Shrykull wrote:
Think they just need to mine neutron stars, the cardies had a neutronium door in an episode.
In "What You Leave Behind," yes. (A neutronium door is pretty damn goofy, but that's a whole other story.)
'Course, I needn't say a door on Cardassian/Dominion HQ is a far cry from building an entire fleet of ships from similar material.
Where was this mentioned?
Outside of the TMs, I don't recall specifically. Lemme look around...the Canon Database might have an entry or two about this.
Not with Transwarp conduits, according to Geordi in Decent "It's like falling to a river and being swept away by the current" no need for any engines, but who knows really, if a car of sufficiently dense object falls into a river, it will go to the bottom and stay there.
Sure, but that might only apply when you don't have to open the conduit yourself. We don't know what sort of power's required to do that.
Don't get me wrong: this form of transwarp could still be cost effective, but since there are serious unknowns involved, I suggest we focus on something about which we have more information.
Also, a minor point of clarification: since we don't know what kind of super-warp the Federation or allies might eventually develop, I felt it was best to mention downsides to all the different methods.
Wonder how they adapted.
I don't know. They did get a look at Adm. Janewad's "future shuttle," so that probably helped
Was it pegasus where the admiral ordered them to use it to into the asteroid? Wasn't it in the ship that was half into the asteroid inside it, and the E-D modified itself to phase shift out asteroid to get out of it?
Yep, that's the one.
I said with the shields DOWN, not against a shielded ship
Oh, I understand that, but I was under the impression the sparkler effect we saw was the antimatter reacting with matter.
Anyway, the resulting explosions didn't even buffet the E-D's shields (which can be dropped by several to perhaps a couple dozen megatons), so I felt the AM spread didn't involve a lot of antimatter in the first place. I could easily be wrong...maybe what we saw was AM reacting with a bit space dust *shakes head*.
However, if I'm at all right to doubt the energy involved, and especially the spread's
effective range, I do think it's of questionable use against a planet. I certainly can't recall anyone using or planning to use such a "weapon" in that way (though it might be something unique to some Federation starships, like the GCS).
depends how much we use, beam of it or some of it would react with the air in the upper atmosphere and cause huge M/AM explosions, the planet killers beam anti-proton beam (wonder if that's where SW ripped off it's world devastators) certainly would destroy a planet.
Isn't beaming raw AM a no-no?
I guess we could drop a pod into the atmosphere, then open the thing up by remote. We might also launch a pod toward a planet and blast it with phasers or torpedoes, as VGR sorta did with Vidiian ships once.
However, we'd need a lot of energy to wipe out a heavily-populated Borg world--probably well in excess of 100 teratons.
One kilogram of antimatter reacting with an equal amount of matter yields a maximum of 1.8E17J. A metric ton of each would be 1.8E20J, or 43 gigatons. A kiloton, 1.8E23J, or 43 teratons. To do the job, then, we'd need ~3 kilotons of matter and AM.
Keep that number in mind for a moment.
Lt. Cmdr. LaForge said that the warp core "normally kicks plasma up into the terawatt range" ("The Masterpiece Society"). That sets a firm upper-limit on their power required to sustain cruising speeds (warp 6, 7?), since "normal" warp travel is probably factor 7 or less.
Okay, so how long could the GCS keep going at that rate 'til she exhausted her fuel? A few years?
If we guessed warp 7, which requires no more than 999 TW (and probably much less) could be sustained for 3 years straight, a GCS's fuel payload would yield 9.4E22J.
...Whoops. That'd be devastating to a Borg population, but if all my math is correct *crosses fingers*, it's still well short of a mass extinction event. Also:
1--It is impractical, since it pretty much requires ships self-destruct in such a way as to annihilate their entire AM stores with
perfect efficiency.
2--Sacrificing your ships for this purpose is also stupidly impractical.
3--These figures are ridiculously generous in every respect, so the actual number of ships needed to accomplish this could be easily be 10-100 times greater.
Plain-ole' orbital bombardment with a large fleet is a better, if less creative, way to go. It also might be fun to send antimatter tankers crashing into Borg worlds, but we face the same problem as before: every time you pull that little stunt, you're blowing resources which might be better spent elsewhere.
I'm not sure of that, the borg probably already have standard immune systems and enhanced by nanoprobes, although they latch on to cells, rather than engulfing them like macrophages, but perhaps they could destroy infected cells like T-Cells do, or repel them like histamines and antibodies do, it's not perfect.
What about your bio-genic weapons idea? Did you change your mind?
I would think now they could build transwarp ships, Seven tried to build one for Janeway, but Voyager couldn't handle it cause it was too small a ship and couldn't handle the stresses of transwarp, but I think they could build one now if from scratch if seven works with some people at the Utopia shipyards.
I dunno. I don't really think a ship's size is the crux of the matter.
Delta Flyer and VGR actually could handle the stress, and their coil simply "gave out" after a time.
What I'm most interested in is the fact Seven couldn't duplicate that technology.
Well, borg ships use them casually and frequently, they must have the requirements needed to use it, or the damage is not signifact or easily repairable (your body is "damaged" every day, and repairs when you sleep)
Right, but Borg ships are built to accomodate the stuff.
Starfleet ships can adapt existing Borg coils for short-term use. However, like I said earlier, even when it would've been to their decisive advantage, Seven/VGR couldn't
fix a broken coil, nor could they "scratchbuild" one.
Also, I should re-emphasize the fact that shearing forces in transwarp isn't meant to be the meat of my argument. More important is the fact that, in spite of 7's knowledge, I don't see the Federation coming up with reliable transwarp or similar drives anytime soon.