Clinton Attacks West Point while Washington wins at Yorktown
Posted: 2010-01-15 10:18pm
General Henry Clinton receives the news of the surrender of the British Army under Cornwallis at Yorktown. Realizing that the loss of that army will have an extremely negative impact on the British government and public likely breaking their will to continue the war he decides to make one last desperate throw of the dice. He realizes that to lay siege to Cornwallis General Washington has taken the bulk of the Northern Continental Army south to Yorktown and the French Forces under Rochambeau has traveled south with him. Realizing that the Highlands are severely undermanned he is going to strike north against West Point. Other than Arnold's treachery this was the one moment when the British had the best chance of success against the fortifications at West Point.
Washington left the the bulk of the Massachusetts line in the Hudson Highlands minus their light infantry companies that he took to Yorktown. The Massachusetts Line is one of the best equipped and well motivated of the various state lines but they were never as tested as say the Maryland or Delaware Lines. All total you have about 2,500 to 3,000 Continental troops in the Highlands plus state troops and militia. Clinton has 17,000 troops in NYC but he has to maintain his hold on NYC and leave enough troops to block any counterattack that the Washington will launch as he attempts to race his army back north to protect the Highlands. Assume that General Heath receives news of Clinton's intent and has time to move his troops into the fortifications at West Point and call for additional troops from the states and militia.
1) So can Clinton take West Point and control of the Hudson?
2) How murderous will his causalities be? Is there the potential that they might be so great that it would leave the British in a worse position at home then they were historically after the loss of Cornwallis Army?
3) Does taking and controlling West Point and the Hudson achieve enough for the British?
4) Can they hold it against the combined American and French force returning from Yorktown and also maintain control of NYC?
Washington left the the bulk of the Massachusetts line in the Hudson Highlands minus their light infantry companies that he took to Yorktown. The Massachusetts Line is one of the best equipped and well motivated of the various state lines but they were never as tested as say the Maryland or Delaware Lines. All total you have about 2,500 to 3,000 Continental troops in the Highlands plus state troops and militia. Clinton has 17,000 troops in NYC but he has to maintain his hold on NYC and leave enough troops to block any counterattack that the Washington will launch as he attempts to race his army back north to protect the Highlands. Assume that General Heath receives news of Clinton's intent and has time to move his troops into the fortifications at West Point and call for additional troops from the states and militia.
1) So can Clinton take West Point and control of the Hudson?
2) How murderous will his causalities be? Is there the potential that they might be so great that it would leave the British in a worse position at home then they were historically after the loss of Cornwallis Army?
3) Does taking and controlling West Point and the Hudson achieve enough for the British?
4) Can they hold it against the combined American and French force returning from Yorktown and also maintain control of NYC?