Page 2 of 4

Posted: 2003-07-21 06:00pm
by Solauren
I think he was referrring to a padded-bra.

I'd say the odds are, Jeri's chest has been augmented via surgery

Posted: 2003-07-21 06:00pm
by Sam Or I
First off people, a girl does not need to look like a super model to be hot. She is better looking than 85% of most females.
I have seen her ass in real life (Down in San Monica), if I was any closer I would have grabbed it.

Posted: 2003-07-21 07:15pm
by SirNitram
Solauren wrote:I think he was referrring to a padded-bra.

I'd say the odds are, Jeri's chest has been augmented via surgery
We need extensive video and tacitle evidence to be sure. I volunteer.

Posted: 2003-07-21 07:59pm
by neoolong
Solauren wrote:i would kick her out of bed under only the following conditions

she was still a borg and wanted to assimilate me (in Trek only)
real life, she had a communicable disease
real life, there was a chance my girlfriend would catch us
In porn life, if your girlfriend caught you, she'd join in. :D

Posted: 2003-07-21 08:04pm
by TrailerParkJawa
In porn life you would ask her for the sub-space hyrdospanner modulator to repair the replicator, when all of a sudden you'd hear 70's music and you would be doing it doggy style.

Posted: 2003-07-21 08:10pm
by Jeremy
All I ask for is something that is generally not ugly, generally not over three hundred pounds, and a healthy vagina.

Posted: 2003-07-21 08:20pm
by neoolong
TrailerParkJawa wrote:In porn life you would ask her for the sub-space hyrdospanner modulator to repair the replicator, when all of a sudden you'd hear 70's music and you would be doing it doggy style.
Except, that actually did happen to me. :twisted:

Posted: 2003-07-21 09:40pm
by Solauren
Actually, in porn, my girlfriend would try to kill Seven of Nine with one of my swords. The only thing Star Trek she likes is William Shatner and the Battl'eh swords I own

Posted: 2003-07-22 03:27am
by Tsyroc
SirNitram wrote:
Solauren wrote:I think he was referrring to a padded-bra.

I'd say the odds are, Jeri's chest has been augmented via surgery
We need extensive video and tacitle evidence to be sure. I volunteer.
Don't forget the taste test. You always need the taste test to be absolutely certain. :twisted:

Posted: 2003-07-22 03:46am
by Peregrin Toker
Embracer Of Darkness wrote:I once read an in-depth interview in FHM (For Him Magazine) about Jeri Ryan's costume and she said that she wears *no* underwear under the catsuits except a small body-shaping corset.
I actually recall Jeri Ryan stating in another interview that the costume was way too tight.

Posted: 2003-07-22 03:52am
by Embracer Of Darkness
Simon H.Johansen wrote:
Embracer Of Darkness wrote:I once read an in-depth interview in FHM (For Him Magazine) about Jeri Ryan's costume and she said that she wears *no* underwear under the catsuits except a small body-shaping corset.
I actually recall Jeri Ryan stating in another interview that the costume was way too tight.
That's not surprising, there's a corset under it. You can even se the ribs of the corset constantly on TV, especially in the silver one.

The things women will do for money.

Posted: 2003-07-22 05:22am
by XaLEv
NecronLord wrote:Jeez, give the woman a break :roll: . Would any of you actually kick her out of the bed (assuming no external pressures)?
I'd only consider it if she was disrupting my sleep. Otherwise, I'd just make sure she has enough blanket and try not to disturb her.

Posted: 2003-07-22 05:23am
by Zed Snardbody
It really is a shame trek got to her first. Shes a good actress, not great, but quite good. She did well on boston public, though I havent seen the show in a while so I'm not sure what they've done to her chracter.

Posted: 2003-07-22 06:57am
by Tsyroc
Zed Snardbody wrote:It really is a shame trek got to her first. Shes a good actress, not great, but quite good. She did well on boston public, though I havent seen the show in a while so I'm not sure what they've done to her chracter.
I missed a lot of it but because of a program she put together to help the school study for some standardized test she basically became a second vice principal. Something that Guber didn't particularly care for.

She was also banging the new science teacher (the one that was nearly 10 years younger than her, and short :) )

Posted: 2003-07-22 10:53am
by Peregrin Toker
Embracer Of Darkness wrote:
Simon H.Johansen wrote:
Embracer Of Darkness wrote:I once read an in-depth interview in FHM (For Him Magazine) about Jeri Ryan's costume and she said that she wears *no* underwear under the catsuits except a small body-shaping corset.
I actually recall Jeri Ryan stating in another interview that the costume was way too tight.
That's not surprising, there's a corset under it. You can even se the ribs of the corset constantly on TV, especially in the silver one.

The things women will do for money.
But was the corset really that necessary?? It's not as if Jeri Ryan wasn't shapely enough to begin with.

Posted: 2003-07-22 11:08am
by Warspite
Simon H.Johansen wrote: But was the corset really that necessary?? It's not as if Jeri Ryan wasn't shapely enough to begin with.
Perhaps, she wasn't up to Braga's exquisite TV series standards.

Posted: 2003-07-22 12:53pm
by Peregrin Toker
Warspite wrote:
Simon H.Johansen wrote: But was the corset really that necessary?? It's not as if Jeri Ryan wasn't shapely enough to begin with.
Perhaps, she wasn't up to Braga's exquisite TV series standards.
Yet another reason to dislike B&B.

Posted: 2003-07-23 11:18am
by Kurgan
It isn't that people are unbelievably critical of women's bodies (well, unfortunately some people are), it's that Jeri Ryan was put forth as a "bimbo" from the start. B&B's plot to distract horny adolescent viewers from bad writing, cliched plots and shallow characters.

I consider Jeri Ryan "cute", and she's better looking than Blalock (the latest trek "bimbo"), but to me her character of Seven of Nine serves as yet another symbol of how far into the crapper Trek has fallen at the hands of B&B.

Seven or T'Pol don't have to strut around in catsuits and hit on the nerdy crew members and get possessed by weird diseases or radiation that make them "horny" every other episode, but oddly enough, they do. I wonder why?

Obviously "babes" have existed in trek since the beginning. Sex appeal was part of the original series, over the years, it's become so transparent, that I think many fans have gotten fed up. How about a little substance behind the eye-candy?

It's like the old "drape a bikini model over a new car" trick in advertising. Sure, it looks great to a guy who appreciates that kind of thing, but it really won't change the car into something it's not.

Posted: 2003-07-23 12:03pm
by neoolong
Putting substance behind eye candy takes something called talent. And this is B&B. I think the answer is obvious.

Posted: 2003-07-23 02:31pm
by Dark Hellion
B&B and talent should never be used in the same posts without the words NO screamed a couple million times.

Posted: 2003-07-23 03:30pm
by Peregrin Toker
Kurgan wrote:B&B's plot to distract horny adolescent viewers from bad writing, cliched plots and shallow characters.
B&B didn't invent that. I'm sure they just got the idea from either Terry Goodkind or..... (shudders) John Norman.
Kurgan wrote:Seven or T'Pol don't have to strut around in catsuits
Neither did Kes, for that matter.....

Posted: 2003-07-23 03:54pm
by YT300000
758 replies. :o But that's not surprising for a thread titled Stuffed Bra. :)

Posted: 2003-07-23 07:59pm
by Sir Sirius
Your confusing the number of views with the number of posts. In other words you just pulled a XaleV. :lol:

Posted: 2003-07-23 08:10pm
by YT300000
Sir Sirius wrote:Your confusing the number of views with the number of posts. In other words you just pulled a XaleV. :lol:
Well, you know what I meant.

btw, it's XaLEv, not XaleV. :)

Posted: 2003-07-23 08:45pm
by XaLEv
Sir Sirius wrote:Your confusing the number of views with the number of posts. In other words you just pulled a XaleV. :lol:
Go win a spelling bee asshat. :P