Posted: 2004-08-06 03:13pm
Good Catch though
StarDestroyer.Net BBS
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
https://bbs.stardestroyer.net/
The Official Episode III spoiler thread
Page 16 of 89
Posted: 2004-08-06 04:09pm
Several of those images appeared in the emails which i have never ever received, such as the Vader-Palpy ones and one of the top ones ETC
Good Catch though
Good Catch though
Posted: 2004-08-06 06:52pm
Wow.. hayden looks pissed in that first pic
Posted: 2004-08-06 08:38pm
The top of Vader's helmet is longer than it was in the OT. I don't like the change.
Posted: 2004-08-06 09:21pm
I don't think it is. Here is an OT pic that looks to have the same head height.YT300000 wrote:The top of Vader's helmet is longer than it was in the OT. I don't like the change.
Posted: 2004-08-06 09:28pm
It looks that way because the picture is squashed.YT300000 wrote:The top of Vader's helmet is longer than it was in the OT. I don't like the change.
Posted: 2004-08-06 09:43pm
That's probably it. It's only a little longer, but it stood out enough for me to notice. The distortion would explain that.Galvatron wrote:It looks that way because the picture is squashed.YT300000 wrote:The top of Vader's helmet is longer than it was in the OT. I don't like the change.
Posted: 2004-08-07 01:39pm
Yeah, those pictures are from an anamorphic source, so they haven't been stretched back out to normal. Same thing was going on with a lot of screenshots over at Millennium Falcon from the OT DVD rips, except that none of them seemed to notice it.
Posted: 2004-08-08 01:04am
Wow, Hayden is really starting to look like Mark Hamill.
EDIT: Has anyone noticed that Anakin is using a red lightsabre, yet he doesn't appear to be wearing his Sith uniform seen on the SW site?
Intriguing.
EDIT: Has anyone noticed that Anakin is using a red lightsabre, yet he doesn't appear to be wearing his Sith uniform seen on the SW site?
Intriguing.
Posted: 2004-08-08 06:56am
It's probaly that color so it would stand out better from the greenscreen, since Obi-wan is using red also.Gandalf wrote:EDIT: Has anyone noticed that Anakin is using a red lightsabre, yet he doesn't appear to be wearing his Sith uniform seen on the SW site?
Intriguing.
Posted: 2004-08-08 07:01am
Possibly, but on the ones with the blue background Obi- Wan is holding a green lightsabre.Lord Revan wrote:It's probaly that color so it would stand out better from the greenscreen, since Obi-wan is using red also.Gandalf wrote:EDIT: Has anyone noticed that Anakin is using a red lightsabre, yet he doesn't appear to be wearing his Sith uniform seen on the SW site?
Intriguing.
Posted: 2004-08-08 07:17am
My point was that can't assume anyhing from color prop lightsaber blade color, since it's nothing more then a computer/actor aide. (red on blue backround looks black when looked at from distance and could be confused with the set itself.)Gandalf wrote:Possibly, but on the ones with the blue background Obi- Wan is holding a green lightsabre.Lord Revan wrote:It's probaly that color so it would stand out better from the greenscreen, since Obi-wan is using red also.Gandalf wrote:EDIT: Has anyone noticed that Anakin is using a red lightsabre, yet he doesn't appear to be wearing his Sith uniform seen on the SW site?
Intriguing.
Posted: 2004-08-08 11:46am
Besides, Hayden used a red lightsabre prop in filming AOTC as well, according to a making-of feature. It was an obvious inside joke and if you don't get it, you aren't that big of a Star Wars fan to begin with.
Posted: 2004-08-08 12:54pm
Sabre rod colour doesn't correlate to sabre blade colour whatsoever. They just use whatever contrasts best with other sabre rods and the background.
Posted: 2004-08-09 07:56am
Posted: 2004-08-09 08:03am
Neato.
Chewie's looking good.
Chewie's looking good.
Posted: 2004-08-13 05:12am
Official site lists AT-TEs in Ep. III and links them with the Galactic Empire as well. 
Posted: 2004-08-14 12:27am
Suited Vader seems to have a bad posture in those pics.
Posted: 2004-08-15 03:06pm
NiftySo its only 277 days away and we just learnt the name of the final Star Wars film but we can already reveal the names of the 4 action figures that will make up the preview wave....
The episode three Revenge of the Sith preview wave will be hitting stores spring 2005 but we have already the names of the four figures that will be in this wave.
General Grevious - 1st movie version but as seen in the Clone Wars cartoon last episode.
Astromech Droid
General Tarfful - Wookie Warrior. Played by actor Michael Kingma.
Tion Medon - Caretaker of an unnamed planet. Voiced by actor Bruce Spence.
Posted: 2004-08-15 03:16pm
NiftySo its only 277 days away and we just learnt the name of the final Star Wars film but we can already reveal the names of the 4 action figures that will make up the preview wave....
The episode three Revenge of the Sith preview wave will be hitting stores spring 2005 but we have already the names of the four figures that will be in this wave.
General Grevious - 1st movie version but as seen in the Clone Wars cartoon last episode.
Astromech Droid
General Tarfful - Wookie Warrior. Played by actor Michael Kingma.
Tion Medon - Caretaker of an unnamed planet. Voiced by actor Bruce Spence.
Posted: 2004-08-15 06:47pm
Wow... those were just fantastic shots. I can't wait for next MayTHEHOOLIGANJEDI wrote:Look what I found
[url]http://078.ezboard.com/fsupermancinemad ... .topic[url]
Posted: 2004-08-16 02:21am
Has anyone been following the www.millenniumfalcon.com Episode III databank? Look at some of the entries-
CLONEGUNNER:
Why? Why Clones?
CLONEGUNNER:
CLONE GUNNER
Imperial Trooper
Clone Gunners take command of the large gunports on the Star Destroyers during the battle over Coruscant.
Why? Why Clones?
Posted: 2004-08-16 05:11am
Vymp, have you any idea of the credibility of this site?
Just wondering because on their forums they have a report about the OT on DVD. Looks interesting.
Just wondering because on their forums they have a report about the OT on DVD. Looks interesting.
Posted: 2004-08-16 06:32am
It *seems* credible. The OT DVD screens would be hard to fake.
Posted: 2004-08-16 10:03am
In my view, they are very reliable, so I´d take those things as fact.
What´s wrong with having clones for gunners in that particular battle?
What´s wrong with having clones for gunners in that particular battle?