Manufacturing would not necessarily go down the tubes. As stated, replicators could be used to make components; components that would still require assembly. Several plants would indeed disappear, but there would still be plants for assembly purposes. To make an analogy, GE could lose the plants in Warren and elsewhere that make lamp parts, but the Ravenna plant which does assembly only would still be running.Col. Crackpot wrote: Mike, imagine the economic impact of either of these. Suddenly every manufacturing plant in the world is deemed useless. Farms are deemed useless. With transporters the entire transportation indistry would be deemed useless. either way we are looking at tremendous economic turmoil.
Farms would still be around, replicators still need some sort of raw material to work and recycling poo back into food has conservation of matter working against it. Besides, I doubt that any demand for real food would diminish just because replicators would be available.
I don't know if the ENTIRE transportation industry would be gone. UPS and FedEx may be out of a job, but the airlines and auto industry would be running just fine, assuming people aren't actually going to consider committing suicide a travel option. Some transportation would still be around as well for those instances that it's cheaper/more efficient use of energy than those energy-intensive transporters.
