Intrepid Class vs US Navy

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Demiurge wrote:
Ender wrote:Link please?
Allow me.
I don't understand what all of the fuss is about. Given this picture of Voyager:
Image
and the estimate of a 1000km asteroid and 300km altitude, they are arguing over its size? It's obvious that Darkstar would involve himself heatedly in such activities (it's not like he's got anything else to do), but let's suppose for the sake of argument that it really is 1000km in diameter, even though the explosion graphics are incongruous with this figure. Given the image above, Voyager is roughly 250 pixels wide while the planetoid is roughly 230 pixels in diameter (ie- its diameter looks smaller than Voyager).

Since Voyager's size is known (let's say it's about 400 metres from left to right in that shot, since I'm not really that familiar with Voyager's exact dimensions), and the planetoid is supposedly 1000km wide, this means that Voyager has to be roughly 2700 times closer to the camera than the planetoid.

Now, we confessedly don't know how far the camera is from Voyager, but given the lack of obvious perspective distortion, the front of the ship can't possibly be twice as far from us as the back of the ship. In fact, it is doubtful that it is even 50% farther away than the back of the ship, since that would be quite noticeable as well, so we can estimate that the camera is at least two ship-lengths away from Voyager. This puts the planetoid at least 1500km away, not 300km away.

What are they trying to prove with this, anyway?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Darth Wong wrote:What are they trying to prove with this, anyway?
It's important to them because if we use the 1000 km diameter, the 1500 km distance, use the GPE for a constant density, and assume the density of sillicon, and if I'm recalling Voyagers size right (72 meters tall, 150 wide, right?) then the shields crank in at 630 MT. 20 times greater then that of a TNG era GCS
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Ender wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:What are they trying to prove with this, anyway?
It's important to them because if we use the 1000 km diameter, the 1500 km distance, use the GPE for a constant density, and assume the density of sillicon, and if I'm recalling Voyagers size right (72 meters tall, 150 wide, right?) then the shields crank in at 630 MT. 20 times greater then that of a TNG era GCS
Sorry, but you can't use the GPE as a figure for energy density at a given altitude. These people obviously misunderstand their basic physics. GPE is negative for a planet, and a large influx of kinetic energy to a planetary mass brings it back up to zero. You need to show that energy is vastly in excess of GPE in order to equate energy intensity at altitude with the energy pumped into the planetary mass.

Of course, there is also the fact that relative velocity is not accounted for (is the Voyager assumed to be holding station during this event? If so, why?), the question of why their nav deflectors aren't deflecting the material around the ship (as they're designed to) for a much lower energy cost than stopping it cold, etc.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Darth Wong wrote:
Ender wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:What are they trying to prove with this, anyway?
It's important to them because if we use the 1000 km diameter, the 1500 km distance, use the GPE for a constant density, and assume the density of sillicon, and if I'm recalling Voyagers size right (72 meters tall, 150 wide, right?) then the shields crank in at 630 MT. 20 times greater then that of a TNG era GCS
Sorry, but you can't use the GPE as a figure for energy density at a given altitude. These people obviously misunderstand their basic physics. GPE is negative for a planet, and a large influx of kinetic energy to a planetary mass brings it back up to zero. You need to show that energy is vastly in excess of GPE in order to equate energy intensity at altitude with the energy pumped into the planetary mass.

Of course, there is also the fact that relative velocity is not accounted for (is the Voyager assumed to be holding station during this event? If so, why?), the question of why their nav deflectors aren't deflecting the material around the ship (as they're designed to) for a much lower energy cost than stopping it cold, etc.
Setting aside the other objections you brought up, how would you go about calculating for this scene then? Just basic KE= m*V^2 for the chunk in question?
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Ender wrote:Setting aside the other objections you brought up, how would you go about calculating for this scene then? Just basic KE= m*V^2 for the chunk in question?
That's the most straightforward method. Mind you, spacebattles "vs" arguments are polluted by the same tired old "visuals vs dialogue vs writer's intent vs whatever I think is reasonable today" bullshit that comes up in every goddamned thread, so I wouldn't presume to comment on what is acceptable there.

Another method would be to estimate the average velocity at Voyager's position, plug that into the KE formula using the mass of the entire sphere, and then use the inverse-square rule to work it down to energy intensity. But you'd still have to deal with the relative-velocity issue and the fact that the material should deflect around the ship (which is, after all, much more aerodynamically shaped than a Borg cube).

For example, if we take a 1500km altitude (2000km distance to centre) and a 1000km wide spheroid with average density like our moon (although I'm not sure where this diameter figure comes from), we get about 1.75E21 kg. If the particle velocity was 7km/s, we get 4.3E28 J total, or roughly 8.5E14 J/m^2 at a 2000km radius. Multiply that by 150x72, and you get roughly 2 gigatons. Factor in the low likelihood of Voyager actually stopping an entire column of mass dead cold between it and the planet, and the number drops significantly.

Of course, that assumes flat velocity distribution, which is rather dicey.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Darth Wong wrote:
Ender wrote:Setting aside the other objections you brought up, how would you go about calculating for this scene then? Just basic KE= m*V^2 for the chunk in question?
That's the most straightforward method. Mind you, spacebattles "vs" arguments are polluted by the same tired old "visuals vs dialogue vs writer's intent vs whatever I think is reasonable today" bullshit that comes up in every goddamned thread, so I wouldn't presume to comment on what is acceptable there.

Another method would be to estimate the average velocity at Voyager's position, plug that into the KE formula using the mass of the entire sphere, and then use the inverse-square rule to work it down to energy intensity. But you'd still have to deal with the relative-velocity issue and the fact that the material should deflect around the ship (which is, after all, much more aerodynamically shaped than a Borg cube).

For example, if we take a 1500km altitude (2000km distance to centre) and a 1000km wide spheroid with average density like our moon (although I'm not sure where this diameter figure comes from), we get about 1.75E21 kg. If the particle velocity was 7km/s, we get 4.3E28 J total, or roughly 8.5E14 J/m^2 at a 2000km radius. Multiply that by 150x72, and you get roughly 2 gigatons. Factor in the low likelihood of Voyager actually stopping an entire column of mass dead cold between it and the planet, and the number drops significantly.

Of course, that assumes flat velocity distribution, which is rather dicey.
IIRC, people did plug that information into some of your formula's Mike. The debate degenerated into interpretations of what happened. People on both sides ended up being upset with the formula results and argued the scene was flawed and thus no firepower could be figured. That thread was a bloody mess by the 3rd page.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Heh, by abouts page 2-3 the moron is arguing something should slow down the expansion of a fireball in a vacuum. Hilarious.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Ender wrote:Heh, by abouts page 2-3 the moron is arguing something should slow down the expansion of a fireball in a vacuum. Hilarious.
Does anyone actually listen to him? Besides the well-known idiot Andrew Joshua Talon, of course.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Ender wrote:Heh, by abouts page 2-3 the moron is arguing something should slow down the expansion of a fireball in a vacuum. Hilarious.
You're telling me...
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
TurboPhaser
Padawan Learner
Posts: 298
Joined: 2003-05-30 03:39am
Location: Australia

Post by TurboPhaser »

Chris OFarrell wrote: :?

Only if you want it to be.

In 'Blink of an Eye' what the heck said that the antimatter based weapons
were KT ranged? The antimatter warheads were not even bothering Voyager all that much given the number of hits she took. The Tricobolot weapons were what actually hurt her.

The Malon ships spacial charges never had a yield attributed to them.

The Borg Cubes I don't know if they even had their shields up at the time of the planetary explosion. Their standard MO appeared to be shields down until they've experience a specific threat, then adapt defences.

Think tank is just....weird.

<snip>
Practically everything I was gonna say was said by Darth Wong. I'm fairly sure they had developed intelligence by then, no they wouldnt be blowing up nukes in their atmosphere. And if i'm not mistaken, explosion power can be judged by detonation fireball.

The Tricolbolt devices? I thought it was the antimatter charges damaging the ship.....then the tricolbolt devices simply made it worse.

The Malon.....again i'm guessing by the detonation fireball (no it was not a typical fireball, but i have nothin else to go on.

Yeah like Darth said, as if they wouldnt raise their sheilds while their planet is under attack.

Think Tank may be wierd, though I dont think so, but it is canon therfore must be taken into consideration.
Wasn't the Malon ship unshielded and falling apart? How powerful could these charges have been if they were detonated anywhere near it?
No actually. It was heavily shielded, but yes it was falling apart somewhat. As a matter of fact, it saved Voyager from the aliens in that starless area of space and later when Voyager went to the aliens aid against the Malons, Voyager was no match for their Garbage Cruiser. The Malon vessel easily withstood a massive volley of torpedoes and phasers.

The only way Voyager won was because the Aliens intervened and disabled the Malons shields. Voyager then destroyed the Malon ship by blowing a hole in a weakened area used for holding radioactive waste.
Voyager summed up in 1 quote:

Neelix: These people dont appreciate what they have! This ship is the match of anything in a hundred lightyears, yet what do they do with it?
(fake voice) Oh, well lets go find some space anomaly today that'll rip it apart!

- Voy: 'The Cloud'
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Post by Chris OFarrell »

Darth Wong wrote: What have you been smoking? If you detonate megaton-ranged nuclear devices in low orbit, you will ionize a huge portion of the upper atmosphere and cause a monster EMP. That's one of the reasons that space-based nukes are frowned upon, in case you didn't know. And these people were detonating these things in low orbit above major population centres.
Eh? Voyager was in Geosynch orbit, not low orbit. EMP isn't something I know much about but unless I am mistaken, the strength of an EMP is directly related to the distance from the upper atmosphere. And the ability of the explosion to energise electrons hanging around in the ionsephere. If you hit the Voyager out in Geosynch with a nuke, would you even get a significant EMP effect on the ground?

And this is asssuming that they don't have any technology capable of shielding against an EMP like, well, shields...

Wasn't the Malon ship unshielded and falling apart?
It wasn't exactly a nice place to live but it was hardly falling appart. And it wasn't unshielded as far as I know. The first time Voyager came up against a Malon ship it got its ass kicked badly and almost destroyed. I don't know where you got the idea that it wasn't shielded.

How powerful could these charges have been if they were detonated anywhere near it?
They were detonating all around Voyager.

So you figure the Borg wouldn't raise their shields when a flotilla of S-8472 ships appear after six months of continuous warfare? :roll:
True but the Borg only appear to shield against specific things they are expecting. For example. They would have been destroyed by the E-D with their main defelctor play. Until Picard was assimilated and they adjusted their defenses accordingly. This is not saying that they didn't have shields before hand, just that they had not prepared to defend against that kind of specific attack. The question put was that of a rationalisation of a pair of sceens, the Cubes in Scorpion and the Think Tank event. I am attempting to come up with one.

What exactly happened?
Basicly Voyager was in front of a planatoid that exploded, showing it with debris and crap. The sceen is self contradictory in terms of distances, velocities and what not. There was a large thread on it on SB some time ago.

Ah, leave it to you to misrepresent a Star Trek episode in hopes that no one will notice. From the screenplay:
ROM: We fly straight into the atomic explosion, expose the kemacite to the beta radiation and engage the warp engines. If we have enough kemacite, we should be able to create a reverse time warp and ride it home.
...
72 EXT. NEVADA DESERT (OPTICAL) - NIGHT: Close on the mushrooming cloud of a nuclear explosion. Hold on it for a second, and then the Ferengi shuttle zooms into screen and plunges into the cloud.

73 INT. FERENGI SHUTTLE (OPTICAL): The Ferengi shuttle is undergoing some serious shaking and stirring.

QUARK: I don't like this.
ODO (concerned): Rom, tell your brother it's going to be all right.
ROM: It's going to be all right, Brother. (qualifying) I hope.

Suddenly, the screen WHITES OUT.
74 EXT. SPACE (OPTICAL): The Earth as seen from space. Suddenly the Ferengi shuttle winks into existence and drifts across the screen, with no engine power.
Nope, they did not fly into the "heart of a nuclear detonation". They flew into the mushroom cloud created after a nuclear detonation, because they just wanted beta radiation from the mushroom cloud to interact with their Kemacite cargo (note that this also means their ship was not shielded against low-penetration particle radiation, and that they must have been in dire need of Trek's magical radiation curative therapy when they got back to DS9).
A poor choice of words on my part. Though I thought the shuttle flew right into the detonation just as it happened in the actual episode, though I concead my memory of this may well be in error. The point is though that the detonation of the nuke wasn't even considered to be the slightest threat to their ship, just a source of power to do something with their technobabble material and get them home. They were never concerned with the shockwave or initial thermal pule or EMP or any of the effects of the detonation.

:lol: Chris, "deflection" is precisely how radar works. It detects bounces from the target object, remember? Now, while these missiles are not currently designed for this purpose, it seems reasonable to me that they might be for this scenario, where the USN is gathered in one place to confront Voyager and has obviously been preparing.
Again a very poor choice of words on my part. I did not mean deflection as in return to the radar, I ment it in the context of scattering / absorbing the radar waves away from the receiver so that no return signal was received. In 'Futures End' when Voyager gets sent back to 1996, they mentioned quite a few times that their shields could and were modified slightly to scatter any attempted Radar scan. They also were able to use the shields to project a false radar / visual image at anything but point blank range for their shuttles. And this is backed up on the ground.

What kind of maneuvering speed has Voyager ever demonstrated in atmosphere? Note: crashing and falling like a stone doesn't count. It seems to me that Fed ships handle like pigs in an atmosphere.
The episodes we realy see Voyager in an atmosphere are Basics PT 1. Futures End PT 1. Demon. And Dragons Teath. In those episodes it wasn't realy doing major manouvering as there wasn't a real reason to do so. However its not shabby in what they can do. In Basics she was able to accelerate from the ground into a climb for space and out of sight very quickly. That ability alone would mean the Voyager could quickly withdrawl into orbit where she can't be touched to lick any wounds. Hell she could just sit there and fire down with impunity if she wanted to.

The only really "idiotic" thing about it, given the scenario, is that it presumes the USN has special guided nuclear airburst missiles.
Well they wouldn't as a matter of course today. But the idea that an Ohio would be able to fire on a fast moving or even slow moving spacecraft/aircraft with an ICBM...its absurd.[/img]
Image
User avatar
TurboPhaser
Padawan Learner
Posts: 298
Joined: 2003-05-30 03:39am
Location: Australia

Post by TurboPhaser »

Eh? Voyager was in Geosynch orbit, not low orbit. EMP isn't something I know much about but unless I am mistaken, the strength of an EMP is directly related to the distance from the upper atmosphere. And the ability of the explosion to energise electrons hanging around in the ionsephere. If you hit the Voyager out in Geosynch with a nuke, would you even get a significant EMP effect on the ground?

And this is asssuming that they don't have any technology capable of shielding against an EMP like, well, shields...
Still, detonating a Nuke in orbit of your planet still isnt a good idea.......
Voyager summed up in 1 quote:

Neelix: These people dont appreciate what they have! This ship is the match of anything in a hundred lightyears, yet what do they do with it?
(fake voice) Oh, well lets go find some space anomaly today that'll rip it apart!

- Voy: 'The Cloud'
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Chris OFarrell wrote:Eh? Voyager was in Geosynch orbit, not low orbit. EMP isn't something I know much about but unless I am mistaken, the strength of an EMP is directly related to the distance from the upper atmosphere. And the ability of the explosion to energise electrons hanging around in the ionsephere. If you hit the Voyager out in Geosynch with a nuke, would you even get a significant EMP effect on the ground?
Actually, orbital nuclear detonations create a remarkably devastating EMP because the blast interacts with the upper atmosphere to create an ionization shockwave. See the Nuclear Weapons FAQ for more information.
And this is asssuming that they don't have any technology capable of shielding against an EMP like, well, shields...
So you figure the whole facing hemisphere of the planet was shielded now? Even though their visitor could fly right down with his primitive spacecraft without difficulty?
It wasn't exactly a nice place to live but it was hardly falling appart. And it wasn't unshielded as far as I know. The first time Voyager came up against a Malon ship it got its ass kicked badly and almost destroyed. I don't know where you got the idea that it wasn't shielded.
Perhaps I was confusing it with some other episode.
True but the Borg only appear to shield against specific things they are expecting. For example. They would have been destroyed by the E-D with their main defelctor play. Until Picard was assimilated and they adjusted their defenses accordingly.
Mere conjecture. You don't know that to be true.
This is not saying that they didn't have shields before hand, just that they had not prepared to defend against that kind of specific attack. The question put was that of a rationalisation of a pair of sceens, the Cubes in Scorpion and the Think Tank event. I am attempting to come up with one.
That planet took a looong time to blow up, and they had more than enough time to figure out what was about to happen. People keep acting as though it looked just like the Alderaan explosion, when nothing could be further from the truth.

There is no need to worry about rationalizing "Think Tank", because it is ambiguous. The lower limits for that event are quite low, and the upper limits quite high, so it proves nothing either way. I saw the SB thread, and the only person really making a fuss about it was Darkstar. Since Darkstar makes a fuss about everything, this hardly warrants consideration.
A poor choice of words on my part. Though I thought the shuttle flew right into the detonation just as it happened in the actual episode, though I concead my memory of this may well be in error. The point is though that the detonation of the nuke wasn't even considered to be the slightest threat to their ship, just a source of power to do something with their technobabble material and get them home. They were never concerned with the shockwave or initial thermal pule or EMP or any of the effects of the detonation.
Incorrect. They all shared a look of concern over the safety of the plan, and Odo expressed his doubts about its feasibility. Then, they flew into the mushroom cloud after the initial pulse and EMP were already over. And small objects can more easily withstand the overpressure from the shockwave at their initial distance than large objects (simple physics; this is why people can survive a 5 psi overpressure while buildings fall down).
Again a very poor choice of words on my part. I did not mean deflection as in return to the radar, I ment it in the context of scattering / absorbing the radar waves away from the receiver so that no return signal was received. In 'Futures End' when Voyager gets sent back to 1996, they mentioned quite a few times that their shields could and were modified slightly to scatter any attempted Radar scan. They also were able to use the shields to project a false radar / visual image at anything but point blank range for their shuttles. And this is backed up on the ground.
If they're moving as quickly as some would suggest, it won't matter because their movement through the air will create a trackable disruption itself. But I'd agree that if they have stealth capabilities built into their shielding, that would make tracking much more difficult.
The episodes we realy see Voyager in an atmosphere are Basics PT 1. Futures End PT 1. Demon. And Dragons Teath. In those episodes it wasn't realy doing major manouvering as there wasn't a real reason to do so. However its not shabby in what they can do. In Basics she was able to accelerate from the ground into a climb for space and out of sight very quickly.
Do you have a figure for "very quickly?"
That ability alone would mean the Voyager could quickly withdrawl into orbit where she can't be touched to lick any wounds. Hell she could just sit there and fire down with impunity if she wanted to.
That point was raised much earlier in this thread (I raised it myself). The thread-starter clarified that Voyager is already in the atmosphere for some reason.
Well they wouldn't as a matter of course today. But the idea that an Ohio would be able to fire on a fast moving or even slow moving spacecraft/aircraft with an ICBM...its absurd.
It doesn't have to hit it. It only needs to get in the neighbourhood.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Just for the sake of argument, until only recently even Tomahawk took a very long time to retarget: generally, targets were planned long in advance of any action.

While this is largely because of the need for TERCOM maps and such, I would not bet on Tridents being any easier to retarget.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Howedar wrote: While this is largely because of the need for TERCOM maps and such, I would not bet on Tridents being any easier to retarget.
Actually its massively easier to do so, and doing so on the fly is possibul.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Is it? Do you have a source on that? I'd be curious as to how much ability to quickly retarget the USN incorporated into such a system that seems not to need it.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
TurboPhaser
Padawan Learner
Posts: 298
Joined: 2003-05-30 03:39am
Location: Australia

Post by TurboPhaser »

Do you have a figure for "very quickly?"
Its been a while since I've seen that ep but IIRC, from the time Voyager began to ascend to the time she was out of sight was about 5 - 10 seconds. Since 'out of sight' may not mean she left the atmosphere, we can stick a few more seconds on that - say another 15?

So that makes it roughly 30 seconds to leave an atmosphere. Rough guesses I know, but its all I can come up with.
Voyager summed up in 1 quote:

Neelix: These people dont appreciate what they have! This ship is the match of anything in a hundred lightyears, yet what do they do with it?
(fake voice) Oh, well lets go find some space anomaly today that'll rip it apart!

- Voy: 'The Cloud'
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

TurboPhaser wrote:Its been a while since I've seen that ep but IIRC, from the time Voyager began to ascend to the time she was out of sight was about 5 - 10 seconds. Since 'out of sight' may not mean she left the atmosphere, we can stick a few more seconds on that - say another 15?
When you say "out of sight", do you mean it shrunk to a point, or did it just go past the cloud cover?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
TurboPhaser
Padawan Learner
Posts: 298
Joined: 2003-05-30 03:39am
Location: Australia

Post by TurboPhaser »

Darth Wong wrote:
TurboPhaser wrote:Its been a while since I've seen that ep but IIRC, from the time Voyager began to ascend to the time she was out of sight was about 5 - 10 seconds. Since 'out of sight' may not mean she left the atmosphere, we can stick a few more seconds on that - say another 15?
When you say "out of sight", do you mean it shrunk to a point, or did it just go past the cloud cover?
Alas, I'm not entirely sure. I think it shrank to a point.
Voyager summed up in 1 quote:

Neelix: These people dont appreciate what they have! This ship is the match of anything in a hundred lightyears, yet what do they do with it?
(fake voice) Oh, well lets go find some space anomaly today that'll rip it apart!

- Voy: 'The Cloud'
Post Reply