A Federation interdictor cruiser

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

A Federation interdictor cruiser

Post by Sarevok »

In the TNG episode Force of Nature it was revealed that vetryon particles could disrupt warp. Two scientists rigged some unmanned platforms to emit those particles making warp travell impossible in nearby space. Now this could be used to create a Federation interdictor cruiser. Take a starships, modify it's deflector dish to emit vetryon particles and it will prevent nearby ships from warping out.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16383
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Post by Gandalf »

Theoretically yes, but what was the range on these platforms?
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Post by Sarevok »

Gandalf wrote:Theoretically yes, but what was the range on these platforms?
Well they caused a Ferengi Marauder and the Enterprise-D to drop out of warp while in interstellar space. So their range could be quite high since interstellar space is big. Maybe their range is billions of kilometers. Also the Marauder's warp drive was destroyed when it tried to force it's way through so it is a pretty effective system.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Strategicaly speaking the system would be limited because of how vast space is. However when you know where your enemy will be moving through, then they gain use.

I've always felt that Starfleet used something like this in FC in order to slow down the Borg Cube on its way to Earth. That would explain how slower ships like the Defiant were at both the first and last Borg battle.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Post by JME2 »

While this would certainly apply to conventinal warp drive, would transwarp itself be affected? If so, then I agree with Alyeska's FC theory.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

There is no direct evidence it would affect Borg Transwarp (they appear to have 3 types). However circumstansial evidence does indicate its possible this is what happened.

We know the following.

There exists Warp Interdiction fields
Borg Cubes are faster then any Starfleet ship
Defiant class ships are not as fast as Galaxy class ships
The Defiant was at both the first and last battle of First Contact

We can conclude that something slowed the Borg down significantly enough that a slower Starfleet ship was able to catch up. We also know its in Starfleets best interest to slow the Cube down while they gather more assets, say at Earth. So we are left with a theory that Interdiction fields were used against the Borg. Just no concrete proof this happened.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Enola Straight
Jedi Knight
Posts: 793
Joined: 2002-12-04 11:01pm
Location: Somers Point, NJ

Post by Enola Straight »

Wasn't this "interdiction field" first used in the Hekaras Corridor, a very narrow passageway through a star system which, unfortunately, is now experiencing subspace rifts?
Masochist to Sadist: "Hurt me."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Post by Chris OFarrell »

We have no idea of the range of said pulses. The becons actualy had to emmit a distress signal or some other such lure (such as a debris field) to attract the attention of the Starship. The pulse also past right through shields and fried any subspace related activity on the ship including the subspace fields in the shields, warp core and some of the computers / communications systems.
Image
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6772
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Re: A Federation interdictor cruiser

Post by Isolder74 »

IUnknown wrote:In the TNG episode Force of Nature it was revealed that vetryon particles could disrupt warp. Two scientists rigged some unmanned platforms to emit those particles making warp travell impossible in nearby space. Now this could be used to create a Federation interdictor cruiser. Take a starships, modify it's deflector dish to emit vetryon particles and it will prevent nearby ships from warping out.
Not the deflector dish of doom! It would be better to build a unit that does it as a containes system rather then weaken your deflector array with extra tasks.

It does bear a good idea though. The problem is it would deny both sides warp travel until the particle dissapate.
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Re: A Federation interdictor cruiser

Post by Kuja »

Isolder74 wrote:It does bear a good idea though. The problem is it would deny both sides warp travel until the particle dissapate.
True enough, but then, the same thing happens when a SW Interdictor is switched on.

How quickly do these particles dissipate?
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6772
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Re: A Federation interdictor cruiser

Post by Isolder74 »

Kuja wrote:
Isolder74 wrote:It does bear a good idea though. The problem is it would deny both sides warp travel until the particle dissapate.
True enough, but then, the same thing happens when a SW Interdictor is switched on.

How quickly do these particles dissipate?
What I mean is any fancy warp manuvers, like The Picard Manuever, would now be out on both sides which would ensure that the better fleet is garanteed to win.
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Re: A Federation interdictor cruiser

Post by Sarevok »

Kuja wrote:
Isolder74 wrote:It does bear a good idea though. The problem is it would deny both sides warp travel until the particle dissapate.
True enough, but then, the same thing happens when a SW Interdictor is switched on.

How quickly do these particles dissipate?
IIRC as soon as the particle generating unit is switched off the field dissappears.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10663
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Post by Solauren »

I'd also be tempted to make partical canons that work on this.

Remember, the Subspace tech frying effect lasted after the field was gone.

That would be a handy weapon for disabling enemy ships

Aim, Fire, and one disabled enemy ship
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
CaptainChewbacca
Browncoat Wookiee
Posts: 15746
Joined: 2003-05-06 02:36am
Location: Deep beneath Boatmurdered.

Post by CaptainChewbacca »

Solauren wrote:I'd also be tempted to make partical canons that work on this.

Remember, the Subspace tech frying effect lasted after the field was gone.

That would be a handy weapon for disabling enemy ships

Aim, Fire, and one disabled enemy ship
According to Insurrection, subspace weapons are illegal due to their unpredictable nature and the way they can permanently damage space.
Stuart: The only problem is, I'm losing track of which universe I'm in.
You kinda look like Jesus. With a lightsaber.- Peregrin Toker
ImageImage
User avatar
Typhonis 1
Rabid Monkey Scientist
Posts: 5791
Joined: 2002-07-06 12:07am
Location: deep within a secret cloning lab hidden in the brotherhood of the monkey thread

Post by Typhonis 1 »

Or you set it up along an enemies expected path and have them drop into normal space n something "fun" like a minefield. A remote station should be possible.
Brotherhood of the Bear Monkey Clonemaster , Anti Care Bears League,
Bureaucrat and BOFH of the HAB,
Skunk Works director of the Mecha Maniacs,
Black Mage,

I AM BACK! let the SCIENCE commence!
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10663
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Post by Solauren »

[quote="CaptainChewbacca"
According to Insurrection, subspace weapons are illegal due to their unpredictable nature and the way they can permanently damage space.[/quote]

Oh, I know that. But I'm not sure a Vertiron particle weapon is a subspace weapon per-say.

I just affects subspace systems.

In many ways, it's the equal of a Star wars Ion cannon, just on Star Trek subspace-based systems (i.e Warp Drive, Shields, Communications)
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Post by Sarevok »

CaptainChewbacca wrote:
Solauren wrote:I'd also be tempted to make partical canons that work on this.

Remember, the Subspace tech frying effect lasted after the field was gone.

That would be a handy weapon for disabling enemy ships

Aim, Fire, and one disabled enemy ship
According to Insurrection, subspace weapons are illegal due to their unpredictable nature and the way they can permanently damage space.
Well the two scientists in the episode in question were protesting subspace damage caused by warpdrives. They should be doing subspace damage to protest subspace damage !
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
Post Reply