Had to bring up that instead of the DS, because I wouldn't say Goku is sure to kill the DS many times over just yet, for fear of putting my foot in my mouth

Moderator: Steve
Vegeta destroyed the planet Arlia. Here's how he did it:Connor MacLeod wrote: This has nothing to do with the manga or anime explaining something or power levels. It has to deal with reconciling observed feats and activities in a scientifically plausible fashion rather than some knee-jerk qualitative fanboy assertion. I have yet to meet a DBZ fan who actually makes a serious effort at analyzing the "claimed" events to come out with any sort of rational analysis.
Vegeta points at Arlia. Arlia goes boom. Canon event, got it?A practical debate is only possible under quantifiable terms. Power levels might work in internal-DBZ discussions, but they dont tell us much about how DBZ fares against other universes (and the usual qualitative fanboy-crap I talked about before is hardly helpful either.) If you're going to debate or make claims, you have to back them up. You can't do alot of hand waving and pretend science doesnt exist.
Your happy little theory ignores the fact the FRIEZA HELD BACK. He even states: "Damn, I held back too much energy." IIRC, Frieza destroyed Namek's core, which initiated a chain reaction that destroyed the planet completely five minutes later.Besides which, there's also the small matter of Frieza taking FIVE MINUTES to destroy a planet - a DET event would be near-instantaneous destruction.
Vegeta points at Arlia. Arlia goes boom. Simple, isn't it?The same way other universes are gauged, by observation and quantification of abilities. Is there some reason you think we cannot apply the scientific method to the DBZ universe?
Vegeta's destuctuion of Arlia was so complete that the larget ejecta seen is dust-sized.http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tec ... hStar.html
Basically, 2e32 joules is required to scatter the mass of a planet, death-star style (to do so you need to accelerate the planet's mass to escape velocity, to overcome its own gravity, in order to scatter the mass.) In the case of the Death Star, the "escape velocitY" of the debris is substantially faster, so the energy input from the superlaser beam was proportionately greater. And this event is very rapid (like under a second, IIRC Alderaan correctly.)
Don't forget to mention how easily Freezer destroyed Vegeta. He launched a small ball of energy (which he shows no visible strain or effort in producing) that grew larger as it closed distance to the planet.Your happy little theory ignores the fact the FRIEZA HELD BACK. He even states: "Damn, I held back too much energy." IIRC, Frieza destroyed Namek's core, which initiated a chain reaction that destroyed the planet completely five minutes later.
Good point. I forgot about that.Hamel wrote:Don't forget to mention how easily Freezer destroyed Vegeta. He launched a small ball of energy (which he shows no visible strain or effort in producing) that grew larger as it closed distance to the planet.
I'll have to dig up the video to see if there's any ejecta.It then easily dug some distance into the planet before it detonated, though I don't recall how big Vegeta's remains where (if any were left)
Freezer did the deed while in his weakest form
IIRC, they showed some roughly pebble-sized pieces flying past Freeza's face when he was laughing at it.IG-88E wrote:I'll have to dig up the video to see if there's any ejecta.
Fine. It shows he destroyed a planet somehow. How does this exactly mean he fired 2e32 joules worth of energy at the target? (Hint: what is going to be the momentum of a 2e32 joule blast? And how much does Vegeta weigh?)IG-88E wrote: Vegeta destroyed the planet Arlia. Here's how he did it:
1. Vegeta stops his spaceship outside the atmosphere of the planet, then exits his ship using its internal reserves to breath and remain standing.
2. Vegeta points at the planet Arlia. A purple energy beam issues from his right hand.
3. The beam hits Arlia and the planet explodes. It is destroyed so completely that the debris we see is dust-sized when it's compared to Vegeta, a human-sized person.
I'm questioning whether or not Vegeta actually PRODUCED the required amount of energy to blow up the planet, not that it actually occured.Vegeta points at Arlia. Arlia goes boom. Canon event, got it?
Your counterargument ignores the fact that HAD it been a direct energy transfer event (the point I am disputing, you might remember), the planet should have blown up the very second the bolt struck. It would not have drilled down throught he crust, had a chain reaction, etc. This PROVES my point. Get it?Your happy little theory ignores the fact the FRIEZA HELD BACK. He even states: "Damn, I held back too much energy." IIRC, Frieza destroyed Namek's core, which initiated a chain reaction that destroyed the planet completely five minutes later.
Simple, yes. Quantitative analysis? No.Vegeta points at Arlia. Arlia goes boom. Simple, isn't it?
And he was still sitting there, rather than being flung away from the planet at near-lightspeed. That doesnt strike you as being a problem?Vegeta's destuctuion of Arlia was so complete that the larget ejecta seen is dust-sized.
No it doesn't. If you're going to bother analyzing the scene, consider all the implications of destroying a moon (IE where the energy goes, debris hitting the planet, how the loss of a large planetary body like the moon would affect the planet, etc.)ShinjiGohan wrote:Alright fine, it takes roughly 1.261E+27 joules of energy to destroy the moon, which Roshi was able to do with a PL of roughly 139.
So it stands to chance that someone of say Vegeta, with a Pl of 18,000 is capable of 1.6329496402877697841726618705036e+32 joules of energy.
While Goku who had a max PL of 32,000 during the saiya jin arc was capable of 2.9030215827338129496402877697842e+32 joules of energy.
Goku on Namek without Kaiouken had a PL of 60,000 was capable of 5.4431654676258992805755395683453e+32 joules of energy.
With Kaiouken, his PL was at 180,000, at which point he was capable of 1.6329496402877697841726618705036e+33 joules of energy.
When he first fought Freezer without the Kaiouken his PL was 375,000, so he was capable of 3.4019784172661870503597122302158e+33 of energy.
While SSJ Goku at a PL of 15,000,000 was capable of 1.3607913669064748201438848920863e+35 joules of energy.
If we could figure out how much joules it takes to blow up a solar system, we could figure out Ultra Perfect Cell's PL.
But I think I satisfied your requirements.
BTW all calcuations used the lower limit for destroying the moon.
Red herring. I never said that it didnt happen. I was challenging the fanboy argument that because it happened, it means it was a DET event, although this appears to have slipped under your eagle eye.JodoForce wrote: We saw it happen in the cartoons, therefore it did happen. Suspension of disbelief, remember?
Seeing is only part of it. It has to be properly analyzed as well. Your analogy regarding the mechs is flawed btw, since the magnitude of the energy involved is vastly out of proportion to most mechas, and a mecha is typically more massive than a human. (besides which, you clearly missed the point as to why I mentioned momentum)Now, there are cases in other stories where the storyline implies one explanation that is scientifically implausible, whereas there is a scientifically plausible explanation that is not obvious at first but is actually consistent with the observed evidence. (e.g. power figures for Clan mechs, IIRC; the story seems to imply high-powered weapons but based on the fact that none of the mechs fall over when firing and their weapons only damage other mechs, another plausible explanation is that the mech weapons are weak); however this is simply not the case here--
We SEE the original form Buu fire a normal attack blast at the earth. (such blasts cn be flung at multiple shots per second).
We SEE everyone gasp in horror and say the earth is goner (OBVIOUSLY BECAUSE OF THE BLAST)
We SEE Goku desperately trying to save the people around him in time by getting a hold on everybody and then teleporting to King Kai's planet.
We SEE Earth blowing apart.
No, I'm going to argue that it was not a direct energy transfer event. Nice Strawman, by the way.As a brilliant start to your 'scientific investigation of DBZ', are you going to try to argue that
1. Buu did not destroy the earth
or
2. The earth was not destroyed?
![]()
Maybe you're going to resort to more strawman tactics to debate me.Perhaps you are going to claim (1) by saying that someone planted a multi-zillion ton antimatter bomb and set it to go off the moment Buu's blast hit the earth?![]()
Matter and energy are interchangable (hint relatavistic mass). Not only that, but large quantities of energy do in FACT have momentum. This is well discussed on the website regarding shields, but obviously you never bothered to figure that out. (and we're dealing with such a tremendously massive quantity of energy there would be A HELL of alot of momentum.)Now, there ARE ways to rationalize the lack of recoil. For one thing, it's obvious that it is an ENERGY blast and not some kind of KE projectile--did you consider that perhaps the damage has something to do with other forms of energy transfer like, oh I don't know, HEAT???![]()
Its only a convincing argument if you're totally uninterested in making an actual effort at presenting an intelligent debate. (In your case, it obviously works quite well for you.)'DBZ fanboys' don't ordinarily tax their brains much because they shouldn't really need to--don't you think that "x character can destroy planets - he wins!" is quite a convincing argument already if the statement can be proved true by direct observation of the show?
Even IF the energy of the blasts were all delivered in KE (there is no reason to think this is so) remember that these fighters are able to propel themselves at great speeds (lightspeed and beyond apparently, if some of the others' claims are to be believed) through air and space--they could be just using their movement ability to counteract the recoil of their blasts.
No, its some unknown mechanism because the effects are inconsistent with a DET event.JodoForce wrote:Ah. So your argument goes: SSJs blow up planets, but it's not done using a direct energy transfer, so it can't hurt anyone.
Nice try.
yet another bad analogy. If you fire a gun, your arm suffers recoil. Guess which is closer to an energy discharge, if you're so on top of things.If you throw a hand grenade that's going to blow up a continent, does your body get flung backwards at supersonic speeds?![]()
Try figuring out how many kilograms of matter 2e32 joules of energy are worth before shooting your mouth off like you know something. Mass and energy are interchangable. If you ADD energy to something, particularily in large quantities, it will become more massive (IE relatavistic mass when an object approaches the spee dof light.) And recall that momentum is MASS times velocity. Increasing one automatically increases the momentum.I KNOW that if you fire a laser with enough power to blow up a planet you are going to be flung back like that. If you fire a slow moving bolt of plasma at 9 jillion kelvins with a containment mechanism that releases on impact, which causes its destruction of the earth by heat, does that fling you back at supersonic speeds too?![]()
Red herring. We're talking about destroying planets, not affecting others.OK, suppose Goku produces his destructive power using some exotic chain reaction that requires much less input energy than output energy.
Show me ONE instance where this chain reaction doesn't manage to initiate on some exotic matter, never mind ordinary people. It doesn't matter that you need an exotic chain reaction for your weapon to work if the chain reaction works on absolutely EVERYTHING!
It is possible that their energy blasts detonate on impact like a hand grenade.yet another bad analogy. If you fire a gun, your arm suffers recoil. Guess which is closer to an energy discharge, if you're so on top of things.If you throw a hand grenade that's going to blow up a continent, does your body get flung backwards at supersonic speeds?![]()
![]()
I have conceded that the heat energy would be manifested in momentum too. Let's move on and enough with the ad hominems already.Try figuring out how many kilograms of matter 2e32 joules of energy are worth before shooting your mouth off like you know something. Mass and energy are interchangable. If you ADD energy to something, particularily in large quantities, it will become more massive (IE relatavistic mass when an object approaches the spee dof light.) And recall that momentum is MASS times velocity. Increasing one automatically increases the momentum.
On the contrary, it is very relevant because the blasts they use to destroy planets are NOT SHOWN TO BE ANY DIFFERENT FROM THOSE USED TO ATTACK PEOPLE AND OTHER OBJECTS. If a chain reaction is used to destroy planets, it can be assumed that the same chain reaction is used from killing people to blowing up mountains.Red herring. We're talking about destroying planets, not affecting others.OK, suppose Goku produces his destructive power using some exotic chain reaction that requires much less input energy than output energy.
Show me ONE instance where this chain reaction doesn't manage to initiate on some exotic matter, never mind ordinary people. It doesn't matter that you need an exotic chain reaction for your weapon to work if the chain reaction works on absolutely EVERYTHING!
By the way, there is a precedent suggesting that planet-destruction is NOT a DET Event - that being Frieza attempting to destroy Namek.
Wait a minute this doesn't sound right...On the contrary, it is very relevant because the blasts they use to destroy planets are NOT SHOWN TO BE ANY DIFFERENT FROM THOSE USED TO ATTACK PEOPLE AND OTHER OBJECTS. If a chain reaction is used to destroy planets, it can be assumed that the same chain reaction is used from killing people to blowing up mountains.
Also, there were many planet destroying events in DBZ and they have different properties. Frieza's destruction of Namek was a delayed 'chain reaction' because he held back. In other cases where the planet blew up immediately, can you say for sure that those were also chain reaction events? Those WERE consistent with a simple DET event. Can the same type of chain reaction as in Namek be used to destroy a planet in an instant flash?
What are you refuting? Define "it" please.Connor MacLeod wrote: No it doesn't.
I gave you the output that these characters were capable of (LL mind you). For the sake of this topic. If you choose to ignore the numbers then your ignorent.If you're going to bother analyzing the scene, consider all the implications of destroying a moon (IE where the energy goes, debris hitting the planet, how the loss of a large planetary body like the moon would affect the planet, etc.)
Look at him, he clearly is pushed back, but he was able to hold his ground. You know someone that can use ki in such a way could use their ki to comphensate for the change in momentem you know.You might also consider dealing with the momentum issues of such a tremendous blast of energy, and why Roshi was still in place.
hint I have you the LL numbers, if you wanted me to give you the UL numbers I could do that too. but if you're going to complain about the numbers, then do the work yourself.I'm interested in an actual analysis, not a meaningless generation of the biggest numbers possible. (hint: figure out how much momentum is in a 2e32 joule blast, consider how that momentum is going to act on a human-scale mass.)