Enterprise, Flagship

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
RogueIce
_______
Posts: 13392
Joined: 2003-01-05 01:36am
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by RogueIce »

Howedar wrote:Sounds extremely dubious to me, seeing as carriers probably have a large handful of Captains, and the Commodore rank is essentially out of US Navy usage.
Well, the CO is a Captain, as is the XO (I believe). And then the CAG is too. There may be others, too (an Admiral's staff may have a Captain on it, I guess). I guess it's possible the Chaplain or head Doctor could be Captains as well (in theory at least), but they're not URL officers so they wouldn't be able to take command anyway.
Image
"How can I wait unknowing?
This is the price of war,
We rise with noble intentions,
And we risk all that is pure..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, Forever (Rome: Total War)

"On and on, through the years,
The war continues on..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, We Are All One (Medieval 2: Total War)
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear." - Ambrose Redmoon
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - Harvey Dent, The Dark Knight
Raoul Duke, Jr.
BANNED
Posts: 3791
Joined: 2002-09-25 06:59pm
Location: Suckling At The Teat Of Missmanners

Re: Enterprise, Flagship

Post by Raoul Duke, Jr. »

Stofsk wrote:
Crown wrote: Something I just thought about now, perhaps Picard's full rank was Fleet Captain (one of those not-quite-an-admiral, not-quite-a-captain ranks), afterall we do see him commanding fleets on at least two occassions (the blockade fleet assembled in "Redemption" and the Earth defence fleet in "First Contact").
The first example works, the second doesn't. In First Contact, Picard took command of the fleet in direct violation of a Starfleet order intended to keep him the hell away from the battle.
User avatar
RogueIce
_______
Posts: 13392
Joined: 2003-01-05 01:36am
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by RogueIce »

Speaking of First Contact and weird Starfleet protocol things, since I just watched the last hour of it...

Why, oh why is a friggin' Doctor able to authorize a ship's self destruct sequence??!! And why is this same doctor giving orders to the ship's security force?

And how is it a mere Lieutenant Commander can completely override the Captain's own self destruct orders, and alter the command codes or whatever to lock out a full Captain and the CO of the ship?!
Image
"How can I wait unknowing?
This is the price of war,
We rise with noble intentions,
And we risk all that is pure..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, Forever (Rome: Total War)

"On and on, through the years,
The war continues on..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, We Are All One (Medieval 2: Total War)
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear." - Ambrose Redmoon
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - Harvey Dent, The Dark Knight
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

RogueIce wrote:Speaking of First Contact and weird Starfleet protocol things, since I just watched the last hour of it...

Why, oh why is a friggin' Doctor able to authorize a ship's self destruct sequence??!! And why is this same doctor giving orders to the ship's security force?
Presumably because said Doctor held the next rank in the chain of command. There's no good reason for it but we do know that they'll put non-line personell in the chain of command (remember Troi's turn in the big chair?) simply because of rank.
RogueIce wrote:And how is it a mere Lieutenant Commander can completely override the Captain's own self destruct orders, and alter the command codes or whatever to lock out a full Captain and the CO of the ship?!
Because start fleet apparently has computer security done by Microsoft.
Image
User avatar
Rhoades
Youngling
Posts: 148
Joined: 2003-01-16 09:00pm
Contact:

Re: Enterprise, Flagship

Post by Rhoades »

Crazedwraith wrote: Basically this can be summed by Voyager's "EQUINOX" whcih stated it was starfleet protocol that whne two or more ships mere together and their commanders were of equal rank then commands falls to the captain of the best equipped ship.
I'm just going to say that this is another piss-poor example of Starfleet protocol. Normally in the military, if two there were two people of equal rank than the one in who take command should be an earlier date of rank. If the dates are equal, then we look at time in service.

Basically, they look at the experience of the two officers, not who has shinier ship. It's seems definative that way, since someone can who has a better equipped ship. For example, if it's between a Galaxy-class and a Soveniur(sp?)-class, both in good condition. Then the Sov. gets badly damaged in combat or something, does the authority shift?
User avatar
Tsyroc
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13748
Joined: 2002-07-29 08:35am
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Post by Tsyroc »

RogueIce wrote:
Howedar wrote:Sounds extremely dubious to me, seeing as carriers probably have a large handful of Captains, and the Commodore rank is essentially out of US Navy usage.
Well, the CO is a Captain, as is the XO (I believe). And then the CAG is too. There may be others, too (an Admiral's staff may have a Captain on it, I guess). I guess it's possible the Chaplain or head Doctor could be Captains as well (in theory at least), but they're not URL officers so they wouldn't be able to take command anyway.
CO-yep, XO-most likely, Navigator - possibly, OpsO - Maybe, Cheng - possibly, CAG-yep. I've even had the case where the CDC-O was a captain and (as mentioned above) so was the head Chaplain.

There would be at least one and probably more captains as part of the Admirals staff. Some of the squadrons of the airwing might have captains as CO but usually they were Commanders.

As for Commadore, I've only heard it used in the Navy as a title (not a rank) for a senior captain in charge of a Destroyer Squadron or something like that. Ocassionaly a Rear Admiral Lower Half might have people call him Commadore ocassionally but I think the one instance I saw it was a personal thing and not official.
By the pricking of my thumb,
Something wicked this way comes.
Open, locks,
Whoever knocks.
User avatar
Rogue 9
Scrapping TIEs since 1997
Posts: 18722
Joined: 2003-11-12 01:10pm
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by Rogue 9 »

RedImperator wrote:The U.S. Navy has dispensed with the rank of Commodore, replacing it with Rear Admiral (lower half), as opposed to Rear Admiral (upper half). I read a few years ago that there was some grumbling about this in the Pentagon, but no changes are in the works that I know of (telling quote: "If 'Commodore' was good enough for David Farragut, it's good enough for these guys")
Which is ironic, since the U.S Navy in its beginning had no Admiral rank. :wink: Commodore was the highest naval grade. One commander who I forget the name of refused the (equivalent) position of CinC Navy unless the Navy would create the title of Admiral for him. The Navy refused. The whole thing had something to do with how the British Admiralty was set up, and how they didn't want that system or something. I'll fetch my history books and look it up.
User avatar
RogueIce
_______
Posts: 13392
Joined: 2003-01-05 01:36am
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by RogueIce »

Rogue 9 wrote:Which is ironic, since the U.S Navy in its beginning had no Admiral rank. :wink: Commodore was the highest naval grade. One commander who I forget the name of refused the (equivalent) position of CinC Navy unless the Navy would create the title of Admiral for him.
I don't recall a story like that, but if I had to guess on anyone, it would be John Paul Jones, since he went to the Russian Navy.

Er, wait, was that before or after they created the US Navy after they abolished the Continental one that he went to Russia? Don't remember...
Rogue 9 wrote:The Navy refused. The whole thing had something to do with how the British Admiralty was set up, and how they didn't want that system or something. I'll fetch my history books and look it up.
Sounds plausible I suppose.

And Rear Admiral (Lower Half) just sounds funny to me. It'd be nice if it were Commodore instead, but I guess I can see the reason behind it (since all the other flag officers are Admirals, I guess they decided one starts would as well, and they could leave Commodore as a "courtesy rank" type of thing to Captains who command small groups of ships).
Image
"How can I wait unknowing?
This is the price of war,
We rise with noble intentions,
And we risk all that is pure..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, Forever (Rome: Total War)

"On and on, through the years,
The war continues on..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, We Are All One (Medieval 2: Total War)
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear." - Ambrose Redmoon
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - Harvey Dent, The Dark Knight
Post Reply