Star Trek and Fighters

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

That's out of context though. Rogue 9 was suggesting that Federation technology has a hard time landing a torpedo on a Warbird, therefore it would follow from that that locking onto a fighter would be even harder.

Now, unless we're talking cloaking fighters, instances of being unable to lock onto cloaked Warbirds are irrelevant, because that's not what's at issue here.
User avatar
Lancer
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2003-12-17 06:06pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Lancer »

Uraniun235 wrote:That's out of context though. Rogue 9 was suggesting that Federation technology has a hard time landing a torpedo on a Warbird, therefore it would follow from that that locking onto a fighter would be even harder.

Now, unless we're talking cloaking fighters, instances of being unable to lock onto cloaked Warbirds are irrelevant, because that's not what's at issue here.
Hmm, did you totally ignore the humor on purpose or are you humorless enough that I should mark any humor [humor][/humor] from now on out?
User avatar
Kamakazie Sith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7555
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Post by Kamakazie Sith »

Stark wrote:
Kamakazie Sith wrote:Can you provide a couple of those lines?
Embarrassingly, no. :oops: There's the old Voyager line from Dragons Teeth - TUVOK: "Their vessel is highly maneuverable. It is difficult to get a phaser lock." - but I remembered these situations being more common. Regardless, given the (slight in modern weapons) firing delay, the slow ROF (nothing compared to modern AA), and the difficultly in doing whatever it is you do to point a phaser at a moving target, I'm not convinced they're as effective vs fighters as Alyeska suggests. The torp idea isn't any better, however (particularly since at short range, to keep flight time down you'd need to orient the ship directly towards or away from your fighter targets; fighters approaching from the beam and jinking would have a higher survival rate)
For a good idea of what a phaser array can do when employed against fighters you should take a look at TNG "Conundrum". Note that all seven fighters were destroyed in less than two seconds.

However, the range was pathetic but I was addressing ROF.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Rate of fire is only important in isolation if you're willing to resort to spray 'n pray tactics. At that range, a man with a rifle could have easily hit those ships (except for that "death by asphyxiation in vacuum" thing, of course).
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Kamakazie Sith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7555
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Post by Kamakazie Sith »

Darth Wong wrote:Rate of fire is only important in isolation if you're willing to resort to spray 'n pray tactics. At that range, a man with a rifle could have easily hit those ships (except for that "death by asphyxiation in vacuum" thing, of course).
True, and I already mentioned that. However, could a person with a rifle hit all seven in under two seconds? 8)

I've always wondered whether the battles in Star Trek were accurately portrayed as Gene saw them or were they simply victims of a small budget and greedy executives.....
Milites Astrum Exterminans
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Stark »

*grin* I appreciate the example, but its not 100% applicable here, since the Conundrum aliens were incredibly weak by ST standards. Alyeska has a good point, tho; although Klingons usually fire two weapons at once, and Rom Warbirds have (sometimes) fired their green bolt things rapidly, so power could be a limitng factor, although this is likely true for the Feds as well.

Alyeska, I've not seen any DS9 - during the large battles there, do the Feds show a consistently higher fire rate than the other powers?
User avatar
Kamakazie Sith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7555
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Post by Kamakazie Sith »

Stark wrote:*grin* I appreciate the example, but its not 100% applicable here, since the Conundrum aliens were incredibly weak by ST standards. Alyeska has a good point, tho; although Klingons usually fire two weapons at once, and Rom Warbirds have (sometimes) fired their green bolt things rapidly, so power could be a limitng factor, although this is likely true for the Feds as well.

Alyeska, I've not seen any DS9 - during the large battles there, do the Feds show a consistently higher fire rate than the other powers?
True, maybe against modern fighters they would have to allocate more power to the beam in order to destroy them thus their ROF would be lower.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Stark wrote:Alyeska, I've not seen any DS9 - during the large battles there, do the Feds show a consistently higher fire rate than the other powers?
Starfleet ROF is relatively equal to all other races. ROF can flucuate, but they all fall within the same range.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Post Reply