AIP only submarines

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

AIP only submarines

Post by Adam Reynolds »

Has there ever been a proposal for an Air Independent Propulsion only submarine as opposed to a mix of AIP and diesel-electric ? Such a thing is clearly possible, but I don't think it's ever actually been done.

I've also heard of somewhat recent proposals for Hydrogen powered shipping, so that is further evidence in favor of this being plausible, but it hasn't really been done for naval vessels. Such a design would almost certainly trade range for greater stealth.
User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by madd0ct0r »

Aip only? Batteries and electric motors only?

Well, it was good enough for Nemo. But in reality.. Batteries only with no way to recharge at sea would be cripplingly short ranged I think.
It would only make sense if you expected you sub to make short forays and be attempted to be tracked from the second of leaving harbour. The gulf being such a location?

I toyed with the idea of a sub that could surface and unfurl some lilypad solar panels but you'd be visible when basking which goes against the Ultra stealth ideal. Not done the calcs but I think the space volume of the solar panels would be equivalent to the diesel engine and fuel tank. If stealth is not a concern for most of the journey, just chugging along on a diesel engine seems easier.
The lilypads would only pay off if you needed very long missions, such that the sub's diesel tank could not be large enough.

So next I thought about seperating the functions, so you could have a floating solar array that the aip sub's return to to refuel. This feels even more vulnerable to spotter planes. You could have the recharge point being a battleship or a nuclear submarine - a little like in-air refuelling.

Then you have super stealthy aip sub's covering and ranging around the slightly less stealthy nuclear one. It feels rather all in on sub warfare.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by Adam Reynolds »

AIP doesn't just have to be batteries. It can also be hydrogen fuel cells or Stirling engines. These systems are generally slightly lower power than batteries and can't run at full power, but they have longer endurance and allow the sub to stay down longer without snorkeling.

There are a few special operations submarines that do run on batteries alone for nations like Korea, but they are in something of an unusual situation.
User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by madd0ct0r »

You realise fuel cells need a source of oxygen to oxidise the hydrogen right? If you are assuming a canister of oxygen why not the same approach for conventional engine? Use the cooled exhaust fume as a buffer to dilute the oxygen to atmospheric thickness.

Stirling engine needs a source of heat and somewhere to dump it. Ocean is latter, but you need something for the heat and im not seeing energy storage density better then nuclear or batteries. Some dehydrated salts give off heat during hydration, but I don't think high energy density.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by Elheru Aran »

madd0ct0r wrote: 2020-09-20 08:26am Stirling engine needs a source of heat and somewhere to dump it. Ocean is latter, but you need something for the heat and im not seeing energy storage density better then nuclear or batteries. Some dehydrated salts give off heat during hydration, but I don't think high energy density.
If you used a Stirling engine to propel a submarine and dump excess heat into the ocean, wouldn't fairly basic infrared become quickly popular to detect such submarines?
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
TimothyC
Of Sector 2814
Posts: 3793
Joined: 2005-03-23 05:31pm

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by TimothyC »

Adam Reynolds wrote: 2020-09-18 11:45am Has there ever been a proposal for an Air Independent Propulsion only submarine as opposed to a mix of AIP and diesel-electric ? Such a thing is clearly possible, but I don't think it's ever actually been done.

I've also heard of somewhat recent proposals for Hydrogen powered shipping, so that is further evidence in favor of this being plausible, but it hasn't really been done for naval vessels. Such a design would almost certainly trade range for greater stealth.
At the risk of being exceedingly flippant, there are 68 American, 49 Russian, 16 Chinese, 11 French, 10 British, & 2 Indian nuclear powered boats, and almost all of these still have some form of diesel engine as a backup. Diesel is a relatively compact power source, and one that if you don't always need to haul half of your energy source for. One thing to remember is that all submarines (and all non-sailing ships) have to carry their own store of energy for motive power. For most conventional ships, that's in the form of chemical energy. For nuclear powered ships, that's nuclear energy. Having to haul around all of your oxygen in addition to your fuel gets very big very quickly relative to the trade-off of having some time you run on diesel engines on/near the surface.

In short you could do what you asked, but the trade-offs to doing so make it not economic. There are lots of navies out there, and if it made sense in a particular set of circumstances that exists, I'm sure someone would have done it.
"I believe in the future. It is wonderful because it stands on what has been achieved." - Sergei Korolev
User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by madd0ct0r »

Elheru Aran wrote: 2020-09-20 10:55am
madd0ct0r wrote: 2020-09-20 08:26am Stirling engine needs a source of heat and somewhere to dump it. Ocean is latter, but you need something for the heat and im not seeing energy storage density better then nuclear or batteries. Some dehydrated salts give off heat during hydration, but I don't think high energy density.
If you used a Stirling engine to propel a submarine and dump excess heat into the ocean, wouldn't fairly basic infrared become quickly popular to detect such submarines?
I don't know if infrared penetrates very far under water. The thought crossed my mind, but nuclear submarines dump heat the same way so I assume not a significant problem?
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10361
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Pretty sure navies already use IR detectors (specifically FLIR) to spot subs near the surface already.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
Sky Captain
Jedi Master
Posts: 1267
Joined: 2008-11-14 12:47pm
Location: Latvia

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by Sky Captain »

There is Swedish Gotland class submarine
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotland-class_submarine

that has onboard LOX tanks and Stirling engine for underwater endurance of several weeks. That system generate only 75Kw of power so the submarine won't brake any speed records in AIP mode , but it is good enough for slow stealthy cruise or battery charging to achieve short bursts of 20 knot speed. On the surface regular diesel engine is used.
I suppose it should be possible to design more powerful Stirling engines and not have diesel engine at all, just use atmospheric air on the surface and onboard LOX in AIP mode.
User avatar
JI_Joe84
Padawan Learner
Posts: 205
Joined: 2015-11-01 09:53pm

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by JI_Joe84 »

Are we not considering nuclear power as a AIP? I don't understand why nations are still launching diesel/ electric boats in the nuclear sub age. Nuclear power just seems like God mode IMHO
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16329
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by Batman »

Nucs tend to be on the biggish side and fiendishly expensive. Bluewater only ships are little use to a costal/littoral navy even if they can afford it.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
JI_Joe84
Padawan Learner
Posts: 205
Joined: 2015-11-01 09:53pm

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by JI_Joe84 »

Batman wrote: 2022-02-14 03:09pm Nucs tend to be on the biggish side and fiendishly expensive. Bluewater only ships are little use to a costal/littoral navy even if they can afford it.
Hhhmmm well I watch sub brief by Aaron Amick on YouTube and on the whole nuclear subs don't seem to be that much more expensive than diesel subs but that is mostly gov. bureaucracy screwing things up like it's a sport.
Then again maybe they don't want to seem too threatening so they choose a sub that can defend /keep an eye on their coast but would be useless out in the open ocean 🤔
User avatar
aerius
Charismatic Cult Leader
Posts: 14768
Joined: 2002-08-18 07:27pm

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by aerius »

It's not just the cost of the sub. It's the cost of the entire nuclear industry & infrastructure needed to build & support it, plus you need to train all those people along with the ones who are operating the subs. The subs themselves may cost $3 billion a pop or whatever it is, but what you need to build & support them probably costs 10-100 times as much.
Image
aerius: I'll vote for you if you sleep with me. :)
Lusankya: Deal!
Say, do you want it to be a threesome with your wife? Or a foursome with your wife and sister-in-law? I'm up for either. :P
User avatar
JI_Joe84
Padawan Learner
Posts: 205
Joined: 2015-11-01 09:53pm

Re: AIP only submarines

Post by JI_Joe84 »

aerius wrote: 2022-02-14 09:16pm It's not just the cost of the sub. It's the cost of the entire nuclear industry & infrastructure needed to build & support it, plus you need to train all those people along with the ones who are operating the subs. The subs themselves may cost $3 billion a pop or whatever it is, but what you need to build & support them probably costs 10-100 times as much.
Ohhhh I didn't think about getting the nuclear material and storing the waste compared to just getting some diesel engines. I see now. Thanks
Post Reply