Now, now enough of this completely irrelevant discussion. We all know that Picard is the superior Captain.Certainly, if you pretend Star Trek started in 1987.
To the Reference goes the Cookie.
Moderator: Vympel
Now, now enough of this completely irrelevant discussion. We all know that Picard is the superior Captain.Certainly, if you pretend Star Trek started in 1987.
You are a fucking GENIOUS! This is hilarious, it would have provided a lot of comic relief if every few episodes the good Captain had to provide an explanation to Starfleet as to why his Political Officer just met an untimely end. Not to mention that suddenly all those Holodeck and Transporter accidents would actually make sense, instead of suggesting sloppy engineering. It would also provide an interesting angle for some of the episodes, particularly those with Q in them. "But mon Capitan, you have no choice. Unless of course you want Starfleet to know what really happened to all those Political Officers..."Jalinth wrote:I didn't like the ship's councilor role. Although the "political officer" function on board could have made a nice spin. Then Picard could see how often "alien attacks" or "unknown diseases" could get rid of them. You'd have two categories of disposables, red shirts and political officers. Could be an interesting plot twist - how to justify to Star Fleet the loss of yet another political officer (Picard going through the various causes of death to find an unused one - beheading by turbolift, done. Tortured to death by aliens, done. Friendly fire - 85 accidental phaser hits in the back, while in bed, done. Death in bawdy house due to sexual overload with 5 prostitutes, still open.)