Do you agree with Eddington?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

CDiehl wrote:Do you really think it's impossible that the colonists attempted to find relief through official channels before resorting to fighting? I can imagine them pleading, protesting and petitioning the leaders of both sides for months or years, and being ignored or rebuffed at every turn. I can also imagine they didn't bother with all that, assuming the Cardassians encouraged the attacks and the Federation would refuse to aid people no longer their citizens.
They were still Federation citizens though and they hadn't told Starfleet what ws going on because Sisko didn't have a clue (and they hadn't told anybody about he weapons smuggling because they had no proof).
As for them attacking Federation cargo ships, it makes sense from their point of view. Those ships were carryng supplies that made the Cardassians' campaign against them feasible.
Were they? Sure the replicators were but they attacked regular civilian shipping.
I think the Maquis' goal was to make the Cardassian attacks on them unfeasible, by making them have to pick between helping their own population or aiding the attacks on the colonies. By sending supplies to Cardassia, the Federation was helping to extend the war. The friend of your enemy is also your enemy, so they attack Federation shipping, just as they attack Cardassian shipping. It's sad, but it's all they can do with what they have. Whether those ships were owned by civilians or the government, armed or unarmed, Cardassian or Federation, they were carrying supplies useful to the war against the colonies, making them a legitimate military target.
No, they also attacked Federation shipping that had nothing to do with the Cardassians and their aim was revenge nothing more.
If either group didn't like it, they could stop any time they wanted. The colonists could not do the same if they wanted to live.
They could have sought negotiation but they wanted revenge not peace as Cal Hudson stated.
Finally, even just sending those supplies, let alone hunting the Maquis dwn for the Cardassians, violates longstanding Federation policy not to take sides in an internal conflict, not to mention the Prime Directive.
It isn't an internal conflict; the Maquis are federation citizens committing crimes against the Federation and the Cardassian Union.
Thos planets are Cardassin territory and their inhabitants are Cardassian citizens. Therefore, it's an internal matter, and none of the Federation's business. If those colonists were Federation citizens, the Federation would be obligated to defend them.
They are Federation citizens.
Unless the Maquis, or the Cardassians, were receiving aid from an outside group, the Federation could do nothing, and even if they were receiving such aid, the Federation could only move to interdict that aid, using the events of the Klingon Civil War as precedent.
Not really as I have said it wasn't an internal matter, they are Federation citizens, committing crimes inside Federation space and are staging from Federation space to attack Cardassians.
User avatar
Burak Gazan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1536
Joined: 2002-12-30 07:45pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
Contact:

Post by Burak Gazan »

One thing that has always nagged at me, how the hell can they be Fed citizens if the live in the DMZ? I grant you that Fed citizens living IN the Federation are subject to Fed law, but it doesnt make sense to try and apply law to FORMER citizens living in what is supposed to be a demilitarized zone -- which btw, the Feds lack the spine to face down the Cardies over :evil: But they WILL pursue, and prosecute those who even commit the henious crime of even supplying them with food and medical supplies :roll:
Dax gave quaint speech about how the Klingon Empire needs to die and be re-formed; I think the Federation needs to die a similar death, and perhaps rediscover what it was created for.
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Burak Gazan wrote:One thing that has always nagged at me, how the hell can they be Fed citizens if the live in the DMZ? I grant you that Fed citizens living IN the Federation are subject to Fed law, but it doesnt make sense to try and apply law to FORMER citizens living in what is supposed to be a demilitarized zone -- which btw, the Feds lack the spine to face down the Cardies over :evil: But they WILL pursue, and prosecute those who even commit the henious crime of even supplying them with food and medical supplies :roll:
Dax gave quaint speech about how the Klingon Empire needs to die and be re-formed; I think the Federation needs to die a similar death, and perhaps rediscover what it was created for.
I would guess they have dual citizenship (those under Cardassian jurisdiction) and aiding terrorists is aiding terrorists no matter if it is just medical supplies. Even if they weren't federation citizens they still commit crimes in Federation space, could I walk into the US and start robbing people at random and then whine when they arrest me?
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

TheDarkling wrote:
Stofsk wrote:Ahem. You're forgetting how the Cardassians armed their colonists with weaponry, which was against the treaty, and Starfleet did nothing. The Maquis formed in response to that.
The Maquis were already armed and fighting before they even informed the Federation about the suspected arming process.
Yes... and? When they did inform them, Starfleet did nothing. Remember what Hudson said to Sisko? "My position here (as Starfleet's rep to the colonies) is a JOKE." He would know more than anyone about the situation in the DMZ, and any attempts to request assistance from the gov't would be in vain.
Indeed it is true the Cardassians aren't blameless but the Maquis chose to live under Cardassian rule and they started an unofficial war with them without giving the Federation a chance to lean on the Cardassians.
The problem here is that the Federation was following a policy of appeasement - while the Federation and its ships are stronger by large, perhaps the Cardassians hold some special advantage, regional superiority perhaps (as in the logistics for waging a war would favour the Cardies more than the Feddies)? And a better soldier ethic? For whatever reason the Federation were afraid that the Maquis would jeopardise the peace initiative.

Anyway I disagree with your assertion that the Maquis chose to live under the Cardassians. They chose to live on the colonies of their birth, homes which had been theirs for decades. In my mind they had a right to defend themselves, and the Federation had an obligation to defend it's people.
Image
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Stofsk wrote: Yes... and? When they did inform them, Starfleet did nothing. Remember what Hudson said to Sisko? "My position here (as Starfleet's rep to the colonies) is a JOKE." He would know more than anyone about the situation in the DMZ, and any attempts to request assistance from the gov't would be in vain.
So he thinks but they didn't even try but jumped straight to violence.
The problem here is that the Federation was following a policy of appeasement - while the Federation and its ships are stronger by large, perhaps the Cardassians hold some special advantage, regional superiority perhaps (as in the logistics for waging a war would favour the Cardies more than the Feddies)? And a better soldier ethic? For whatever reason the Federation were afraid that the Maquis would jeopardise the peace initiative.
The Federation wanted peace and they didn't want the Maquis to upset that, this isn't news.
Anyway I disagree with your assertion that the Maquis chose to live under the Cardassians. They chose to live on the colonies of their birth, homes which had been theirs for decades. In my mind they had a right to defend themselves, and the Federation had an obligation to defend it's people.
No they were given the choice, move or accept Cardassian rule and they chose.
Yes the Federation shouldn't have given up the colonies (but only because they could have won the war, if the war would have cost billions of lives then I would have had no problem with moving the colonists in order to gain peace) but once that ship sailed the colonists should have just moved.
However they didn't and started a private war, after which they should have sought a peace settlement once the facts were known but instead they were out for revenge and to help ion this quest for vengeance they were willing to attack civilians both Federation and Cardassian.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

TheDarkling wrote:So he thinks but they didn't even try but jumped straight to violence.
Why does he think his position is a joke then? He woke up one day and declared it to Sisko? Gimme a break, the guy obviously thought the Federation was against it's obligations. The fact that Starfleet jumped at the chance to snag the Maquis shows that Starfleet wasn't interested in a peaceful settlement.
The Federation wanted peace and they didn't want the Maquis to upset that, this isn't news.
And so they sold out their own citizens.
No they were given the choice, move or accept Cardassian rule and they chose.
What a great choice. Tell me, did the colonists have any say in the matter? Oh yeah, they did - "Journey's End" - and their concerns were rejected.
Yes the Federation shouldn't have given up the colonies (but only because they could have won the war, if the war would have cost billions of lives then I would have had no problem with moving the colonists in order to gain peace) but once that ship sailed the colonists should have just moved.
Justify that. Why should they give up their homes because a bunch of space nazis are bullying you?
However they didn't and started a private war, after which they should have sought a peace settlement once the facts were known but instead they were out for revenge and to help ion this quest for vengeance they were willing to attack civilians both Federation and Cardassian.
Except that the Maquis don't exist in a vaccum. You assert that "once the facts were known they should pack their bags and leave" - well, what about the Cardassians? Like I said before, the Federation did nothing about the Cardassians arming their colonists. Starfleet could've intervened on behalf of the Maquis, they didn't, which forced the Maquis on a divergent course. The Cardassians didn't stop hunting the Maquis down once it was revealed they were being naughty and breaking the treaty. It is unreasonable to expect the Maquis to surrender when their enemy is bearing down on them.

Incidentally this was one time I actually (semi)enjoyed ST writing, it showed that the reset button wasn't going to be reused for this matter.
Image
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Stofsk wrote: Why does he think his position is a joke then? He woke up one day and declared it to Sisko? Gimme a break, the guy obviously thought the Federation was against it's obligations. The fact that Starfleet jumped at the chance to snag the Maquis shows that Starfleet wasn't interested in a peaceful settlement.
Sisko constantly offered a peaceful settlement to Hudson and Hudson outright told him he didn't want peace but wanted revenge, then Sisko tried again, and again and again.
And so they sold out their own citizens.
Indeed.
What a great choice. Tell me, did the colonists have any say in the matter? Oh yeah, they did - "Journey's End" - and their concerns were rejected.
And? So? Therefore?

They chose Cardassian rule instead of moving.
Justify that. Why should they give up their homes because a bunch of space nazis are bullying you?
They should have moved when the Federation asked them to, why should they have moved? because it is better to move and build a new life than wait around for the Cardassians to ruin you anyway and possibly kill you.
Except that the Maquis don't exist in a vaccum. You assert that "once the facts were known they should pack their bags and leave" - well, what about the Cardassians? Like I said before, the Federation did nothing about the Cardassians arming their colonists.
Rubbish, Sisko stopped that arming of the colonists when he discovered it and Central Command admitted what was going on and put a stop to the "renegade operation".

After this he again offers Cal the olive branch, with the weapons arming stopped peace could have been sought but the Maquis chose to escalate the conflict which was most illogical as Quark pointed out.
Starfleet could've intervened on behalf of the Maquis, they didn't, which forced the Maquis on a divergent course. The Cardassians didn't stop hunting the Maquis down once it was revealed they were being naughty and breaking the treaty.
That is because the Maquis continued to commit terrorist actions, Sisko stopped the weapons smuggling to eth Cardassians and that wasn't enough to bring the Maquis to the table, who were by their own words out for retaliation.
It is unreasonable to expect the Maquis to surrender when their enemy is bearing down on them.
They weren't, a chance for peace existed and the Maquis weren't interested and in the end it led to their deaths.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

Sisko constantly offered a peaceful settlement to Hudson and Hudson outright told him he didn't want peace but wanted revenge, then Sisko tried again, and again and again.
No he didn't. He tried once, then he went off to rescue Dukat. Then when he went to the DMZ he opened fire on the Maquis.
And? So? Therefore?

They chose Cardassian rule instead of moving.
They shouldn't have been forced to move.
They should have moved when the Federation asked them to, why should they have moved? because it is better to move and build a new life than wait around for the Cardassians to ruin you anyway and possibly kill you.
If so then the Federation should have supported their views over the Cardassians.
Rubbish, Sisko stopped that arming of the colonists when he discovered it and Central Command admitted what was going on and put a stop to the "renegade operation".
Except that Picard, Necheyev, Sisko et al were unconvinced. "Gee, the Space Nazis have told us they've stopped - I wonder, are they telling the truth?" No-one seemed to think so, they just couldn't prove it.
After this he again offers Cal the olive branch, with the weapons arming stopped peace could have been sought but the Maquis chose to escalate the conflict which was most illogical as Quark pointed out.
Perhaps.
That is because the Maquis continued to commit terrorist actions, Sisko stopped the weapons smuggling to eth Cardassians and that wasn't enough to bring the Maquis to the table, who were by their own words out for retaliation.
They weren't, a chance for peace existed and the Maquis weren't interested and in the end it led to their deaths.
You forget that not only were the Cardassians being armed, but they were also being encouraged to harass the Maquis colonists. In that environment people will push back. You keep saying that after the first arms shipment to the Cardassians was stopped the Maquis should've stopped too. Sorry, but they (the Cardassians) were inciting the violence and the Maquis were defending themselves. Just because Sisko stopped one arm's shipment, and Central Command says the policy has been discontinued (something which Picard, Necheyev et al didn't believe for one second) does not mean the Maquis didn't have legitimate grievances that were ignored by the Federation.
Image
CDiehl
Jedi Master
Posts: 1369
Joined: 2003-06-13 01:46pm

Post by CDiehl »

So, the Federation left a number of their citizens in the hands of the Cardassians, neglected to protect them from harm, failed to expose the Cardassian government's aid to those attacking them when it was within their power to do so, and even punished their own citizens for resisting the treatment they received at the hands of the Cardassians, all in the name of an illusion of peace. If the Federation had any honor (not the macho BS Klingons call honor), they would have told the Cardassians where they could shove their claims to those planets, if any, rather than displace those people from their homes or subject them to the mercies of a vile dictatorship they just defeated in a war.
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Stofsk wrote: No he didn't. He tried once, then he went off to rescue Dukat. Then when he went to the DMZ he opened fire on the Maquis.
SISKO
We'll go to Cardassia... find the
evidence to back up your claim. And
when we do, we'll take it to the
Federation...

HUDSON
(interrupting)
No. The Federation abandoned us.
Told us to take care of ourselves.
Well, that's what we intend to do.
But you, Ben, you could be invaluable.
(off Sisko's look)
Let us use your station.

He refuses Federation intervention in favour of military action.



SISKO
You don't want peace, Cal. You want
revenge.


HUDSON
I prefer to call it retaliation.

As he said they don't want peace.

SISKO
Tell Cal Hudson I haven't told
Starfleet anything yet.



SISKO (Cont'd)
Tell him we can still solve this
thing together, but we're running out
of time. Tell him I still have his
uniform. He can have it back anytime
he wants.


Again Sisko sends word to Cal that peace is available.

SISKO
I have reason to be. The way I see
it, now that we've stopped the
shipments of Cardassian weapons,
there's no longer any need for the
Maquis. You and I can work together
to reach a peace agreement with the
Cardassian colonies.

HUDSON
It's too late for that. We're in a
war here. And I intend to win it.


The weapons have stopped and again Sisko offers peace but Cal still wants his war.

SISKO
Sisko to Hudson. It's not going to
work, Cal. Turn those ships around
before someone gets hurt.

HUDSON
(on monitor, cheerful)
I was going to say the same thing to
you.

Sisko offers Cal one final chance to end this before Cal forces Sisko to prevent him from killing Cardassian civilians and starting a full out war.

They shouldn't have been forced to move.
No disagreement there but when it came down to it they should have.
If so then the Federation should have supported their views over the Cardassians.
The Federation wanted peace and sacrificing some colonists homes for the greater good didn't seem that to high a price to pay.

Let me ask you if faced with a choice between the deaths of millions or moving a few hundred people which would you choose? (Answer the question please don't avoid it I will explain below)


Now while this isn't the situation the Federation was faced with their natural pacfism made them more willing to accept peace for worse terms than a normal person world.
Except that Picard, Necheyev, Sisko et al were unconvinced. "Gee, the Space Nazis have told us they've stopped - I wonder, are they telling the truth?" No-one seemed to think so, they just couldn't prove it.
Sisko did prove it and he stopped it.

You forget that not only were the Cardassians being armed, but they were also being encouraged to harass the Maquis colonists. In that environment people will push back. You keep saying that after the first arms shipment to the Cardassians was stopped the Maquis should've stopped too. Sorry, but they (the Cardassians) were inciting the violence and the Maquis were defending themselves. Just because Sisko stopped one arm's shipment, and Central Command says the policy has been discontinued (something which Picard, Necheyev et al didn't believe for one second) does not mean the Maquis didn't have legitimate grievances that were ignored by the Federation.
But they should have stood down and given a peace process a chance, instead they were eager to kill some Cardies and get revenge - this is the problem I have with them, they sacrificed the interests of the colonists for their own petty desires for revenge.
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

CDiehl wrote:So, the Federation left a number of their citizens in the hands of the Cardassians,
No they chose to stay there
neglected to protect them from harm,
The Federations ability to protect them was limited and the Federation wasn't gte the information they needed.
failed to expose the Cardassian government's aid to those attacking them when it was within their power to do so,
no they did prove it and stopped it.
and even punished their own citizens for resisting the treatment they received at the hands of the Cardassians,
if by resisting you mean waging war upon Cardassian and the Federation then yes they did
all in the name of an illusion of peace.
Who is to say it was an illusion
If the Federation had any honor (not the macho BS Klingons call honor), they would have told the Cardassians where they could shove their claims to those planets, if any, rather than displace those people from their homes or subject them to the mercies of a vile dictatorship they just defeated in a war.
They had no just defeated them in a war, this has already been made clear in the thread, the treaty was to promote peace by giving the Caradssians no reason to wage a war aganist the Federation.
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Post by Chris OFarrell »

Just to make a few points on this:

Firstly, I'll just post the relevant quotes, then discuss the effects.
"TNG Journey's End"

PICARD
You were saying something about
the Cardasians I believe...

NECHEYEV
Yes. The Federation has just
completed a very long and
difficult series of negotiations
regarding the final status of our
border with the Cardasians.

Necheyev hands Picard the PADD she brought in.

NECHEYEV
(continuing)
These will be the official
boundaries... you'll notice that
a demilitarized zone has also been
created along the border. Neither
side will be permitted to place
military outposts, conduct fleet
exercises, or station warships
anywhere in the demilitarized
area.

PICARD
(off PADD)
This border will put several
Federation colonies in Cardassian
territory... and some Cardassian
colonies in ours.

Necheyev sips some tea... she's not completely happy
with this agreement.

NECHEYEV
The agreement is by no means
perfect... neither side got
everything they wanted... but
everyone got something. And as
someone once said, diplomacy is
the art of the possible.
(beat)
Those colonies finding themselves
on the wrong side of the border
will have to be moved.

Picard doesn't like the sound of that.

PICARD
The colonists are not going to be
very happy about that... some of
them have been there for decades.

NECHEYEV
It won't be easy... but it is a
reasonable price to pay for peace.
(beat)
Your mission is to evacuate the
colony on Dorvan Five.

PICARD
Dorvan Five... that's where the
group of North American Indians
has settled, isn't it?

NECHEYEV
Yes. They've been there for about
twenty years... they've
established a village in a small
valley on the southern continent.

Picard sits back in his chair... very disturbed by
this. Necheyev is vaguely irritated -- she doesn't
respond well to resistance from her subordinates, but
she holds her tongue and gives him a polite smile.

NECHEYEV
Is there something wrong?

PICARD
(continuing)
Admiral... centuries ago, the
North American Indians were
forcibly displaced from their
ancestral lands. This group on
Dorvan Five originally left Earth
two hundred years ago because they
wanted to preserve their cultural
identities.

NECHEYEV
(dry)
I am aware of that Captain...

PICARD
There are certain... disturbing
historical parallels here. Once
again, these people are being
asked to leave their homes because
of political decisions made by a
distant government.

Necheyev nearly gives him a tart reply, but instead,
she takes a sip of her tea... trying to maintain the
civil atmosphere.

NECHEYEV
An Indian representative was
included in the deliberations of
the Federation Council. His
objections were noted,
discussed... but ultimately
rejected.

Necheyev leans forward, trying to make Picard see the
validity of her position... trying to make him
understand.

NECHEYEV
(continuing)
Captain, the Indians colonized
Dorvan only twenty years ago...
and at that time they were warned
the planet was hotly disputed by
the Cardassians. The bottom line
is... they never should have
settled there in the first place.

PICARD
Then perhaps we should not have
allowed them to settle the planet
originally. But to go to them
twenty years later and ask them to
leave what is now their home...

Necheyev sits back in her chair and regards him for a
moment... her expression is weary... tired.

NECHEYEV
I made the same argument to the
Federation Council. But it took
three years to negotiate this
treaty... some concessions had to
be made... and this is one of
them.

.......................

And at the end:

PICARD
Anthwara... I want to make
absolutely sure you understand the
implications of this agreement.
By giving up your status as
Federation citizens... any future
request you or your people make
for assistance from Starfleet will
go unanswered. You will be on
your own... and under Cardassian
jurisdiction.

ANTHWARA
I understand, Captain. And we are
prepared to take that risk.
(to Gul Evek)
Will the Cardassian government
honor the agreement you've made
here?

GUL EVEK
I believe that I can convince them
this is an... equitable solution.
I cannot speak for every
Cardassian you will encounter...
but if you leave us alone... I
suspect that we will do the same.
(to Picard)
Will this be acceptable to
Starfleet Command?

PICARD
It will take some doing... but
with Admiral Necheyev's support,
I think they'll go along with it
in the end.

So first we know:

1. The final boarder would gain and lose some territory for both sides. Neither side got everything they wanted, but they did get something that would WORK for both sides. So we can presume this was the best diplomatic outcome factoring in strengths and weaknesses of both sides, the current situation in the Alpha Quadrant, loses in the war for both sides, relative strength of the claims to territory e.tc.

2. While Picard raises moral objections to the idea of moving the Indians, he does not raise LEGAL objections (and neither does anyone else through the episode). Which makes it quite probable that colonies (specifically human colonies which would make them subject to Terran law -> Federation law) are legally able to be moved from their world if so decided. No different to laws today saying that the Government has a right to seize your property for its own uses if the situation warrants it, while paying you proper compensation. The Federation appeared to be willing to go above and beyond to compensate them, they refused.

3. When these planets then decided to stay under Cardasian jurisdiction, they did so KNOWINGLY and WILLFULY (at least the Indian planet) renouncing all Federation citizenship and with the EXPLICITE and formal warning from the Federation that they would not be able to help or interfere with them from then on.

4. At least one of the planets if not more were claimed by the Cardasians before the colonists moved in. And they settled the planet regardless.

5. The Boarder between the UFP and Cardasia runs through the middle of the DMZ, not the edges as some people appear to think. Out from that boarder on both sides extending some distance is the DMZ. Inside that area, no fleets can go, no military outposts e.t.c. The idea clearly to create a non military buffer between the two powers instead of a Korra type situation. In the DMZ both sides have jurisdiction over their own space, but are limited to what they can bring in. Which is great to keep the tension down...but unfortunately makes it horribly hard to police groups like the Maquis.

Moving on. DS9 'The Maquis Pt 1 & 2. Note that this is when the Maquis make their appearance.

HUDSON
(nods in agreement)
You can't imagine what my life's
been like since the Federation
abandoned these colonies...

SISKO
(reacts)
Abandoned them? Doesn't your presence
there...

HUDSON
(interrupting)
My presence there is a joke. I'm
supposed to help these colonies
function under the terms of the new
treaty -- what the hell does that
mean?

SISKO
I thought these colonists wanted to
stay... that they refused to be
evacuated.

HUDSON
(shrugs, what else
could they do?)
The treaty gave away their territory
to the Cardassians... territory these
people had invested their lives in...
if you knew them like I do, Ben,
you'd understand why they couldn't
leave. It's a bad treaty. The
Federation gave away too much.

SISKO
Several Cardassian colonies wanted
to stay on the Federation side of
the Zone too... it seemed like a
reasonable compromise...

HUDSON
The Cardassians were delighted to
keep their colonies in our territory.
Because they knew we'd protect them.
But they're not about to do the same
for ours.

Sisko frowns at the dire prediction...

SISKO
A number of Admirals at Starfleet
Command are worried the destruction

of the Bok'Nor might jeopardise the
treaty.

HUDSON
(a critical grin,
shakes his head)
Are they really?

SISKO
As the two ranking officers along
the Cardassian border, we've been
asked to assess the potential risk...

HUDSON
There is no risk, Ben. None. I've
been dealing with the Cardassians
for most of my professional life.
Believe me, the Cardassians are very
happy with what they got out of this
treaty. They're not going to risk
losing all they've gained by sending
forces into the Zone. They're much
too slick for that. If I were you,
I'd be more concerned about security
along the Bajoran border...
1. The Cardasians were quite happy with losing the planets they lost to the Federation because they knew the Federation would treat them equitably. This also makes it clear that the Cardasians didn't evacuate their worlds but like the Federation just swapped them. Why is unclear, the far more totalitarian regime of Cardasia wouldn't have any qualms about grabing everyone off those worlds and throwing them somewhere else and I very much dobut the people on them would protest at such an occurrence if their Government ordered it. Which leads me to belive there was little strategic value to those worlds, besides their proximity to the UFP border. So the Cardasians were happy to let the Federation keep them, knowing it would look after the planets. Possibly for intel purposes? Having a local population of Cardasians in Federation space operatives can easily work out of?

2. The colonies were only settled for a matter of decades, no longer. The people still refused to get up and leave when the Federation asked them to. We know from "Journeys End" that the Federation was willing to go to great lengths to find them another home. Yet even after all this, they still blame the Federation from abandoning them and not helping them after ALL THE WARNINGS ABOUT HOW THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO. They appear to think they can have it both ways. They knew what the Cardasians could be like. They refused to move. They knew the Federation would be able to do little to help. Then they start screaming bloody murder when exactly what everyone expected to happen happens.....

Moving right along.

Later in the episode (I won't include the quotes cause it takes some time) we see that the Maquis were blowing up Cardasian ships docked at a Federation Starbase. We see the colonists on both sides are more or less in the middle of a private war. The Cardasians are being outfitted by one faction of their own Government, quite probably the Obsidian Order. The Maquis are buying weapons on the black market, but also quite possibly being helped by factions in Starfleet such as Commander Hudson and other people who defect to the Maquis.

I think its very interesting that its not a uniform Cardasian policy to arm their people or to try and push the former Federation people out. If I had to guess in fact, I would say there is a split between the Obsidian order and Central command. Dukut (representing Central command).

And very critically I think its important to say the Maquis were only partially concerned with peace and protection. Through the episode a LOT of pointed statements make it clear that they are out for revenge just as much as peace. Even when the opportunity existed to try and settle the whole situation, they rejected it. And I would note that the Cardasian settlers NEVER again appeared to have the weapons or resources they did at this point, such as armed ships to launch their own raids at Federation colonies. However it does appear the Cardasians were allowed to station some warships in their part of the DMZ to deter attacks, though it was only partially successful. We also know the Federation had Starships patrolling their half to intercept attacks and Starfleet Intelligence was always quite active in infiltration and covert ops, like Ro in Pre-Emptive strike or Tuvok in Caretaker.


And last, I'll post Quarks speech on the situation. Because its actually highly relevant. The Maquis had their chance to solve the whole situation…and rejected it.
QUARK
Remind me to get you a copy of the
Rules. You never know when they'll
come in handy. Now, the third rule
clearly states, "Never pay more for
an acquisition than you have to."

SAKONNA
Logical. But I fail to see how that
applies to my situation.

QUARK
You want to acquire peace. Fine.
Peace is good. But how much are you
willing to pay for it?

SAKONNA
Whatever it costs.

QUARK
That's the kind of irresponsible
spending that causes so many business
ventures to fail. You're forgetting
the third rule. Right now peace
could be bought at a bargain price
and you don't even realise it.

SAKONNA
I find this very confusing.

QUARK
Then I'll make it so simple that
even a Vulcan can understand. The
Central Command has been caught red-
handed smuggling weapons to their
settlers. So from now on, every
ship approaching the Demilitarized
Zone will be searched. Without the
support of the Central Command, the
Cardassian settlers won't be so eager
to fight.

SAKONNA
You forget the weapons they already
have.

QUARK
They have weapons... you have
weapons... everyone has weapons.
But right now, no one has a clear
advantage. So the price of peace is
at an all-time low. This is the
perfect time to sit down and hammer
out an agreement. Don't you get
it... attacking the Cardassians now
will only escalate the conflict and
make peace more expensive in the
long run. Now I ask you, is that
logical?


In short. I have little sympathy for the Maquis. I have quite a bit for the Federation colonists, but if it was a choice between a war and not letting them keep their planets, some that should NEVER have been settled, I'd chose against the war in a heartbeat. They should have evacuated with as many concessions from the Federation in getting a new planet as possible, such as nice shinny new equipment and state of the art ships e.t.c. Instead they chose to live under the Cardasians and got what they knew may happen. Life’s a bitch, tough for them.
Image
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

TheDarkling wrote: SISKO
We'll go to Cardassia... find the
evidence to back up your claim. And
when we do, we'll take it to the
Federation...

HUDSON
(interrupting)
No. The Federation abandoned us.
Told us to take care of ourselves.
Well, that's what we intend to do.
But you, Ben, you could be invaluable.
(off Sisko's look)
Let us use your station.

He refuses Federation intervention in favour of military action.
Except that Hudson said "The Federation abandoned us. Told us to take care of ourselves." He's the Starfleet officer in charge over there, and if anyone knows the politics of the situation it would be him. Why take his meaning in any other way? Perhaps the Federation wasn't willing to listen.
TheDarkling wrote:
SISKO
You don't want peace, Cal. You want
revenge.


HUDSON
I prefer to call it retaliation.

As he said they don't want peace.
As he said, they want retaliation. Their people were being victimised, the Cardassians should have been brought to account on that matter as well, but weren't.
TheDarkling wrote: SISKO
Tell Cal Hudson I haven't told
Starfleet anything yet.



SISKO (Cont'd)
Tell him we can still solve this
thing together, but we're running out
of time. Tell him I still have his
uniform. He can have it back anytime
he wants.


Again Sisko sends word to Cal that peace is available.
Sisko is sounding desperate, and betrays his naivette. After all, what's he going to write in his report about the matter? Starfleet's gonna wonder why Hudson hasn't been sending in reports as well.
TheDarkling wrote: SISKO
I have reason to be. The way I see
it, now that we've stopped the
shipments of Cardassian weapons,
there's no longer any need for the
Maquis. You and I can work together
to reach a peace agreement with the
Cardassian colonies.

HUDSON
It's too late for that. We're in a
war here. And I intend to win it.


The weapons have stopped and again Sisko offers peace but Cal still wants his war.
The Cardassians started the treachery, it has to end with them. In other words, they're the ones who have to come to the Federation and say the shipments have stopped, we're serious now. Besides, did the Federation come to the Cardassian's door and took them to account for their illegal activities? Is it Sisko's offer to make? He's a lowly Commander, if a Federation high official made that offer Hudson would, perhaps, have relented - because that would show the Maquis that the Federation was serious. Remember Sisko's short and furious argument with Starfleet about this matter? They didn't care about the Maquis's concerns.
TheDarkling wrote: SISKO
Sisko to Hudson. It's not going to
work, Cal. Turn those ships around
before someone gets hurt.

HUDSON
(on monitor, cheerful)
I was going to say the same thing to
you.

Sisko offers Cal one final chance to end this before Cal forces Sisko to prevent him from killing Cardassian civilians and starting a full out war.
It is tragic, but neither Hudson or Sisko can really back out now. The Federation could've reconsidered its policy on this matter and sent a diplomatic envoy to the colonies. The Cardassians could've done the same. They didn't. Hudson feels his actions are imperative, as does Sisko - both are caught in their own crucible and both have no way out other than what goes down.

Hudson could've retreated, but he would have lost all his credibility in the eyes of the people he was sent to represent. Sisko could've retreated, but probably relieved of his post if his actions got back to SFC. The only party that could've really ended this was Dukat, and what did he do? Try to destroy Hudson to prevent him from getting away.

No disagreement there but when it came down to it they should have.
Erm, you don't disagree, but then you disagree?
The Federation wanted peace and sacrificing some colonists homes for the greater good didn't seem that to high a price to pay.

Let me ask you if faced with a choice between the deaths of millions or moving a few hundred people which would you choose? (Answer the question please don't avoid it I will explain below)
Try a few hundred-thousand people. That would not have been a simple task, and they were tied to their lands for decades. Would I, in other words, abandon Queensland to, say, the Japanese in WW2 - to prevent a war? In that case, hell no. Remember that the territorial concessions were a part of a peace treaty to conclude a war. Tell me again who won the war?
Now while this isn't the situation the Federation was faced with their natural pacfism made them more willing to accept peace for worse terms than a normal person world.
No arguments there. Their problem was sacrificing their citizens rights for the rights of the enemy, who apparently were trounced in the war (well, I don't know about that - everyone seems to think so, but is there proof?).
Sisko did prove it and he stopped it.
For that occassion, yes. But when Picard and Necheyev are sitting in his ready room on the -D they start talking about this matter and both seem to be somewhat dubious of the Cardassian claims. It's not much, but it does show that both of them have doubts and suspicions. (ref. "Pre-Emptive Strike")
Picard and Gul Evek wrote:PICARD: Starfleet does not condone the Maquis' actions in the Demilitarized Zone. Any more than your government condones paramilitary actions by Cardassian civilians.
GUL EVEK: We have taken measures to deal with our colonists who have armed themselves.
PICARD: Considering that they destroyed a Juhryan freighter less than a week ago, I'd say your efforts have met with limited success.
Necheyev and Picard wrote:NECHAYEV: Evek manages to make the Cardassians sound like helpless sheep being preyed on by Federation wolves. The truth is, we caught the Cardassian government supplying its colonies in the Demilitarized Zone with weapons.
PICARD: Gul Evek assures me that practice has stopped.
NECHAYEV: Ah. How comforting
But they should have stood down and given a peace process a chance, instead they were eager to kill some Cardies and get revenge - this is the problem I have with them, they sacrificed the interests of the colonists for their own petty desires for revenge.
Those were the colonist's interests - the Maquis were the colonists. Their organisation, and their hopes and goals and decisions. Hudson represented them. The Maquis don't exist in a vaccum. If you killed them all, there would still be hundreds of thousands of colonists who would still hold a grudge.
Image
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Stofsk wrote: Except that Hudson said "The Federation abandoned us. Told us to take care of ourselves." He's the Starfleet officer in charge over there, and if anyone knows the politics of the situation it would be him. Why take his meaning in any other way? Perhaps the Federation wasn't willing to listen.
He wants to solve the situation his own way and that fits with what he is saying, they don't want a peace they want to force the Cardies out of the DMZ and set up their own nation.
As he said, they want retaliation. Their people were being victimised, the Cardassians should have been brought to account on that matter as well, but weren't.
They want retaliation at the cost of peace, they are willing to make their own colonists and innocent Cardassian colonists (not to mention normal Federation citizens outside the zone) suffer in exchange for getting back at the spoon heads.
Sisko is sounding desperate, and betrays his naivette. After all, what's he going to write in his report about the matter? Starfleet's gonna wonder why Hudson hasn't been sending in reports as well.
He could have covered it (it had only been a day or two) and the point was Sisko offered peace more than once like you alleged.
The Cardassians started the treachery, it has to end with them. In other words, they're the ones who have to come to the Federation and say the shipments have stopped, we're serious now. Besides, did the Federation come to the Cardassian's door and took them to account for their illegal activities?
How could they? The Cardassians would just point at the Federation citizens turned terrorists and say they were just protecting their people, how can Starfleet respond?
Is it Sisko's offer to make? He's a lowly Commander, if a Federation high official made that offer Hudson would, perhaps, have relented - because that would show the Maquis that the Federation was serious. Remember Sisko's short and furious argument with Starfleet about this matter? They didn't care about the Maquis's concerns.
They wanted it solved, if it could have been solved through peaceful means the Federation would have gone for it as for Cal wantnig a high offcial, would it have hurt to enquire first before escalating the war?
It is tragic, but neither Hudson or Sisko can really back out now. The Federation could've reconsidered its policy on this matter and sent a diplomatic envoy to the colonies. The Cardassians could've done the same. They didn't. Hudson feels his actions are imperative, as does Sisko - both are caught in their own crucible and both have no way out other than what goes down.
Again my point is Sisko continually offered, you made out as if he turned up said "Surrender now" and then started shooting people, Sisko did everything he could to try and get a peaceful solution and Cal was out for blood.
Hudson could've retreated, but he would have lost all his credibility in the eyes of the people he was sent to represent. Sisko could've retreated, but probably relieved of his post if his actions got back to SFC. The only party that could've really ended this was Dukat, and what did he do? Try to destroy Hudson to prevent him from getting away.
What could Dukat do exactly? Hudson was going to fire on a Cardassian colony, he chose that over a chance at peace as I said.

Erm, you don't disagree, but then you disagree?
I don't disagree that they shouldn't have had to move but when that became the choice before them they should have left.

Try a few hundred-thousand people. That would not have been a simple task, and they were tied to their lands for decades. Would I, in other words, abandon Queensland to, say, the Japanese in WW2 - to prevent a war? In that case, hell no. Remember that the territorial concessions were a part of a peace treaty to conclude a war. Tell me again who won the war?
The treaty came 4 years after the war, it was a territorial reallignemnt not an actual treaty to conclude a war and you didn't answer the question, move a few hundred to save millions - yes or no.
No arguments there. Their problem was sacrificing their citizens rights for the rights of the enemy, who apparently were trounced in the war (well, I don't know about that - everyone seems to think so, but is there proof?).
The war was a cake walk, we don't even hear about it as it is going on.
For that occassion, yes. But when Picard and Necheyev are sitting in his ready room on the -D they start talking about this matter and both seem to be somewhat dubious of the Cardassian claims. It's not much, but it does show that both of them have doubts and suspicions. (ref. "Pre-Emptive Strike")
Bt that doesn't exactly prove anything and it is hard for the Feds to crack down on the cardies when they are under attack, not to mention we don't hear about Cardassian colonists attacking the Maquis after that it seems to become the Maquis on the offensive and eventually they end up fighting the Cardassians directly.

Those were the colonist's interests - the Maquis were the colonists.
Yes and the IRA has the best interest of the average Northern Irish Catholic at heart.

The Maquis wanted revenge the colonist wished to live in peace, allow me to quote those touched by the divine :)

SISKO
You know what I see out there,
Mister Eddington? I see victims...
SISKO (Cont'd)
... but not of Cardassia or the
Federation. Victims of you. The
Maquis. You've sold these people
the dream that one day, they can
go back to those farms and homes
and schools -- but you know they
never can.

Sisko turns around, faces him directly.

SISKO
(continuing)
And the longer you keep that hope
alive, the longer they're going to
suffer.


Their organisation, and their hopes and goals and decisions. Hudson represented them. The Maquis don't exist in a vaccum. If you killed them all, there would still be hundreds of thousands of colonists who would still hold a grudge.
Yes but those colonist wanted peace the Maquis wanted war, can you not see that the Maquis betrayed them, either knowingly or through their own pig headiness.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

TheDarkling wrote:He wants to solve the situation his own way and that fits with what he is saying, they don't want a peace they want to force the Cardies out of the DMZ and set up their own nation.

Well, it was their colonies and their people - why shouldn't they feel a need to set up their own nation? They had the numbers for it, according to Eddington.
He could have covered it (it had only been a day or two) and the point was Sisko offered peace more than once like you alleged.
Conceded. It's easy to dismiss one's efforts because they bore little fruit. Sisko sucked as a peace negotiator. :)
How could they? The Cardassians would just point at the Federation citizens turned terrorists and say they were just protecting their people, how can Starfleet respond?
Except that the Cardassians were acting like terrorists as well. And all the Federation has to say is: "Y'know what? Arming your colonists and harassing ours proves you're not taking the peace treaty seriously. If you want another war then just say so, my Fleet Admirals are getting ants-in-their-pants."

If Gul Evek or whoever doesn't wet his pants, I'd be surprised.
They wanted it solved, if it could have been solved through peaceful means the Federation would have gone for it as for Cal wantnig a high offcial, would it have hurt to enquire first before escalating the war?
Except that Hudson implies his position at the DMZ is already a joke, and that the Federation isn't interested in pursuing the matter. Remember, Sisko had that heated exchange with the Federation, and the details of that conversation aren't known except he tells Major Kira the difficulties the Federation council has when deliberating on this issue (namely, their distance - the leaders on Earth can't conceive what the Maquis are going through, so dismiss it as irrelevant). He was looking really pissed, though.
Again my point is Sisko continually offered, you made out as if he turned up said "Surrender now" and then started shooting people, Sisko did everything he could to try and get a peaceful solution and Cal was out for blood.
Hudson probably had more at stake. Sisko wasn't totally unsympathetic to the Maquis (at least in the start), but if the only alternative is a return to the status quo - something which people hundreds of light years came up with - then why should he back down? He didn't feel he was doing anything by being an official Starfleet rep, but he obviously felt that going against the Cardassians as the Maquis would do more good.
The treaty came 4 years after the war, it was a territorial reallignemnt not an actual treaty to conclude a war and you didn't answer the question, move a few hundred to save millions - yes or no.
To concede territory that has been in my possession for decades? To forcibly evacuate these colonies for shittier ones, nevermind what the colonists might think of the matter? To give more ground to an enemy who I was at war with before (and apparently beat them back)? No, no and no.
The war was a cake walk, we don't even hear about it as it is going on.
Well the Cardassians must have had some advantage over the Federation - shorter and more secure supply lines, better logistics and soldiering, better tactics and strategy etc. Otherwise, the only other explanation is the Federation is politically naive when writing down that treaty.
The Maquis wanted revenge the colonist wished to live in peace, allow me to quote those touched by the divine :)
*snip Sisko's speech to Eddington*
He sounds so sanctimonius and self-righteous. The perfect priest. :)
Yes but those colonist wanted peace the Maquis wanted war, can you not see that the Maquis betrayed them, either knowingly or through their own pig headiness.
Look, this is obviously a muddy issue (as are all such issues). I personally side with the Maquis on this one, I think the Federation should have shown a stronger hand in their negotiations with the Cardassians, and I feel the Maquis had little recourse but to do as they did. Why? Because the Cardassians offered little to no guarantee that the violence would be halted.

Besides, the Maquis weren't that bad. Don't forget everyone's favourite turncoat, Michael Eddington, who held a gun to Sisko's head with a smug expression on his face. Dammit, I wished he'd pull the trigger. :(
Image
CDiehl
Jedi Master
Posts: 1369
Joined: 2003-06-13 01:46pm

Post by CDiehl »

I still can't understand why the Cardassians' territorial desires should matter to the Federation, let alone why they would appease them with their own planets. Why should they sacrifice the futures of hundreds of thousands of their citizens, whom they are sworn to defend, to sate a second-rate local dictatorship? I don't get why giving them more planets, whose resources they would likely use to rearm, is a good idea. Sure, the Federation would spank them in another war, but why go down that road if you can avoid it? They could tell them to stuff their demands, and the Cardassians would have no choice but to do without.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

CDiehl wrote:I still can't understand why the Cardassians' territorial desires should matter to the Federation, let alone why they would appease them with their own planets. Why should they sacrifice the futures of hundreds of thousands of their citizens, whom they are sworn to defend, to sate a second-rate local dictatorship? I don't get why giving them more planets, whose resources they would likely use to rearm, is a good idea. Sure, the Federation would spank them in another war, but why go down that road if you can avoid it? They could tell them to stuff their demands, and the Cardassians would have no choice but to do without.
The only way you can rationalise it is to suggest the Cardassians have some advantage the Federation doesn't enjoy. The most likely explanation is that the Cardassians have stronger logistics and shorter supply lines, while the Federation is spread all over the place. It's a policy that speaks of fear, to my mind. The Federation may have kicked the Cardassian's arse, but maybe the Borg threw a spanner in the works, and the Klingon Civil War scare could have split the focus on Fed leaders to multiple fronts.
Image
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Stofsk wrote: Well, it was their colonies and their people - why shouldn't they feel a need to set up their own nation? They had the numbers for it, according to Eddington.
Because it was a very long shot, they could have had several years of peace instead they got war and eventually extermination.
Conceded. It's easy to dismiss one's efforts because they bore little fruit. Sisko sucked as a peace negotiator. :)
Well old Benny boy's talents lay more in the creation of conflict than resolving it.
Except that the Cardassians were acting like terrorists as well. And all the Federation has to say is: "Y'know what? Arming your colonists and harassing ours proves you're not taking the peace treaty seriously. If you want another war then just say so, my Fleet Admirals are getting ants-in-their-pants."

If Gul Evek or whoever doesn't wet his pants, I'd be surprised.
So they behave themselves and the Maquis continues its attacks, they had given up a peaceful solution so the only way to deal with the Maquis was to defeat them militarily.
Except that Hudson implies his position at the DMZ is already a joke, and that the Federation isn't interested in pursuing the matter. Remember, Sisko had that heated exchange with the Federation, and the details of that conversation aren't known except he tells Major Kira the difficulties the Federation council has when deliberating on this issue (namely, their distance - the leaders on Earth can't conceive what the Maquis are going through, so dismiss it as irrelevant). He was looking really pissed, though.


I have no doubt that the core worlds safety were at the root of the problem, they are the reason the Federation never crushed the Cardies during the war5 however if a near armed rebellion had erupted, the two ranking officers along the zone screaming that things have gotten out of control and the Cardassians had been supplying their weapons I think the Federation might have listened and I certainly think it is worth the risk given the potential gains.
Hudson probably had more at stake. Sisko wasn't totally unsympathetic to the Maquis (at least in the start), but if the only alternative is a return to the status quo - something which people hundreds of light years came up with - then why should he back down? He didn't feel he was doing anything by being an official Starfleet rep, but he obviously felt that going against the Cardassians as the Maquis would do more good.
And I question whether that is true or not (and with hindsight I know it wasn't), I think a peaceful solution should have at least been given a chance and hat is my issue with the Maquis, they seemed hell bent on war regardless of what it would mean.
To concede territory that has been in my possession for decades? To forcibly evacuate these colonies for shittier ones, nevermind what the colonists might think of the matter? To give more ground to an enemy who I was at war with before (and apparently beat them back)? No, no and no.
Then we disagree, moving a few people to save many more lives doesn't seem like a bad trade off to me, I don't disagree in this instance because the Federation could have eaisly won bt if they couldn't and the best way for peace is to move a few colonists then I would move the colonists.
Well the Cardassians must have had some advantage over the Federation - shorter and more secure supply lines, better logistics and soldiering, better tactics and strategy etc. Otherwise, the only other explanation is the Federation is politically naive when writing down that treaty.
The Cardassians were crippled by the war, people were starving, museums robbed for what they could bring to the war effort not to mention that within6 years of the end of the war that had withdrawn from Bajor and the military government had been overthrown.

Contrast this with the Federation where it doesn't rate a mention in everyday conversation of the military!!!!

The Federation never stepped upto the plate and instead let the Cardassians fight a few ships Starfleet had to spare, they didn't throw their weight into the war because the core worlds prefered to live in their little bubble of perfect peace.

Then 4 years after the war they decide to tidy up the border to prevent another war and in that treaty they exchange some worlds with teh Cardassians (although some of the colonists stay where they are).
He sounds so sanctimonius and self-righteous. The perfect priest. :)
God outranks Priest last I checked so I think you underestimate him :wink:

All joking aside I think what he says is correct, they brought those colonists misery and death.
Look, this is obviously a muddy issue (as are all such issues). I personally side with the Maquis on this one, I think the Federation should have shown a stronger hand in their negotiations with the Cardassians, and I feel the Maquis had little recourse but to do as they did. Why? Because the Cardassians offered little to no guarantee that the violence would be halted.
I think the Federation should have crushed the cardies during the war and the negotiations should have been about the process of handing over control to the new Federation installed civilian government, however I still think the Maquis lead to unnecessary suffering for all parties.
Besides, the Maquis weren't that bad. Don't forget everyone's favourite turncoat, Michael Eddington, who held a gun to Sisko's head with a smug expression on his face. Dammit, I wished he'd pull the trigger. :(
You don't think the wormhole aliens would have allowed that do you?
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

CDiehl wrote:I still can't understand why the Cardassians' territorial desires should matter to the Federation, let alone why they would appease them with their own planets. Why should they sacrifice the futures of hundreds of thousands of their citizens, whom they are sworn to defend, to sate a second-rate local dictatorship? I don't get why giving them more planets, whose resources they would likely use to rearm, is a good idea. Sure, the Federation would spank them in another war, but why go down that road if you can avoid it? They could tell them to stuff their demands, and the Cardassians would have no choice but to do without.
Because the Federation didn't want war, the hope was that a fair treaty that made Cardassian feel secure would prevent another conflict.
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Stofsk wrote: The only way you can rationalise it is to suggest the Cardassians have some advantage the Federation doesn't enjoy. The most likely explanation is that the Cardassians have stronger logistics and shorter supply lines, while the Federation is spread all over the place. It's a policy that speaks of fear, to my mind. The Federation may have kicked the Cardassian's arse, but maybe the Borg threw a spanner in the works, and the Klingon Civil War scare could have split the focus on Fed leaders to multiple fronts.
Hostilities lasted over a decade, yet we see no Federation build up, no warships built, no mention of the war as the Federation just doesn't take the war seriously, I have looked at the issue often and it is the only explanation that fits.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

I don't disagree in this instance because the Federation could have eaisly won bt if they couldn't and the best way for peace is to move a few colonists then I would move the colonists.
When I was talking about "slaughtering thousands of lives" earlier, I wasn't just referring to Starfleet casualties, but to Cardassian casualties.

We know that the Federation values all life, and they may have felt that it wasn't worth losing hundreds of Starfleet personnel and killing thousands of Cardassian soldiers over a petty border dispute when they have such a fucking huge territory they haven't even fully explored and exploited yet.
User avatar
Enola Straight
Jedi Knight
Posts: 793
Joined: 2002-12-04 11:01pm
Location: Somers Point, NJ

Post by Enola Straight »

The needs of the Many outweigh the needs of the Few, or the One.

At leas the Federation Council won't attempt to trade territory for peace again...the concessionmade to prevent war onli indirectly CAUSED the greatest conflict Man has ever known.

Wait...this is the Federation we're talkin' about...

NEVER MIND. :wink:
Masochist to Sadist: "Hurt me."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
Fleet Admiral Thompson
Mindless Scooter Cockgoblin
Posts: 120
Joined: 2004-05-11 06:40pm

Post by Fleet Admiral Thompson »

Enola Straight wrote:The needs of the Many outweigh the needs of the Few, or the One.

At leas the Federation Council won't attempt to trade territory for peace again...the concessionmade to prevent war onli indirectly CAUSED the greatest conflict Man has ever known.

Wait...this is the Federation we're talkin' about...

NEVER MIND. :wink:
Well, hold on a moment. The Federation used those systems as barganing chips because they didn't want a war with the Cardassians. In such a war, those systems would have been on the Federation/Cardassian border, so they would have been easy to attack. In a way, the Federation saved the people who lived on those systems, but I know how I would feel if I were forced to leave my home. In some ways, the Federation is wrong, but in others, they are right. The same goes for the Maquis.
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

If you want to make a topic about the Maquis and the Federation do so...

Do Not ressurect dead topics

It's called Thread Necromancy.

You did five times before...and honestly just stop because they get locked when they passed a certain point in time.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Locked