The Evolutionary Theory Is Crumbling!

[Admiral Valdemar]

http://www.creationposter.com/sdm.asp

My head hurts.

[XaLEv]

If the universe began with a "big bang", all the planets would spin in the same direction. Venus and Uranus do not!

Hah. Like to see their reasoning on that.

[TrailerParkJawa]

Dinosaurs allegedly disappear suddenly (according to the evolutionists) in a catastrophic event. In reality most dinosaurs were killed in the worldwide flood about 4400 years ago, but some did survive on the ark. Dinosaurs have been sighted and recorded throughout history and are even seen today in some areas (very seldom).

I saw dinosaurs in the movie theatre. There fore the Earth must be young, because there is an island in the Pacific which still has dinosaurs today.

[Exonerate]

If the universe began with a "big bang", all the planets would spin in the same direction. Venus and Uranus do not!

Hah. Like to see their reasoning on that.

Somebody must've failed their physics class... Even I can tell thats wrong.

[ArmorPierce]

If the universe began with a "big bang", all the planets would spin in the same direction. Venus and Uranus do not!

Ummm. Do they even try to give any explanation what-so-ever to why this would be?

[Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi]

The Sahara Desert spread each year. It is only about 4,000 years of age.
UK Independent, July 15, 2000

Dinosaurs are not millions of years old. Deep in the African Likouala swamp missionaries report local natives have sighted dinosaur-like creatures they call Mokele-Mbembe.

How hasy of a generalization...

This photo shows a plesiosaur that washed up on a beach in Monterey, California in 1935. This is evidence that dinosaurs didn't become extinct millions of years ago.

Even funnier is the picture that went with it.

The "Methuselah" Bristlecone pine tree is the world's oldest living tree at age 4,765 years. Located in White Mountains, California.
Photo courtesy of the National Parks Service

Wouldn't that be disproof of a great flood?

This drawing is totally contrived. There is no evidence that humans were once apes. The missing links are still missing.

How many missing links do Creationists need?

Human population of 6+ billion would be much larger if humans have been on earth for more than 6,000 years

If there were only 8 humans on Earth 4,400 years ago, how were the Pyramids built, which were built not long after?

No evidence of life on Mars or anywhere else in the Universe. Canals on Mars do not necessarily indicate water is on Mars. Canals may be created by jets of carbon dioxide.
Wired News October 12, 2000 NASA American Research Center
Rare Earth, Peter D. Ward, Donald Brownlee, Copernicus Books, 2000

What the hell does that have to do with anything?

The distance between the Earth and its moon is gradually widening. Over billions of years the moon would be much farther away from the Earth.

Notice how they provide no numbers and calculations.

Carbon dating is flawed. Wood freshly cut out of living trees has been carbon dated at 10,000 years, and living mollusks (such as snails) dated at 2,300 years. Carbon dating falsely assumes a constant rate of decay.
B. Huber, "Recording Gaseous Exchange Under Field Conditions," in Physiology of Forest Trees, ed. by K.V. Thimann, 1958; M. Keith and G. Anderson, "Radiocarbon Dating: Fictitious Results with Mollusk Shells," in Science, 141, 1963, p. 634

Notice how they only pick the most erronoeus estimates, and throw out the others, which, although they all put the Earth's age in the billion-year range, then they all must be millions of times too high. If three clocks put the times at 11:26, 11:28, and 11:31 PM, does that mean that hte actual time is 7 AM?

The evolutionary model would have you believe that the extremely complex living cell, more complex than the space shuttle, evolved from a non-living thing, a rock.

Now, that's one hell of a strawman!

[Darth Yoshi]

The distance between the Earth and its moon is gradually widening. Over billions of years the moon would be much farther away from the Earth.

Isn't that true? I remember reading that that the earth's rotation is gradually slowing at a rate of one second every ten thousand years or so due to the changing alignments of the earth, moon and sun. The moon's smaller mass means that it's rotation has stopped relative to its revolution, and to compensate, it's moving away from the earth.

[data_link]

What I'd like to know is how they can fashion a poster out of pure bullshit. That must be some kind of scientific miracle.

[Admiral Valdemar]

If the universe began with a "big bang", all the planets would spin in the same direction. Venus and Uranus do not!

Ummm. Do they even try to give any explanation what-so-ever to why this would be?

No, you accept it you non-believer scum!

[Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi]

If the universe began with a "big bang", all the planets would spin in the same direction. Venus and Uranus do not!

Hah. Like to see their reasoning on that.

It's a strawman anyway. They must think planets came out of the Big Bang. Someone, go over there and inform them of the bullshit factory they're running.

[Grand Admiral Thrawn]

What kind of utter bullshit is this?

[data_link]

What kind of utter bullshit is this?

It's certified Black Angus Bullshit(tm)!

[neoolong]

The distance between the Earth and its moon is gradually widening. Over billions of years the moon would be much farther away from the Earth.

Isn't that true? I remember reading that that the earth's rotation is gradually slowing at a rate of one second every ten thousand years or so due to the changing alignments of the earth, moon and sun. The moon's smaller mass means that it's rotation has stopped relative to its revolution, and to compensate, it's moving away from the earth.

I think the moon is gradually moving away. The operative word being gradually, as in really fricking slowly. It is still consistent with the old earth thing.

[InnerBrat]

did you have a look at theirNeanderthal page?

Dan Ackroyd's a Neanderthal!

[NecronLord]

Theory: If the stars are millions of light years away, and humans can see them flicker in the night sky, then the universe must be very old.
New facts: Not enough time has elapsed for light speeding at 186,282 miles per second to have traversed the entire universe. Yet light has reached the entire expanse of the cosmos, meaning light has travelled faster than the known speed of light at some time in the past. Researchers estimate light may have travelled 1069 times faster at the beginning of the universe. This means the universe is smaller and younger than most scientists believe.

*BANG*...............*BANG*

that is the sound of me banging my head against the wall in despair.

On general principle though...

Yes this is known as the sphere of detection. (or something similar) it is expanding @ C. Idiots.

Earth's moon has a hot interior. This is evidence of a young origin.

Someone go and "Explain the theory or planetery impacts to these loosers, also the fact that the earth also has a molten interior (but wait this is evidence against YEC! ) Mybe they think there is another hell on the moon.

[NecronLord]

There are short-period comets in outer space whose life expectancy is less than 10,000 years. Evolutionary astronomers mistakenly claim short-period comets originate from imaginary "Oort Cloud."

I know! theyr'e bits of the "Firmament" that have fallen down.!

[Exonerate]

The distance between the Earth and its moon is gradually widening. Over billions of years the moon would be much farther away from the Earth.

Isn't that true? I remember reading that that the earth's rotation is gradually slowing at a rate of one second every ten thousand years or so due to the changing alignments of the earth, moon and sun. The moon's smaller mass means that it's rotation has stopped relative to its revolution, and to compensate, it's moving away from the earth.

I think the moon is gradually moving away. The operative word being gradually, as in really fricking slowly. It is still consistent with the old earth thing.

Wasn't there a theory on how the moon used to be a part of Earth which broke away?

[InnerBrat]

Actually, I think that's the prevalent one...

[neoolong]

Wasn't there a theory on how the moon used to be a part of Earth which broke away?

It's been awhile since I took astronomy, but I think that there was supposed to be an impact(asteriod or something) that blasted a huge chunk of the Earth which was caught in its gravity and became the moon.

I think.

[TrailerParkJawa]

I think thats one of the dominant theories to the moons formation. After some large impact when the earth was young, it ejected material formed the moon.

[Anarchist Bunny]

I'm a High School student thats having trouble with Work equations at an angle in Physics Honors and I still can tell this is utter bullshit.

[beyond hope]

One thing is for certain: evolution has definitely passed these people by

[Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi]

The distance between the Earth and its moon is gradually widening. Over billions of years the moon would be much farther away from the Earth.

Isn't that true? I remember reading that that the earth's rotation is gradually slowing at a rate of one second every ten thousand years or so due to the changing alignments of the earth, moon and sun. The moon's smaller mass means that it's rotation has stopped relative to its revolution, and to compensate, it's moving away from the earth.

It's true, but it's evidence for an old Earth. The YEC people there just pretend it's evidence for a young earth, because if they bother to do calculations, then they wouldn't get desirable results.

But, if they actually knew how to do such calculations, then they wouldn't be running such a dumb site.

[Warspite]

Wasn't there a theory on how the moon used to be a part of Earth which broke away?

It's one of the main theories, I think it has to do with the rocks brought from the Moon having similar geological properties to Earth. Hence, huge asteroid - BANG - spew molten lava - Moon. Of course, this happened billions of years ago, even before life appeared on this planet, or if there was any, it was destroyed in the impact.

Also, I think the decrease in Earth's rotation has something to do with the inertia of the ocean mass.

[Ghost Rider]

Is this what happens to people when science looks too complex?

I mean my god the dinosaur thing alone...next we're going to have that see the Loch Ness is a dinosaur...proof the earth is young