son of the catargorizing Starfleet ships thread

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Rubberanvil wrote:
phongn wrote:FAC is generally a relatively small ship packing lots of antiship firepower at the expensive of everything else, like decent sensors, crew quarters or whatnot.
I ment what does the acronym FAC stand for?
Fast Attack Craft. Most modern ships of that type are FAC-Ms, M meaning 'Missile'.
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Fast Attack Craft. Google is your friend.

*EDIT* Damnit!
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Iceberg
ASVS Master of Laundry
Posts: 4068
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:23am
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by Iceberg »

Publius wrote:When the battlecruiser concept fell into disrepute, the United States Navy avoided the name by designating USS Alaska (CB 1) and USS Guam (CB 2) as "large cruisers".
Alaska and Guam were descended from heavy cruiser designs (their armament fit was essentially identical to the smaller Baltimore-class heavy cruiser, but with 9x12" guns replacing the Baltimore's 9x8"). The Lexington-class battlecruisers (redesigned to become carriers while under construction) were, like their foreign counterparts, descended from battleships - in this case, from the Standard type designs).
"Carriers dispense fighters, which dispense assbeatings." - White Haven

| Hyperactive Gundam Pilot of MM | GALE | ASVS | Cleaners | Kibologist (beable) | DFB |
If only one rock and roll song echoes into tomorrow
There won't be anything to keep you from the distant morning glow.
I'm not a man. I just portrayed one for 15 years.
Post Reply