Or Whirlies.
Seriously, demon. In a Beanie. With a propeller. Flying through the air.
Giggling.
[EDIT]
General Petraeus tells it like it is.
![Image](http://memegenerator.net/Advice-General/ImageMacro/1851797/Advice-General-Invade-Heaven-Troll-Fundies.jpg)
Moderator: LadyTevar
Somebody came up with Percies for angels back in the early days of TSW:A but it didn't catch on. I like Homo Caelis Agelicus and Homo Caelis Daemonis. We'll know the right popular name when somebody comes up with it and everybody else says "I was thinking that"Commander Xillian wrote:Like Percy's. Or Whirlies. Seriously, demon. In a Beanie. With a propeller. Flying through the air.
Giggling.
On the scientific name issue, which is somethin that can be agreed on coldly:Stuart wrote:Somebody came up with Percies for angels back in the early days of TSW:A but it didn't catch on. I like Homo Caelis Agelicus and Homo Caelis Daemonis. We'll know the right popular name when somebody comes up with it and everybody else says "I was thinking that"Commander Xillian wrote:Like Percy's. Or Whirlies. Seriously, demon. In a Beanie. With a propeller. Flying through the air.
Giggling.
Code: Select all
The English adjective human is a Middle English loan from Old French humain, ultimately from Latin hūmānus, the adjective of homō "man". Use as a noun (with a plural humans) dates to the 16th century. The native English term man is now often reserved for male adults, but can still be used for "mankind" in general in Modern English. The word is from Proto-Germanic *mannaz, from a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root *man-, cognate to Sanskrit manu-.
The generic name Homo is a learned 18th century derivation from Latin homō "man", ultimately "earthly being" (Old Latin hemō, cognate to Old English guma "man", from PIE *dʰǵʰemon-, meaning 'earth' or 'ground').
"Now, now Lucy, my boy- said the old, wrinkly angel grandmother, her gray feathers caressing the savage, teary face of the child gently- I`ve told not to steal the human toys from your brother."GrayAnderson wrote:...why did I just think of "Angels and Demons" being a wonderful name for a comedy show?
Anyhow...Stuart, I've got to say that while there obviously need to be parents of some sort, there's enough talk in mythology of lousy family relations that the existence of parents does not dictate their current presence. Also, knowing how genetics can be wonky at times, it also seems plausible that the parents in question might not be on par with the kids in terms of power...or, for that matter, might be more or less powerful. It's also interesting, thinking of Uriel as the youngest brother...actually, you seem to have a pretty good set of family dynamics there.
And, of course, I've now got this image in my mind of those three having a little old pensioner angel for a mother (with big wings and all) who they visit once a week living in an apartment, and who always tells them that they should be more like their father.
What about Yahweh-class beings? Yahweh, Elhmas, Uriel and Satan were this.darksoul wrote: Caelini Genus:
Angelus (this is pig latin, remember. Since all angels are the same species and the change are cuantitative and not qualitative, there is only one genus).
Not likely. The Angels carrying the First Bowl did so in cauldrons.kulervo wrote:I wonder if susceptibility to anthrax is something Caelis has too.
I concur.Humans and Angels both evolved somewhere else. Or somewhen else. If there is an infinite cycle of universes represented by the Taijitu Yin Yang then all bets are off, Closed Timeline Curves give me a headache.
Some intelligent design there. Something akin to the stargate/ star trek seeder race theory.Genus Homo emerged fully formed from our Austro ancestors like Athena from the head of Zeus. We then split off about the same time into H.Sap and H.Cae.
Backcross breeding INDEED. There is no rule written on the hybrids being healthier. Besides, there is no need for us to be breed from Caelis. Our ancestors lived at the same time angels were fighting demons, true. but they also had ancestors, and on and on, from which we don't have registries. Maybe we weren't evolved into our current shape from oceans and lower animals, but rather from the ancestors the angels evolved from, that somehow stayed in their original form. the branch is even further than thought. That would address the angels not being native to heaven, would account for any and all missing links that might exist in human evolution before the homo habilis, and still would provide a basis for genetic compatibility between all species of the hominini family as described above, or Homo genus as seems to be Stuart`s choice.H.Caelis evolved first, evolved the ability to open portals, and was sentient 4.5 MYA. Which Yaya remembers. Yaya and his group mated with Australopithecines. Due to inbreeding, interbreeding and selection by H.Caelis H.Sapiens evolved. God bred us in his image. (Backcross breeding. I wonder if susceptibility to anthrax is something Caelis has too. Hybrids are usually healthier, but not always.) - I like this idea.
this is interesting, but forming separate species(genus, actually) by the processes of evolution as known has not been observed, AFAIK. That's one of the great points in favor of creationism, so debunking it using angels are demons is, well, a Crowning Moment of Irony, if such existThe 4.5 Million years angels and demons have been separate populations is certainly enough to form them into separate species. The interesting thing is the change in the appearance. This implies that the human genome, when given a regenerative ability, is capable of re-forming the body according to wildly differing body plans. Given that then even small differences in genetics would create wildly different looks. Satan's breeding programs would help that more.
Yes, do we? This is a very important point. Are angels ashamed of what they were, so they forgot? Does human (hominid, for that matter) genetics has a component, perhaps in the so called junk DNA, that makes it react heavily to environment? that would account for the separation of the three kinds according to the wildy different environments they were. And would allow satan to carry on his breeding plans at a sufficiently rapid rate, by choosing a suitable environment to each of his subspecies. In a less degree, the same response can account for races in humans. Angels didnt get races because conditions are even in Heaven in all known areas. Hell offers a more diverse environment and as such allows for more races, even subspecies. And Earth is somewhere in between, in what environmental ranges are concerned.Do we have a firm statement that angels 4.5 MYA looked like angels now? Did angels make statuary? Is this the origin of the prohibition on graven images? Over that long an individual might not even remember looking different.
red bulls or jokes?Ruadhan2300 wrote:Methinks a good red-bull joke is needed here, I don't have any.
Actually, Luga would rather do that.Hofner1962 wrote:well, I can certainly see Maion getting asked as spokesmodel for Red Bull.
Ahmmm... Well, based on the whole, "These dogs of widly different sizes and appearances are all the same species and could technically mate" thing, I'm going to go out on a limb and say "yes"... Picture it like this...(Time for sick side thought: Can a Herald mate with a dwarf Japanese woman? Ok... no need to actually answer that.)
If you thought it would be easy, you REALLY got some strange priorities in life...Ilya Muromets wrote:Maybe we can call the angels "wingnuts" or something. Seriously, though, I never expected coming up with a slang term for angels could be this hard.