Gorgious fan-designed Fed ship
Posted: 2003-11-08 05:18pm
This ship is just gorgious ( nevermind the silly technobabble anb bio-stuff, it's the hottest ship that could be seen in ST ).
What dayya think ?
What dayya think ?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
https://bbs.stardestroyer.net/
Typical thing for someone to say. I don't have to be good at designing ships to know when something looks (and is) simplistic and ugly.Howedar wrote:Well made, but I'm not a fan of the design.
Kojikun, I'd be curious to see you do better.
But you didn't criticize the design. You criticized the meshing, texturing, and lighting.kojikun wrote: Typical thing for someone to say. I don't have to be good at designing ships to know when something looks (and is) simplistic and ugly.
I also said the design is unthought out, so you can now kiss my ass.Howedar wrote:But you didn't criticize the design. You criticized the meshing, texturing, and lighting.
I never said I could do better, dumbfuck. I have nothing to back up because I was stating my opinion on the ship, AS THE ORIGINAL POSTER REQUESTED. So fuck off, Howedar.So just once kojikun, back your shit up. Looks asstastic? Fine. Do better or shut your damn mouth.
So in other words, you presume to judge someone's techniques without knowing said techniques yourself? Kiss my ass, you self-righteous piece of shit.kojikun wrote: I never said I could do better, dumbfuck. I have nothing to back up because I was stating my opinion on the ship, AS THE ORIGINAL POSTER REQUESTED. So fuck off, Howedar.
I know the techniques, which is exactly why I was able to comment on them specifically. And even if I didn't, I can still comment on it because that was the entire point of this thread. Why don't you rag on the other people here who don't like the design, hmm? Aya thought it was ugly, why isn't he getting yelled at by you? Are his critiques not specific enough to be considered "unknowledgable"? What about Sirius? Is "lame" indicative of his expert knowledge of 3D modelling techniques? I said it's simple to make with nurbs, and that it is. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out, just someone with a passing familiarity with how nurbs work. I said the texturing is shit, and that it is. To recognize that you just have to compare it to high quality texture jobs and notice the severe lack this model has. I said the lighting is horrible. All you need to do is look at the pictures and notice that you can barely see the fucking ship in any detail because the pics are oft too dim.Howedar wrote:So in other words, you presume to judge someone's techniques without knowing said techniques yourself? Kiss my ass, you self-righteous piece of shit.
Ever done any 3D modeling work? I have, and for real engineering purposes, not just pretty pictures. The general shape of that ship is child's play with any decent CAD system. Just make an ellipsoid primitive, then hash it into a pair of NURBS surfaces, split at the middle. Now, grab a couple of points on that NURBS, pull 'em out with a surface-morph tool until you think you've got nice-looking stretched winglets, and then mirror the resulting surface. Join 'em back together, stitch it to solid, and then do a couple of Boolean subtracts in order to create those fucking stupid-looking hood scoops (the first Riceboyz Star Trek shipHowedar wrote:So in other words, you presume to judge someone's techniques without knowing said techniques yourself? Kiss my ass, you self-righteous piece of shit.kojikun wrote:I never said I could do better, dumbfuck. I have nothing to back up because I was stating my opinion on the ship, AS THE ORIGINAL POSTER REQUESTED. So fuck off, Howedar.
Did you read the part about "bio-tech"Aya wrote:Ugliest.ship.ever.
Seriously, it looks like a B5 shadow vessel reject.