What can pull a vessel from warp?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Lancer
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2003-12-17 06:06pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Lancer »

Lord Revan wrote:
Matt Huang wrote:If transporters can lock onto and transport somebody on a stationary object while the ship is at warp, why can't weapons fire at warp?
It's not couldn't fire weapons at warp (since ENT are human ships could do that), but it's nearly impossible to hit any sublight and/or stationary object due to the speeds involved (by the time you have a target lock your out of weapons range).
and it's somehow easier to grab a target w/ transporters at warp?
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Post by JME2 »

Matt Huang wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:
Matt Huang wrote:If transporters can lock onto and transport somebody on a stationary object while the ship is at warp, why can't weapons fire at warp?
It's not couldn't fire weapons at warp (since ENT are human ships could do that), but it's nearly impossible to hit any sublight and/or stationary object due to the speeds involved (by the time you have a target lock your out of weapons range).
and it's somehow easier to grab a target w/ transporters at warp?
It's possible, but risky.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Matt Huang wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:
Matt Huang wrote:If transporters can lock onto and transport somebody on a stationary object while the ship is at warp, why can't weapons fire at warp?
It's not couldn't fire weapons at warp (since ENT are human ships could do that), but it's nearly impossible to hit any sublight and/or stationary object due to the speeds involved (by the time you have a target lock your out of weapons range).
and it's somehow easier to grab a target w/ transporters at warp?
Well we have seen weapons being fired at objects at warp, but we haven't seen weapons being fired at warp to sublight target or sublight object firing at an target that's traveling at warp. IIRC even near-warp transport is considered very dangerous while possible. BTW where did they make a inwarp transport since all I can remember is the near warp transport in TNG.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Post by Praxis »

Yep, warp ships can hit warp ships (only with torpedoes), and sublight ships can hit sublight ships. Warp ships have NEVER been seen hitting nonmoving ships.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Praxis wrote:Yep, warp ships can hit warp ships (only with torpedoes), and sublight ships can hit sublight ships. Warp ships have NEVER been seen hitting nonmoving ships.
Enterprice (NX-01) has fired and hit with its phase cannons while at warp.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Stark »

Matt Huang wrote:If transporters can lock onto and transport somebody on a stationary object while the ship is at warp, why can't weapons fire at warp?
Oh go away. Don't ask me why they don't, fact is they don't. Remember how evidence works? Since they don't do it, even when it'd be a damn good idea, it is INDEED inventing capability to say they can, or will. Fanwankery does not translate into real capability.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16502
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Missing Alfred

Post by Batman »

Lord Revan wrote:Enterprice (NX-01) has fired and hit with its phase cannons while at warp.
At what?
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Batman wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:Enterprice (NX-01) has fired and hit with its phase cannons while at warp.
At what?
a Suliban ship.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16502
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Missing Alfred

Post by Batman »

Lord Revan wrote:
Batman wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:Enterprice (NX-01) has fired and hit with its phase cannons while at warp.
At what?
a Suliban ship.
Moving at Warp or STL? Warp-to-Warp combat was never under debate.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16502
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Missing Alfred

Post by Batman »

And where does the information that you can transport between ships at Warp and STL/stationary objects come from?
Several TNG episodes indicate that rather you can't and have to go sublight for the transport ('touch-and-go downwarping' I think they called it),
and transport between ships that are both at Warp require matching Warp velocities, indicating that the relative speed of both parties is indeed the deciding factor.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Batman wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:
Batman wrote: At what?
a Suliban ship.
Moving at Warp or STL? Warp-to-Warp combat was never under debate.
It warp-to-warp what Praxis said to be torps only.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16502
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Missing Alfred

Post by Batman »

Lord Revan wrote:
Batman wrote: Moving at Warp or STL? Warp-to-Warp combat was never under debate.
It warp-to-warp what Praxis said to be torps only.
Ah, thanx. I had missed that.
IIRC there are a number of Warp-to-Warp phaser/disruptor usage incidents from DS9 so I thought that point was moot.
Thanks for clearing that up.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Batman wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:
Batman wrote: Moving at Warp or STL? Warp-to-Warp combat was never under debate.
It warp-to-warp what Praxis said to be torps only.
Ah, thanx. I had missed that.
IIRC there are a number of Warp-to-Warp phaser/disruptor usage incidents from DS9 so I thought that point was moot.
Thanks for clearing that up.
no problem
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Post by Sarevok »

Praxis wrote:Yep, warp ships can hit warp ships (only with torpedoes), and sublight ships can hit sublight ships. Warp ships have NEVER been seen hitting nonmoving ships.
Beam weapons do work at warp sometimes. In one Voyeger episode (Human Error) an autonomous missile shot down multiple photon torpedoes while both Voyeger and the missile was at warp
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

IUnknown wrote:
Praxis wrote:Yep, warp ships can hit warp ships (only with torpedoes), and sublight ships can hit sublight ships. Warp ships have NEVER been seen hitting nonmoving ships.
Beam weapons do work at warp sometimes. In one Voyeger episode (Human Error) an autonomous missile shot down multiple photon torpedoes while both Voyeger and the missile was at warp
and there NX-01 using its phase cannons at warp (2150's human tech)
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
The Silence and I
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1658
Joined: 2002-11-09 09:04pm
Location: Bleh!

Post by The Silence and I »

And a dominion bug attacking a runabout in DS9, it is quite well established that beam weapons can be fired from warp. Warp strafing is also theoretically possible, but due to relative speeds and targeting ranges this becomes impractical.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Stark »

The Silence and I wrote:And a dominion bug attacking a runabout in DS9, it is quite well established that beam weapons can be fired from warp. Warp strafing is also theoretically possible, but due to relative speeds and targeting ranges this becomes impractical.
Which is why we never, ever even see a passing ship dump a load of torps on a target. I mean, THAT should be EASY. (short time on target needed, guided weapons, warp sustainers, not a beam) But they don't, probably because for some reason beyond our imperfect understanding of their technology it doesn't work.

I'll agree that it *sounds* plausible. But they never, ever do it. Basing any ST space battle around a tactic there are obviously reasons for avoiding is just stupid. Its saying the Master should just materialise his TARDIS around the entire universe and keep it in his pocket for laughs.
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Post by Praxis »

The Silence and I wrote:And a dominion bug attacking a runabout in DS9, it is quite well established that beam weapons can be fired from warp. Warp strafing is also theoretically possible, but due to relative speeds and targeting ranges this becomes impractical.
Those are polarons, not phasers. They look similar, but are completely different.
Post Reply