Defiant Hull Resilience?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Defiant Hull Resilience?

Post by McC »

Okay...I don't really want to post in here because I'm quite convinced of Mike's overwhelming conclusions on the main site and have little interest in actually debating Trek vs Wars (much more interested in exploring the function of the technologies irrespective of pitting them against one another). I haven't really had a reason to post here, and I'm half-tempted to put this in the PST forum rather than here, but I don't know what the implications of it are (if any at all), so I'm putting it here just the same.

In the DS9 episode "Starship Down," the Defiant must travel in the atmosphere of a gas giant. The episode, IMO, is basically an excuse to use submarine tactics in space, but that's irrelevant to what I'm bringing up: there are two figures mentioned in the episode relating to the altitude of the Defiant and the atmospheric pressure (presumably) exerted on the Defiant's hull. At one point, it's mentioned that the Defiant's hull is at five million "GSC." A bit later, it's at nine million "GSC." At this point, it's mentioned that in six minutes, the ship's hull will be crushed by the pressure.

My first question: what the hell is GSC? I can't find it mentioned anywhere on any kind of pressure units site. Maybe I'm not looking hard enough, or maybe I'm just a moron. What gives?

Second: What are the implications of the resilience of the Defiant's hull given the above figures with relation to that of Imperial hull resilience? Mike discusses the structural stresses felt by Imperial ships merely undergoing acceleration (1.8 TPa for the Executor, as I read it). How do the two figures compare?

Finally, and perhaps this should actually be my first question: is GSC even a real unit? Or is it a made-up Treknounit? "Galactic Standard Compression" or something?

Thanks for reading.
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

Since this is much more suited to PST, off it goes there.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Post by McC »

Ok. Like I said, I was tempted to put it in PST, but wasn't really sure, so I went with the vs. forum. Thanks for moving it :)
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
Burak Gazan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1536
Joined: 2002-12-30 07:45pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
Contact:

Post by Burak Gazan »

Just a complete WAG here, G = ? S = square C = centimetre ?

So, something something per sq. cm? However, it may be just "invented" terminology by the writing department that sounded cool :)
"Of course, what would really happen is that in Game 7, with the Red Sox winning 20-0 in the 9th inning, with two outs and two strikes on the last Cubs batter, a previously unseen meteor would strike the earth, instantly and forever wiping out all life on the planet, and forever denying the Red Sox a World Series victory..."
Robert Walper
Dishonest Resident Borg Fan-Whore
Posts: 4206
Joined: 2002-08-08 03:56am
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Post by Robert Walper »

Burak Gazan wrote:Just a complete WAG here, G = ? S = square C = centimetre ?

So, something something per sq. cm? However, it may be just "invented" terminology by the writing department that sounded cool :)
G = 1 gigaton of atmospheric pressure. :twisted:
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Post by McC »

The only references I can find to it are on Trek stating that it stands for "gross structural compression." :|
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
Kyle
Padawan Learner
Posts: 465
Joined: 2003-06-02 02:04pm
Location: WHODEY-Ville

Post by Kyle »

Burak Gazan wrote:Just a complete WAG here, G = ? S = square C = centimetre ?

So, something something per sq. cm? However, it may be just "invented" terminology by the writing department that sounded cool :)
Well if you're gonna go with that theory G would most likely be Grams. But its most likely some made up ST unit, like isoton.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

GSC = imaginary unit designed to prevent the writers from being pinned down by hard figures, and also to save them the effort of thinking too hard about it.

Oh! You want the in-context answer?

...well tough shit. Make something up yourself... god knows it'll probably be more plausible than the writers could come up with.
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Post by Chris OFarrell »

Uraniun235 wrote:GSC = imaginary unit designed to prevent the writers from being pinned down by hard figures, and also to save them the effort of thinking too hard about it.

Oh! You want the in-context answer?

...well tough shit. Make something up yourself... god knows it'll probably be more plausible than the writers could come up with.
For contrast, the NX-01 was able to go deep enough into a Gas Giants atmosphere that it was going through liquid....
Image
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

*twitch*
Post Reply