Dragons - alive, well and about to roast your arse!

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2002-12-04 06:06am

http://www.anzwers.org/free/livedragons/index.html

Sorry if this has alreday been posted, but I did search, and couldn't find it...

Post by **Vympel** » 2002-12-04 06:11am

Nope I don't believe this particular idiocy has ever been posted.

If I read it will I become dumber?

Post by **Edi** » 2002-12-04 06:14am

Ahhh, the stupidity! Gaaahhh! It hurts! Make it go away! *head explodes*

Edi

Post by **Edi** » 2002-12-04 06:14am

Yes, you will. *shudder*

Edi

Post by **Kuja** » 2002-12-04 06:14am

Oh. My. FUCKING. God.

Dralan · Post by **Dralan** » 2002-12-04 06:26am

Well... that was an interesting page filled with facts... Or perhaps not..

Anyone got a instant stupidity remover here.. I think I might need one after reading that.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2002-12-04 06:37am

I wish there was a section about the biology of dragons.

But that would require a basic knowledge of biology

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2002-12-04 07:43am

What was it like? I opened the page but it crashed my browser so I take that as a good omen.

Post by **Kuja** » 2002-12-04 07:45am

dinosaurs = dragons and shit like that. Pure, utter shit.

Majin Gojira · Post by **Majin Gojira** » 2002-12-04 08:29am

Argh...Stupidity!...it burns! AHHHHH!!

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2002-12-04 08:45am

Wait Wait.. THERES MORE!

Apprently this guy's a young earth creationist as well!

I'll tell you why! It's the same reason why we are so conditioned to disbelieve that a massive flood once covered the earth some 4.400 years ago, which, by the way, is the real reason for the decimation of dragons and mammoths. And that scenario even has historical support in all kinds of ancient documents like the Bible, Quran, Gilgamesh Epic, and other similar Flood & Ark scenarios in the historical legends of the Chinese, Incas and almost every ancient nation on the face of the earth!
Why are we being conditioned the other way? Because the Flood theory is not politically correct, nor tax-supported by the powers that be, as that theory supports a whole different & contrary world view to theirs! The majority of conscientious scientists prefer to keep their mouths shut to keep their jobs for convenience and filthy lucre's sake, although there is an alternative minority of a few brave ones that do speak out!
Anyhow, there is tons more evidence for a catastrophic sudden worldwide flood! For example: the Siberian burial places of hundreds of Mammoths in ice, still with grass in their mouths. Whereas there is miniscule evidence for some blooming "asteroid!" That hoax was thought up by people who chose for Secular Humanist convenience sake to reject what really happened. Don't you smell a rat? You still trust the hijacked Media and Modernist Science? Come on people! The Emperor really has no clothes on! Fight for internet freedom today, before "the Ministry of Truth" becomes monopoly and does us in! Yikes!

buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuullllllllllllllllllllllllshhhhhhhhhitttt

We need to invite this fellow on

PeZook · Post by **PeZook** » 2002-12-04 10:11am

Every time you think logic and reasoning just gained a little more ground in the world, another cretin like this one pops out. Oh my! There are 800 sightings of the Loch Ness monster! It must be real!
I wonder if he jacked off to "Reign Of Fire"...

Plus, his site is almost unreadable. Not only he considers the Bible, Quran and Gilgameshian Epics to be "reliable historical documents", but he has worse aesthetics perception than me (that's saying something

)

Man, I had a bad day. Had to vent some steam

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2002-12-04 10:21am

hang on, hang on...

Anyhow, there is tons more evidence for a catastrophic sudden worldwide flood! For example: the Siberian burial places of hundreds of Mammoths in ice, still with grass in their mouths. Whereas there is miniscule evidence for some blooming "asteroid!" That

Is anyone claiming that the extinction of the mammoths at the beginning of the holocene (about 100kya, but I'm not looking it up- recent, OK?) is in any way related to the K/T meteorite?

AAaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<unamused palaeontologist sulk>
I hadn't seen that..

Tsyroc · Post by **Tsyroc** » 2002-12-04 10:27am

I kind of liked the pictures of the "Pterodactyls" shot during the Civil War.

The funny thing about all the posted pictures of various "dragons" is that when they're all put together like that they all look so much more fake than I remember them being when I read about them in junior high. The Lake Champlain monster especially gave itself away.

Here's my absolute favorite though.

* Ever heard of the "Komodo Dragon"? Its existence could not be denied by evolutionists, as so many of them were preserved on an isolated island in Indonesia! But although it is a perfect member of the "Dinosaur" Family, it was not classified as such, because otherwise the asteroid theory would fail, so they called it just a "reptile!"
Well "Dinosaurs" are all reptilians! The Dragons of the written and unwritten history of Man!

Komodo Dragons are reptiles. Dinosaurs were dinosaurs not really big reptiles. They may have some reptilian like traits but they also had traits of other modern animals.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2002-12-04 10:32am

I loved that too. Someone doesn't know jackshit about dinosaurs!
I'm guessing he's not read any palaeontological work written in the last 50 years...

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2002-12-04 10:36am

How will this guy explain how a dragon's fire-breath works??

BTW, doesn't the Monster Manual for Dungeons & Dragons state that dinosaurs are biologically related to dragons?? (and vice versa)

BTW#2, I find it quite odd to find a creationist site which prefers the term "dragon" over "dinosaur."

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2002-12-04 11:01am

And the Monster Manual is the definitive work on dinsoaur biology? </sarckyness>

Dragons can be no mroe related to dinosaurs than fish - they're not even tetrapods, for Bob's sake!

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2002-12-04 11:25am

Gah, such stupidity. And real convincing photos.

beyond hope · Post by **beyond hope** » 2002-12-04 11:33am

and people wonder why i drink....

Post by **NecronLord** » 2002-12-04 11:36am

Kosh_The_Vorlon · Post by **Kosh_The_Vorlon** » 2002-12-04 12:49pm

The only picture out of that entire set that I can disprove right off the bat (I'm not very good at this) is the one of the huge yellow bony-plated fish that "nobody has seen before". It's actually a picture of a lake sturgeon, which is hardly a rare fish but does oftentimes play a part in monster sightings (my dad once mistook a school of them swimming nose-to-tail through stormy waves for a long, snakelike creature..Not too surprising given the distance and the fact that it was storming out)..I mean, I can tell what it is and I've never actually seen one in person before!

Post by **haas mark** » 2002-12-04 12:50pm

Why don't we have a wtf icon again.......?

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2002-12-04 12:51pm

beyond hope wrote:and people wonder why i drink....

Well so do I but more for enjoying a fine liquor...seeing these people just give me an urge to play Unreal or something.

beyond hope · Post by **beyond hope** » 2002-12-04 01:26pm

Ghost Rider wrote:
beyond hope wrote:and people wonder why i drink....
Well so do I but more for enjoying a fine liquor...seeing these people just give me an urge to play Unreal or something.

UT bots are smarter than that...

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2002-12-04 01:47pm

True...they are...hell my cats are.

Still it's fun thinking these poor bots are these people and off I go blasting them.