Page 2 of 2
Posted: 2002-11-16 06:40pm
by Sea Skimmer
Master of Ossus wrote:Sea Skimmer wrote:IG-88E wrote:
1: since when do protorps emit an EMP?
2: because we've never seen one used.
Proton torpedoes use nuclear warheads. Set one of those off in space and you get a big EMP pulse.
I don't think they're nuclear weapons. They appear to use some other version of high-explosives to create a 250-750 MT (upper limit), directed blast. That's pretty tough with a nuclear payload.
They have been repeatedly identified as shaped charge nuclear weapons in the EU. Building a 750-megaton nuclear warhead s no big deal. The US could do it with ease. Heck the Russians designed and built their 100-megaton super bomb in a matter of weeks.
Building one the size of a basketball would be slightly harder.
Posted: 2002-11-16 06:54pm
by Darth Wong
consequences wrote:No, the ideal battle droid is a mouse droid with a thermal detonator inside.
That's a Palestinian battle droid.
Posted: 2002-11-16 06:56pm
by Kuja
Darth Wong wrote:consequences wrote:No, the ideal battle droid is a mouse droid with a thermal detonator inside.
That's a Palestinian battle droid.
ROTFLMAO!!!
Posted: 2002-11-16 07:01pm
by His Divine Shadow
Sea Skimmer wrote:Proton torpedoes use nuclear warheads. Set one of those off in space and you get a big EMP pulse.
No, they are not nuclear, they are some weird kind of proton-scattering warheads.
Posted: 2002-11-16 07:22pm
by Sea Skimmer
His Divine Shadow wrote:Sea Skimmer wrote:Proton torpedoes use nuclear warheads. Set one of those off in space and you get a big EMP pulse.
No, they are not nuclear, they are some weird kind of proton-scattering warheads.
Multiple EU sources disagree with that.
Posted: 2002-11-16 07:26pm
by His Divine Shadow
Sea Skimmer wrote:Multiple EU sources disagree with that.
These are?
Personally I like the proton-scattering thing, removes all these bullshit debates about proton yields, shield vulnerabilities and all that crap.
Posted: 2002-11-16 07:27pm
by Master of Ossus
Sea Skimmer wrote:His Divine Shadow wrote:Sea Skimmer wrote:Proton torpedoes use nuclear warheads. Set one of those off in space and you get a big EMP pulse.
No, they are not nuclear, they are some weird kind of proton-scattering warheads.
Multiple EU sources disagree with that.
What sources? What do they say? Many of them claim that there are "thermonuclear explosions" in space around very large ships, but I don't think they are ever clear on what is causing such explosions.
Posted: 2002-11-16 09:27pm
by Pu-239
EU stupidity and inconsistency. Anyways the protons would still fuck up electronics, wouldn't they?
Posted: 2002-11-16 11:24pm
by Sea Skimmer
His Divine Shadow wrote:Sea Skimmer wrote:Multiple EU sources disagree with that.
These are?
Personally I like the proton-scattering thing, removes all these bullshit debates about proton yields, shield vulnerabilities and all that crap.
Page 18 of SWICS for starters.
"Proton torpedoes such as the MG-7-A's carried by the X-wing are extremely dangerous focused nuclear explosions."
The proton scattering information comes for where exactly?
Posted: 2002-11-16 11:28pm
by Sea Skimmer
Something else, ATOCICS credits the LAAT with among other possible missile loadouts "electromagnetic pulse effects"
If such was effective against the driod army then I would expect them to use those against at least the rear driod ranks rather then the explosive missile they where firing.
Posted: 2002-11-17 04:06am
by Peregrin Toker
I forgot to mention my "tiny robot spider" battle droid's main advantage:
They can access almost all terrain which humans can't pass.
And they can be deployed in very large numbers from airborne units.
Posted: 2002-11-17 09:09am
by Neko_Oni
Just a point, don't you require the nuclear detonation to be in an atmosphere to produce a good EMP? Interactions with Earth's magnetic field and atoms in the atmosphere or something like that.
Posted: 2002-11-17 12:06pm
by His Divine Shadow
Sea Skimmer wrote:Page 18 of SWICS for starters.
"Proton torpedoes such as the MG-7-A's carried by the X-wing are extremely dangerous focused nuclear explosions."
The proton scattering information comes for where exactly?
Thats not a contradiction though, the proton-scattering warhead could generate a nuclear explosion for all we know.
The source is the EGWT.
Posted: 2002-11-17 12:40pm
by Exonerate
Neko_Oni wrote:Just a point, don't you require the nuclear detonation to be in an atmosphere to produce a good EMP? Interactions with Earth's magnetic field and atoms in the atmosphere or something like that.
Thats one way to produce a EMP blast, but there are other methods.