Trek Fleet counts

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
fallendragon
Youngling
Posts: 73
Joined: 2010-10-28 12:05am
Location: no fucking clue

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by fallendragon »

Junghalli wrote:
Serafina wrote:Is there any reason that it has NOTHING to do with it?
It's magic that somehow lets you ignore the normal forces that keep you from passing through solid objects. It doesn't appear to expend energy to let you move through stuff, so there's no reason to think there's some straightforward relationship between the density of a material and how hard it is to move through.

Granted as I remember there was an episode where somebody was cloaked in such a manner, and they didn't fall through the floor, which could be consistent with the floor being denser than walls or people, hence dense materials are harder to pass through.
I see no reason why we should believe the claim that it can penetrate anything regardless of properties, since there is not a shred of proof for it.
It doesn't necessarily have to. "We don't know if it'll be able to penetrate denser SW armor" is a distinct and different position from "it will probably be useless against stuff with Wars armor". The latter position can't be taken without some estimation of its upper limits, and in the absence of evidence there's no particular reason that Wars armor = impenetrable to phase cloaked stuff should be the default assumption.
ummm actaully the death of the USS Pegasus seems to indecate that it DOES take more energy to pass through things, however i have to agree that the default mode being it cant get through armor seems a little off to me. having said that the alpha quadrent versions have all proven highly unrelayible at best (feds have the best record, it works on fully HALF the ships with out major acendents) but as it has not been used since and there are solid reasons for a lack of new testing it would at best be a rare last ditch item, not standard gear
User avatar
Kythnos
Youngling
Posts: 143
Joined: 2008-12-05 10:19pm

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Kythnos »

Junghalli wrote: It doesn't necessarily have to. "We don't know if it'll be able to penetrate denser SW armor" is a distinct and different position from "it will probably be useless against stuff with Wars armor". The latter position can't be taken without some estimation of its upper limits, and in the absence of evidence there's no particular reason that Wars armor = impenetrable to phase cloaked stuff should be the default assumption.
I agree still the sensors on the Enterprise still detected the Warbird and responded to the rock blocking off the entrance of the cave so some form of energy still reacts with both normal matter and "phased" matter. The implication from the name shows this, Phase-Cloak has if there was 2 devices in one, if it was truly untouchable by energy the Phase device would be all that was needed as the light would not bounce off the ship.
There's a great difference between potential and developed power. The one is clearly visible and can be awe-inspiring. The other may take a demigod to recognize.
Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Junghalli »

Serafina wrote:So - you are just assuming that it has no limits?
No, I'm objecting to the notion that it should be assumed to have trouble with Star Wars armor when no compelling evidence has been presented suggesting that this would be the case.
fallendragon wrote:ummm actaully the death of the USS Pegasus seems to indecate that it DOES take more energy to pass through things
I had the impression the Pegasus phase cloak suffered some kind of spontaneous failure, not one related to any strain of moving through the asteroid. Been a while since I watched the episode though, and the evidence is probably ambiguous on that note.
Kythnos wrote:I agree still the sensors on the Enterprise still detected the Warbird and responded to the rock blocking off the entrance of the cave so some form of energy still reacts with both normal matter and "phased" matter. The implication from the name shows this, Phase-Cloak has if there was 2 devices in one, if it was truly untouchable by energy the Phase device would be all that was needed as the light would not bounce off the ship.
Yeah, if memory serves I think it's pretty obvious it's not a "put you in a totally seperate bubble universe" type device. If it were it'd probably be a lot less useful for the most part.
fallendragon
Youngling
Posts: 73
Joined: 2010-10-28 12:05am
Location: no fucking clue

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by fallendragon »

that is some truely interesting timeing if it was merely spontaneous
Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Junghalli »

fallendragon wrote:that is some truely interesting timeing if it was merely spontaneous
Not necessarily. It might have been a prolonged test that involved them hanging out inside the asteroid for some time. Or the device might have had some flaw that caused it to fail within a few seconds of being turned on, during a short test. Wasn't there supposedly some kind of mutiny on the ship too? Maybe some critical system somewhere was interrupted during the fighting.
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Serafina »

As for evidence that the phase cloak can't just automatically phase trough everything:
Pegasus wrote:RIKER: The cloak appears to be functioning normally. The ship's matter/energy phasing rate should be sufficient to pass through the asteroid.
Destructionator is probably going to whine that i just copy from Mike, but who cares? I am just using his database to get dialogue.

Anyway, the quote above says that they have a "phasing rate", and that it is "sufficient" to pass trough the asteroid.
Now, that implies that they just don't "phase", and that it's either on or off.
Furthermore, the "rate" could be related to three things:
-the amount of material they need to pass trough. However, that appears to be unlikely, since they should speak about "capacity" or the like, not about a rate.
-the speed with which they can pass trough matter. However, that is unlikely, since they could just take their time, and they are not talking about speed.
-The density of the material they need to pass trough. This makes more sense than both explanations, and also fits with the statement about the asteroid.

So, let's explore the third explanation. It actually makes sense that it is more difficult to pass trough dense materials - you have fewer "gaps" trough which you can squeeze your own matter. If we use that mechanism (that "phasing" means that you squeeze your atoms trough the empty space in matter), then it's also easier to phase a less-dense material trough something - it would be easier to get flesh trough metal than to get metal trough metal. If that is actually the case, then the capabiltiy of humans to pass trough walls does not necessarily imply that a starship could pass trough the same walls.
Basically, this means that the maximum we see a starship-hull pass trough (assuming that it is the most dense part of the ship) is rock. The maximum we saw less-dense human being pass trough is a starship hull.
We can not conclude that a starship-hull would be able to pass trough another starship-hull.

If we use that explanation, then the amount of material they have to pass trough might not matter, they just need to contain a continuous rate. However, the generator might be under continuous stress while passing trough a dense material, since it needs to work at higher capacity. We don't know it's limits either way, but a limit of some kind would fit with the quote above.




Even if we disregard my entire explanation, we still do not know which "phasing rate" they can achieve, and whether or not it would be sufficient to pass trough the Deathstars hull. Given that the incident where humans were phased was based on an accident, we can not conclude that they are similar - that incident might have had a higher phasing rate.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
fallendragon
Youngling
Posts: 73
Joined: 2010-10-28 12:05am
Location: no fucking clue

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by fallendragon »

Junghalli if it wasn't drifting for a while at the time i would find that a better arguement (but yes the warp core was shot out and exploded(ya that is a real shocker :roll: )) but neither my memory nore memory alpha give RECENT damage, in fact memory alpha has the hull drifted before unphasing in the Asteroid gamma 601

http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Asteroid_gamma_601
Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Junghalli »

fallendragon wrote:Junghalli if it wasn't drifting for a while at the time i would find that a better arguement (but yes the warp core was shot out and exploded(ya that is a real shocker :roll: )) but neither my memory nore memory alpha give RECENT damage, in fact memory alpha has the hull drifted before unphasing in the Asteroid gamma 601
It's been a while since I've watched any Trek. That is a heck of a coincidence, yeah. It could be consistent with the idea that passing through material creates strain on the cloak. Alternately, maybe it got captured by the asteroid's gravity, pulled into its core, and just stayed there until the cloak failed later. If it was co-orbiting with what as I remember was a pretty dense asteroid field its relative velocity to the roids would probably have been pretty low.
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29309
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Vympel »

Picard wrote:
160 kilometers.
No, shithead. 900km. That is derived from the films themselves (the DS2 compared to the planet), back stage information confirming that scaling is the correct one, and the EU which has been updated to reflect same. Your scaling from the trench is invalid because we know from the EU that it is just one trench within a single 'super trench' (Inside the Worlds - OT).

I've had quite enough of your bullshit. You will obey the rules of this forum in so far as canon is concerned. If you persist, you will be banned.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
takemeout_totheblack
Padawan Learner
Posts: 358
Joined: 2010-01-26 03:59pm
Location: Knowing where you are is no fun! Back to adventure!

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by takemeout_totheblack »

See you later Picard, it's been fun. If you're lucky they may make a show trial out of you, but they usually only save that for spectacular failures, you have just been re-hashing arguments, so bye!

Anyway, how dense is Tritanium and/or Duranium anyway? There's that midget Borg cube scout thing that weighs a whopping 2.5 megatons, but there's also the 'Picard's willy-extension' Enterprise-E, well over 650 meters long but is stated to be less than four megatons (or is it about 4 MMT? I'm not sure, I think it was stated in First Contact or something)

What would the realistic weight be for a ship that size made from a material suggested to be super-dense (Picard/Destructionator XIII)? I'd do it myself but my math is sorely lacking.
There should be an official metric in regard to stupidity, so we can insult the imbeciles, morons, and RSAs out there the civilized way.
Any ideas for units of measure?

This could be the most one-sided fight since 1973 when Ali fought a 80-foot tall mechanical Joe Frazier. My memory isn't what it used to be, but I think the entire earth was destroyed.
~George Foreman, February 27th 3000 C.E.
fallendragon
Youngling
Posts: 73
Joined: 2010-10-28 12:05am
Location: no fucking clue

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by fallendragon »

Destructionator XIII wrote:
Serafina wrote:As for evidence that the phase cloak can't just automatically phase trough everything: [..]Furthermore, the "rate" could be related to three things:
Or, 4: the difficulty of passing through solid objects; if the magic phase wasn't good enough, they'd still impart a force to the object as they passed through it, and would thus also feel a counter force. (This is exactly what happened to Geordi and Ro near the end of "The Next Phase")

If that counter-force is big enough, it'd still feel like the ship was pushing its way into a wall, which would damage it.

Fully phased - solid objects don't feel like they exist so you pass right through them
Partially phased - solid objects feel like a thick liquid; you can push through them, but you feel some of the force
Not phased - solid objects feel like solid objects


There's no evidence that density has anything to do with it. It can be entirely explained by feeling a percentage of the force.

Umm wouldn't a percentage make more sense then a rate for that? Maybe I am not understanding you right, but Serafina's 3rd option is the most sensible to me right now.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16347
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Batman »

Destructionator XIII wrote: There's no evidence that density has anything to do with it.
There's no evidence saying it doesn't either. If Picard wants to claim it doesn't matter, burden of proof is on it.

And while I don't remember any mass figures being given in FC (or any of the other Trek movies, at least WRT the mass of the big E), at a rough eyeball guesstimate (and that's all it is for now), a mass between 4 and 8 million tons would put the E-E's density at roughly the same as a modern day aircraft carrier, which aren't armoured worth shit and are limited by having to be able to float. So no ultradense hull material there, at least in any amounts worth mentioning.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Kythnos
Youngling
Posts: 143
Joined: 2008-12-05 10:19pm

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Kythnos »

Kythnos wrote: Where do you see that the Borg use Tritanium?
I was able to find some information about Tritanium: (it is from Memory Alpha so take that as you may)
Tritanium is an ore that is known to be 21.4 times as hard as diamond.
Tritanium alloy was a widely-used construction material. The bulkheads of Federation starships, specifically of the Galaxy-class and Intrepid-class, were composed of tritanium.
Borg tactical drones possessed a tritanium infrastructure, as did Borg cubes.
I am going to guess that the term "Bulkhead" is referring to the Keel (or what I would call the "frame" of the ship). My knowledge of Nautical terms and there use is very limited.
It does not appear to mean that the "armor" of the ship was made of the same stuff. In addition the term "Alloy" means that the metal used in ship construction differed in some way from the ore, as other elements where mix in with it.

Do we know the weight of the Engine, fuel, and Drive systems, or baring exact figures the weight of similar devices? (I am going to guess the ship in question has a transwarp drive system, and I know nothing about Borg fuel or power systems)
I ask these questions because a if the Borg where using a "forced quantum singularity as a power source", like the Romulans, that would vastly increase the mass of their ship.
There's a great difference between potential and developed power. The one is clearly visible and can be awe-inspiring. The other may take a demigod to recognize.
Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Junghalli »

takemeout_totheblack wrote:Anyway, how dense is Tritanium and/or Duranium anyway?
I think I remember Destructionator mentioning in another post that Mike Wong speculates duranium to be a term for depleted uranium somewhere, in which case Wikipedia tells me 19.1 grams/cm^3.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16347
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Batman »

Destructionator XIII wrote:
Batman wrote:There's no evidence saying it doesn't either. If Picard wants to claim it doesn't matter, burden of proof is on it.
There's no evidence saying invisible pink unicorns aren't holding a gun to your head right now, forcing you to type such stupid shit. If you want to claim they aren't there, the burden of proof is on you.
No it is not. Incidentally, if the unicorns are invisible, how do you know they are pink?
The moment I claim density does affect the phase cloak, burden of proof absolutely is on me (or Serafina, if she is the one making that claim). We're not doing that. We're saying it might. Picard is the one saying that it positively does not and thus burden of proof is on it to show that density of material to to be phased through has no bearing on it.
And while I don't remember any mass figures being given in FC (or any of the other Trek movies, at least WRT the mass of the big E), at a rough eyeball guesstimate (and that's all it is for now), a mass between 4 and 8 million tons would put the E-E's density at roughly the same as a modern day aircraft carrier, which aren't armoured worth shit and are limited by having to be able to float. So no ultradense hull material there, at least in any amounts worth mentioning.
First off, the whole "ultradense" thing is irrelevant. Serafina is saying phase cloak works worse against higher density, and has shown nothing beyond a creative interpretation of Riker's one line to support this.
You have shown nothing period to contradict it.
If it works worse against higher density, we should see a difference between people and walls, for one example. No such difference was shown in any of the episodes. (Or if it was, nobody has presented it.)
Because-you say so. Yes, there maybe should be a difference. That doesn't mean it would be an easily noticeable one, especially as the whole phased matter idea is implemented inconsistently as hell anyway (not that Trekl is the only franchise guilty of this).
Whether the Enterprise has a superdense hull or not doesn't matter - there is no correlation between density and phase effectiveness seen at all.
There is nothing seen to contradict it either. Burden of proof is on the party that claims density doesn't matter.
Secondly, your logic is wrong. If the density of the ship overall is low, it doesn't necessarily mean the density of any one material is low. It could be that the Enterprise has big open air areas, like a lounge bridge, or wide hallways, or luxoriously large crew quarters, which serve to balance out its overall density.
Yeah. I mean we know modern day aircraft carriers are solid slabs of metal. They totally don't have bigass hangar decks, or corridors, or mess halls, or are actually made up mostly of empty space to begin with.
E-E has roughly (say, within an order of magnitude) the same density as a modern day CVN. It ISN'T virtually exclusively empty space. No ridiculously dense armour for the E-E.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
fallendragon
Youngling
Posts: 73
Joined: 2010-10-28 12:05am
Location: no fucking clue

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by fallendragon »

USS Pegasus' death would seem to indecate some relationship, just due to where the cloak failed.

"RIKER: The cloak appears to be functioning normally. The ship's matter/energy phasing rate should be sufficient to pass through the asteroid." (by the way how do you do the quote thing?)
So it is on and working, then repeats that it is working?

And when did the "walls that don't have corrodors behind them" happen?
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16347
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Batman »

Destructionator XIII wrote:
Batman wrote:No it is not. Incidentally, if the unicorns are invisible, how do you know they are pink?
Someone told me about it on the Internet.
I forgot the freaking smiley again. I need to do something about this no sense of humour thing.
The moment I claim density does affect the phase cloak, burden of proof absolutely is on me (or Serafina, if she is the one making that claim). We're not doing that. We're saying it might.
Sure, and there might be an invisible pink unicorn licking my beautiful brunette locks.
Picard claims density has nothing to do with it. Burden of proof is on it.
You have shown nothing period to contradict it.
God FUCKING damn it, I'm sick and tired of you hatfuckers ignoring evidence. Is there some part of "no correlation has been seen" and "here's an alternative theory with evidence to support it" you guys don't get?
You could say "I'm unconvinced" but "nothing period" is flat out wrong.
No it's not, what with there not being any evidence to contradict it. ALL you've shown is there's an an alternative theory. Evidence would be the canon supporting that theory over the one presented by Serafina. So far, I notice a complete and utter lack of that.
If it works worse against higher density, we should see a difference between people and walls, for one example. No such difference was shown in any of the episodes. (Or if it was, nobody has presented it.)
Because-you say so.
wait what
Are you saying metal walls and people have equal density?
No?
If no, and if the phase cloak was affected by density, there should be a difference. This isn't rocket science.
As a matter of fact yes it is. And again there being a difference noticeable to the naked eye is your assumption.
That doesn't mean it would be an easily noticeable one, especially as the whole phased matter idea is implemented inconsistently as hell anyway (not that Trek is the only franchise guilty of this).
We're talking difference in density of nearly a full order of magnitude (~1 g/cc for ugly bags of mostly water vs ~8 g/cc for a steel bulkhead. Still a good 3-4x change if it is aluminum or titanium. If a difference existed, they should have felt that.)
Because...you say so. Phasing technology is inconsistent as hell as it is (they don't fall through the floor, they can still breathe, they can still see (yet somehow are invisible).
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
fallendragon
Youngling
Posts: 73
Joined: 2010-10-28 12:05am
Location: no fucking clue

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by fallendragon »

Granted it is MORE likely... but even astroid belts are more space then astroid to my knowledge and I have admited it could be just random timing,it is just if it is, it is an odd timing.

[quote=Destructionator XIII] Yeah, he's saying what matters to his immediate situation. Even if it were known to be true, he would say "to pass through the Doomsday Machine's neutronium hull" since the Doomsday Machine wasn't there.[/quote]
:wtf: Ummm Huh? You totally lost me there. The "rate" and the "should" still make me lean towards Serafina's 3rd explaination of the quote, however I must say that the ship beingable to pass through, at the very least the outer hull, seems to be the most likely outcome to me right now, just not sure how far it can get in, nore its interaction with other systems.

Oh, and what, exactly, is the reason no one has brough up the shields yet?
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16347
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Batman »

Actually Serafina brought up shields repeatedly, Picard just chose to ignore it (as it did pretty much everything else, to nobody's surprise).
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Serafina »

Destructionator XIII wrote:
Serafina wrote:As for evidence that the phase cloak can't just automatically phase trough everything: [..]Furthermore, the "rate" could be related to three things:
Or, 4: the difficulty of passing through solid objects; if the magic phase wasn't good enough, they'd still impart a force to the object as they passed through it, and would thus also feel a counter force. (This is exactly what happened to Geordi and Ro near the end of "The Next Phase")

If that counter-force is big enough, it'd still feel like the ship was pushing its way into a wall, which would damage it.

Fully phased - solid objects don't feel like they exist so you pass right through them
Partially phased - solid objects feel like a thick liquid; you can push through them, but you feel some of the force
Not phased - solid objects feel like solid objects


There's no evidence that density has anything to do with it. It can be entirely explained by feeling a percentage of the force.
So, if we take explanation number four - then HOW does the material they pass trough have nothing to do with it?
Oh, right - it's a handwave. You are not going to explain anything. You are just assuming that it's Treknomagic.
Note that my explanation is also compatible with "feeling a counter force".
That's my whole problem with that - both of our Trekkies are assuming that there are no limits to the phase cloak - no shields, no material density, no radiation, no tractor beams, no nothing.
Those straw-arguments sure are easier to defeat, aren't thet?
But you ARE arguing that there are no limits.
Right above (well, technically, it was below), you are arguing that the cloak can pass trough any matter if it works properly (if it's "fully phased"). You have also outright IGNORED any argument regarding shields, radiation or tractor beams.
It's reasonable to assume that there are no limits regarding radiation and gravity, since you are ignoring both arguments.
Given that assumption - YES, you ARE arguing a no-limits fallacy.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Darth Fanboy »

Darth Hoth wrote: Film dialogue describes the Rebellion as utterly insignificant. Which bears out, since the EpVI novelisation shows that the Endor fleet was crewed by every single rebel in the million-world empire. Now, there are certain EU sources that go against this, but using the strict canon hierarchy those are overridden. So, in G-canon the Rebellion is tinier, relative to the scale of the setting, than the Branch Davidians.
So because the Alliance military was small means that the number of beings in the galactic population discontent with the Empire was small? And I suppose those parties being held at the end of RoTJ were just isolated little incidents in no way reflective of the population as a whole? :lol:
The same novelisation also shows that Palpatine was beloved by the galaxy, and that he would be mourned by all the numerous Empire loyalists when he died; he was a villain with good publicity. Which is quite to the contrary of your interpretation.
I repeat, I suppose those parties being held at the end of RoTJ were just isolated little incidents in no way reflective of the population as a whole? :lol:

There is no fucking way that the Emperor is still beloved post-RoTJ, especially amongst nonhuman populations who were discriminated against. Not to mention the human socities who opposed Palpatine politically. Especially once truth about the Death Star was released.

In one of the X-Wing Novels (I think Wedge's Gamble) it was mentioned that only the staunchest loyalists believed the lies behind the need for the destruction of Alderaan (Bail Organa's secret Bioweapon hahahaha). Not to mention the fact in the same book the Empire has felt the need to refer to the Death Star as the peaceful "Planetary Ore Extractor."

If the Empire was so greatly beloved why was there such a need to lie about all of the events surrounding the Battle of Endor?
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
User avatar
Dooey Jo
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3127
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
Contact:

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Dooey Jo »

Darth Fanboy wrote:I suppose those parties being held at the end of RoTJ were just isolated little incidents in no way reflective of the population as a whole? :lol:
Obviously they were nothing but a small number of ideologues, ivory tower academics, and editorial writers. Doesn't tell us anything about the opinions of Hard-working Patriots™.
Image
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...

Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
Picard
BANNED
Posts: 168
Joined: 2010-07-01 05:26am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by Picard »

Actually Serafina brought up shields repeatedly, Picard just chose to ignore it (as it did pretty much everything else, to nobody's surprise).
Normally, given that from ANH we know that ships can pass throught shields of Death Star without problem.
First of all - that is a BORG sphere. NOT a Federation ship.
First of all, it is not sphere, it is scout. Second, both UFP and Borg use tritanium in ship construction.
And given that that ship crashed on a planet, it would have caused absolutely catastrophic damage at that weight.
It did cause some damage. But you forget (again) that we are talking about ship built by using tritanium, not steel.
-How does the density of the hulls and walls they penetrated compare to the density of SW-hulls?
Tritanium vs steel? Tritanium is way denser.
That is derived from the films themselves
900 kilometers is derived from hologram on Rebel meeting. I derived figure from model.
we know from the EU that it is just one trench within a single 'super trench' (Inside the Worlds - OT).
So, we have invisible super-trench... which was never shown on physical model... and never shown on diagram.
I've had quite enough of your bullshit. You will obey the rules of this forum in so far as canon is concerned. If you persist, you will be banned.
I thought that canon rule is that G canon overrides everything else. So explain me what is wrong with analyzing G canon?
fallendragon
Youngling
Posts: 73
Joined: 2010-10-28 12:05am
Location: no fucking clue

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by fallendragon »

Picard wrote:
Actually Serafina brought up shields repeatedly, Picard just chose to ignore it (as it did pretty much everything else, to nobody's surprise).
Normally, given that from ANH we know that ships can pass throught shields of Death Star without problem.
First of all - that is a BORG sphere. NOT a Federation ship.
First of all, it is not sphere, it is scout. Second, both UFP and Borg use tritanium in ship construction.
And given that that ship crashed on a planet, it would have caused absolutely catastrophic damage at that weight.
It did cause some damage. But you forget (again) that we are talking about ship built by using tritanium, not steel.
-How does the density of the hulls and walls they penetrated compare to the density of SW-hulls?
Tritanium vs steel? Tritanium is way denser.
That is derived from the films themselves
900 kilometers is derived from hologram on Rebel meeting. I derived figure from model.
we know from the EU that it is just one trench within a single 'super trench' (Inside the Worlds - OT).
So, we have invisible super-trench... which was never shown on physical model... and never shown on diagram.
I've had quite enough of your bullshit. You will obey the rules of this forum in so far as canon is concerned. If you persist, you will be banned.
I thought that canon rule is that G canon overrides everything else. So explain me what is wrong with analyzing G canon?
Wow, dude your a dumbass
1) Then why the fuck did the need to blow up the tower on endor for?
2) Yes in bulkheads and in cube "infrastructure" (memory aplha)
3) Interior only so far AND there should have been MASSIVE damage to the surrounding planet
4) Proof that starwars uses steel? Proof that Startrek uses Tritanium hulls? (Oh and proof of the density of Tritanium in the first place?)
5) I love how you ignore the REST of Vympels statement
fallendragon
Youngling
Posts: 73
Joined: 2010-10-28 12:05am
Location: no fucking clue

Re: Trek Fleet counts

Post by fallendragon »

Even the scifi ones I remember are more open space then astroid, but still that is the only possible data that can possibly show relationship to density and it could still just be odd timing. it is the shields that make this much more interesting IMO, how the hell would that reaction work? (if it would react at all even)
Post Reply