows no bounds I see. Either that you are a dishonest turd, because the fact this was the last of the Racnoss was a fucking plot point.
The fact that the queen and her brood were the last of the Racnoss flew over your head? If a nation leaves only one member of an ethnic group alive it would be counted as genocide by the UN.
Meanwhile, lazerus finds out that the mercenaries employed by RDA are clearly not the last of the humans. Therefore what he did to the Racnoss as a whole was worse and was genocide.
Don't get me wrong, mass murder is still really bad, but he killed a few thousand members of his most hated enemy when the death of billions of humans was on the table if he didn't.
The Racnoss was his most hated enemy? What the fuck are you smoking boy?
I can imagine a one of those quiz nights in a group where one of the questions is, In Doctor Who, which alien is the title character's most hated enemy?
Random Doctor who fan 1 : Daleks.
Random member of the public : Daleks.
Lazerus : THE RACNOSS
This is no doubt more of your usual and utterly worthless hyperbole.
That is hardly comparable to slaying all the humans who were clearly terrified of him and has no chance against his overwhelming firepower.
Yeah you are right. Its not comparable because he didn't genocide the humans in my story.
Once again just for you, I don't care if you hate the Doctor as a character. I do care that you accuse me to writing him differently from how he is potrayed in the show when a wealth of evidence shows he has done worse. Oh I forgot, killing bug eye monsters is less bad than killing evil humans.
I also don't care if you like the fic or not. I do care that a lot of your criticism is based on things WHICH DIDN'T OCCUR in the story. You know the part where he kills all the humans, the part where he makes things worse, the part where the Na'vi remain primitives because of him. The fact that you make, like one criticism of events which actually did happen in the fic does not absolve you of the above actions.
Never apologise for being a geek, because they won't apologise to you for being an arsehole. John Barrowman - 22 June 2014 Perth Supernova.
Countries I have been to - 14.
Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.