In Federation Ships, what does the USS stand for?
Posted: 2004-02-04 02:30pm
Like the title says, what does the USS stand for when used with Federation ships? I'm curious.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
https://bbs.stardestroyer.net/
Huh. It's like they took United States Ship and went, hrm, States isn't right, and thumbrubbed Stars in there.Tribun wrote:United Stars Ship
That is all.
That would make the most since, but you'd think that Federation and Planets are big enough nouns to be included in the acronym.HRogge wrote:United federation of planets Star Ship ?
If they've said it in TOS, then that's good enough for me.Uraniun235 wrote:The characters have said "United Star Ship" in TOS, so I imagine that's what it stands for.
Could it be that United is short for UFP but Starfleet just didn't like the sound of "UFPSS Enterprise"? I certainly don't.
I understand it stands for Naval Construction Contract.Ma Deuce wrote:My question is: What does the "NCC" in the registry number stand for?
It doesn't stand for anything. The prefix was invented by Matt Jefferies. He put in the "N" for aircraft regesitered in The USA the C for civilian aircraft and the second "C" because it looked good.Gil Hamilton wrote:I understand it stands for Naval Construction Contract.Ma Deuce wrote:My question is: What does the "NCC" in the registry number stand for?
I remember reading somewhere that NCC was created by Gene Roddenberry. It was suppose to combine the Soviet and American hull classification letters for a general purpose cruiser.Crazedwraith wrote:It doesn't stand for anything. The prefix was invented by Matt Jefferies. He put in the "N" for aircraft regesitered in The USA the C for civilian aircraft and the second "C" because it looked good.Gil Hamilton wrote:I understand it stands for Naval Construction Contract.Ma Deuce wrote:My question is: What does the "NCC" in the registry number stand for?
Too bad there's been a USS Yamato, USS Melbourne, etc etc etc.Metrion Cascade wrote:There is no canon explanation. But Naval Construction Contract makes sense. And while I have heard in-canon the phrase "United Star Ship," I also considered the possibility that Starfleet ships are named after historical ships from Earth, so if it was named after an American ship it gets USS, if it was British it gets HMS, if it was Canadian it gets HMCS, what have you.
The first carrier Enterprise was CV 6. The second is CVN 65. I assume the NCC numbers are equivilant to naval hull numbers. NCC 1701 was made up by Matt Jefferies because his private plane's registry number was NC 171 or something similar.Metrion Cascade wrote:Repeated Google searches for "naval construction contract," including searches that ruled out any page containing "star trek" or "starfleet," still did not yield a single non-Trek reference. If it's used in building real ships, or the aircraft carrier Enterprise is NCC 1701 (which I heard when I was in the Navy), there is absolutely nothing I can find online about it.
Presumably they could be named after ships that haven't been commissioned yet, but it's moot. Starfleet never used anything other than USS, and we've heard United Space Ship and United Star Ship.Howedar wrote:Too bad there's been a USS Yamato, USS Melbourne, etc etc etc.Metrion Cascade wrote:There is no canon explanation. But Naval Construction Contract makes sense. And while I have heard in-canon the phrase "United Star Ship," I also considered the possibility that Starfleet ships are named after historical ships from Earth, so if it was named after an American ship it gets USS, if it was British it gets HMS, if it was Canadian it gets HMCS, what have you.