Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Moderator: Vympel
Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
The usual suspects have been crowing for some time that the Death Star's destruction of Despayre in the novel of the same name proves that the Death Star doesn't really have the power to destroy a planet, and it uses unnamed technobabble to do so.
They base this claim on the novel relating how the Death Star fires on Despayre, three times at supposedly 33% power each time - with only the third shot shattering the planet violently (the first ignites the atmosphere kills all life on the planet causes ground quakes etc, the second causes massive cracks to appear in the planet etc)
One 'theory' advanced is that the successive beam strikes infuse "hyperspace superlaser exoticness" into the planet until the third shot breaks the 'threshold' required to destroy the planet - by bringing in energy from elsewhere.
Obviously, the aim is to show that the energy to shatter the planet is coming from anywhere as opposed to the reactor, and 33% power having successively more catastrophic effects is claimed to be proof of this.
IMO, this is obviously out and out total bullshit. The novel itself, and every other source, explicitly indicate that the energy to destroy a planet comes from the Death Star's reactor. Nowhere else. You'd think that some source would mention the fantastic energy-from-hyperspatial-rift-or-whatever-nonsense required to destroy a planet, no?
So, what's the parsimonious rationalization? One I thought of is that if you read the novel - it never actually explicitly says that the shots are 33% each. It implies it by saying - before the test firing - that the engineers thought they could get 33% power every hour or two with a fast capacitor charge, but its never confirmed.
Thoughts?
They base this claim on the novel relating how the Death Star fires on Despayre, three times at supposedly 33% power each time - with only the third shot shattering the planet violently (the first ignites the atmosphere kills all life on the planet causes ground quakes etc, the second causes massive cracks to appear in the planet etc)
One 'theory' advanced is that the successive beam strikes infuse "hyperspace superlaser exoticness" into the planet until the third shot breaks the 'threshold' required to destroy the planet - by bringing in energy from elsewhere.
Obviously, the aim is to show that the energy to shatter the planet is coming from anywhere as opposed to the reactor, and 33% power having successively more catastrophic effects is claimed to be proof of this.
IMO, this is obviously out and out total bullshit. The novel itself, and every other source, explicitly indicate that the energy to destroy a planet comes from the Death Star's reactor. Nowhere else. You'd think that some source would mention the fantastic energy-from-hyperspatial-rift-or-whatever-nonsense required to destroy a planet, no?
So, what's the parsimonious rationalization? One I thought of is that if you read the novel - it never actually explicitly says that the shots are 33% each. It implies it by saying - before the test firing - that the engineers thought they could get 33% power every hour or two with a fast capacitor charge, but its never confirmed.
Thoughts?
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
To not even explode the planet at all means these shots must be pretty low (but it sounds like they are in an increasing sequence). It sounds more likely they were just slowly ramping up the weapon to gather data and test it, which seems pretty rational to me. The first shot sounds like Eclipse-level, which might be a well known benchmark for these kind of weapons.
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Who's resurrecting this old argument agian? I swear anytime I hear about Death Star its because some troll is bending over backwards desperately to pretend that novel means something other than what is blatnatly obvious. The novel flat out STATES in multiple ways that its brute force, but there's always feigning ignorance on that.
Anyhow, any and every attempt to use hyperspace as some sort of technobabble "shortcut" will always fall flat on the basis of existing canon for one simple fact: they invariably assume access to hyperspace (nevermind travelling in it) takes little or no energy to accomplish. But there's absolutely NO evidence of this, and quite a bit of evidence to the contrary (there wouldn't be hyperdrive ranges for one thing, there's the energy an ISD expends in its hyperspace jump, etc.) The fact that this "theory" fails to explain where the energy comes from (or fails to provide evidence or a convincing argument as to why jumping to hyperspace should be a zero-energy feat)
Besides, if they're shooting "exotic hypermatter" into the planet, that means that hypermatter reactions with matter are matter-energy conversion process, as outlined in the ANH novelization. which hardly helps their argument now does it (I believe Mike has made this point in the past before when someone tried a similar argument.)
Anyhow, any and every attempt to use hyperspace as some sort of technobabble "shortcut" will always fall flat on the basis of existing canon for one simple fact: they invariably assume access to hyperspace (nevermind travelling in it) takes little or no energy to accomplish. But there's absolutely NO evidence of this, and quite a bit of evidence to the contrary (there wouldn't be hyperdrive ranges for one thing, there's the energy an ISD expends in its hyperspace jump, etc.) The fact that this "theory" fails to explain where the energy comes from (or fails to provide evidence or a convincing argument as to why jumping to hyperspace should be a zero-energy feat)
Besides, if they're shooting "exotic hypermatter" into the planet, that means that hypermatter reactions with matter are matter-energy conversion process, as outlined in the ANH novelization. which hardly helps their argument now does it (I believe Mike has made this point in the past before when someone tried a similar argument.)
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Just a clarification - this is mainly about Despayre and the best explanation for the test-firing, not the attempts to distort the 'hyperspace boost' provided by the reactor in general.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Vehrec
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: 2006-04-22 12:29pm
- Location: The Ohio State University
- Contact:
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Well, I would think that steadily ramping up the power of test-firings would be something they could very certainly be doing. They have previously established the ability to fire off only single percent values of planet-cracking power. It makes more sense than technobabble exoticness sticking to the planet. If that was the case, and any level of exoticness was naturally occurring or generated by normal hyperspace activity, there would be planets and suns blowing up all the time.
Commander of the MFS Darwinian Selection Method (sexual)
- Ritterin Sophia
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5496
- Joined: 2006-07-25 09:32am
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
L33teltard and Oragahn.Connor MacLeod wrote:Who's resurrecting this old argument agian?
A Certain Clique, HAB, The Chroniclers
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Yeah... sorry I brought that up again and bailed on the thread not long after...Vympel wrote:The usual suspects have been crowing for some time that the Death Star's destruction of Despayre in the novel of the same name proves that the Death Star doesn't really have the power to destroy a planet, and it uses unnamed technobabble to do so.
"He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot."
"Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero."
"Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero."
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
LOL, you're the smart one. There's only so much stupidity one can take. I've reached my threshold and don't plan on bothering to post again.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Vehrec
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: 2006-04-22 12:29pm
- Location: The Ohio State University
- Contact:
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Its an interesting survival tactic. Become so stupid that your chief opposition can't bear to oppose you and flees.
Commander of the MFS Darwinian Selection Method (sexual)
- Batman
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 16349
- Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
- Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Interesting, yes. Effective, no. In places where you can actually get AWAY with that you wouldn't have to resort to that sort of tactics to begin with.Vehrec wrote:Its an interesting survival tactic. Become so stupid that your chief opposition can't bear to oppose you and flees.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
What explanation? They're basically regurgitating the "mysterious unknown mechanism" theory Darkstar has been using all along, they just covered it with some highly speculative hyperspace technobabble. They don't specify where the energy is coming from (Hyperspace? Where's the proof? And why is this somehow not relevant to power generation or weapons technology?) and just hope people won't notice they're trying ot pass off their rampant speculation as the ONLY answer.Vympel wrote:Just a clarification - this is mainly about Despayre and the best explanation for the test-firing, not the attempts to distort the 'hyperspace boost' provided by the reactor in general.
We have three different firings with wildly disparate results. We have Motti saying the weapon is highly theoretical. We have lots and lots of evidence the DS does not operate on technobabble chain reaction mechanisms but on brute force (even in the Death Star novel itself, which is why those people go to tremendous lengths to contort it to mean something other than what it does.)
Earlier in the novel I recall they make a point of the gunner dude commenting how incredibly complicated and precise the formation of the superlaser beam was, and how important it was for everything to go right and all the time it would take to build up to it. The first two shots were basically "improperly aligned" or some such, so they only channeled part of the overall power into the weapon and it ended up weaker than it actually was. The excess energy buildup got bled off as waste heat by the radiators. That's why the recharge rate was approximately the same (and basically outputting the same level of energy in all three firings. They were testing the storage level of the capacitor despite it being able to only accumulate at about 33%, as I recall.)
- Lord Revan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 12217
- Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
- Location: Zone:classified
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
it was something like that and ironing out any major bugs from the system as technically the death star was finishing constructing rather then already finished (that being the reason they could get only 33% capacitor power to begin with), so it's far more reasonble that the shot was less then the predicted amount due ineffiencies and bugs in the system, hell they were still doing some non-critical interior construction (or at least so it was implied) when the DS blew up at Yavin IV (well not at that exact moment but you know what I mean).
frankly this sounds far more reasonble to me then some wierd technobabble explanation, after all even in real life it's not unheard of that high profile (and the death star was high profile) military project be officially "finished" until the weapon/ship/whatever was actually ready and all the bugs had been ironed out.
frankly this sounds far more reasonble to me then some wierd technobabble explanation, after all even in real life it's not unheard of that high profile (and the death star was high profile) military project be officially "finished" until the weapon/ship/whatever was actually ready and all the bugs had been ironed out.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
- DudeGuyMan
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 587
- Joined: 2010-03-25 03:25am
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
So yeah, I'm just a newbie and don't usually debate this topic, but... uh... wouldn't it make a fucking shitload more sense to just assume that only the third shot was 33% power and the other two were something less? Rather than invent some form of superlaser magic that sticks to the planet between shots?Vympel wrote:So, what's the parsimonious rationalization? One I thought of is that if you read the novel - it never actually explicitly says that the shots are 33% each. It implies it by saying - before the test firing - that the engineers thought they could get 33% power every hour or two with a fast capacitor charge, but its never confirmed.
Thoughts?
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Can somebody explain to me why they're trying to make this argument? Do they think that somehow generating the energy at the point when the beam strikes the planet is less impressive or deadly than if the death star generates it in a reactor then pumps it into the laser? Does it really matter either way?
:/
:/
A scientist once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the Earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the centre of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy.
At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got up and said: 'What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.
The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, 'What is the tortoise standing on?'
'You're very clever, young man, very clever,' said the old lady. 'But it's turtles all the way down.'
At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got up and said: 'What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.
The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, 'What is the tortoise standing on?'
'You're very clever, young man, very clever,' said the old lady. 'But it's turtles all the way down.'
- DrStrangelove
- Youngling
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 2008-07-29 08:07pm
- Location: Peoples Republic of Washington
- Contact:
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Yes because it means that SW is less powerful than X(usually ST with those two), and that ICS numbers are crazy and can be ignored.adam_grif wrote:Can somebody explain to me why they're trying to make this argument? Do they think that somehow generating the energy at the point when the beam strikes the planet is less impressive or deadly than if the death star generates it in a reactor then pumps it into the laser? Does it really matter either way?
:/
I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it. ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
You don't know the power of the dark side~ Darth Vader
You don't know the power of the dark side~ Darth Vader
- Formless
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: 2008-11-10 08:59pm
- Location: the beginning and end of the Present
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Actually, no, because its explicit that the same technology is at work. So either way, the calcs would hold true. Besides, they are barking up the wrong tree. What they really have to argue against is the calcs based on the movies themselves that Wong and Saxton made even before the ICS, because those are based on the highest canon there is-- the movies.DrStrangelove wrote:Yes because it means that SW is less powerful than X(usually ST with those two), and that ICS numbers are crazy and can be ignored.adam_grif wrote:Can somebody explain to me why they're trying to make this argument? Do they think that somehow generating the energy at the point when the beam strikes the planet is less impressive or deadly than if the death star generates it in a reactor then pumps it into the laser? Does it really matter either way?
:/
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.
- DrStrangelove
- Youngling
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 2008-07-29 08:07pm
- Location: Peoples Republic of Washington
- Contact:
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
I know this, unfortunately the retards in question have decided since is wasnt explicitly shown or stated in the movies it cant be true. If you want to see their epic trolling firsthand, go start an ICS thread on the technical debates section of SB. I'd say SFJ but they aren't the only ones there.Formless wrote:Actually, no, because its explicit that the same technology is at work. So either way, the calcs would hold true. Besides, they are barking up the wrong tree. What they really have to argue against is the calcs based on the movies themselves that Wong and Saxton made even before the ICS, because those are based on the highest canon there is-- the movies.DrStrangelove wrote:Yes because it means that SW is less powerful than X(usually ST with those two), and that ICS numbers are crazy and can be ignored.adam_grif wrote:Can somebody explain to me why they're trying to make this argument? Do they think that somehow generating the energy at the point when the beam strikes the planet is less impressive or deadly than if the death star generates it in a reactor then pumps it into the laser? Does it really matter either way?
:/
I'm not interested in preserving the status quo; I want to overthrow it. ~ Niccolo Machiavelli
You don't know the power of the dark side~ Darth Vader
You don't know the power of the dark side~ Darth Vader
- Formless
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: 2008-11-10 08:59pm
- Location: the beginning and end of the Present
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
If they only want to use the movies as evidence, then they are dishonest assholes for trying to use the book "Death Star" in their argument since it is, you know, Part of the EU. Of course, this is where Mike's calcs come in, since they are based entirely on the movies. They aren't as powerful as the ICS... but only because they represent the lower limit. A lower limit that is still more powerful than they want to admit.DrStrangelove wrote:I know this, unfortunately the retards in question have decided since is wasnt explicitly shown or stated in the movies it cant be true. If you want to see their epic trolling firsthand, go start an ICS thread on the technical debates section of SB. I'd say SFJ but they aren't the only ones there.
As for SB... from what I've heard about the place, the internet would be a lot smarter if it got nuked from orbit or something.
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.
- Ritterin Sophia
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5496
- Joined: 2006-07-25 09:32am
Re: Death Star and Despayre- return of the technobabble
Eh... SB is kind of a weird place. On the one hand insults are disallowed but you can passive aggressively act a douche all day long. They're smarter than the average internet goers (which isn't saying a lot) but they've got shitloads of conservative trolls out the ass, including one of the mods. That said it's a good place to go if you're tired of the echo chamber that is SDN.Formless wrote:As for SB... from what I've heard about the place, the internet would be a lot smarter if it got nuked from orbit or something.
A Certain Clique, HAB, The Chroniclers