Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
agreed. it´s full of these typical flash elements such as crapy, standard waving and fading fonts. furthermore it makes my browser crash after the "intro" page.Crayz9000 wrote:This guy needs to take a serious web design class, as well. You can kind of tell most of these nutjob sites out: they're usually designed with minimal knowledge of an editor like FrontPage, and they try to cram as much multimedia garbage in as small a space as possible.
they´ll just claim that it was possible with the help of god in case it violates any physical laws.Darth Wong wrote:Open challenge to any fundie in the world: build a wooden boat full of stalls that's structurally sound, seaworthy, 1000 feet long, and make it float for six months.
I don't care about finding this mythical Noah's Ark: just prove that it's even physically POSSIBLE to build it. With all the money these assholes throw toward propaganda campaigns, you'd think they'd be able to find the time to disprove the shipbuilders who say it can't be done.
Let's also throw in the facilities to care for untold numbers of animals- including feeding them and most importantly, taking care of their shit.Darth Wong wrote:Open challenge to any fundie in the world: build a wooden boat full of stalls that's structurally sound, seaworthy, 1000 feet long, and make it float for six months.
I don't care about finding this mythical Noah's Ark: just prove that it's even physically POSSIBLE to build it. With all the money these assholes throw toward propaganda campaigns, you'd think they'd be able to find the time to disprove the shipbuilders who say it can't be done.
A similar structure on the north side too??? Just how many Arks are up there?In 1985 , talking about the Ark, General Havens said:
"We've seen it. We have photos of it....It is on a ledge...My pilots had seen a similar structure on the north side of Mount Ararat..."
This makes it clear that the ark is quite approachable, so where exactly are the modern expeditions with the major networks in tow?…Other relatives and friend of the alleged Russian discoverers such as Mrs. Gladys Evans have claimed that this incident was based in reality and have retold the stories as follows. Evans said that her father entertained three former Russian flyers who were part of the search team. They left her father a document (which has now been destroyed in cleaning) which stated the men’s names, birth places, ages, ranks in the Air Force, name of their plane. Mrs Evans continued below.
They told how the Ark was “half in and half out of a lake a log floating in water. It was an immense thing, and it had cages some with metal on them. It had a catwalk on top and the door was off. The door was nearby and had apparently been struck by lightning because it was partly burnt. The Ark was just as good as the day it was built.” The wood reminded them of oleander.
When they first saw the Ark from the air, they thought it was a submarine, but couldn’t figure out why someone would be building it on a mountain. On the later reconnaissance expedition, these three airmen actually got inside the Ark where they took pictures and measurements. The film was turned over to the Russian ...
Yet another person saying we need an expedition up there to prove anything.- Schwinghammer :....I can say to have seen something really strange on that mountain, but only expeditions and scientists can prove the presence of the ark....I believe in God...
I think it's exceptionally silly.Hathor wrote:Can it be?
Found:
Official:
http://www.noahsark.it/
Interviews with Angelo Palego:
http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/mmmgroup/e-ark.html
(there has a video of them)
What do you think of it? Just curious..
By way, I am atheist.
PS: Don't poke me or I will kill you with my hand device!
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
I read somewhere that the modern consensus is that the most likely source for the flood myths of the region (the Bible, Gilgamesh etc) stem from the flooding of the basin which we now know as the Black Sea by the Mediterranean...The Dark wrote:Even I wouldn't bother with those claims (and for those few who don't know, I'm a pre-ministerial candidate). As far as I'm concerned, the Pentateuch doesn't need to be taken literally. As H. Gunkel said, those stories aren't meant to be historically accurate; they're in the literary style of saga, much like the enuma elish or the Odyssey. While the stories likely have some basis in historical fact, they have been exaggerated as the oral tradition was passed down (like Noah and the Ark growing from what was probably a small village of farmers recognizing coming flood conditions and building rafts to survive). Since floods on the Jordan were rare (particularly among the Big Three Rivers of Mesopotamia), it would eventually become known as THE Flood, and grow in legend. There most likely was no Ark, and even if there was, it would likely not exist now due to decomposition, even at high altitudes and low temperatures.
True, but it doesnt take decades of intensive studyAlyrium Denryle wrote:Ooh a Goa' uld *bows in submission*
DIE! *casts disintegrate* Just like a zat gun, but I dont need to hit 3 times, only once
I've got a better challenge for any fundamentalist: show evidence that there was a flood large enough to cover the two peaks here in water that is deep enough for a ship the size of the mythical ark to float on.Darth Wong wrote:Open challenge to any fundie in the world: build a wooden boat full of stalls that's structurally sound, seaworthy, 1000 feet long, and make it float for six months.
I don't care about finding this mythical Noah's Ark: just prove that it's even physically POSSIBLE to build it. With all the money these assholes throw toward propaganda campaigns, you'd think they'd be able to find the time to disprove the shipbuilders who say it can't be done.
And you'd have to make this thing structurally sound enough to allow for whatever deluge that these guys keep saying. That great layer of ice or water or whatever that was supposed to be absurdly hanging in the sky. And yet Noah mentions nothing about the sky changing color or anything of the sort. Not to mention that freshwater or saltwater fish would all be dead, as well as all plantlife. Why do fundies use shellfish in mountain sides as a credible evidence to disprove evolution, disregarding tectonic plate theory, but can't seem to give a good reason why there are still trees?Darth Wong wrote:Open challenge to any fundie in the world: build a wooden boat full of stalls that's structurally sound, seaworthy, 1000 feet long, and make it float for six months.
I don't care about finding this mythical Noah's Ark: just prove that it's even physically POSSIBLE to build it. With all the money these assholes throw toward propaganda campaigns, you'd think they'd be able to find the time to disprove the shipbuilders who say it can't be done.
