Human Population in TNG
Posted: 2004-07-31 02:21am
Are there any sources out there that indicate how many worlds humans have colonized and what are population is at the time of Picard and company?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
https://bbs.stardestroyer.net/
Kirk says that the Federation/Humans (it isn't clear which) is on 1000 planets and spreading out, by the time of TNG that figure has probably increased by a fair margin.TrailerParkJawa wrote:Are there any sources out there that indicate how many worlds humans have colonized and what are population is at the time of Picard and company?
Yeah, but not all those will be humans.TheDarkling wrote:Kirk says that the Federation/Humans (it isn't clear which) is on 1000 planets and spreading out, by the time of TNG that figure has probably increased by a fair margin.TrailerParkJawa wrote:Are there any sources out there that indicate how many worlds humans have colonized and what are population is at the time of Picard and company?
By DS9 the Federation can expect 900 billion casualties in a losing war against the Dominion (and still have enough people left for a revolution to occur within 5 generations).
BASHIR
If we fight, we'll take over nine
hundred billion casualties.
I think those are the best figures we have, although they only give a board outline of an answer to your question.
However, humans seem to be by far the most prolific race of the Federation and the most numerous force in Starfleet.Aya wrote:Yeah, but not all those will be humans.
Wasn't there a third world war that used nuclear weapons? Wouldn't that decrease the population a bit?Stofsk wrote: Something the books said was Earth had something rediculously low like 3 billion people in TNG time. I can't remember which book it was. I remember a thread about it, some time ago...
Which maybe why I said they only give a broad outline and not an actual answer.Aya wrote: Yeah, but not all those will be humans.
600 million died according to Riker.2000AD wrote: Wasn't there a third world war that used nuclear weapons? Wouldn't that decrease the population a bit?
*Shakes fist at* Details, details.TheDarkling wrote:Which maybe why I said they only give a broad outline and not an actual answer.Aya wrote: Yeah, but not all those will be humans.
3 billion seems pretty low even if there was a long period of negative population growth either because most families have only a single child or due to people leaving Earth for colonies.2000AD wrote:Wasn't there a third world war that used nuclear weapons? Wouldn't that decrease the population a bit?Stofsk wrote: Something the books said was Earth had something rediculously low like 3 billion people in TNG time. I can't remember which book it was. I remember a thread about it, some time ago...
I forgot about that. Perhaps in ST:2 replicators were not perfected because I think they also mentioned something about food production, but my memory is a bit hazy. I think a trillion human beings by that time would be feasible. It would be interesting to see however, if by the time of TNG is most families average 2 children or not.Gandalf wrote:Well if the Federation have some 140+ member worlds, some living across a few systems it would seem feasible that they could be well over a trillion.
Also, in ST:2 Carol Marcus mentions Genesis as being a way to deal with over population. This could indciate they're at least thinking about it, which would means a significant population.