mess that Clinton's media flacks insisted did exist, along with
that chemical weapons factory in Sudan, and the Left's muckraking
reminds me of The Good Old Days about Arkansas Cattle Futures,
Whitewater, et al

Bush in office, after a string of failed businesses.
Anyway, on to the meat of the post;
Bush so far hasn't exactly shown much light in the domestic policy front,
putting forth all kinds of programs that the conservatives would be fighting
tooth and nail to stop if it was Clinton who was doing it, but with Bush they're
rolling over (Patriot act, massive government spending that isn't defense
related, etc)
However, Bush has shown a willingness that Clinton never did when it comes
to putting the screws on our enemies (and we have enemies, oh yes)
Clinton's entire foreign policy really only consisted of going to the UN
for condemnations of atrocities or bombings, or using dozens of cruise
missiles in ultimately ineffectual strikes against either fixed targets or
where the targets had been 3 hours ago.
For example, the details in this article show the Clinton Administration's
method for dealing with an assassination plot against former President
Bush in 1993 by none other than Saddam:
http://hnn.us/articles/1000.html
That's a clear casus belli for war against Iraq, way back in 1993,
and what Clinton did then, set the tone for most of his foreign policy
over the next eight years: fire off cruise missiles, then apologize profusely
at the UN for firing said cruise missiles and killing the poor defenseless
targets.
In the long term, I think Clinton will eventually end up being remembered
as another Jimmy Carter who had the luck to be in office during boom times, not as a corrupt SOB (that honor belongs to none other than LBJ).