Command and Conquer discussion
Posted: 2003-06-16 08:37pm
this thread is to discuss all C&C games, new and old.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
https://bbs.stardestroyer.net/
1.) Yes they areRye wrote:What would you like to discuss about them?
1)they're cool.
2)red alert series is better than tibsun series.
3)is generals better than the rest?
4)what technology would you most like to have?
1) yep!Rye wrote:What would you like to discuss about them?
1)they're cool.
2)red alert series is better than tibsun series.
3)is generals better than the rest?
4)what technology would you most like to have?
Na, RA is best! It seems ALMOST more plausabile, I mean, which is closer to reality: Time travel (which could have happened at any time in the future, but you play the results during a DIFFERENT ww2), or some green stuff that came from space and kills anyone who stands on it?weemadando wrote:Fuck no Rye. The Tiberium timeline is infinately better that RA.
No, Generals is supposed to be a completely different timeline (something like the near future, I think). If I can find the quote I will post it.Shinova wrote:Could Generals have been a precursor to the Tiberian series? Maybe.
YEAH! RA1 ALL THE WAY! I recently played that game again, and DAMN it's easy after surviving the confusion of TS and RA2 (I haven't played Generals much, so I can't say about that). I mean, there's only 2 columns on the menu bar (as opposed to the RA2 4 catagories thing), and like 30 units total. Now we have 100s of different options, advanced AI, and all kinds of computer-slowing crap...And most say that RA1 was the best of the CnC series.
Ah, I remember all those desktop themes.. those are for WIn 95 tho aren't they? Don't tell me you still run WINDOWS 95?!?!?!??!JediNeophyte wrote:I believe my desktop states my opinion quite clearly:
http://comem.clansites.com/images/commiedesk.gif
My comp only loaded the top 2 inches or so of your desktop....JediNeophyte wrote:Nope, if you look in the bottom right corner it lists the version number.
Its my shitbox. My real comp has XP.Mitth'raw'nuruodo wrote:My comp only loaded the top 2 inches or so of your desktop....JediNeophyte wrote:Nope, if you look in the bottom right corner it lists the version number.
EDIT: Nm, my cable modem just burped the first time... but still, WIN 98??? Not even SE? DAMN!
My comp is dead, but it was a shitbox I managed to put XP on. THe one I'm using now would be a great gaming computer, but I can't use it for that... pisses me off.JediNeophyte wrote:Its my shitbox. My real comp has XP.Mitth'raw'nuruodo wrote:My comp only loaded the top 2 inches or so of your desktop....JediNeophyte wrote:Nope, if you look in the bottom right corner it lists the version number.
EDIT: Nm, my cable modem just burped the first time... but still, WIN 98??? Not even SE? DAMN!
This is the wrong thread for this, but uh, I know. With Service Pack 1, you sign an agreement that says pretty much "we can fuck with your computer ANYTIME we want for any REASON we want, and there's nothing you can do about it if we find something bad (like warez, or uh, illegal porn or something)Coaan wrote:The hell does everyone knock 98 for?...Are people so zombie-esque that they refuse to see that with Xp, Microsoft weans that bit closer to owning your soul in the fucking eula? They all but say 'Oh, and we own your soul for buying this' By which time, you've already agreed to the contract because to open the box and to read it is to agree to it...
With 98, at least you have control over your own machine...What is the heart of a pc? DOS. What does Xp try and lock out? (Albeit futily for those who are quick of finger) DOS.
It's simple..they're trying to force everyone into their way of thinking...wouldn't be surprised if the RIAA is in with them
1) YeahRye wrote:What would you like to discuss about them?
1)they're cool.
2)red alert series is better than tibsun series.
3)is generals better than the rest?
4)what technology would you most like to have?
well i expected lots more of that actually... but i still like playing ra2 way more than tibsun.weemadando wrote:Fuck no Rye. The Tiberium timeline is infinately better that RA.
You'd have to cast it on your car though cos it'd kill you outright if you used it on you.4) Iron Curtain, I'd like to be invulnerable for a minute or two.
Oooh...theheap wrote:I'm not a big C&C player myself but my cousin works for EA and he is the art director for C&C 3... I have seen the concept art for it. It looks really good. The guy who designed boba fett is working with him.
Shitty programing?... don't know but that sucks assLord Pounder wrote:I have one major question regarding C&C Generals. WHY IN THE NAME OF FUCK WILL C&C G REFUSE TO WORK ON MY 2.2 GIG ATHLON XP YEYT IT'lLL CHUG ALONG, ABET A BIT SLOW, ON MY 750 DURON SHITBOX? When i ty and load Generals it says my equipment isn't up to specs. I spent £550 on the fucking tower 2 months ago. All my drivers are up to date. I check for updates to my drivers every weekend.
On that note, in RA1 I used to chronoshift cruisers to within firing range of the other's base. Fun fun funRye wrote: 5) most fun thing to do in any cnc game?
RA2 - making a box of tanks of all sorts, with a space in the middle, chronoshit their ore truck into the middle.
intensely irritating, but very funny.
This is the wrong thread for this, but uh, I know. With Service Pack 1, you sign an agreement that says pretty much "we can fuck with your computer ANYTIME we want for any REASON we want, and there's nothing you can do about it if we find something bad (like warez, or uh, illegal porn or something)[/quote]Mitth'raw'nuruodo wrote:It's simple..they're trying to force everyone into their way of thinking...wouldn't be surprised if the RIAA is in with them